The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Streetcar Line

Presidential Bright Side

By on 2.25.11 @ 6:08AM

This field may not be so bad.

Several weeks ago I listed the most important, surface-level arguments why just about every seriously mentioned, potential Republican presidential candidate has drawbacks that should make conservatives severely nervous. The point was less to trash the candidates than to encourage them and their supporters to figure out the weaknesses against which they need to inoculate themselves — in order that they be better candidates in terms of winnability and ability to serve if elected.

The flip side of that column is that conservatives should also concentrate on each candidate’s most important strengths, so as to figure out how best to weed out the field. In that spirit, it is worth considering the following major points of interest. (Any failure to mention a particular candidate is entirely intentional. Some, like last cycle’s two runners-up, don’t merit mention. Others, such as Paul Ryan, Chris Christie, Jim DeMint, and several others, seem truly disinclined to run.)

Rick Santorum merits forgiveness for his one sin of once supporting Arlen Specter, because his record otherwise is one of the finest of any senator in the past two decades. He was a major player in welfare reform, a major rallying force for conservative judicial nominees, a stalwart for the sanctity of life, and a real leader — extremely knowledgeable — against threats from abroad. Yes, he lost Pennsylvania in a horribly Democratic year, but no other candidate has such an overall record of using political savvy and energy to beat the odds. He was given no chance for the House in 1990, but he won. He was given no chance for the Senate in 1994, but he won. He was given little chance for re-election in 2000, but he won while G.W. Bush lost the state. He also is a man of genuine and fundamental decency.

Mitch Daniels is becoming way, way, way too much of a Johnny-one-note on the budget, but he is so superb on that issue that he merits serious consideration. Meanwhile, his record if not his rhetoric on “social” issues also is terrific. Conservatives have developed a habit of looking too much at verbiage and not enough at proven conduct. Daniels’ conduct, at least until his abdication on right to work, has been A-1.

Tim Pawlenty’s record is solid (if unexciting) almost across the board, except for his formerly promiscuous dalliance with cap-and-trade globaloney. When asked a question he doesn’t want to answer (try asking him about ethanol), he is a truly inartful dodger. But his record on spending, on taxes, and on life is excellent.

Herman Cain is an inspirational American success story. The man is a proven commodity when it comes to turning around businesses, and he is a wonderful speaker. Philosophically, he seems as sound as can be. He’s a serious man, and also seriously likable.

John Bolton is smart as a whip, tougher than five layers of rawhide, and deeply conservative, as far as can be determined, across the board. He’s also one of the most articulate men on the scene today. He effectively gets his points across, and makes their good sense clear.

Sarah Palin has a genius for finding just the right turn of phrase to capture attention and get her message across. Her principles seem to spring from deep within, rather than being mere appendages of convenience. And her instincts are anti-establishmentarian, in an age where the establishment’s ramparts do need to be assaulted. (And yes, we can still use the word “assault” in a political context. And we know Palin won’t hesitate to do so, nor to “target” the word-police for justifiable ridicule.)

Newt Gingrich is a great ideas man. He also is a visionary, usually in the best sense of the word. He’s also tough as nails.

Haley Barbour knows how to build an unparalleled political operation. He’s a fairly reliable conservative, and is as good as they come at beating back the jackpot-justice trial lawyers.

Dark horse Bob Riley of Alabama is the best governor that almost nobody has ever heard of. He looks a little like Reagan, has an infectious optimism, and successfully improved Alabama’s education, economy, and ethics. His ACU rating in six years in Congress was 97 percent. He’s tireless. And he’s a genuinely nice human being.

There. For now, that’s it. Ronald Reagan Reincarnate isn’t running. Maybe Jon Kyl of Arizona should run, although he will be 70 on election day. Former Gov. Frank Keating of Oklahoma is an impressive man who in the past has been mentioned, and maybe should be drafted. But for now, those above are our choices, and they really aren’t bad. It behooves us to find some enthusiasm for at least one of them; our nation can’t afford another Obama term, so we can’t make the perfect the enemy of the good. Nuff said.

About the Author

Quin Hillyer is a senior editor of The American Spectator and a senior fellow at the Center for Individual Freedom. Follow him on Twitter @QuinHillyer.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (194) |

Deborah D | 2.25.11 @ 6:33AM

Thanks, Mr. Hillyer. It's good to focus on the positive. I believe most of these men/women will put the interests of the country above their personal/party interests, and that alone is enough for me to support nearly any one of these with passion. I only hope our country can last until Jan. 2013. I fear the Democrats won't hesitate to drive us over the cliff...they think they'll be the ones to pick up the pieces and reshape a broken nation into a Marxist utopia. Amazing how out of control the left is. They got a taste of absolute power, and like an animal with it's first taste of blood, they are thirsty for more. Frightening times we are living in. At least most of us on the right are awake, let's hope enough in the middle have figured it out. Let's find the right man/woman to return our country to the American people.

Alan Brooks| 2.25.11 @ 8:10PM

The field "isn't so bad"
How enthusiastic: "the GOP candidates for next year aren't so crummy, so lousy."

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:14PM

Well, the other side has 1 candidate, and he's already proven himself to be incompetent, so we're suffering an abundance of riches by comparison.

Alan Brooks| 2.27.11 @ 9:57PM

You are similar to Rush, you want Obama to fail.

Tina B| 2.25.11 @ 6:46AM

Thank you, Deborah and Quin, for a positive way to start the day. I agree with both of you, and will remain hopeful.

Bill Hussein O'Stalin| 2.25.11 @ 6:50AM

Your claim that "Conservatives have developed a habit of looking too much at verbiage and not enough at proven conduct" doesn't hold up to the facts.

There is no proven product when it comes to social issues and alas, that's where the wheels come off the wagon. Not one government program has ever worked nor will it ever. There's no incentive for the programs to work and they never will. Pretending otherwise is a dangerous game.

In the meantime, several of those candidates you mentioned besides Pawlenty are global warming enthusiasts. I hope they don't run. It will get bloody and that's not necessary.

Several others are amnesty advocates. I could live with that if they were perfect otherwise but anyone who supports amnesty has underlying themes of supporting welfare and free government health care since all illegal aliens receive it. That's not good because it looks phony and it is phony.

That leaves Palin and Cain.

That would be momentous.

M Glasgow| 2.25.11 @ 7:28AM

Herman Cain for President. John Bolton would be fine by me if it looks like Obama is unelectable- but if it's really going to be close I'm not sure he will pass the likability test of the independent moron crowd. I don't have the time to get into the reasons right now, but I can't support Romney, Daniels, Huckleberry, Palin, Pawlenty, or Gingrich. I will never forgive Santorum.

Lullabys, Legends and Lies| 2.25.11 @ 8:11AM

But what if it comes down to Santorum vs. Obama in 2012, are you going to be able to call a truce, or will you vote for four more years of this Leftist crap? Santorum can't be "that" bad!! Just close your eyes, hold your breath, and pull the lever on the right, easy, done!!

Mike McLaren| 2.25.11 @ 11:42AM

" I will never forgive Santorum". M Glasgow, would you tell me what it's like to be perfect. Since you can never forgive, you must never need forgiveness yourself.

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:18PM

Fine. Then we get 4 more years of Obama, another leftist SCOTUS judge, and progressive disaster for another fifty years. Happy now?

ALL conservatives must get out and support the Republican nominee. Period. No ifs, ands or buts. Obama must be defeated or we are doomed. Get a grip on reality here, hold your nose in 2012 if you must, and VOTE.

Fisher Ames| 2.25.11 @ 7:31AM

Although Mitch Daniels is my first choice—he would flay Obama in a face-to-face debate—I agree entirely that Bob Riley is the “best governor that almost nobody has ever heard of.” (He also has none of the baggage that Haley Barbour lugs around.) Is there, however, any indication that he would run?

Quin| 2.25.11 @ 9:32AM

According to an article in Politico, Riley hasn't ruled it out, but has done absolutely nothing to prepare for it either. He wanted about six weeks to decompress after his term as governor ran out on Jan. 17, I think.

Occam's Tool| 2.25.11 @ 6:44PM

Bolton/West, or West/Bolton. Either would be the best Republican ticket in over 100 years. (Yes, I think it could be better than the Gipper.)

Occam's Tool| 2.25.11 @ 7:11PM

And Ken, I adore Sarah---but Bolton is smarter and has more experience. He's scary bright.

Ryan| 2.25.11 @ 8:08AM

I know that there is a bias against Huckabee at the AS - but the criticisms of him are also often overstated. He ran a VERY effective grassroots underdog campaign, and exposed Romney's weaknesses.

Alert1201| 2.25.11 @ 9:57AM

Not a big fan of Huck but one thing he does have going for him is that he is a very likable guy. I heard him on a talk show one time and the most rabid leftists as well as conservatives who where not by no means fans called. I expected a knock-down-drag-out fight but with a matter of minutes Huck took control of the situation it they sounded like a couple of neighbors sharing a few beer over their fence.

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:20PM

I'd take Huck over Romney ANY day. But I'll vote for Romney if I have to.

Catman| 2.25.11 @ 8:10AM

My Money is on Sarah Palin all the Way to the White House... Get use to it!!!
the Cuda in 2012

VBMax| 2.25.11 @ 9:12AM

As much as I love Sarah, it's hard to get over the fact that she campaigned for McCain in the last election cycle.

Ken in Tyler| 2.25.11 @ 9:24AM

I despise McCain politically but try to imagine this: If Governor Palin had declined his invitation to join his campaign, would she have ever made it to the national stage? I doubt it.

VBMax| 2.25.11 @ 11:01AM

Ken, I'm talking about McCain's campaign for Senator in last November's election.

Bob Grant| 2.25.11 @ 4:09PM

Ken,

An excellent question, one that no one really wants to consider.

Her political ascendancy is eerily similar to Obama's in that a series of serendipitous events happen to fall into her lap, thus propelling her to national prominence.

If she's such a beacon of conservative principles and values, why haven't we heard of her before John McCain desperately chose her as VP?

I don't have an issue with what she stands for....I have issue with her motivations.

An opportunist????

Temperament, MOTIVES, leadership abilities.

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:23PM

I didn't have issues with her motivation until recently. I feel as if she is toying with us, being coy and flirting with running. She needs to announce that she is or is not running. She wants to prove she's a leader? Then she needs to lead. I feel like she's playing cat's paw with us, and I don't like it. I also think her quitting as governor makes her UNELECTABLE, but that's an argument for another day.

Anthony| 2.25.11 @ 11:15AM

It's time to wake the hell up folks. 2012 is THE ELECTION of our lives, if this republic is to endure. If we lose in 2012, kiss America goodbye. We need a solid conservative in 2012, someone who lives and breathes conservativism each and every day of their daily lives, not just mouths the words during elections.
I'm a big Palin fan because she is the real deal. She lives and breathes conservative values, all of them, not just some of them!! Her instincts are uncanny and she is fearless. She's taken on Obozo and the left and has won each time!!!
I've had it with all the simpering and sniping about her and her chances, mostly echoed from the leftist whores in the LSM who despise her because they know what a threat she is to the left.
I watch Obozo get a pass each and every day; a man with a resume as thin as a razor and a past as murky as swamp water, who is destroying America by the day, yet he is still seen as presidential, even amoung some on the right, while Palin gets a "well, I'm not so sure".
Yeah she supported McCain, it's called loyality. To do otherwise would have really brought the LSM down on her neck. She is not the reason McLame beat Hayworth.
And speaking of McLame, and Graham, somebody wake them up and tell them Obozo is not tacking to the center, especially after his DOMA pronouncement. God what dangerous idiots these RINOs are!!!
This said, I'll support any real conservative in 2012, even if not Palin. But get real folks, there's no margin for error on this one.

irish19| 2.25.11 @ 1:31PM

I don't entirely agree that we absolutely need to elect a conservative President. I want to, but I'm not sure we can-especially since we seem committed to eating our own for real or imagined lack of adherence to the True Religion.
What we absolutely must do is take the Senate. We must increase our lead in the House.
We must then not allow any non-conservative, non-constitutionally justified legislation to see the light of day going forward. Pass conservative legislation and dare zero to veto it (should he be re-elected). Dare him to try ruling by executive decree. That will be the wake-up call to the American people that will send the proggies back under their rocks and slimy logs.

Deborah D | 2.25.11 @ 5:30PM

Sorry, Irish. If you don't think we need a conservative president, then you aren't paying attention or you aren't a conservative. Without a conservative president, our country won't survive. Obama has shown that he will "rule" (and he believes that he's a ruler not a president) by regulation. That's not the American way. He's on to banana republic/Hugo Chavez's ways of thinking. Face it, or we know who you are.

tatosian| 2.25.11 @ 7:42PM

What we need are legislators willing to corrupt, diminish and destroy every unconstitutional bill or amendment within their reach. By any means necessary. Including putting what used to be known as the secret hold (applicable in the Senate committees) but is now known as the "notify the congressional record within 24 hours" hold on the offending legislation.

A not Obama presidency in 2012 is all well and good but a majority in the Senate is well within reach. An emboldened Republican (mutually exclusive terms I know) majority can turn Obama into an immediate lame duck.

Defund, investigate and see that your own legislation gets pushed through.

And when Obama starts pondering his presidential "legacy", as all these fops do, well the majorities can point out just how horrific a legacy that will be.

I'm an American. I'm not a conservative. I won't ignore reality. I won't keep drawing water from the same poisoned Republican well wondering why my condition is getting worse.

A committed and aggressive anti Obama/liberal majority in both houses can make him accountable for his every move. That's what's needed.

Use the truth against him in the presidential run. The truth will set us free, yes?

big bob| 2.25.11 @ 1:52PM

Palin sees things very differently than do most Americans. That is, she can see more clearly and is very secure in what she sees. She can see the "chess game" several more steps ahead than most. Campaigning for McCain was the cost of doing business. Her enthusiasm was much less than usual and she did not knock herself out as she has for other candidates. She knows where she came from, and now that she has paid her dues, I don't think we will see any more such "payback". In my book, she IS the one. She's got it all. If King Barry has been the first black president, then we should counter with a genuine winner by electing Sarah as the first female president. I for one would LOVE to see the debates between those two. And for the record, Barry could even keep his teleprompter!!! She would still kick his....you know what.

Anthony| 2.25.11 @ 2:12PM

big bob, I like the chess game analogy, very astute, very accurate, as is the rest of your post.
irish 19, ok as far as it goes, but you realize that if Obozo is re-elected, even under your senerio, he will bypass congress completely, with his tzars in complete control, outside congressional perview.
Also, you cannot count on a R senate doing the right thing, remember the " Gang of 14". McCain, Graham, Lugar, and a few others would take the opportunity to grandstand once again and place themselves in the middle of things, and of course, reach out to Obozo because they believe in bipartisanship.
Nope, we need a conservative as president to quash all this crap from the top down.

Phil Suckalewski| 2.25.11 @ 9:32PM

Very astute observation.

The folks in Georgia aren't very happy with either of their RINO senators right now.

Bob Grant| 2.25.11 @ 4:18PM

Guess what,

Even if she did "kick his ass" in a debate it, would have absolutely NO effect on the electorate.

Because of her actions the past 2 years (examples I've posted ad museum), she has ABSOLUTELY sabotaged her chance of gaining the necessary swing votes (libertarian, independent, blue dog democrats, disgruntled obama voters) to beat Obama .

This is of HER doing...not the press, liberals, or RINO'S.

Temperament, motives, leadership abilities.

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:30PM

Bingo. How many times do people have to point out she has ZERO credibility with independent voters? We need the indies to defeat Obama, and Sarah has not gained any indie support.

Also, can we PLEASE stop painting Sarah Palin as the begin-all and end-all of conservatism? She is not. And she is not the only qualified conservative we have. Honestly, sometimes, I feel as if the Palin siupporters are just as obsessed as the swooning fan-girls of Obama. I like Sarah, but she's not the most qualified candidate, nor the only conservative.

Bob K.| 2.25.11 @ 10:26AM

I don't think Palin can win. It seems to me that too many women dislike her. Even conservative professional women like my wife and her colleagues. I don't know why. I think it is something visceral and it has not been explored in depth.

mike daniels| 2.25.11 @ 11:16AM

Palin is absolutely not electable and brings nothing to the table. She sounds like a hick school teacher and has a voice as irritating as Hillary's.
Face fact people- the electorate is swayed by speaking ability. We are a movie star culture. McCain, Dole, Bush were horrible speakers. Obama and Clinton were very very good. Palin comes off like a simplistic twit. Besides- what does she really bring to the table?? Get over it.

loulou| 2.25.11 @ 12:34PM

"Palin comes off like a simplistic twit. "
Does she? I don't think so.
She can speak without a teleprompter unlike Barry. Obama is not a good speaker. If you want to talk about voices, his has a singsong quality plus he has a speech impediment--a whistle.

Cult members think Obama's teleprompter is a good speaker.

big bob| 2.25.11 @ 1:57PM

Bravo.

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:33PM

Her voice is annoying. Sorry. It is. So is Obama's. There are better candidates who don't have the "quitter" moniker attached to them. As unfair as it is, she has that moniker. Indies ARE NOT supporting her. Now, she might change their minds in primary season. If so, I'll eat my words. Until then, no. We have better, more electable candidates than Palin.

Bob Grant| 2.25.11 @ 4:20PM

Ditto,

I'm getting this vibe from female conservatives among my group as well.

It is a "female thing". One which I cannot explain but know it's out there.

Wayne | 2.26.11 @ 1:12PM

I think women who have had abortions do not like Palin.

Troy Fla| 2.27.11 @ 9:20PM

Wayne that's exactly right. They like her but worry about the abortion issue. Whether they've had one or not, and many have, they don't want to deny another woman her right. I agree with them.

martin j smith| 2.25.11 @ 8:12AM

From my perspective as an Independent voter who cannot stand as opposed to Socialist Left Marxism the first step is to pick a potential WINNER !!!!!!!!!!!!
Among other things:
No more in articulates no more cowards no more spinelsss PC types.
Some who can stand up to Obama and the Left proudly--singing the praises of our country and being willing to take the opposition on and calling out those who deserve it.
Gloves off, no Mr Nice Guy but done with civility --whatever that means.

Ken in Tyler| 2.25.11 @ 9:33AM

With respect Mr Smith, we have been doing as you suggest and putting the cart before the horse for far too long. Our priority should not be to, "pick a winner". Rather our focus should be on putting forward a candidate who will stand on the principles of Constitutional government and let the chips fall where they may. Imo, such a candidate would be a winner and much less susceptible to Constitutional compromise when the chips are down. I know of only two persons who would pass this test: Bolden and Palin. I would work my backside off in support of a campaign by either.

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:36PM

I think all the candidates on the above list are very supportive of our Constitution. Electability is important, like it or not.

Joe 53| 2.26.11 @ 5:48AM

A very accurate description of Mrs. Palin. She is a fighter and winner. When referring to the leftist propagandist media recently, she said: "...they will not shut me up..." She speaks truth to power. Thank God she is a conservative

USSAlabama| 2.25.11 @ 8:13AM

Quin, we enjoyed you last week - please come back soon.

Quin| 2.25.11 @ 9:33AM

Thanks so much. It was great to be back in Alabama!

Bob Grant| 2.25.11 @ 4:22PM

I like your mention of Riley. Any explanations as to why he is rarely mentioned as a potential candidate?

Occam's Tool| 2.25.11 @ 7:09PM

Small State with only one mid-sized media market (B'ham). Bull Connor stereotypes still prevail. That may be why no significant coverage of Riley. Also, the kudzu factor. The only time the MSM ever focused on Alabama was after hurricanes, to note the opinions of the dentally challenged.

I love 'Bama. It gets a bad rap.

Bob Grant| 2.26.11 @ 10:00AM

Using the Bull Connor tag, I believe, would be TOO predictable and can be used against whomever attempts to make the connection.

We all know how Obama will campaign in '12 so we will have the luxury of "gaming" out it's procession.

The fallacy that Obama ran a flawless campain in '08 is absurd. A compliant press willing to carry the water AND go above and beyond protecting his backside will make the most sophomoric campaign look "genius".

"hope and change" "we are the one's we are waiting for"? ....sophomoric at best. Stuff for simpletons.

No excuse for republicans to be flat footed in '12. They have ALL the weapons at their disposal to put an end to this presidency, IF they stick to their convictions and select someone who is electable. Yes, you can both.

tatosian| 2.25.11 @ 9:03AM

I expect we'll be hearing the "can't make the perfect the enemy of the good" and "purity is not a winner in politics" arguments a lot more in the coming months.

Both statements are true enough, i suppose, but more often than not they're used to bludgeon those of us who've grown sick and tired of the same garbage in garbage out election results.

This piece never mentions illegal immigration, border security or the growing influence of Islam. Three issues the American people have expressed concern about.

Am I to ignore those issues, put them aside for the greater good like so many of us did during the McCain debacle? Where'd that get us?

We should be focused on getting a Senate majority and increasing the majority in the House.

Run Bolton and Mcclintock at Obama and Biden.

Let Bolton tear Obama apart in the debates. Let McClintock do the same. And if Obama wins, let the Republican majorities finish him off.

I'm not interested in purity. I want somebody who'll do the right thing for us and this country. I want a fighter who'll stand up to this leftist, liberal thuggery and win.

I want my country back. no more no less.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ldx8gZDwZWs

USSAlabama| 2.25.11 @ 9:24AM

The more I look them over and analyze strengths, weaknesses and what the country is in need of, the more I conclude a Bolton/Christie ticket would be a winner in more ways than just the election.

Christie would get the benefit of Bolton's foreign policy experience and it may guarantee at least 3 terms of Conservative governance.

Riley was definitely a 'rule of law' man as governor which is in his favor. There may be some questions about money on the horizon however.

USSAlabama| 2.25.11 @ 10:46AM

Tuscaloosa Times has removed the story about the money transfer, maybe erroneous.

Occam's Tool| 2.26.11 @ 5:14PM

Christie is the opposite of Bolton of Foreign Policy. He's an Islamist, apparently.

Why not West?

irish19| 2.25.11 @ 1:35PM

I really like Bolton. He puts America first. If not as President, I would make him SecState and let him spray his brand of Round-Up on the metrosexual girlie men who seem to want to put our country's interests way below those of other countries'.

David| 2.25.11 @ 9:11AM

I like Santorum and Barbour. Never heard of Riley, but will certainly check on him because of the good things said about him here. Yes, Santorum really p'd me when he supported Specter. But as he explains it, it had to do with the next Sup Ct vacancy and Specter had promised to support bush's choice, whereas if a dem won the general election, he surely would have voted against Bush's pick. Other than that, Santorum is likeable, is knowledgeable on all the issues including economic, social, national security, and foreign policy, and he can and WILL defend conservative principles better than almost anyone, AND he has a great conservative voting record.

Jindal may be good pick for the ticket, and I wouldn't mind seeing Fred Thompson take another shot. I know he didn't have the fire in the belly the last time, but I think that had a lot to do with the fact that his supporters DID NOT show him any fire in the belly in terms of financial support. He was my choice and I didn't send him a dime. Also, he was running against his good friend McCain. There is a lot to be said for loyalty, but that is one reason I do question his judgment and conservative bona fides. I think he could destroy Bam Bam in the debates. If Bam Bam even participates in any debates this time around. Would that surprise anyone? Not me. Not the way he accomplishes what he wants through back door channels such as with czars and executive orders and abuses of his admin's power.

I also like Chris Smith, NJ congressman. Great conservative.

No to Gingrich, Romney, Palin, and Huckabee. All are great for the party in different ways, but I don't want to see any of them running for prez or as VP.

Riley, the case against Huckabee is not overstated. It has not been broadcast enough, in fact. The guy released from prison far more felons in his ten years as gov of Arkansas than were released from Texas, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Missouri combined during the same 10 year period. Think about it, just how many more people live in Texas alone than in Arkansas. Too many people on the repub party have said the Huck "destroyed the Republican party in Arkansas". And he is big on welfare, government spending, sympathetic to illegals, etc. Add to that he is devious. Witness his denial that his Christmas add several years ago had a cross intentionally put into the ad. Nothing at all wrong with that - I loved it. But he denied it and claimed it was all an accident - it was just the lighting reflecting off the bookcase - pleeeeease. Then his backhanded swipes at Romney were very unfair. Not the legitimate criticisms, but the ones where he claimed not to question Romney's faith, then turned around and said things like "don't Mormons believe that Jesus and satan were brothers?" The man can't be trusted, and what is all the more troubling about that is that he was a Baptist preacher for years. Conservative Christians should not be fooled by Huckabee again.

Amanda| 2.25.11 @ 9:18AM

No appeasers need apply. It will take someone with a spine of steel to undo the wrongs this country has experienced during the Obama years.
And with at least half the democratic party taken over by the whacked out extreme liberal socialist/marxist/communist fringe, it will be
some fight. Take a look at what is happening in Wisconsin and maginify it by 1000.

Right now Palin is the only one for me; however, I will take a look at Bob Riley. The others - no.

USSAlabama| 2.25.11 @ 9:27AM

Hear! Hear! on the appeasers!

irish19| 2.25.11 @ 1:37PM

Agreed!. Another reason to support Bolton.

Occam's Tool| 2.25.11 @ 6:46PM

But the cost of Bolton---the cost to reinforce the Oval Office floor to support the two huge brass ones....;)---as opposed to light in the head Obama and his former ballerina Chief of Staff.

USSAlabama| 2.25.11 @ 9:41PM

Occam, you're hilarious!

Occam's Tool| 2.27.11 @ 4:32PM

Thank you so much. Roll Tide!

Catman| 2.25.11 @ 1:36PM

please listen to this this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....r_embedded

JKS| 2.25.11 @ 1:58PM

I implore you to take a look at Herman Cain as well. He can do something the rest of these candidates can't while doing everything they all can. The one thing none of these other candidates can do is take away the race card (this is an assumption on my part because I haven't researched all the candidate, but I think I'm correct).

I love Sarah Palin, but I don't think she's electable - she is too big a lightening rod and can do more outside the presidential race to further conservatism. However, if she ends up with the nomination, I will most certainly vote for her.

Having said that, I will not vote for anyone who has previously either run for president or been on a presidential ticket in the primary election. If we all do this we can assure new blood in the GOP. I haven't made up my mind as to whether or not I will vote if a rino is nominated. I hope I don't have to make that choice.

Bob Grant| 2.25.11 @ 4:33PM

Regarding Cain, too little too late. He should have at least "strongly hinted" he was running at least a year ago.

You best formula for beating Obama is choosing the republican governor who emerges from from current budget battles. What better way to vet our candidate than watching him/her in real time battling it out with the federal government?

This is where Sarah Palin completely dropped the ball. Instead of being on of many republican governors battling budget/states rights issues with the federal government, she decided to go another direction and is now rightfully seen as a lightweight who opines on her facebook/twitter page like millions of others in the peanut gallery.

An epic fail on her part.

Temperament, Motives, Judgment, Leadership abilities.

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:39PM

Then say hello to four more years of Obama and another lib SCOTUS judge. You MUST support the Republican candidate, whoever that person is. We all must, or we are doomed. Please, face reality.

martin j smith| 2.25.11 @ 10:03AM

A winner eliminates all RINOS, Centrists and "moderates. They are WINOS-Winning is no option.

martin j smith| 2.25.11 @ 10:10AM

Let me add for Ken in Tyler--No we have been picking losers. A loser is a candidate such as McCain who refused to act as if he is running for President. I thought he was running away from office myself. As for GWB--he was a bad choice but better than the alternative--In articulates are out. Those not ready to defend their own polcies are out. Those not willing to defend their own supporters are out. I hope I have made myself clear.

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:41PM

Bush gave us two great SCOTUS justices. Whatever his other faults, those choices are saving us from disaster right now.

Michael L. Hauschild| 2.25.11 @ 10:22AM

Vast parts of the world we are collapsing (see Bolton), oil the fuel that runs the rest is suffering production cuts here (see Palin), many of the “list” represents unrepentant losers or incompetent losers, some Governors on your list will not even carry their own purple states in a matchup with Obama.
It is Palin or Bolton in any order on my 2012 ticket.

JimH| 2.25.11 @ 10:22AM

As being of somewhat ample proportions myself, I can say of Gov. Christie 'Run fat boy run'.

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:42PM

He isn't running. He has said so numerous times, very emphatically. I believe him, and if he changes his mind, I will not like that he lied to me. And he is NOT a true conservative. he's great for NJ. Not for POTUS.

Maxwell| 2.25.11 @ 10:29AM

I have to add my two cents about Chris Christie. He is not opposed to aministy, we have cap and tax here in Jersey, is for 'reasonable gun control', and he did not join those that filed against Obamacare. While I voted for CC in the general election, in the primary I voted for Lonegan.

I really like John Bolton and will follow Bob Riley.

Mr. Hillyer, thank you for doing a follow up to your first article. I appreciate it.

Doctor Right| 2.25.11 @ 2:31PM

I supported Lonegan in the primary, too.

Christie has surprised me, I'll admit that, but he's not a rock-ribbed Conservative. He has RINO instincts hiding beneath his tough exterior.

Petronius| 2.25.11 @ 10:34AM

Bolton is the only one of this lot who understands power.

Doctor Right| 2.25.11 @ 2:32PM

It's way too early, but I like the idea of a Bolton candidacy.

His comment about the U.N. was a thing of beauty!

Occam's Tool| 2.25.11 @ 6:53PM

Bolton is what PG Wodehouse's heroines would refer to as "a veritable Dream Rabbit," yes, indeed.

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:44PM

Europe would crap their pants if Bolton become president. What a lovely thought. I like it.

Occam's Tool| 2.26.11 @ 5:16PM

Indeed, especially the French crapping their pants; of course, how can you tell.

Fisher Ames| 2.25.11 @ 10:40AM

For those who question Mitch Daniels’s foreign policy credentials, you might want to listen to the November 2009 address in which Daniels accepted the Anti-Defamation League’s Man of Achievement award.

Dave | 2.25.11 @ 10:58AM

I admit to not being completely up to speed on the various positions and pronouncements of each of these that Quin listed and analyzed. Having said that, and from my current point of reference -- the more I hear Herman Cain speak, the more I like what the man says, has accomplished and proposes to do should he find a way to 16oo Penn Blvd. I also thoroughly embrace the thinking from John Bolton. There are others, but those two came first to mind.

My concern ...

At this point on the calendar, I'm not seeing anyone among this current group that may be electable to the masses. Keep in mind that, unlike Obama ... we need to elect a president who'll act in the interest of ALL Americans, not just a radical base of gay, gray hippies and those howling mobs of unionized tax suckers who back, "protest for" and supports all things redistributionist, leftist and semi-socialist in their agendas.

Certainly it's still very early, and someone from the conservative side may yet emerge as viable and ... electable. I suspect a lot of what happens over the next 3 years will depend on what the newly elected House Republicans and (hopefully) a new majority of conservative senators after the '12 elections can accomplish. If their list of negoiated results with Obama, Reid and Pelosi et al end up looking like past pieces of Republican legislation; supplying us with slightly adjusted versions of the same old "go-along-git-along" grab the ankles concessions - then I fear when Obama's first term ends and he gears up for "Term Two/The Final Solution" - the CBS Chipmunk and her mainstream minions from the Nightly News will find yet another way to push their boy across the goal line.

But, it's still very early. We'll just have to see how it goes ... til then.

timmah| 2.25.11 @ 11:36AM

In a perfect world Bolton and...Palin??? They could learn a lot from each other, seriously. However, and I hate to say this, we have to talk about who the average apolitical American will really like (yes, I said it) in spite of the inevitable demonization by the Peoples Ministry of Disinformation (ABC, NBC, CBS, NYTimes, WaPost, etc.,). My wife (a pretty typical American) hates! Palin. The MSM has an impact, unfortunately.

Oldefarte| 2.25.11 @ 11:40AM

Typically great article, Quin! The important point is that there are numerous potential Republican candidates that are ALL SUPERIOR TO THE CURRENT OFFICE HOLDER. Everyone should simply sit back and analyze all's strengths and weaknesses, since there's plenty of time until November 2012. The essential point is that we should select an aggressive, experienced winner; who will have the political guts to take on the current president tooth and nail, in non-politically correct fashion [call a spade, a spade]. Personally, I'm preferential to Barbour for personal reasons, but will support and vote for any Republican selected that possesses the above qualities. IMO, November of 2012 is just too damned far into the future, and I only wish that it would be tomorrow [since I'm sick and tired of the political EXCREMENT that has occurred for not only the last two years, but for the majority of my adult lifetime as well]!!!!!!!!!

Ken (Old Texican)| 2.25.11 @ 12:00PM

Ah...folks we are only a year away from the primaries. Get your STUFF stacked.

Bolton/Palin ...Palin/Bolton.
The best ticket I can see...either way.

One thing about it...Sarah has 40% of the electorate locked up in her purse....a pretty good head start.....Quin.

JKS| 2.25.11 @ 2:01PM

What about a Bolton/Cain...Cain/Bolton ticket? I understand from reading your posts here for over a year that Sarah is your choice, but what if she doesn't run?

Ken (Old Texican)| 2.25.11 @ 4:44PM

JKS
Hi!
Heck, I will be voting for DAFFY DUCK if necessary to beat Obama and crew.

If Sarah, chooses not to run...or if she is primaried out...She will still force the men to grow some .....brass bells? (smile)
If we get a decent candidate...Sarah can put him over the top by cheering for him.

You know, once in a generation we get a truly splendid American leader emerge ...Truman....Goldwater....Reagan.....(yeah even JFK)... Even FDR...and Dubyah.

They all had their faults and blind spots, just like every one of us...human beings all.

Sarah is now, as is Bolton, and a couple of others could get there.
Bottom line...............
I'll go for DAFFY DUCK!

Occam's Tool| 2.25.11 @ 6:54PM

What about Bolton/West? I REALLY like Col. West.

David T| 2.25.11 @ 12:02PM

Face it, folks. As much as I hate to say it, not one of these pretenders stands a chance against Obama.

Oldefarte| 2.25.11 @ 12:31PM

HUH????????????????????

big bob| 2.25.11 @ 2:01PM

In what, ppm? (promises per minute). There is only one pretender in the class of Obama. He has nothing that is real, except his love of vacations, spending our money. In fact, as a true narcissist, he doesnt even know which is pretending and which is real. Now that is "real" pretender.

PhilTheCapitalistPig| 2.25.11 @ 2:38PM

Only a brainwashed fool could vote for Obama at this point. Commies, academic types and union members are his voting block this time around.

Anyone in the real world couldn't possibly be so self-destructive as to vote for him, without being completely ignorant.

PhilTheCapitalistPig| 2.25.11 @ 2:43PM

Sorry for repeating myself, I could have just stopped with "commies"... That's obama's voting block. And ignorant people of course.

YeloStalyn| 2.25.11 @ 3:09PM

Hence why a factual and outspoken conservative will have a hard time vs. the zero. I hate to say it, but there are far too many lazy and inept people who vote who will easily be turned off of a "war monger" like Bolton, a "Bible-thumper" like Huck, a "divisive personality" like Palin, or any other only-psuedo accurate moniker placed on our candidate unfairly. All Obama has to do is not screw up while the rif-raf majority of the nation are swayed not TOO the zero, but AWAY from the conservative. The candidate will be immediatly tied to "extreme" views and that will scare away people quickly... no matter how untruthful the examples or arguments are. During the campaign season, Obama doesn't have to do anything but look pretty (which he's great at). People have a short memory and will probably fall for "Hope and Change" again... even though it will be the same thing they just had.

As for me, though... Bolton, Cain, Col. West (what a bad ass!!!)... I'd be all over those guys. Palin I like and would support, but she's a poor choice. Too many conservatives (who are not politically "fired up" but who hold those values) are turned off by her. My mother and mother-in-law are prime examples. And as sexist as it may sound... women live in a dog eat dog world. My wife would agree. The Huck is weak. Peroid. It's one thing to be a "compasionate conservative" but that requires you to be conservative FIRST and temper it with compassion... not be a bleeding heart who just rejects the label of liberal. The others do not have the "pezaz" or "shock" of Bolton and/or Cain. Bolton would shock people by being so matter-of-fact... and right. Cain is a pimp of the highest order (in the modern slang way of it being a good thing). He is a smoothe operator. I really... REALLY... like Cain. And SO very smart. Either order... Cain/Bolton or Bolton/Cain and I would be in heaven. True, there are some social issues that Bolton isn't the farthest on the right on (he as much said so about abortion) but he is certainly not liberal on any of them that I know of. Besides, I would wager he is conservative enough to know it doesn't matter how liberal an individual is on a issue... so long as they govern by allowing the Constitution and idea of limited government pervail all views will have room for a voice... just in their right places (ie, locally, not federally).

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:49PM

I would totally support Cain in every respect.

Wayne | 2.26.11 @ 1:36PM

No more HOPE and CHANGE. He will get a pass from the lame stream media, but we saw that they could not influence the elections in October. It will be harder to use ACORN to fix elections and without the fix Obama will lose. What we don't need however is a squishy candidate who makes Obama look presidential. We already saw a Mc Cain in that role.

somnolence| 2.25.11 @ 12:04PM

I don't see this irritating manner of speaking from Palin that someone pointed out. Instead I see a relentless, impassioned speaker, one who can easily rouse a crowd instead of putting them to sleep. She is also the candidate who is least likely to compromise her principles within the senseless format of "just to get along." And as far as the regionalism in her speech, give me a break. Barbour, Daniels, Santorum especially have that regionalistic brogue. Sarah draws the crowds, the money, and has the mental and physical endurance to go the distance. Someone's interpretation of shrillness is certainly different than mine. I do know one thing: it had all better be cohesive by the middle of 2013, and I do mean in the sense of unity and purpose to beat Obama.

somnolence| 2.25.11 @ 12:05PM

Oops. I certainly mean 2012, not 2013.

irish19| 2.25.11 @ 1:42PM

Preview is your friend.

Mark Shepler| 2.25.11 @ 12:08PM

There is another larger, supremely positive point in Mr. Hillyer's scouting report: All the energy, initiative, new ideas, fresh faces, vigorous debate and emerging talent is on our side. Conservatism is once again in growth mode. In the scheme of things, it seems virtually last week no one had heard of Paul Ryan, Allen West, Michele Bachmann and a whole host of others. Who was Chris Christie or Sarah Palin before the other day? Sure, we have some older warhorses like Newt but his day has passed. He had his shot and blew it and he'll know it soon enough and should have the grace to play the elder statesman of conservatism a true wisdom calls for.

Contrast that to Liberalism. Where are its counterparts, those new young Turks of Liberalism? The fresh faces and new blood with fresh zeal for timeless truths and principles? About the only one I can even think of is Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and she is not new and hasn't had a new thought in her head ever because Liberalism is not founded on timeless truths but passing fancy. I know, I lived in her district for 10 years and met her when she was a wet-behind-the-ears state legislator.

No, we are as blessed in our opponents as we are in our rising stars. There is no better proof of the creaking failures of modern liberalism than the visuals presented by its "leaders". Aging, radical graybeards still waving their Little Red Books and the flags of our enemies. Those pinched, cantankerous and shriviled souls who never miss a chance to hate their countrymen so that they might feel superior another day. Their day is passing too and their manic and desperate attempts to cling to it reveals them more clearly each day as the true reactionaries they are, all of their self-flattering labels notwithstanding.

There is no better evidence of conservatism's ascendency than in the respective class photos and in that we should take solace, unity, pride and strength.

Quin| 2.25.11 @ 3:15PM

I like Mr. Shepler's attitude!!! :)

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:50PM

I totally agree. We have the Young Turks. They have the whipped puppies.

Wayne | 2.26.11 @ 1:33PM

I am with you.

George S| 2.25.11 @ 12:33PM

We can line up candidates like baseball cards, check the stats and debate pros and cons all day long. But the winner in 2012 is going to be the one who has the ability to raise close to a billion dollars, has the discipline to ignore the media, runs a tight well-oiled campaign, has the ability to attract motivated volunteers, and has that one guru that can shake out voters from any crevice and get them to the polls.

Right now, the only one who has that ability is... Obama.

irish19| 2.25.11 @ 1:45PM

Score one for Palin, then. She can raise funds like nobody's business, can certainly attract motivated volunteers (ever hear of the Tea Party?), and will catch the slings and arrows of the LSM & throw them right back-after putting a fresh and proper edge on the arrows her very own self.
I like Bolton, but his fundraising ability would be a definite question mark.

idalily| 2.25.11 @ 11:53PM

And if another candidate wins the primary, will she campaign for that person and raise funds for that person? I have doubts she would. I am starting to see her as an opportunist, more than anything else. I hope I am wrong.

Delta Zelda| 2.25.11 @ 12:44PM

I live in the Pensacola, FL, area, and have a ringside seat to AL, a business-friendly state. Bob Riley spearheaded bringing varying big business to AL. He upheld state law in the face of the Attorney General, who broke it. He was hands-on with the BP disaster, looking out for his state and its people. (Most of us in Santa Rosa county wished Riley were our governer instead of the political prostitute Charlie Chuckles.) Conservaties throughout the country need to get to know him. I don't know whether we could reasonably expect hhim to be elected as Pres in 2012.

I do know this much: Romney is out because of Romneycare; Mitch Daniels and McCain are RINOs; Palin is very good at vetting candidates and recommending them for state and federal offices; Mike Huckabee is out--too many pardons; I can overlook Santorum's support of Spector when I see why he did it. Conservaties MUST choose a candidate with a steel backbone. Playing nice with the Dems is not why we sent Repubs to state houses, governorships, and the Congress. We sent them to cut spending (start with foreign aid, CPB, turtle over/under passes, etc). Medicare recipients should be means-tested. Bailouts must be stopped. Wealth redistribution must be abolished. Bill Gates earned his money, and there is no reason I think I have a claim on one dollar of it.

The morning after Jimmy Carter was elected, I said I would never underestimate the stupidity of the American voter. I was not surprised when the useful idiots elected the current Incompetent in Chief.

Conservatives, get your body in good shape, including your dialing finger, wear good walking shoes, and develop strong mouth muscles. It's time to elect a different tenant at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

Occam's Tool| 2.25.11 @ 6:56PM

Yes, I have heard much that is good with Bob Riley. Alabama is a GREAT, underrated state. Great food, great people.

Clint| 2.25.11 @ 12:47PM

"WASHINGTON — - U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint’s keynote speech next month to an Iowa forum for Republican presidential candidates has fueled hopes among some evangelicals and conservative activists that the South Carolinian will launch a White House run.

DeMint, overwhelmingly elected to his second Senate term in November, will deliver the evening banquet address to a dozen GOP presidential hopefuls — and hundreds of party stalwarts — March 26 at a Des Moines hotel, scarcely 10 months before Iowa’s leadoff presidential House caucuses.

In the audience will be Steve Scheffler, a Republican National Committee member from Iowa and an influential evangelical in the Midwestern state.

Scheffler would like to see DeMint, dubbed “the Tea Party senator” for his unyielding conservatism and fervent opposition to President Barack Obama, throw his hat into the Oval Office ring.

“He’s very highly regarded among activists,” Scheffler said. “His running would add a lot to the dialogue, not only in Iowa but across the country. I think he’s a voice that needs to be heard.”

Scheffler is among a growing number of Republican national committeemen who inquire about DeMint’s intentions in talks with Glenn McCall, a Rock Hill retired bank executive who represents South Carolina on the Republican National Committee.

“He’s extremely well liked by movement conservatives and Tea Party-types across the United States,” McCall said. “He definitely would have a lot of support if he ran. I hope that he’s seriously considering it and doesn’t rule it out entirely.”

A DeMint presidential bid could be jumpstarted by South Carolina’s early Republican primary — the exact date hasn’t been set — on the heels of voting in Iowa and New Hampshire."

Jim DeMint is Our Tea Party Kingmaker & Our Senate Point Man.

Obama Is Beatable.

The Tea Party Rebellion Escalates.

Rise Up.

Doctor Right| 2.25.11 @ 12:49PM

I see more than a few posts expressing the feelings of joy that will flow watching Obama get ripped-apart in a debate by [insert name of candidate] in 2012.

I hate to be a wet-blanket, but this is a pipe-dream; it ain't never gonna' happen. And it has nothing to do with Obama and his inherent weaknesses; it's about the debate format and location, as well as the complicity of the media.

What's called a "debate" these days is a sick joke that probably makes Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas turn-over in their graves. These modern "debates" are nothing more than theater, with the idiotic "Town Hall" meeting/debate as the best example. They're also meticulously managed from start to finish. There's very little spontaneity; for Pete's sake, they give the questions to the candidates before the actual debate!

What makes matters worse is that these "debates" are meticulously managed BY Liberals and FOR Liberals. The networks and lame-stream journalists decided in the 90's to forever minimize the potential impact of a "There you go again" moment directed at a Democrat candidate, thus the never-ending stream of soft-ball questions, the lib-friendly location and audience, the lib-friendly network, host, and panel (with the token RINO Republican...don't be surprised to see a useful idiot like David Brooks or David Frum introduced as a "Conservative commentator" on the panel).

2o12 is going to be a historic, water-shed election. If you think the Libs were carrying Obama's water in 2008, you ain't seen nuthin' yet. Having just absorbed a tremendous beating last November, the Liberal incumbent-protection machine will be in maximum over-drive to "expose" every Republican foible and misstep (real and imagined), and cover-up every glaring example of Obama's destructive, pathetic first four years.

So in short, don't look to the debates for that "Gotcha!" moment, because unless the GOP nominee veers off-script and goes completely after Obama with no holds barred, it's not going to happen.

We need a nominee who will take on Obama "on the stump" and in front of each and every crowd that he/she faces. We need a candidate who will speak over the heads of the media directly to the American people, and speak openly and honestly about what's happening, and won't back down when he/she is inevitably challenged by the sycophantic idiots in the press.

In short: He/she must be FEARLESS.

YeloStalyn| 2.25.11 @ 3:15PM

I didn't read your whole post as lunch time is over... but wanted to say you are correct.

Christine O'Donnell's CORRECT statement about "church and state" and the Constitution, anyone?

Obama and "over my pay-grade", anyone?

"I've visited... what now?... 57 states and have a few more to go," anyone?

It's a stacked deck against us in the worst way. But... that doesn't mean we can't win. Pray to God that, if it be His will, we do.

Bob Grant| 2.25.11 @ 4:43PM

I Completely agree.

We don't have to go far back to know debates are completely overrated.

Take G. W. Bush who was beaten in 2 of 3 debates against Gore, and 3 of 3 debates vs Kerry and still emerged unscathed.

These dreams of Palin smoking Obama in a debate will only satisfy some personal need but have minimal effect politically.

Occam's Tool| 2.25.11 @ 6:58PM

Then it must be The Bolton or The West, then. Or perhaps BOTH? What I like about both guys is that when they miss you with the fist, they hit you with the ELBOW. The Marciano approach, which as you know, worked for him (49 wins, no losses, no ties, 43 KOs).

David| 2.25.11 @ 1:14PM

I would love to see our eventual candidate at the right moment during a debate with Bam Bam (probably when attacked for being mean-spritited or not compassionate for opposing redistribution of weath or some other giveaway) to calmly and matter of factly refer to "the hate-filled, so-called Christian church that you attended for 20 years".

He was never made to answer for that, and in my opinion, the voters should be reminded of it. That fact, above all other double standards I have witnessed in recent years, is the most disburbing to me. Any white man would have been run out of politics for attending even one service at a church like that while this phony and his family were voluntary members for 20 years.

A.M. Mallett| 2.25.11 @ 1:20PM

Ryan strikes me as the strongest potential candidate out of the whole bunch, even if he seems disinclined to run. Cain and West both seem to be strong as well.
I know this ticks off some of the tea party folks, but Palin is not going to be President. She has too many negative numbers, undeserved or not, it doesn't matter. She was the VP candidate on a losing ticket. Do the history.

Doctor Right| 2.25.11 @ 2:06PM

This Tea-Partier agrees with you about Palin.

Personally, I think she's great. The problem is that the media has effectively smeared her for 3 years now, and that negative press will stick in the minds of the "vital center' of folks who don't pay attention to politics except on election day.

Mimi| 2.25.11 @ 5:09PM

Keep your eye on Sarah !! She is a busy worker, going from dinner SPEECH to dinner SPEECH all over these United States. AND...she's looking and sounding better and better. If not 2012 I am convinced that one day in the future She WILL be President.
In 2012 we have to get the Strongest of MINDS and SPINES. They must win over the millions of voters out there and be able to convince them of the Conservative road to Liberty.
It ...is not too early in fact it may be too late! One short year from NOW we will have a winner of Iowa and the New Hampshire Primary and on our way to South Carolina...One Year ! I hope the Primaries don't have it that Independents and Non registered can vote in Republican primaries. We must CHOOSE! My favorite talk show host is my pick...Mark Levin..I hope he gives it some thought. He has the statemanship qualities.. and is real, as well as a GREAT SPOKSMEN for our conservative cause. NO.2 John Bolton...No.3 Paul Ryan all high on authenticity and INTEGRITY.

Steve A| 2.25.11 @ 2:08PM

Palin is the one they clearly fear the most. She has the guts to say what needs to be said & would absolutely shred, I mean shred, Obama in what would be the largest viewed televised political debate in history. This alone would turn the tide.

PhilTheCapitalistPig| 2.25.11 @ 2:26PM

Agreed. They can call her dumb, but what happens when she destroys their harvard boy in a debate?

And now he can't just speak in platitudes, or she will nail him to the wall. Its time to justify that policy record!

PhilTheCapitalistPig| 2.25.11 @ 2:22PM

I see what you are saying, but I think if Sarah Palin can start learning her facts and numbers a bit I think she can change people's minds. They can't keep calling her stupid if she knows more than the other guys.

But in the same token, allow me to say that I wouldn't put it past the Old Media to still paint her as a fool. They've done it so far, why stop now?

I think too many people overlook the basic qualities of a person. Obama sounded really smart in his televised stump speeches and debates and such, and so many people were willing to overlook his personal life where there were red flags EVERYWHERE.

On the other hand, I see an inherent goodness and honesty in Sarah Palin. I think americans should value these basics when it comes to choosing leaders.

I think this question should be asked of any candidate first: "Do I trust them to do the right thing?"

idalily| 2.26.11 @ 12:00AM

She ran as Veep. Shouldn't she already have learned her facts and numbers?

Bob Grant| 2.26.11 @ 10:26AM

I truly think the problem with Sarah will not be "do I trust her to do the right things" but does she have the temperament, judgement, leadership abilities to be a good president.

She's made many mistakes that have torpedoed her chances to acquire the necessary mix of voters to win a presidential election. The press has sucessfully raised serious issues about her ability to govern on a national level, and, instead of seriously challenging those issues, she decided to engage in a petty war with those media entities. Instead of rising above and acting presidential, she evades, throws bombs, and stubbornly conducts herself the "Sarah Way" which satisfies needs of her followers on a personal level but will prove fruitless in a campaign for national office.

As much as I like Fox News (Hannity and Greta specifically), Rush and other talk show hosts, they will lose a supporter if they continue to push this person on the voting public, conservatives in particular.

The next test for Sarah as far as I'm concerned is: is she self-aware enough to know her weaknesses and NOT run, or self-delusional to the degree that she believes she can win on sheer personality.

Let her become the next Ophra, kingmaker, bomb thrower extraordinaire, reality queen, or a female version of Rush, but please refrain from running for office.

Catman| 2.25.11 @ 1:26PM

Please listen to this about Sarah Palin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....r_embedded

Ken (Old Texican)| 2.25.11 @ 5:13PM

Catman.....
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I will link this to every comment I make from now on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just watch.
Several hundred thousand people read my posts here and elsewhere.
I pray earnestly that she runs. Please, Sarah , run hard!

Catman| 2.25.11 @ 5:21PM

Ken You are Welcome From NJ

Anthony| 2.25.11 @ 10:26PM

Thank you Catman. Gallagher's comments get to the essense of why the Ds are petrified of her. Unfortunately, too many Rs are too stupid or too beaten down by the liberal establishment to understand what the enemy is trying to tell them.
In addition, some are attempting to be the smartest ones in the room in their excuses as to why they believe Palin can't beat Obama.
Gallagher has nailed the essense of Palin. Given a campaign of Palin v. Obozo, without any other distractions, one on one, she'll cream him. This will include, by the way, all the supposed women who hate her, and yes, I've met some of them as well. They have no solid reasons, so when forced to choose between Palin and Obozo, I predict they'll run to her in droves.
The Ds know this, they're just hoping the Rs will once again snatch defeat from the jaws of victory with a tepid, bland, careful professional R pol, who will become McCain II.

Kingofthenet| 2.25.11 @ 2:08PM

Sounds like a bunch of Losers to me, the question is by how much?

Occam's Tool| 2.25.11 @ 7:00PM

Yup, just like we lost the Midterms, my friend. 2012 will be the End of The World for the Dhimmicrats, Terrorist Catamites that they are.

idalily| 2.26.11 @ 12:02AM

Then you are not looking. There is much to like in these candidates. Especially Cain, Bolton, and Santorum.

PhilTheCapitalistPig| 2.25.11 @ 2:15PM

"Others, such as Paul Ryan, Chris Christie, Jim DeMint, and several others, seem truly disinclined to run.)"

Isn't it a shame? Let's recruit Walker to run! I like him too!

PhilTheCapitalistPig| 2.25.11 @ 2:29PM

Ok, did we not learn anything from the last election?

We let the left tell us who was an acceptible candidate last time and we got McCain. And I STILL can't find anyone whose first choice was McCain.

How about this time around, we quit dogging out the people who have OUR interests at heart as conservatives, and quit letting the libs control who OUR candidate is? Whadya say?

Every Conservative I talk to says the same thing, "I like her a lot, but she just can't win."

I say pick who YOU like.

idalily| 2.26.11 @ 12:03AM

Pick who you like in the primaries, yes. In the general, no. Vote for whoever won the primary and drag every other conservative and independent to the polls with you. We will need them.

Clint| 2.25.11 @ 2:32PM

Jim DeMint can be Dis-disinclined to run.

He can span The Tea Party, Romney, Indy, Social Religious Conservative, Fiscal Conservative, Etc. Voting Blocks.

Obama Is Beatable.

The Tea Party Rebellion Escalates.

Rise Up.

Occam's Tool| 2.25.11 @ 7:02PM

And, of course, Pro-sand monkey blocks, right, Clint? (I like DeMint, Clint, my problem is with the Paulites. Lice they are.)

Clint| 2.26.11 @ 12:16AM

The Fixated Israel Firster Fanatic Troll Tool Job is all angst ridden & atwitter because Our Tea Party Senator Dr.Rand Paul & Our Tea Party Favorite Dr.Ron Paul,The New House Monetary Committee Chairman & Our Tea Party Mission Statement won't asskiss Tool Job's Personal Israel Firster Agenda.

The Tea Party Rebellion Escalates.

Rise Up.

Occam's Tool| 2.26.11 @ 5:20PM

And neither could get elected President, either. People don't like limp wristed candidates on foreign policy issues, Clint. If you weren't a Terrorist Catamite, like Ron Paul is, I wouldn't have to explain this to you.

Clint| 2.26.11 @ 7:31PM

They already got elected in November Israel Firster Troll, Tool Job.
Our Tea Party Candidate from The Commonwealth of Kentucky, Dr.Rand Paul was elected United States Senator & Tea Party Favorite Dr.Ron Paul was elected United States Representative from Texas & has been appointed Chairman of The House Monetary Sub-committee, which will go after The FED.

You Can't Stop Our Tea Party Pauls, Fanatic Israel Firster Slandering NutBag.

The Tea Party Rebellion Escalates.

Rise Up.

Occam's Tool| 2.27.11 @ 4:38PM

Yes, but neither could get in The Oval Office. KyMouse aside, there's a good reason why Rand Paul could get elected from KY and not elsewhere---a lot of inbreeding (I practiced Medicine there for 5 years---I neither insult nor surmise.). I went to Medical school in Galveston. It is NO surprise why a StormFront buddy like Ron Paul could get elected from there. By all means, put him on financial issues. But keep them away from foreign policy. That's for grownups; people who don't use terms like "Sand Monkey," Terrorist Catamite Clint.

John Navratil| 2.27.11 @ 6:39PM

Occam's Tool,

Bingo! I've lived in Houston for just shy of forty years and Ron Paul has been around for much of that time. I admire the man for his principals and for affording them, but could never vote for him as President. He is just where he should be.

OLDRAY| 2.25.11 @ 2:45PM

Many good men, BUT Palin could not only win, she would be one hellof a great President. Fearless, steady, solid values,and a terrific speaker. I'd like Bolton as a running mate but think Rubio would strengthen the ticket.

idalily| 2.26.11 @ 12:06AM

Palin shredded herself beyond repair when she quit as governor. Period. She got the "quitter" label, and won't get rid of it. She'd have to run one hell of a campaign to get the indie vote. Indies, especially the women, for whatever reason, really hate her. I mean, HATE her. She cannot win.

Wayne | 2.26.11 @ 1:30PM

I respect her choice. I think you need to analyze WHY they hate her. Maybe its because she is THEIR worst nightmare, just as the current POTUS is OUR worst nightmare.

We should not let the LEFT define OUR candidates.

idalily| 2.26.11 @ 8:33PM

I respect her choice, too. But that choice makes her unelectable. She quit. As for WHY Indies hate her, it doesn't matter. She cannot win a national election without Indie support, and we cannot afford to support a losing candidate.

Wayne | 2.27.11 @ 12:30PM

It doesn't make her unelectable at all. She quit for the right reason in my opinion, leaving Alaska in good hands. She will get independent support.

Kingofthenet| 2.25.11 @ 2:48PM

Are you people living in FANTASY LAND? Palin could win? When EVERY polls lists her 'absolute hate' TRIPLE her Absolute Love?

idalily| 2.26.11 @ 12:07AM

Thank you. A voice of reason.

somnolence| 2.25.11 @ 3:00PM

That is exactly right----namely, that John McCain was the left's favorite GOP candidate for at least a decade before he was the standard bearer. The leftist mainstream media guys and gals especially trumpeted him every chance they could. That is why I pay little attention to George Will when he said on ABC that Palin wouldn't carry the Philadelphia suburbs. I suppose he has inside information as to which GOP candidate would? If so he didn't divulge it. Will forfeits a lot of his credibility just by sitting near Cokie Roberts and George Stephanopoulos. In other words, he is a token "conservative" pundit there. Another example is David Brooks urging Mitch Daniels to run. Voters don't need to be swayed or influenced by these overpaid pundits.

somnolence| 2.25.11 @ 3:04PM

Mike Gallagher is exactly right when he maintains that the continued demonization of Sarah Palin works in her favor. To all you liberals, she will burn Obama's backside with three years worth of infomercials containing his mountainous lies.

Wayne | 2.26.11 @ 1:27PM

I see 4 candidates willing to go after the juggler: Palin, Bachmann, Cain and West. Any surprise that they are women or black? I am souring on the white male good ole boys.

Occam's Tool| 2.26.11 @ 5:45PM

Don't forget The Bolton.

PattyMor| 2.25.11 @ 3:28PM

I disagee that Palin can't win. Just wait until gasoline gets to $5-$6 dollar per gallon and her drill in Alaska now will be a big hit and a giant relief to poor suffering Americans. She is very smart and seems to know how to tweak the Marxist Media types. She probably has learned at lot since John McClain threw her to the wolves AND did not use her strengths properly in 2008 election.

I think with the dire situation the U.S. finances are in, that a governor with budgeting experience would make the best candidate. Herman Cain could also fit the bill with his business background.

And, whoever he/she is must be able to corral the congress and make them do the right thing. Palin has a history of reform, even from within her own party.

I'm all in for Palin.

Bob Grant| 2.26.11 @ 10:37AM

I would agree Sarah's timing is impeccable, she always seems to say what need to be said.

Who does that remind you of?
Yes, Rush Limbaugh.

Although I love Rush, he is not presidential timber and would be the first to tell you.

Ditto for Sarah only she doesn't see this YET. Too bad if she continues.

Yes, she is correct about "drill baby drill" however, do you really believe she was the first to address this? Come on.

Kingofthenet| 2.25.11 @ 3:56PM

Alaskan Oil is largely symbolic it wouldn't cover 10% of US daily needs, we create 'Fake' Reserves for National Emergencies, how about a real one, you know something to pass down to the kids.

Clint| 2.25.11 @ 4:29PM

Look at the polling where Hillary Clinton was beating Obama in almost every poll until around February of 2008 .
Obama is beatable, as American Voters & Business Interests will Vote Their Wallets.

While Tea Party Kingmaker & Senate Point Man Jim DeMint has a business background, experience, creds & Tea Party support, Sarah Palin could beat Obama, if she demonstrates to voters, that she has a proper grasp on the issues.

Like Jim DeMint, Sarah Palin ain't sayin' whether she'll run yet.

Catman| 2.25.11 @ 4:39PM

Sarah Palin Will be India March 19th and Will be the Keynote Speaker, Name of her Address
My Vision of America. http://conclave.intoday.in/con.....ve2011.php

Ken (Old Texican)| 2.25.11 @ 5:23PM

EVERYONE..............

Catman sent this to us. PLEASE LISTEN!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSkjYeP2KjA

Kingofthenet| 2.25.11 @ 5:32PM

Catman? That's it! Einhorn is Finkle! Finkle is Einhorn! Einhorn is a man!

Jean| 2.25.11 @ 6:01PM

Governor Christie is too fat, Governor Daniels is too short and Newt Gingrich is too old. I think I will vote for Romney, he is a nice looking man and has business experience.

Occam's Tool| 2.25.11 @ 7:04PM

Allen West is a better looking man than Romney, as if it matters. He's a much better thinker, and a much better leader of men. Someone who leads the way he lead in Iraq could command fanatical loyalty from his men.

George PQ| 2.25.11 @ 7:23PM

Wasn't Allen West TV's Batman from the 60's? If so he must be pretty old now. I like Sarah Palin, she's hot, Sarah has nice biceps for a woman.

Bob Grant| 2.25.11 @ 8:39PM

Speaking of go0d looking, I say let's give Allen Thicke a shot. He may be a little old, has no experience in goverment, and uh, he may be from Canada but WTH...

Occam's Tool| 2.26.11 @ 5:44PM

Representative Allen West. War Hero. Not Adam West, actor who portrayed the Cape Crusader. (Check his Website---lots of cool stuff---and no, I've got no financial interest, it's just fun to hear the theme song on the site)

To pull this type of stunt, ya gotta know the names.

david| 2.25.11 @ 6:45PM

Jean, I've never you post here before, and can't say that I have missed anything. Three extremely credible people and you describe them as "fat", "short", and "too old". You truly are a deep thinker sweetheart. I wish you well.

Bob Grant| 2.25.11 @ 8:41PM

Um, yes, one parts their hair left to right.

Deal killer if there ever was one.

Bob| 2.25.11 @ 7:09PM

The revolution has started in NJ. Citizens of New Jersey rally with Union members. Support the NJEA and keep up the pressure in Trenton. Just be careful Governor Dumbo doesn't fall on you.

PCP Smoker| 2.25.11 @ 7:36PM

"Mitch Daniels is becoming way, way, way too much of a Johnny-one-note on the budget, but he is so superb on that issue that he merits serious consideration. Meanwhile, his record if not his rhetoric on "social" issues also is terrific. Conservatives have developed a habit of looking too much at verbiage and not enough at proven conduct. Daniels' conduct, at least until his abdication on right to work, has been A-1."

Nothing A-1 or A or B or C- about a coward with majorities in both houses who refuses to get rid of union muscle. To paraphrase Stacy McCain (Other McCain) relative to Mike Castle during the 010 senate campaign: Fuck Mitch Daniels and fuck anyone who supports Mitch Daniels.

idalily| 2.26.11 @ 12:11AM

If this is what you think of Daniels, you know nothing about him. The man is no coward. You do not know what you are talking about. I don't find him perfect, but I would happily vote for him, your insulting profanity notwithstanding.

Occam's Tool| 2.26.11 @ 5:42PM

PCP, the problem with the boy Daniels is that he caves when he should be strong. But I respect my nether regions too much.

david| 2.25.11 @ 10:24PM

PCP Smoker, please speak English. I want to know what you had to say. Thanks.

Wayne | 2.26.11 @ 1:22PM

Why no comment on Bachmann? She has been in tune with the Tea Party from day one. She is a tiger when it comes to energy policy and limited government. She is fearless and will definitely get the Palin treatment from the left WHICH is a good thing.

Notice how the left hardly criticises Christie or Mc Cain or Huckelby or even Romney. That should be a tip off. They will react to their threats and they don't see them as threats.

We need a candidate with fire in her belly and I think women are leading the conservative charge. Out front is Bachmann. I could see a Bachmann - Cain ticket of a Bachmann - West ticket on the attack all of 2012. That is what we need, attack, attack, attack the Obama ticket. No more squishy republicans.

Maxwell| 2.26.11 @ 3:53PM

Speaking of Christie, I saw an ad for the New York Slimes (Times) they are doing a feature in the 'Magazine Section' this Sunday on him. While I voted for him as I have said before, once the Times features you, my feeling is drop like a hot potato.

Occam's Tool| 2.27.11 @ 4:49PM

I do like her, Bachmann, very much. Unfortunately, she is also the best Representative from a State that has terrible ones (McCollum,Ellison, etc.). I'd hate to lose her.

chris haynes| 2.26.11 @ 3:18PM

Mitch Daniels.
Superb on the budget!!!!!
Just dont ask him for any numbers.

Mitch is articulate, bright, and clean. In other words, he wont touch abortion. That's why our elite love him.

On his big issue, balancing the budget, where will he find that $1600 billion a year? He wont say.

Perusha| 2.26.11 @ 5:22PM

When you seriously consider the negatives for all the candidates, in the big picture, it seems to me that Tim Pawlenty could be the guy.

First, I just LOVE Bolton, but logic and history tell us that he's unelectable---he's never run for any office, let alone been elected.

As for Pawlenty's flirtation with global warming, which I've never heard about---and, I'm VERY in tune with political action---I imagine he's already renounced this faux pas.

Remember, in a horse race, only ONE entrant can win.

So, we'll find out if he can fine tune his "NICE GUY" presentation, by not only saying the "right" things about any topic, but doing so with power and steadfastness.

Ah, how well I remember my social studies class, from senior year in HS, in 1960!

We were all required to pick someone to "back" in the Oregon Democratic primary, and I was stuck with Governor (of California) Pat Brown (Who would have been the favorite son, since the Democratic convention was to be in the golden state). In those days, I hated politics, being totally bewildered by the whole shmeer---one "pole" seemed the same as any other "pole"!

So, I hadn't any clue or interest in any of it.

Of course, JFK won and demolished bad old Nelson Rockefeller, and we know the rest---

JFK sicced public sector unions on America!

P.S.---little did I know that a few years later, a lady named Pat Brown became my first adventure into sexual union!

Occam's Tool| 2.26.11 @ 5:40PM

By the way, Clint, DeMint CAN be elected, and Ron Paul could not be elected, as President. Since their Domestic views have 90% overlap (except for legalization of drugs), the difference must be in foreign policy; where, despite his age, Paul acts as a Islamist Catamite whenever possible (like you). Grovelling on his knees to terrorists, begging for mercy from child raping scum, eager to serve mass murderers, just like you, Clint. A craven, jellyfish backed cowardly supporter of Consentless Connubial "Bliss." A Moral Maggot, a Piece of Purulent Putrefaction. A Filthy Phallocentric Supporter of the Fondling and Filleting of Fillies---like yourself, Clint.

Unlike DeMint, who is an admirable man.

Like I said, Clint, this "Sand Monkey" is just warming up. You are a Racist fool; I am Logic's Tool. The Razor is ready to Rumble! So far, you've brought a fifth grader's intelligence to the table---let's see what you got, beardless punk. Doesn't seem to be much.

Bob Grant| 2.26.11 @ 8:52PM

Actually, DeMint can't be elected.

As much as I respect him let's get real.

Come on guys, let's make this simple and rally around the republican governor who best kicks the feds' and unions' butts over the great budget battle of 2011/12.

It's the best formula we've got.

Clint| 2.26.11 @ 7:20PM

You seem so upset Fixated Israel Firster Crank Troll, Tool Job.

Take Two Shock Treatments & Call Yourself In The Morning.

Occam's Tool| 2.27.11 @ 4:42PM

Yes, Clint, I could do that, and in the morning I'd be much better. But you would still be ugly, inside and out. You're ugly to the bone, Terrorist Catamite.

Turning away from trolls and onto sentient issues, I don't think DeMint wants to run for President. Why should he? Who had more longterm effect on the US, Robert Taft or Jimmy Carter? A long serving Senator can be a huge force for good or evil.

Clint| 2.27.11 @ 5:26PM

Israel Firster Fanatic Tool Job attempts to purloin Churchill's famous retort to Lady Astor.

The actual quote was:
"Sir, you're drunk"
"Madam, you're ugly, but in the morning I shall be sober"

You're one Sorry-assed Walkin' Wounded Self-help Excuse for a Shrink.

Occam's Tool| 2.27.11 @ 4:46PM

That's the best you've got? Rehashed 4th grader comments? Do you even know what a Catamite is, child? I have been savagely insulting you in the vilest way. Jousting with you is like fighting a rutabaga---no style, sentience, wit, skill, bite. Just Caps and Lies.

Clint| 2.27.11 @ 5:14PM

Well, Fanatic Israel Firster Troll Tool Job, that's because you're a Keyboard Israel Firster Chickenhawk,who couldn't beat an egg, let alone fight in combat with The IDF.

John Navratil| 2.27.11 @ 6:48PM

Occam's Tool,

You do a disservice to the rutabaga which when combine in a 1:4 ratio with a potato and mashed makes a dandy adjunct to a grilled steak.

Wankel| 2.26.11 @ 10:57PM

I would love to see Gingrich go up against Obama in the debates...

Wayne | 2.27.11 @ 12:27PM

I will say this about Newt, he is ratcheting up the rhetoric. He calls Obama a socialist (and he is) and talks about impeaching Obama on his DOMA stance. So that would force these issues to come up in any debate. I don't think Obama wants to defend being a capitalist.

Walkthetalk| 2.27.11 @ 1:19PM

Liberals are like spoiled teenagers. They act like they know everything yet know little. In power they have the credit card of the nation and run up charges only to satisfy their own self-centered passions, to enjoy a destructive party, to spend on their friends, and to put it to the adults. Conservatives are like adults. That's why the spoiled teenagers hated Reagan. He was a mature man in character and action. The nation should always have an adult to lead it. So, the conservatives (and Republicans) need only look at those candidates that exhibit maturity. Where does immaturity come from? Examine the left; it has generally abandoned God (sin), trusting in its own immature version of righteousness. The left has exchanged a lie for truth, bad for good, and has eschewed all mature actions (bowing to China, abandoning DOM, forbidding drilling, etc., etc., etc.). (See www.christforamericans.com) Where does maturity come from? From turning to God (repentance) and trusting in him. Look at Reagan. Look at what he accomplished. Now look at the candidates discussed, presented, and offered in this string. Vet them based upon maturity. You can easily remove all pretenders like Huckabee, and Newt. You can remove all who straddle the aisle (who collude with the spoiled teens). You can remove all self-servers. The more the left hates them, the more mature they must be. The candidate of the right must be rock-solid in putting spoiled brats back in their place and in reclaiming the house for the whole family. Then the house must be cleaned. The teenagers who held the destructive party must then be disciplined. Now we need a new list of candidates; based on the criteria of spiritually mature adults.

ml| 2.27.11 @ 2:07PM

Former Gov. Tim Palwenty of Minnesota spoke at the Tea Party Convention yesterday in Arizona. His speech is excellent.

Occam's Tool| 2.27.11 @ 4:43PM

I don't know. No real charisma.

PattyMor| 2.27.11 @ 4:34PM

TPaw and Gingrich flirted with Global Warming.
That is NOT deep thinking, just jumping on the band wagon. Now that Global Warming has been revealed to be a hoax, they jump off.

Huckabee released all those criminals from prison. Where was the compassion for the victims both past and future ones? Talk about the Bible, where is the justice in releasing really bad people?

Romney will NEVER live down Romneycare. That says it all. Could anyone take him seriously that he is against Obamacare, when he instituted about the same thing in Mass?

While Chris Christie wows the audience excoriating the press and liberals, he is NOT a conservative. Better than Obummer, but then that doesn't take that much.

While I like John Bolton, I really don't think he could get elected or raise the necessary amount of money.

Sarah the quitter? She owed a Million Dollars in legal fees. She served about 1 1/2 years as governor. Obummer served in the Senate, but NEVER accomplished anything. After getting elected, he immediately began running for Prez. Obummer's length of service is similar to that of Sarah Palin's. Only she got the pipeline approved, when 20 years before her, the men could not get it done. Her negatives CAN be overcome.

catman| 2.27.11 @ 4:43PM

Patty you need to listen to this it will open your eyes.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....r_embedded

Charles Stevens| 2.27.11 @ 5:04PM

(re-printed from another blog)...

It's obvious from all the comments that there is not only no conservative front-runner, but that agreeing on one will be extremely difficult. With the kind of uncertainty exhibited here, there is a very strong possibility that vile Obama will be re-elected. I therefore suggest that there is a more underlying problem not being addressed, specifically, Republicans' assumptions of politics-as-usual.

It is time to rev up a vast right-wing conspiracy:

All potential Republican candidates should first have a coordinated plan of attack together, NOT separately, and then simultaneously enter the race no matter whether they intend to finish it or not. This includes Palin, Pence, DeMint, Brewer, Daniels, Christie, Walker, Ryan, West, Jindal, Haley, Bolton, Bachmann, etc.

The aim is to be constantly on the offense, never on the defense. They should unceasingly attack Obama and progressives, in a bold, calculated, in-your-face no-holds-barred effort that will keep both the progressives and their media lapdogs completely off guard. It must be coordinated like clockwork… as soon as one group of potential candidates attacks on one front, a second set of candidates should attack on another, and then a third on another, and then back to the first, all of them in step with each other.

The point of all this is that whoever ultimately finishes as the front-runner is secondary to keeping Obama and the evil progressives constantly on the defensive. It is not WHO so much as HOW. And as far as the coordination goes, this cannot be left up to the Republican Party, which historically plays nice when the chips are down and pulls defeat from the jaws of victory.

What Republicans and other right-wing liberals refuse to understand is that this has never been a game, and it is no longer politics, it is war, which the left declared long ago. Conservatives need the equivalent of generals, strategy, and tactics if they are to have a snowball’s chance at taking back our society.

It’s time for the Tea Party to step up, so STEP UP !!!!!!!

Ron| 2.28.11 @ 12:33AM

Nobody can beat Palin both in primary and general elections.

Dee See| 2.28.11 @ 4:28AM

----We need a fearless, Globalist-immune figure
who will advocate DEFAULTING on our bogus
RED China debt (American taxpayers IN FACT
continue to underwrite their own dis-mantling
and out-sourcing to RED China) ---opening, auditing, warmly prosecuting and ENDING the
FED, and coming to grips with comprehensive,
unflinching examination, dismantling and VERY
warm prosecution of our treasonous, POST
democatic, POST republic, 'shadow government'
(tax free, ULTRA-rich 'charitable' foundations,
and ALLLL their proxies, NGO's and actuarial whorehouses).

Also someone able to vigorously pursue the retroactive impeachment of
our last 4 CFR/RIIA/Tavistock Institute et al
set-upand BOGUS administrations.

Even putting aside the Globalist-sellout, lobbyist for
'seamless integration' with NAU, sovietization
and EUGENICS, and former presiding figure
during the heyday of RED China 'empowerment'
---Newt Gingrich, there ain't a single credible
figure on show.

TRULY------------

David| 2.28.11 @ 3:50PM

Charles Stevens, you are absolutely correct. The dems/libs/commies know they have been in a war for decades now. The repubs act like idiot weaklings who constantly get their clocks cleaned by the repubs. Time to play hardball, and especially when it comes to federal judges, and not just at the Sup Ct level, but in the district and appellate courts, too.

Reebok | 8.11.11 @ 2:46AM

is good

العاب | 4.11.12 @ 5:20PM

With respect Mr Smith, we have been doing as you suggest and putting the cart before the horse for far too long. Our priority should not be to, "pick a winner". Rather our focus should be on putting forward a candidate who will stand on the principles of Constitutional government and let the chips fall where they may. Imo, such a candidate would be a winner and much less susceptible to Constitutional compromise when the chips are down. I know of only two persons who would pass this test: Bolden and Palin. I would work my backside off in support of a campaign by either.

More Articles by Quin Hillyer

More Articles From Streetcar Line

Military Might, Out of the Wilderness

May 8, 2013 | Quin Hillyer

Not Wanting to Write About Nothing Good

April 30, 2013 | Quin Hillyer

Perez Abomination Grows

April 23, 2013 | Quin Hillyer

Tea Partiers for Freedom

April 16, 2013 | Quin Hillyer

Make Room for a New Master

April 9, 2013 | Quin Hillyer

http://spectator.org/archives/2011/02/25/presidential-bright-side

ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Headlines

Green Flags, Yellow Flags, and Black Flags

John Tabin|36 comments

Barack’s Brave New World Blarney

George Neumayr|23 comments

There’s Something About Cambridge

Daniel J. Flynn|23 comments

Obama’s Unaffordable Act

Peter Ferrara|38 comments

Celebrating Our Lady of Paris

Joseph A. Harriss|6 comments

Charter Schooling? Why Not Charter Housing?

Wayne Woodman|14 comments

Cash for Organs?

Eric Boehm|11 comments

Back in the Fray

Kyle Peterson|102 comments

The Spectacle Blog

Elbert Guillory: ‘Why I Am a Republican’

Patrick Ryan | 10:13AM

The One Party State

F.H. Buckley | 9:47AM

Cummings Accused of Subverting IRS Investigation

Jeffrey Lord | 6:20AM

Let Pitchers Throw Complete Games

Aaron Goldstein | 12:10AM

Thoughts on New U.S.-Taliban Peace Talks

Aaron Goldstein | 6.18.13

Thank You, Bobby Jindal

Matt Purple | 6.18.13

Buzzfeed Faces $3.6 Million Lawsuit for Copyright Infringement

Kaylin Bugos | 6.18.13

Democrat Dan Maffei Blames Budget Cuts for Girl’s Rape, Mother’s Murder

Robert Stacy McCain | 6.18.13

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

The Mole in Don Draper

James Bowman | 6.17.13

ADVERTISEMENT

Home |About |Contributors |Advertise |Donate |Privacy Policy |Contact

The American Spectator Foundation is the 501(c)(3) organization responsible for publishing The American Spectator magazine and training aspiring journalists who espouse traditional American values. Your contributions are tax deductible to the extent permitted by law. Each donor receives a year-end summary of their giving for tax purposes.

Copyright 2013, The American Spectator. All rights reserved.