The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Another Perspective

Letting Go in Russia

My Perestroika is a wonderful documentary, must viewing not just for old Cold Warriors.

Old Russia hands like to argue over the precise moment that Soviet ideology began to look ridiculous to its citizens — the point at which reality hit people in the face. It’s a fair question because even in the 1980s, just before Gorbachev, the country still had its defenders. At the other extreme, dissidents date their awakening from December 1965 when a tiny protest in Moscow resulted in several jail terms.

An impressive new documentary film, My Perestroika, examines the range of emotions and fears that ordinary Russians felt as the system began to crumble, then morph into something else — nobody knew what. Most of them saw it coming, some sooner than others. Many seem bemused by what has happened to their country.

As one of the main interviewees says, “Somewhere during the eighth or ninth grade in school (mid-1980s) it became clear that people all around you were saying things that did not correspond to reality.” His belief in the system went downhill from there.

A woman comments: “Everything was not what you thought.” She told people, “Open your eyes!’

Speaking as a former Moscow correspondent from the 1960s and 1970s (Associated Press), I can say confidently this film gets inside the Russian mind better than any other documentary has managed — and certainly better than any of us were able to do during our posting there. In fact, Western journalists rarely spoke to ordinary Russians.

We were forbidden fruit to them. A Russian friend once asked me never to call him on his communal telephone at his shared flat. My American accent would cause him problems with his Party supervisor, he said, and could easily cost him his job. Unfortunately, this meant the journalists spoke mainly to each other.

 My Perestroika is a film that was crying out to be done, as director Robin Hessman fortunately realized. She distilled these 90 minutes from 190 hours of footage that she shot or viewed over a three-year period, finally focusing on five schoolmates, members of the last generation of Russians raised behind the Iron Curtain.

A good bit of the value of her documentary is the selection of private home movie footage from the 1970s and 1980s interspersed with commentary from her interviewees. “Part of the beauty is [the movies’] purity of intention,” she says, providing glimpses of Soviet life devoid of propaganda or any agenda.

Some 40 years of Soviet and Russian history are touched upon without cosmic intervention by academics or other experts. In fact the director consciously protected her final product from talking heads, preferring to let the story tell itself.

The cheerful memories of some of these people may surprise people over 60. In the West, Cold War rhetoric and almost daily rocket-rattling on both sides had polarized the two worlds into arch-enemies, yet scenes of happy families romping in the countryside are obviously genuine. It was a complicated time.

The documentary opens with joy beaming from the eyes of the young during the stagnant Brezhnev period. In a surreal shot of a Red Square parade, a boy of about 10 shouts over the public address system, “From the depth of our hearts, we are greatly honored to say thank you for the fact that we live in the country of the happy childhood.” A thousand youngsters, aligned in perfect rows alongside the military, squeak their agreement while Brezhnev and his henchmen look on paternalistically. In today’s context, it all appears very North Korean.

But the story shifts seamlessly into the cramped apartments of the five subjects, all of whom were friends in school together as children. Today most of them live in flats so crowded and steamy you can almost smell the cabbage soup. Everyone is smoking. They speak without guile, trying to express on camera the doubts and confusion they experienced as Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and finally Putin wrenched the predictability from their lives.

There is little discussion of freedom for its own sake, although one of the group proudly invited Ms. Hessman and her camera to his swank “Café Coton” boutique that sells expensive French shirts. He now has 17 outlets around the country and he lives comfortably in a large condo. (In my day, the nearest shop with a decent shirt was in Helsinki.) Another member of the group seems to have found happiness playing his banjo in the subway for small change.

The film is showing coast to coast in U.S. art and specialty houses, attracting Russian émigré families but also the curious from all walks of life. “It has really caught fire in a way we did not anticipate,” distributor Wendy Lidell, president of International Film Circuit, tells me. It opens in Washington, D.C. May 13 and was the subject of a colloquium at the National Gallery of Art May 1 (Sunday). The main couple featured in the documentary were flown over for the event.

As a study of people adapting to relative freedom after a lifetime under tyranny, it would be hard to imagine a better night out for the ordinary people of Egypt, Syria, Tunisia, Bahrain, Yemen, and Libya. Their adaptation to a freer life will have much in common with the experiences of the characters in this film.

Director Hessman, a Boston-area native, told a recent seminar in Brookline that she was intrigued by Russia from a young age and decided to study it first-hand. She has done graduate work and held jobs in television in Moscow and now has completed her first major work on the country. She says she has no Russian ancestry or personal ties other than those she has developed in realizing her dream.

More from her as Russia continues to morph would be most welcome.

About the Author

Michael Johnson spent 17 years at McGraw-Hill, including six years as a news executive in New York. He now writes from Bordeaux in France. He also spent nine years on the board of the London International Piano Competition.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (10) |

Ken (Old Texican)| 5.2.11 @ 8:42AM

Michael,
sadly, one of your conclusions was catastrophically wrong. Muslims are self-imprisoned.

Thomas Wilbur| 5.2.11 @ 10:28AM

Great show at the Nat'l Gallery - classic editing, great archive amateur footage and pics, sympathetic, articulate subjects who tell their own story w/o an outside narrator. My favorite line was from that lead couple, both historians at a school in Moscow, kids who learned Soviet history, then degree'd under Yeltsin's democracy and now teach under revanchist Putin "Our history is unpredictable".

Alan Brooks| 5.2.11 @ 10:54AM

It went bad by 1932 during the Holodomor- helping Hitler to get in power-- too many rumors of what was trtanspiring in the Ukraine were leaking out.

Anthony M| 5.2.11 @ 1:02PM

Gangster rule, government corruption, the average Russian woman is estimated to have 11 abortions in her lifetime, the average lifespan is decreasing, the tragedy of Russia just keeps getting worse.

Alky| 5.2.11 @ 2:26PM

Russia's and America's freedom trains are traveling in opposite directions.

ACynic| 5.2.11 @ 7:35PM

So it took about 65 years (1920 - mid 1980s) for the Russian people to FINALLY figure out they lived in a world of lies and deceit. This is absolutely frightening. The mass starvations of the 1920s, Stalin's reign of terror in the 30s, the Hitler Stalin Pact of 1939, the gulags; you mean AFTER all of this, it still was not enough for the Russian people to see the fraud and lies they lived in??
This is unbelievable and scary, for it shows that almost nothing can shake a belief system - not even mass exterminations and absolute tyranny - unless the "end" is right around the corner; when it is damn near too late.
God help the USA.

Dress Right Dress| 5.3.11 @ 10:27AM

Incidentally, Café Coton makes great shirts that aren't terribly expensive--we Americans are fortunate to have a few of their shops open here in the States; I've got to think the same goes for the Russians. Some small part of being free has got to be the right to dress well...

Wayne| 5.3.11 @ 10:33PM

"Moscow Farewell", Pfeiffer, about a US exchange student in Moscow, gives flavor of life in the Brezhnev era. Frazier's "Travels in Siberia" ranges from the 90's through 2005. Russian society is coping, but would prefer to ignore the awfulness of the communist years. It would be reassuring if they would face up to their history. I got the sense that Russian society is redneck in its own way. Frazier's best insight was the Russia was abused in its early history by invaders and is forever warped by it. Can't wait to see this movie.

Danny| 5.3.11 @ 10:55PM

I look forward in the not too distant future to the same treatment given to the American liberal delusion. Unlike ACynic above, I do not think it will take 65 years, due to our freedom of speech and dissent. Conservatives will crush the opposition. But I fear that the believers will never abandon their faith, perhaps because conservatism's triumph or its innate resilience will shield them from the most serious consequences of the audacity of statism.

But I mistake -- liberalism already has lasted for more than 65 years, only that here, the damage has been relatively contained by our resilience and freedoms.

I only hope I am a true prophet

sex toys | 7.4.11 @ 1:18AM

Moyers' phony quote has one thing correct. NPR/PBS is a gift to liberalism. Why would they fight so hard against de-funding?

More Articles by Michael Johnson

More Articles From Another Perspective

http://spectator.org/archives/2011/05/02/letting-go-in-russia

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT