What is headline news in one country often is barely covered in
another. In Moscow for the past several weeks the news that has
energized the tabloids has been the police raid on the offices of
Yelena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow.
Ms. Baturina, who appears to prefer the use of her maiden
name as some modern Russian women do, has been around as a major
business operator for quite a while. Originally, however, her
husband’s administration was hailed as a well-organized and
disciplined change from earlier Moscow city governments. Yuri
Luzhkov had brought systematic management to Russia’s capital. This
didn’t mean that the traditional corruption that had existed since
the Czar’s days had been wiped out. On the contrary, it was that
there was now a sense of order to the historic payoffs and
privilege that was integral to the Moscow scene.
The advent of Soviet communism with its powerful secret
police had not brought with it the vaunted equality and fairness of
treatment of which the CPSU propaganda had boasted. What was worse
was the fact that the corruption was very disorganized. Luzhkov
brought organization and ” justice” to the running of Moscow. One
might say that the Chicago system had been introduced, but that
would be unfair to Chicago.
Yuri Luzhkov took office in 1992 and swiftly became a
mainstay of the Boris Yeltsin special interest governance system.
This was the day of the oligarch and Luzhkov knew well how to play
this very remunerative post-Soviet game. The Moscow mayor’s office
became a clearinghouse for new private ventures and
government-related contracts within the extended boundaries of the
city. As most all foreign representation and banking activity was
headquartered in Moscow, Luzhkov and his team had their fingers in
many pies. Yelena Baturina held the reins of the family’s interests
in property and building contracts.
The conglomerate, Inteko, acted as the focal point of Ms.
Baturina’s business empire and there was no question about her
personal dominance. Luzhkov himself for the most part stayed as far
as he could from any direct involvement in the business, though
everyone in commerce and banking in Moscow knew which way the wind
blew. Financial leverage for the Luzhkov affairs came to be
obtained through its minority, yet important, position in the Bank
of Moscow, a firm run by family friends. The wealth in Baturina’s
name had been estimated at one time to be above two billion
dollars, but that figure is now reported by the magazine
Finans to be down to half that amount.
Apparently Yuri Luzhkov sought to out-muscle President
Dmitri Medvedev who had made clear last year that the days of the
mayor’s Moscow fiefdom were over. Luzhkov lost the battle and by
September 2010 he was out of a job and under heavy legal pressure.
The new Moscow mayor, with the help of the Russian equivalent of
the Government Accounting Office (GAO), is said to have ordered an
audit of tens of thousands of Luzhkov-era contracts. The still
feisty ex-mayor insists he will fight to regain his political name.
Moscow insiders are not yet willing to write him off
completely.
There are two major interrelated elements in what is now
referred to as “the Luzhkov affair” that hold broader implications.
The initial issue is the extensive outreach of the corruption that
is under scrutiny by city and federal authorities. Apparently the
Moscow deals stretched out across the country and involved
politicians and businessmen, domestic and foreign. The second
factor is the leading role that Dmitri Medvedev has played — and
is still playing — in the exposure of the corruption. The timing
and character of Russia’s presidential racket-busting campaign
tends to support the thesis that Medvedev is gearing up for the
Spring 2012 elections.
The legal and political attack on Yuri Luzhkov and his
wife is being likened to the arrest in 1987 of the corrupt First
Deputy Minister of the Interior, Yuri M. Churbanov, the son-in-law
of the former Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev. This was the beginning
of a public criticism of the entire Brezhnev era and what it
represented in terms of nepotism and generalized
corruption.
In today’s Russian political environment, the
anti-corruption campaign can easily can conceived as an attack on
the years of Vladimir Putin’s ascendancy. On the other hand, some
Kremlinologists prefer the more arcane concept of a clever Putin
ploy performed by his loyal former aide, Dmitri Medvedev, who is
willing to accept the possible political heat involved in taking
down the still influential racketeer, Yuri Luzhkov , while leaving
Putin unscathed.
In any case, the once all-powerful Yuri Luzhkov, czar of
all he surveyed, has lost what in Russian criminal circles is
referred to as his ” roof,” , his protection. Without his
krysha it’s do svidaniya, Yuri!
Ken (Old Texican)| 2.25.11 @ 12:11PM
Mr. Whitman,
Sorry.
Who gives a damn?
They are all scumbags.
Occam's Tool| 2.27.11 @ 4:29PM
Scumbags, Ken? You think they are that high on the respect list? How would you rank them on the Kucinich scale?
conservative Bob| 2.25.11 @ 3:09PM
Ken I enjoy your comments...
but you got to let go and go ahead and say what you think. Holding everything like you do can not be healthy in the long term...
conservative Bob| 2.25.11 @ 3:25PM
Ken I enjoy your comments...
but you got to let go and go ahead and say what you think. Holding everything like you do can not be healthy in the long term...
conservative Bob| 2.25.11 @ 3:26PM
Not exactly sure how the double post happened ... sorry about that.
Ken (Old Texican)| 2.25.11 @ 5:50PM
Con bob,
Thanks for the chuckle.
I can not say what I think...in non fiction environments...
check out the web-site of mine for fiction.
Grab your jock first.
Ken (Old Texican)| 2.25.11 @ 5:51PM
I'm sorry, con-bob www.texassaidno.com
Dave| 2.27.11 @ 9:17AM
Gentlemen:
I suppose that Mr. Whitman hopes that, the next time the readers of the magazine advocate US military intervention to support a small, weak country in its attempt to conquer a de facto Russian client state, they might know something about the society and the leaders they are antagonizing.
Occam's Tool| 2.27.11 @ 4:30PM
Just assume asshat. Easy enough.
weddingdresses | 6.24.11 @ 2:11AM
I suppose that Mr. Whitman hopes that, the next time the readers of the magazine advocate US military intervention to support a small, weak country in its attempt to conquer a de facto Russian client state, they might know something about the society and the leaders they are antagonizing.
Reebok | 8.11.11 @ 2:48AM
is good
العاب | 4.11.12 @ 5:22PM
thank you