The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

At Large

Reluctant Reich

The last thing Germany wants is to be disliked, but it also has no particular desire to be "hegemonic."

There is general confusion in European capitals over German unwillingness to accept the role of savior when all it needs to do is pick up a majority of the bill for the debts of cash-strapped partners in the eurozone. It's downright un-German. For a bit -- perhaps rather a lot -- of money, Germany effectively could buy its way into establishing a Fourth Reich.

Perhaps that's a slight exaggeration, but certainly Germany has a chance to be the great benefactor and thus the acknowledged suzerain of contemporary Europa -- at least starting with the supplicant states of Greece, Ireland, Portugal, and to some extent Spain. In addition there is an imposing list of others eager to relinquish their "virtue" in exchange for Germanic financial protection. Unfortunately for them, that seems to be just what Germany doesn't seek.

The last thing Germany wants is to be disliked, but it also has no particular desire to be dominant -- or hegemonic, as is the fashionable term in today's European political society. After rising from the ashes of its crushing defeat of 1945 (and with initial aid from the Marshall Plan), Germany painstakingly has pulled itself to a level of ascendancy among its eurozone associates. Nonetheless it is not at ease with its own success. It certainly has no interest in taking on the responsibility of caring for its economically sick and needy compatriots -- if that is what success means.

Some would say that Germany's reluctance to assume the lead in ameliorating the debt crisis of its fellow EU members is just another manifestation of Germany's carefully hidden desire for revenge for its WW2 military defeats and civilian devastation. While there may be an appearance of logic in that assumption, the problem with that theory is that there have been over two generations of Germans since that time 66 years ago. Germany's modern history has had several chapters since then. Even the reunification of the country after the fall of the Soviet Union has meant going through a new period of national structural and psychic change.

In any case, Germany is no longer a defeated country. It is not only the most populous but economically the most powerful nation in the EU. This marks the first time in European history that such predominance has not brought with it a parallel drive for even greater power. From an analytical standpoint France is now clearly a junior partner of Germany in their shared leading role among the nations of the European Union. French President Sarkozy's instinct for center stage may have annoyed Chancellor Angela Merkel, but she has been clever enough to not let it show -- at least not too obviously.

Germany's refusal to join in the Libyan expedition may have been a shock to Sarkozy and the foreign press, but it certainly wasn't to the German public. Germans, and their politicians on most all sides, are happy with their economic leverage within the eurozone. Their instinctive reaction to involvement in foreign military ventures is understandably negative. Even their limited role (in relation to Germany's assets) in Afghanistan is not pursued with any great enthusiasm. German diplomats off the record have explained that their government sees little to be gained from military adventures "operating under the guise of humanitarian actions."

When Angela Merkel inspired the establishment of a permanent "crisis resolution mechanism" that would reinforce the eurozone, her ambition was to emphasize the importance of each country devoting itself to its own national economic strength in order ultimately to strengthen the European Union as a group. This was shocking to the functionaries of Brussels, who tend to see the bureaucratic instruments of the EU, such as the European parliament and commission, as the bulwark against parochial national interests.

Germany no longer sees its role in a united Europe merely as one among equals, if it ever actually did. For Germany the future lies in its continued economic superiority. Becoming involved in what it views as fringe regional matters outside of Germany is not part of its long-range plan nor any other plan. German ascendancy through its economic development is all that it wishes.

Of course this carries with it much consternation for France, among others, who expected the old aggressive Germany to be part of a new group dynamic within the unified European concept. The French would always be the diplomatic and political leader in their perception of future Europe. The advantage for Europe of having a strong yet benign Germany is a construct most Germans view as not including any elements of their own past imperial ambitions or anyone else's. This view rejects France's ever-present perception of itself as, at the very least, the political philosophical leader of the new Europe.

For Germany today insularity is its guiding principle -- that and economic advantage. One thing hasn't changed from the past: Germany wants what it wants. It just doesn't want what it wanted before. Being the EU's dominating economic power is quite adequate --- just so long as Germany isn't expected to pick up the tab for the others or fight in wars not immediate to its interest.

About the Author

George H. Wittman writes a weekly column on international affairs for The American Spectator online. He was the founding chairman of the National Institute for Public Policy.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (18) | Leave a comment

joedoc| 4.22.11 @ 6:32AM

The US could learn a lot from Germany. Let us just go about our business without having to be involved in every skirmish that comes down the pike. Of course the currrent POTUS can't let that happen. He want's a global village. I wish this country could concentrate on our well being, not everyone elses.

axbucxdu| 4.23.11 @ 12:03AM

Looking back, there's a whole string of previous POTUSs that had trouble avoiding foreign fisticuffs. Intervention isn't unique to the current occupant, it's been a chronic disease of US politics since Wilson.

Alan Brooks| 4.23.11 @ 10:37PM

"just so long as Germany isn't expected to pick up the tab for the others or fight in wars not immediate to its interest."

Right, Germany wants others to pick up the hefty defense tab and fight the ugly wars. Wittman wont tell the whole truth when a half truth will do.

Bob K.| 4.22.11 @ 10:03AM

You haven't mentioned Germany's demographic problem. It is a rapidly aging country and it doesn't have a young population necessary to sustain the pensions that will be paid in the future to it's aging adults. It is they who are worried about their own future and they are really not interested in bailing out the rest of a dissolute Europe with their future pension monies. And they vote in large numbers!

Occam's Tool| 4.24.11 @ 9:43PM

Brilliant comment, Bob. Germany has an median age in the 40s and a birthrate of 1.3 children per woman; it is distinctly child unfriendly. This does not bode well for the prospect of Heemon; that is a good thing. Unfortunately, it also doesn't bode well for defense against the advocates of sharia.

Germany, as a Western power, will be dead by 2040.

Occam's Tool| 4.24.11 @ 9:45PM

Sorry, prospect of Hegemon.

play nice| 4.22.11 @ 1:30PM

to whom it may concern -

Es ist nichts schrecklicher als eine tätige Unwissenheit.

There's nothing worse than ignorance in action.

- J.W. von Goethe

ABNCP| 4.22.11 @ 4:41PM

Germany was very happy to let the United States
assume the role of military, financial and political protector for their country from 1945 to the end of the USSR. As soon as the understood and believed the Red Army was no longer going to do to them what it did in 1945, their attitude went from supplicant to, we really don't need you anymore so don't ask us to pretend we respect you any longer. Because they never really did.
If the rest of the E.U. thinks Germany is going to be their financial saviour without extracting a very large benefit, one that the E. U. will find very hard to swallow, they are as stupid and corrupt as I believe they are.

Rommel| 4.22.11 @ 4:46PM

And let's not forget, Germany rebounded from the global financial meldown in less than a year!

Maybe we should swap governments.

Alan Brooks| 4.23.11 @ 10:43PM

Rommel, they rebounded in a year because they are much smaller, and more insignificant. If America, Russia, or China were to disappear, the world would be different; if Germany disappeared Europe would be different-- but not the rest of the world.
What a dummkopf you are, Rommel-- a sheisskopf.

e track from saq| 4.22.11 @ 8:34PM

It's funny how the fruitcakes that have mainly lead Germany for the last several years have somehow managed not to destroy the country.Might have something do to with the US picking up their defense tab.Semi socialist successes like those of northern Europe fuel the delusions of the wacky left in this country.That needs to end.Pull all America troops out now.

Bob K.| 4.22.11 @ 11:17PM

The US picked up all of Europes defense tab long ago.

Alan Brooks| 4.23.11 @ 8:24PM

Exactly-- without us, Germans would have become the Westernmost outpost of the Soviet Empire. To this day Germans are under our protection.

Bob K.| 4.23.11 @ 10:14PM

Last time I checked we were still shipping Pennsylvania Anthracite Coal over to our military bases there. That had the bipartisan support of both Senators.

Bob K.| 4.23.11 @ 10:17PM

But even without a military of their own to speak of Germany is still looking at it's own pension problems down the road.

C Smith| 5.22.11 @ 9:08AM

To believe that "German ascendancy through its economic development is ALL that it wishes" is to forget the lessons of History!!!

weddingdresses| 6.24.11 @ 2:09AM

To believe that "German ascendancy through its economic development is ALL that it wishes" is to forget the lessons of History!!!

Creative Recreation| 8.10.11 @ 9:58PM

is good

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Articles by George H. Wittman

More Articles From At Large

http://spectator.org/archives/2011/04/22/reluctant-reich

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Greg Sowards Battles Queen RINO

Jeffrey Lord | 5.24.12

We Have To Do Something

Ben Stein | 5.24.12

The Problem With High-Mileage Cars

Eric Peters | 5.24.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT