Barack Obama’s expertise lies not in creating jobs but in losing
them. In pre-Obama days, employees of a company would have looked
forward to a presidential visit; now they probably tremble in fear
of one. In May of 2010, employees of Solyndra lined up to hear the
visiting president praise their company as a “testament to the
ingenuity” of America. Two weeks ago, 1,100 of those employees lost
their jobs after the solar panel maker declared bankruptcy.
Solyndra is a testament not to the ingenuity of America
but to the credulity and corruption of Washington. The American
taxpayer is now liable for the company’s $535 million loan that the
White House pressured the Office of Management and Budget to bless.
A credit-rating agency predicted Solyndra would go belly up by this
year, but harried OMB staffers had to ignore such warnings and sign
off on the loan quickly so that Joe Biden and Steven Chu could
speak at its groundbreaking.
By the time Obama arrived in 2010, auditors had already
questioned its status as a “going concern,”
reports the Washington Post. That Obama showed up
anyways indicates the depth of the administration’s incompetence
and ideological blindness.
This week Obama fell understandably silent about the
urgency of “green jobs,” shifting his attention to another phony
enthusiasm of the moment — fixing America’s infrastructure.
“Shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as we expected,” he said not
long ago after he received a briefing on the lengthy permit process
for construction projects. But now he is back to the same line,
saying that shovel-ready jobs exist to repair bridges, schools, and
roads. “There are construction projects like these all across the
country just waiting to get started,” he said in Ohio.
Selling his structurally deficient bridges to the
gullible, however, is proving difficult, including in liberal
Brooklyn. Obama cost the Democrats New York’s
9th congressional district on Tuesday.
Democrats had held the district since before the Great Depression.
But Obama’s economy is demoralizing enough to convince even
Democrats to vote Republican.
Flummoxed, Democratic Party leaders are falling back on
desperate spin. “It is a very difficult district for Democrats,”
says DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Never mind that
Anthony Weiner, one of the most stridently liberal members of
Congress, occupied it easily until his sexting scandal.
Democratic leaders are also dusting off the “local” issues
spin that they had tried out in 2009 after Obama cost them
governorships in blue New Jersey and purple Virginia. This
explanation ignores that Bob Turner’s opponent, David Weprin, had
nationalized the race by trying to tar Turner as a Tea Partier.
Turner is an advocate for “Tea Party budget ideas,” said Weprin’s
ads. “My opponent is identified with the Tea Party element of the
Republican Party that clearly has held our country hostage,” Weprin
said at a debate.
Weprin tacitly acknowledged that Obama posed a problem for
him by not asking for his help. Bill Clinton and Andrew Cuomo lent
a hand, but Obama was nowhere to be found. Cuomo’s gay marriage
legislation, which Weprin supported, didn’t help matters, as
Orthodox Jews, disenchanted with Weprin on that issue and others
related to Israel, ended up voting for the Catholic Republican over
the Jewish Democrat. So much for the recent prognostications that
gay marriage is now a politically safe position for the
Dems.
Democratic strategists who are not bothering to spin this
one fret that the party lost not only usually reliable Jewish
voters but also Catholic ones. They interpret that as a
particularly troubling harbinger for 2012. Meanwhile, the
president’s press secretary, Jay Carney, tells reporters to move
on, that there is nothing to see here in this “unique” and
meaningless special election. According to this spin, the one safe
job in Obama’s economy is his own.
Alan Brooks| 9.15.11 @ 6:41AM
Obama like myself brings nothing to the table but walks away from it bloated.
jothepro| 9.15.11 @ 7:16AM
Come on Alan, bring on the bravado and lies.
Timothy L. Pennell| 9.15.11 @ 7:38AM
I thought that Alan only BENT OVER tables? And then walks funny, away from it, with his pants, still around his ankles.
Alan Brooks| 9.15.11 @ 4:43PM
Tell the ID thief above how Obama inherited the worst situation since reagan inherited a very bad situation from Jimmuh in '81.
Doesn't matter what any of you write: I will not vote for your 2nd rate candidates, and will tell everyone I meet not to vote for them. but go ahead, waste your time, make the same mistake year after year, decade after decade hoping for a different outcome.
SpiralArchitect| 9.15.11 @ 4:54PM
Thank you for pushing our agenda, Brooks.
Anyone that you speak with will certainly do as you instruct, no doubt about it.
Alan Brooks| 9.15.11 @ 5:17PM
Whose problem is it? I write that solely because the last decade was a situation YOU created; with all the talented cons in America you wasted those eight years because of the Shrub's connection to Reagan. It was an honest gamble but you did lose the gamble-- and you don't get a do-over in Vegas or in politics.
Though it is water under the bridge, you want to repeat your mistake next year, and expect me to vote for your candidate even though there will be no reason to vote for that candidate, save for to make those such as yourself feel better??
If one didn't know better one would think you are jesting.
wbheff| 9.15.11 @ 5:59PM
Do the country a favour, don't vote
Alan Brooks| 9.15.11 @ 9:19PM
I will certainly not vote for your 2nd rate candidates who pay lip service to small govt.
Lawrence Boccardi| 9.15.11 @ 6:47AM
This is the only posting of yours, ever, that I can agree with.
Alan Brooks| 9.15.11 @ 4:44PM
I did not write it, numbskull. Whoever did can have their IPO looked up in the AS computer office.
SpiralArchitect| 9.15.11 @ 4:58PM
Brooks, you putz, it is obvious that was not you in the first post. Not only did what was said sound reasonable but probable. Thus obviously not you, schmetzler.
Of course someone posting with your TAS tag in an online comments area will be sent straight to the top...of somehting I'm sure.
Alan Brooks| 9.15.11 @ 5:21PM
ID theft is illicit, you OUGHT to know it; whomever did it at 6:41 AM should be getting your noodle-lashing, SpiderArtifact-- not me.
Alan Brooks| 9.16.11 @ 12:14AM
Oh, never mind - I didn't really mean that.
We're all Alan Brooks now. Solidarity, baby!
Shamus| 9.15.11 @ 7:06AM
Perhaps the off year elections mean nothing, but on the other hand they could be predicting devastating defeat for Democrats. Obama has certainly worn out his welcome with most voters.
Dan Hirsch| 9.15.11 @ 2:38PM
The Catholic, loudly anti-Obama, Tea Party political newbie Republican wins over the Cuomo-, Clinton supported, experienced, Jewish Democrat officeholder in a district with 3 registered Democrat for every Republicans and 1 Jewish voter for every 1.5 non-Jewish voters by 8 points. Nothing to see here, people, just move along, move along.
Look there goes another Oink Oink 777 Dream-on-liner!!!!
I pray the Democrats don't take this seriously.
I wish the stupid, statist (read RINO) Republicans would figure that out, Spkr Boehner, you knucklehead....
More, louder, stronger Tea Party please...
DTOM
SpiralArchitect| 9.15.11 @ 5:00PM
ACORN & the dead rarely vote in special elections. Presidential elections, their specialty.
Timothy L. Pennell| 9.15.11 @ 7:50AM
How is this happening? He's a guy who grew up in the Mosques and Muslim Schools of Indonesia. He's been surrounded by Communists, Marxists, Socialists, Maoists, Anarchists, White Haters, America haters, and Anti-Semites HIS WHOLE LIFE. He still surrounds himself with them, NOW.
He's never had a job IN HIS LIFE. He's never made a payroll. Never had to pay for his own Health Insurance. Used to run the streets of the South Side of Chicago, with ACORN. And his #1 Guy, Tony Rezko, who has been with Hussein, in Chicago, since the beginning, is sitting in Federal prison.
Why is he such a bad President?
I don't get it.
SpiralArchitect| 9.15.11 @ 5:04PM
Please, Timothy, control yourself. Obviously, his Presidential ineptitude comes from his race.
Perhaps that too is Bush's fault?
Intelligent Design| 9.15.11 @ 7:56AM
What kind of job is Obama suited for: _________?
Notice that the Obama administration is jumping into the investigation of Solyndra, no doubt to gain control of the incriminating evidence before Congress sees it. Where did 1/2 $Billion go? Democrat campaign funding? Other ideas? Follow the money.
Mike Hawk| 9.15.11 @ 8:15AM
He could be a Wal-mart greeter except that it is a non-union company and he'd need a teleprompter.
Mike D.| 9.15.11 @ 8:46AM
He'd need a teleprompter to say "hi"
Dan Hirsch| 9.15.11 @ 2:39PM
He needs a teleprompter to breathe!
Sheesh!!
DTOM
Buck Ofama| 9.15.11 @ 4:47PM
PULL THE PLUG... save on health care.
rightasrain| 9.15.11 @ 2:42PM
On Obama greeting customers at WalMart: "hello", he lied.
Mike D.| 9.15.11 @ 4:07PM
LOL, thats hilarious!!!!!
SpiralArchitect| 9.15.11 @ 5:05PM
He'd need a teleprompter to say "hi"
"um, hi."
Buck Ofama| 9.15.11 @ 4:01PM
What kind of job is Obama suited for: _________?
Answer:
(a) sucking on camels
(b) fvcking up the economy
(c) inciting well-deserved hatred
(d) repeat from a
Intelligent Design| 9.15.11 @ 5:31PM
I've said this before: after leaving office in January 2013 he will become a Professor of American Un-Exceptionalism at Columbia or Harvard, his colleges. He can host lunches with vermin such as Ahmadinejad of Iran.
beebop| 9.15.11 @ 7:25PM
uh ... I sense even they have standards. He couldn't make it beyond lecturer at the U of Chi
dw| 9.15.11 @ 5:57PM
Check the Swiss accounts of the CEO and his cohorts. I am sure that when the dust settles and the tax payer is screwed out of our "investment" the fat cats will still be in their mansions driving their mercedes.
dw| 9.15.11 @ 6:00PM
Guaranteed, someone or ones have lined their pockets with millions.
Mike D.| 9.15.11 @ 7:57AM
Keep him out there in front of his teleprompters, its just makes it worse. Thats where you WANT him. His solution to his problems is simple, everybody just needs more of him according to him. Every empty word, idiotic oratory, assinine statement just increases the fatigue level of this sock puppet on every voter. Every time he opens his yap and spews his BS, it just reinforces the reality that he's an empty suit who reads teleprompters. Each "speech" he wails out just makes him look less presidential inch by inch. He's the gift that keeps on giving.
Have you considered| 9.15.11 @ 8:07AM
Speaking of bridges to nowhere, have any of you seen any info on the latest House GOP Surface and Air Transportation Programs Extension Act of 2011 (HR 2887)
Breaking their Pledge again, they introduced the bill on 9/12, and passed it by voice vote 9/13....so they didn't give 72 hours for us to read it, and they jammed it through with a voice vote.
I'm surprised I haven't seen this as a topic here at TAS...wonder why?
Here is an article from RedState that has some of the info on it:
http://www.redstate.com/russvo.....ut-a-vote/
None of the new freshmen objected either.
Will we ever get any politicians that actually uphold campaign promises?
TrueBlue| 9.15.11 @ 12:19PM
Actually that bill was sitting there before they went on their little break. Had several co-workers of my dad's that lost their job due to lack of funding because they didn't pass it beforehand even though it was already completely written up.
Have you considered| 9.15.11 @ 4:36PM
TrueBlue, I don't believe that to be accurate.
GOP.Gov states that it was introduced on 9/12, and passed on 9/13.
It was not posted online the promised 72 hours before being voted on, and it was passed by voice vote, so there was no recorded vote on it.
Exactly what the Republicans said they would not do.
Melvin| 9.15.11 @ 8:38AM
People, your thinking rationally now. Think Chicago corruption. All of the programs that were supposed to do something to get our economy going again are merely fronts to siphon off a large part or all tax payer dollars.
Its all one really humongous money laundering operation. Government programs or loans are created to be legitimate government programs and viola a vehicle for instant fraud.
Solyndra, is just the tip of the iceburg.
The reason the players involved are doing what they are doing is because Republicans and Democrats are involved in these easy money scheme, they've been doing it for years, but this time Barrack got greedy and careless.
BenfromMO| 9.16.11 @ 5:58AM
It may be true that both sides are part of the corruption, but there will always be corruption to some extent or special favors.
The probles is the scope (potentially) of what our current president has been doing. His re-election will be financed with crony cash which comes from the tax-payers to such a large extent I doubt we will ever even realize before it is too late.
That is the sad part of all of this. And how do you change the system? The only true way is to make an ammendment to the consitution because otherwise the constitution as it is will continue to be interpreted wrongly in the end.
markenoff| 9.18.11 @ 1:04AM
There was and is a reason our Founding Fathers made the federal government a limited government with restricted powers. They understood from their reading of history that power attracts people who want to use it to line their own pockets all the while calling themselves public servants. Most governments are kleptocracies, rule by those who steal. This is not a new phenomena. Cicero said it well: "When the legislature controls the buying and selling the first thing to be bought and sold is the legislators." We shouldn't need it because the power to guarantee loans to private companies is not an enumerated power of the federal government under the Constitution but since those who believe in a "living" Constitution are willing to pervert it to allow the federal government to guarantee loans made by one private company to another private company, yes let's pass an amendment to the Constitution forbidding ANY AND ALL loan guarantees by the federal government.
Brian Mc| 9.15.11 @ 9:08AM
After all the corruption and incompetence this administration has shown in criminal form, when the alien leaves office we should demand recompense by stripping him of every financial emolliant that would normally come at that point. To see him go off into the night with financial security is too much to comprehend. The thought of this one turning into another Jimmy, harrassing and cackling well into the future while stroking the millions under his mattress is a nauseating thought.
Yes, have him return every paycheck..."Or your money back". If you came home from vacation and found that the house-sitter left you a pile of rubble after throwing a party I doubt you would pay them: most likely, you would call the law. Unless, of course, it was the circuit judge and the police who wielded the biggest sledges hammers while drinking up all your single malt.
When my Grandpa Joe's home was being refurbished a decade or so ago, the Des Moines Register ran an article about the notes the new owner found stuffed into nooks and crannies of the old place. Since he had been a State Senator, there was a story here. One such note, dated in the late fifties pondered, "I wonder if you are still living in a Republic". Sorry, Joe. Too much repair to be done before answering in the affirmative. As a matter of fact, I'm unsure we will ever get this house back in order. We might have to raze the whole...that's OK, we have the blueprint.
Pecos Pete| 9.15.11 @ 1:09PM
Brian: I have the same problem with King O related to where this bozo will decide to live permanently after January 2013. Illinois would be nice but it is too cold there, can't imagine anywhere in the south/southwest. California is a possibility and he would fit Hollywood to a T. Maybe Hawaii? Hawaii is a little bit far away from the national media. I suspect he will decide on the Cayman Islands in order to manage the money he has stored there.
In any event, you are correct about the potential for "harrassing and cackling" from the deposed king. Luckily I don't watch TV and won't have to watch/listen.
Dan Hirsch| 9.15.11 @ 2:46PM
The term you are looking for is "Clawback"
That's what they did to some of the financial guys during TARP. Even though they had contracts - rightly or wrongly. But when your government routinely, without valid reason other than 'optics' feels free to repudiate contracts, nothing and nobody is safe.
Let's get busy people, busy, busy, busy...
On Perry, on Palin, on Santorum, and Romney, on Gingrich and Huntsman, Ron Paul, and Bachman!!! Runaway, runaway with the electorate in two thousand twelve.
With one or two possible exceptions,...
No, actually, ANY of these would be a trillion times better than Barney Obama...
DTOM
hardcard| 9.15.11 @ 9:11AM
just an added factoid bo's pal Tony Rezko is in jail as we speak,did you know rezko is not of Italian decent, but a Syrian born Arab. Very interesting, not just to buds talkin bout the hood.
PattyMor| 9.15.11 @ 9:14AM
Well I saw a new conference with Rand Paul talking about Hussein's lastest jobs bill. The Repubs standing behind Rand, were actually laughing. That is the greatest rebuke to the "consceited one". Its the beginning of the end, but in the mean time, the 'Bamster can still do a lot of damage.
Redstateboy| 9.15.11 @ 9:47AM
I understand ABC (of all things!) is actually pursuing the Solyndra scam with effort! You just know if a lame-stream major media outlet is looking in to this - there may be something here more than just crony-capitalism
TrueBlue| 9.15.11 @ 12:26PM
Yea, they forgot to pay off the ABC folks, oops!
Palrak| 9.15.11 @ 2:30PM
ABC is also the one who broke the Operation Fast and Furious scandal. There is hope, after all.
Indy| 9.15.11 @ 9:50AM
I'm tired of hearing about leaking and crumbling schools on this pass my bill campaign. Sorry Mr. President, school repairs, construction is a matter for State and Local funding. Same with hiring police, firefighters, teachers, those should not be federally funded jobs, and the GOP on this issue zzzzzzzzz along with the media. States and cities have to wrestle with balancing budgets, we don't need the Feds in this because we all know what happens when the money runs out, jobs are lost and funding is stuck in the federal baseline...it's wrong and has to stop. Let's grow the economy, equal opportunity not equal outcome...unleash the enegery sector and the ecomony will respond and grow the tax base, let's do it.
Kingofthenet| 9.15.11 @ 11:02AM
Carville has a good article about this, Everyone on the Republican side has pretty much drank the laced 'Tea' and is acting crazy and foaming at the mouth, while the President tries to be the Staff in the Asylum. He needs to get a little rabid, point out what a Republican 'Contract on America' will look like. Fight them and don't let them paint a false narrative of reality.
Mike D.| 9.15.11 @ 11:15AM
Are you freaking serious? We have three years of seeing what the Communist contract on America looks like. False narative on Reality? How about the "summer of recovery" This is like shooting ducks in a barrel.
Mike D.| 9.15.11 @ 11:18AM
Oh, and King, Carville said he should FIRE everyone around him, change course, and in effect play it like Clinton. He's a marxist, Clinton was a pragmatist. Ain't gonna happen. He's going right off that cliff and his foamers are going with him.
Kingofthenet| 9.15.11 @ 11:35AM
Mike, you must have a long term memory issue. When the President took office in early 2009, the Country was hemorrhaging 700,000 jobs a MONTH, most banks were on the edge of insolvency(and would have taken people lifetimes saving with them) the domestic auto industry was about to disappear (With all those American Jobs) and States were in Fiscal crisis.a couple years latter everything has stabilized, some months we have added jobs, some not but we aren't losing them.Most of the Stimulus went to Banks and States to get them stable, in a nutshell it worked! No the Economy is FAR from perfect but isn't any longer on life support.
Kingofthenet| 9.15.11 @ 11:36AM
That IS the reality...
Redstateboy| 9.15.11 @ 11:59AM
and the 528 million dollars of OUR money gone to Solyndra from Porkulus 1 money?
Mike D.| 9.15.11 @ 12:11PM
Redstate, this guy is a Huffpo plant, gotta be.
Dan Hirsch| 9.15.11 @ 2:52PM
Nah, fuggedabowdit, that was all Chinese money...
kingof thenet,
So nice of you to regurgitate all of the Geithner crisis building lines of 2008. Does BHO know that you are calling yourself "king?" Methinks both BHO and algore might have issues with that...
DTOM
Kingofthenet| 9.15.11 @ 4:16PM
Would you have preferred KBR? So they can rip us off on military essentials?
Mike D.| 9.15.11 @ 12:08PM
This has got to be a plant. First off quit the Obama Talking points, that BS has been rehashed so many times its not worth answering anymore.
So drop em'. Even Carville ISN'T defending his BS anymore. Which brings us back to the Article WHICH WAS the subject at hand if you can remember back that far...and as if by magic here it is:
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideC...../id/411086
Carville: Time to Panic! When Carville says "panic" in public, you can imagine what he's saying in private conversations.
John Navratil| 9.15.11 @ 1:51PM
Kingofthenet,
The reality is that lifetime savings where insured.
The reality is that jobs are lost in a recession and gained in MOST recoveries. The two notable exceptions are in the 20' and now. The last "worst crisis since the great Depression" was under Reagan's watch when unemployment went to 10.8%, but recovered in 24 months. We've had more than 24 months of high unemployment making this the second deepest but longest joblessness since FDR begin fiddling with the economy.
The differences between Reagan, Obama and FDR are clear. In the first case, government stayed away while in the others the government engaged in wild Keynesianism. Too bad Keynes didn't live long enough the repudiate himself as he was beginning to do at the end of his life.
Keynes was nothing but an expert giving his blessing for politicians to do what they always want to do... spend other peoples money.
John Navratil| 9.15.11 @ 2:28PM
Kingofthenet,
For added historical flavour, remember the recession after the .com implosion. The recovery was called "Bush's jobless recovery." Kinda makes you yearn for the good old days, doesn't it.
George S| 9.15.11 @ 12:54PM
Far from perfect? I agree. However, the economy from 2001 to 2008 was as close to perfect as you can get: 4 percent unemployment. A perfect economy needs a 3 or 4 percent unemployment rate, for it shows that labor is in demand and, more importantly, labor is in shorter supply than needed for full employment. The low unemployment rate represents the shifts in jobs that are necessary as the market weeds out inefficient employers and gives rise to new jobs.
Today, we have people out of work not because of transition or self-imposed leisure, but because they want to work but their jobs disappeared. The jobs that DIDN'T disappear account for a 9 percent unemployment rate, whereas if you include those who need work but cannot get it is closer to 20 percent (50 percent for black males 18-35 alone). Couple that with no new jobs created as employers are bracing against the hammer and sickle blow of ObamaCare, and you have a structural unemployment situation not seen anywhere other than Third World economies.
Care to rethink your reality?
DaveD| 9.15.11 @ 3:01PM
"... it [Obama's policies] worked!"
So how come a 63 year old programming expert can't find a job? Oh I can get courtesy interviews - got tired of them rather quickly - but a job, no way. Six year younger former coworker works part time (very) at Menard's and takes tickets at the local ski hill in the winter. Another sold his 2,500 sq ft house in California, moved to Florida and is squeaking by in a small one bedroom apartment. I'd hate to think what things would be like if "it" were not working.
Whatever you are smoking, I want some. Might make the pain easier to bear.
Kingofthenet| 9.15.11 @ 4:18PM
You KNOW the reason if you are in IT, I was but H1B visa abuse by Bush, now I'm not...
chuck| 9.15.11 @ 8:58PM
King, you're so full of fornicating feces! There was no way in Hades that the country was going to continue to lose 750,000 jobs a month, no matter who was president, or what he did. A certain amount were going to be lost. Period. We lost them when Bush was at the end of his presidency. Where are all the jobs Obama promised? Where are the shovel ready jobs? Where did the stimulus go? How did Obama make $800 billion disappear with nothing to show for it? BLAME BUSH FOR EVERYTHING! may have worked for the first year, or 18 months, but the Bamster got everything he wanted from Congress for 2 DAMNED YEARS! WHERE ARE THE JOBS! HE GOT HIS STIMULUS, HIS BUDGET, HIS PROGRAMS, EVERYTHING, AND IT HAS NOT WORKED.
So why don't you pull your head out of your arse, and make room so you can shove this "it's all Bush's fault" where the sun don't shine!
Have a nice day.
Drunken Sailor| 9.15.11 @ 1:44PM
"The President tries to be the staff in the Asylum"
He does kind of remind me of Nurse Rached.
Other than that your a idiot.
fmm| 9.15.11 @ 11:54AM
After only a few months of the O presidency it was obvious that he could be the best thing to happen to this country, because the leftist socialist ideology would finally be right out in the open. So far so good. Even historically democrat voters are realizing that they are much more conservative than even the average democrat politician, let alone their dear leader. Congratulations to those who are waking up.
John Navratil| 9.15.11 @ 1:53PM
fmm,
Ann Coulter said (paraphrasing) that once every generation or so the people decide to put the Democrats in charge of the government then remember why it is such a bad idea.
I have to agree.
Kingofthenet| 9.15.11 @ 7:08PM
I guess you hated the Roaring 90's...
John Navratil| 9.15.11 @ 8:03PM
Kingofthenet,
You may recall that Clinton and the Democrats had the White House, the Senate and the House until HillaryCare caused what was the first great landslide with the Republicans capturing the House in 1994 for the first time in 40 years. That's when Clinton famously triangulated, the budget got balanced and welfare was reformed.
Obama could have saved his bacon by pulling a Clinton, but like the scorpion and the frog, it's not in his nature.
The economy will roar again, but not on Obama's watch.
POST American| 9.15.11 @ 11:29PM
-------------------BOTTOM LINE-----------------------
Great Tavistock approved '90's Show'!
NOW, for those interested in tuning in to
2011 ----
ONE AND ALL ----CHECK OUT
OXP Radio 'Stanley Kubrick Moon Hoax'
--the interview with documentary film-maker
Jay Weidener.
The interviewer's drippy but Weidener's
riveting on Kubrick ----but ESP. on the
unfolding, and Globalist covered up, if
NOT, indeed, HAARP 'precipitated', FUKISHIMA
world DEPOP OP.
Weidener lives on the west coast and
lays out precisely what's coming down.
And remember, this interview was in
June. He thinks it's only 2 reactors that
are leaking -----NOT 5 that are in a state
of ABSOLUTE MELTDOWN.
AGAIN ---------SPECIAL thanks to GE!
and Jeff I-Melt-down for their sterling
sense of 'what's right and honorable'
in the face of this catastrophic disgrace.
Alice Wolf| 9.16.11 @ 2:24AM
Really, pinning the victory of a Republican onto the Jewish vote turning Catholic is beyond reason.
The explanations of why things are so turbulent are so far fetched and so annoying by now, that it is hard to read anyone's blog or article any longer.
We need to straighten things out by reinstating the Glass Steagall standard, and place the too big to fail banks under bankruptcy protection. Once the illegal gambling debts are no longer the responsibility of the tax payer, then Congress can utter credit through a new Federal National Bank to commercial banks statewide, get them back on their feet again, and launch NAWAPA, a project of sufficient magnitude to put millions of the unemployed to work, and take the first step towards the further evolution of mankind by developing high energy flux density power resources, and opening up scientific research and development, inc NASA, industrial and agricultural progress, increasing productivity per head per square kilometer. Anything less is a waste of time.
markenoff| 9.18.11 @ 1:18AM
Don't forget about collectivizing the farms and opening the re-education camps.
Denise| 9.19.11 @ 10:39AM
Anyone that you speak with will certainly do as you instruct, no doubt about it.
http://www.besthandbagsshopping.com
http://www.wholesalesunglassesbrands.com