The last thing Germany wants is to be disliked, but it also has
no particular desire to be "hegemonic."
There is general confusion in European capitals over German
unwillingness to accept the role of savior when all it needs to do
is pick up a majority of the bill for the debts of cash-strapped
partners in the eurozone. It's downright un-German. For a bit --
perhaps rather a lot -- of money, Germany effectively could buy its
way into establishing a Fourth Reich.
Perhaps that's a slight exaggeration, but certainly
Germany has a chance to be the great benefactor and thus the
acknowledged suzerain of contemporary Europa -- at least
starting with the supplicant states of Greece, Ireland, Portugal,
and to some extent Spain. In addition there is an imposing list of
others eager to relinquish their "virtue" in exchange for Germanic
financial protection. Unfortunately for them, that seems to be just
what Germany doesn't seek.
The last thing Germany wants is to be disliked, but it
also has no particular desire to be dominant -- or hegemonic, as is
the fashionable term in today's European political society. After
rising from the ashes of its crushing defeat of 1945 (and with
initial aid from the Marshall Plan), Germany painstakingly has
pulled itself to a level of ascendancy among its eurozone
associates. Nonetheless it is not at ease with its own success. It
certainly has no interest in taking on the responsibility of caring
for its economically sick and needy compatriots -- if that is what
success means.
Some would say that Germany's reluctance to assume the
lead in ameliorating the debt crisis of its fellow EU members is
just another manifestation of Germany's carefully hidden desire for
revenge for its WW2 military defeats and civilian devastation.
While there may be an appearance of logic in that assumption, the
problem with that theory is that there have been over two
generations of Germans since that time 66 years ago. Germany's
modern history has had several chapters since then. Even the
reunification of the country after the fall of the Soviet Union has
meant going through a new period of national structural and psychic
change.
In any case, Germany is no longer a defeated country. It
is not only the most populous but economically the most powerful
nation in the EU. This marks the first time in European history
that such predominance has not brought with it a parallel drive for
even greater power. From an analytical standpoint France is now
clearly a junior partner of Germany in their shared leading role
among the nations of the European Union. French President Sarkozy's
instinct for center stage may have annoyed Chancellor Angela
Merkel, but she has been clever enough to not let it show -- at
least not too obviously.
Germany's refusal to join in the Libyan expedition may
have been a shock to Sarkozy and the foreign press, but it
certainly wasn't to the German public. Germans, and their
politicians on most all sides, are happy with their economic
leverage within the eurozone. Their instinctive reaction to
involvement in foreign military ventures is understandably
negative. Even their limited role (in relation to Germany's assets)
in Afghanistan is not pursued with any great enthusiasm. German
diplomats off the record have explained that their government sees
little to be gained from military adventures "operating under the
guise of humanitarian actions."
When Angela Merkel inspired the establishment of a
permanent "crisis resolution mechanism" that would reinforce the
eurozone, her ambition was to emphasize the importance of each
country devoting itself to its own national economic strength in
order ultimately to strengthen the European Union as a group. This
was shocking to the functionaries of Brussels, who tend to see the
bureaucratic instruments of the EU, such as the European parliament
and commission, as the bulwark against parochial national
interests.
Germany no longer sees its role in a united Europe merely
as one among equals, if it ever actually did. For Germany the
future lies in its continued economic superiority. Becoming
involved in what it views as fringe regional matters outside of
Germany is not part of its long-range plan nor any other plan.
German ascendancy through its economic development is all that it
wishes.
Of course this carries with it much consternation for
France, among others, who expected the old aggressive Germany to be
part of a new group dynamic within the unified European concept.
The French would always be the diplomatic and political leader in
their perception of future Europe. The advantage for
Europe of having a strong yet benign Germany is a construct most
Germans view as not including any elements of their own past
imperial ambitions or anyone else's. This view
rejects France's ever-present perception of itself as,
at the very least, the political philosophical leader of the new
Europe.
For Germany today insularity is its guiding principle --
that and economic advantage. One thing hasn't changed from the
past: Germany wants what it wants. It just doesn't want what it
wanted before. Being the EU's dominating economic power is quite
adequate --- just so long as Germany isn't expected to pick up the
tab for the others or fight in wars not immediate to its
interest.
About the Author
George H. Wittman writes a weekly column on international affairs for The American Spectator online. He was the founding chairman of the National Institute for Public Policy.
The US could learn a lot from Germany. Let us just go about our
business without having to be involved in every skirmish that comes
down the pike. Of course the currrent POTUS can't let that happen.
He want's a global village. I wish this country could concentrate
on our well being, not everyone elses.
axbucxdu| 4.23.11 @ 12:03AM
Looking back, there's a whole string of previous POTUSs that had
trouble avoiding foreign fisticuffs. Intervention isn't unique to
the current occupant, it's been a chronic disease of US politics
since Wilson.
Alan Brooks| 4.23.11 @ 10:37PM
"just so long as Germany isn't expected to pick up the tab for
the others or fight in wars not immediate to its interest."
Right, Germany wants others to pick up the hefty defense tab and
fight the ugly wars. Wittman wont tell the whole truth when a half
truth will do.
Bob K.| 4.22.11 @ 10:03AM
You haven't mentioned Germany's demographic problem. It is a
rapidly aging country and it doesn't have a young population
necessary to sustain the pensions that will be paid in the future
to it's aging adults. It is they who are worried about their own
future and they are really not interested in bailing out the rest
of a dissolute Europe with their future pension monies. And they
vote in large numbers!
Occam's Tool| 4.24.11 @ 9:43PM
Brilliant comment, Bob. Germany has an median age in the 40s and
a birthrate of 1.3 children per woman; it is distinctly child
unfriendly. This does not bode well for the prospect of Heemon;
that is a good thing. Unfortunately, it also doesn't bode well for
defense against the advocates of sharia.
Germany, as a Western power, will be dead by 2040.
Occam's Tool| 4.24.11 @ 9:45PM
Sorry, prospect of Hegemon.
play nice| 4.22.11 @ 1:30PM
to whom it may concern -
Es ist nichts schrecklicher als eine tätige Unwissenheit.
There's nothing worse than ignorance in action.
- J.W. von Goethe
ABNCP| 4.22.11 @ 4:41PM
Germany was very happy to let the United States
assume the role of military, financial and political protector for
their country from 1945 to the end of the USSR. As soon as the
understood and believed the Red Army was no longer going to do to
them what it did in 1945, their attitude went from supplicant to,
we really don't need you anymore so don't ask us to pretend we
respect you any longer. Because they never really did.
If the rest of the E.U. thinks Germany is going to be their
financial saviour without extracting a very large benefit, one that
the E. U. will find very hard to swallow, they are as stupid and
corrupt as I believe they are.
Rommel| 4.22.11 @ 4:46PM
And let's not forget, Germany rebounded from the global
financial meldown in less than a year!
Maybe we should swap governments.
Alan Brooks| 4.23.11 @ 10:43PM
Rommel, they rebounded in a year because they are much smaller,
and more insignificant. If America, Russia, or China were to
disappear, the world would be different; if Germany disappeared
Europe would be different-- but not the rest of the world.
What a dummkopf you are, Rommel-- a sheisskopf.
e track from saq| 4.22.11 @ 8:34PM
It's funny how the fruitcakes that have mainly lead Germany for
the last several years have somehow managed not to destroy the
country.Might have something do to with the US picking up their
defense tab.Semi socialist successes like those of northern Europe
fuel the delusions of the wacky left in this country.That needs to
end.Pull all America troops out now.
Bob K.| 4.22.11 @ 11:17PM
The US picked up all of Europes defense tab long ago.
Alan Brooks| 4.23.11 @ 8:24PM
Exactly-- without us, Germans would have become the Westernmost
outpost of the Soviet Empire. To this day Germans are under our
protection.
Bob K.| 4.23.11 @ 10:14PM
Last time I checked we were still shipping Pennsylvania
Anthracite Coal over to our military bases there. That had the
bipartisan support of both Senators.
Bob K.| 4.23.11 @ 10:17PM
But even without a military of their own to speak of Germany is
still looking at it's own pension problems down the road.
C Smith| 5.22.11 @ 9:08AM
To believe that "German ascendancy through its economic
development is ALL that it wishes" is to forget the lessons of
History!!!
joedoc| 4.22.11 @ 6:32AM
The US could learn a lot from Germany. Let us just go about our business without having to be involved in every skirmish that comes down the pike. Of course the currrent POTUS can't let that happen. He want's a global village. I wish this country could concentrate on our well being, not everyone elses.
axbucxdu| 4.23.11 @ 12:03AM
Looking back, there's a whole string of previous POTUSs that had trouble avoiding foreign fisticuffs. Intervention isn't unique to the current occupant, it's been a chronic disease of US politics since Wilson.
Alan Brooks| 4.23.11 @ 10:37PM
"just so long as Germany isn't expected to pick up the tab for the others or fight in wars not immediate to its interest."
Right, Germany wants others to pick up the hefty defense tab and fight the ugly wars. Wittman wont tell the whole truth when a half truth will do.
Bob K.| 4.22.11 @ 10:03AM
You haven't mentioned Germany's demographic problem. It is a rapidly aging country and it doesn't have a young population necessary to sustain the pensions that will be paid in the future to it's aging adults. It is they who are worried about their own future and they are really not interested in bailing out the rest of a dissolute Europe with their future pension monies. And they vote in large numbers!
Occam's Tool| 4.24.11 @ 9:43PM
Brilliant comment, Bob. Germany has an median age in the 40s and a birthrate of 1.3 children per woman; it is distinctly child unfriendly. This does not bode well for the prospect of Heemon; that is a good thing. Unfortunately, it also doesn't bode well for defense against the advocates of sharia.
Germany, as a Western power, will be dead by 2040.
Occam's Tool| 4.24.11 @ 9:45PM
Sorry, prospect of Hegemon.
play nice| 4.22.11 @ 1:30PM
to whom it may concern -
Es ist nichts schrecklicher als eine tätige Unwissenheit.
There's nothing worse than ignorance in action.
- J.W. von Goethe
ABNCP| 4.22.11 @ 4:41PM
Germany was very happy to let the United States
assume the role of military, financial and political protector for their country from 1945 to the end of the USSR. As soon as the understood and believed the Red Army was no longer going to do to them what it did in 1945, their attitude went from supplicant to, we really don't need you anymore so don't ask us to pretend we respect you any longer. Because they never really did.
If the rest of the E.U. thinks Germany is going to be their financial saviour without extracting a very large benefit, one that the E. U. will find very hard to swallow, they are as stupid and corrupt as I believe they are.
Rommel| 4.22.11 @ 4:46PM
And let's not forget, Germany rebounded from the global financial meldown in less than a year!
Maybe we should swap governments.
Alan Brooks| 4.23.11 @ 10:43PM
Rommel, they rebounded in a year because they are much smaller, and more insignificant. If America, Russia, or China were to disappear, the world would be different; if Germany disappeared Europe would be different-- but not the rest of the world.
What a dummkopf you are, Rommel-- a sheisskopf.
e track from saq| 4.22.11 @ 8:34PM
It's funny how the fruitcakes that have mainly lead Germany for the last several years have somehow managed not to destroy the country.Might have something do to with the US picking up their defense tab.Semi socialist successes like those of northern Europe fuel the delusions of the wacky left in this country.That needs to end.Pull all America troops out now.
Bob K.| 4.22.11 @ 11:17PM
The US picked up all of Europes defense tab long ago.
Alan Brooks| 4.23.11 @ 8:24PM
Exactly-- without us, Germans would have become the Westernmost outpost of the Soviet Empire. To this day Germans are under our protection.
Bob K.| 4.23.11 @ 10:14PM
Last time I checked we were still shipping Pennsylvania Anthracite Coal over to our military bases there. That had the bipartisan support of both Senators.
Bob K.| 4.23.11 @ 10:17PM
But even without a military of their own to speak of Germany is still looking at it's own pension problems down the road.
C Smith| 5.22.11 @ 9:08AM
To believe that "German ascendancy through its economic development is ALL that it wishes" is to forget the lessons of History!!!
weddingdresses| 6.24.11 @ 2:09AM
To believe that "German ascendancy through its economic development is ALL that it wishes" is to forget the lessons of History!!!
Creative Recreation| 8.10.11 @ 9:58PM
is good