The Masque of Africa: Glimpses of African
Belief
By V.S.
Naipaul
(Knopf, 241
pages, $26.95)
“For my travel books I travel on a
theme,” writes Nobel laureate V.S. Naipaul. “And the theme
of The Masque of Africa is African belief.” But
Mr. Naipaul has a problem, and the problem’s name is God.
Again and again in the pages of this otherwise insightful and
entertaining short work, we find the author fussing
and fuming about the impact of God-centered
theist religions born outside of black Africa on
the primitive animist roots of native belief. Perhaps
this phobia is best expressed in a rather bilious early
passage describing present-day Kampala, Uganda:
“Foreign religion, to go by the competing
ecclesiastical buildings on the hilltops, was like an applied
and contagious illness, curing nothing, giving no
final answers, keeping everyone in a state of nerves,
fighting wrong battles, narrowing the mind.”
Narrowing the mind from what? After visiting Uganda,
Nigeria, Ghana, Ivory Coast, and Gabon, Mr. Naipaul has a
confession to make: “I had expected that over the great size
of Africa the practices of magic would significantly vary. But
they didn’t. The diviners everywhere wanted to ‘throw the
bones’ to read the future, and the idea of ‘energy’ remained
a constant, to be tapped into by the ritual sacrifice
of body parts.” In essence, what Christianity and
Islam had supplanted—or at least diminished—was not
so much an earlier native religion in the fullest sense,
but a kind of prehistoric, proto-religion based on
sorcery and nature worship.
My use of the word “prehistoric” is deliberate. Central
to understanding the yawning gap between traditional
African beliefs and the more highly evolved “foreign” faiths
they now compete with is the realization that the Africa where
those old beliefs were born and then atrophied
was—quite literally—a prehistoric place, a place without
a history. Why? Because history
requires documentation and you can’t have documentation
without some kind of writing. The lack of any written language
meant that the black African past was no more than a
semi-fictional series of spoken sagas, the “religious” part of
which was limited to crude, orally transmitted traditions and
rituals.
Mr. Naipaul, with his religious allergy, is puzzled by the
widespread appeal that outside, monotheistic faiths exercised on
the African masses. (“These foreign religions had a difficult
theology; I didn’t think it would have been easy, starting
from scratch, to put it across here.”) But as one scion of a
tribal dynasty in Uganda explains it to him, both
Christianity and Islam were attractive to
Africans for a simple reason: “They both offered an afterlife;
gave people a vision of themselves living on after death”
which African religion, such as it was, did not.
If Mr. Naipaul had thought about it in a broader historical
context, he might have been less perplexed. The transformation
of post-Roman, largely pagan Europe—as in Africa, not
unaccompanied by episodes of violence, disorder, and
intolerance—saw millions of “traditional” peasants and
tribesmen converted from crude forms of nature and
ancestor worship to Christianity. It took centuries, and
many old folk beliefs and practices lingered on or
were grafted onto core Christianity (local Saints
with pre-Christian associations, yule logs, seasonal
festivals, folk remedies, and the like), but a
conceptual “Christendom” emerged, providing rival
tribes, nations, and empires with an overarching
moral structure that, fragile and decrepit as it
may now be, still defines Western Civilization.
In historical terms, today’s post-colonial black Africa
resembles the Europe that slowly, painfully evolved from the
collapse of the Roman Empire and ensuing Dark Ages.
Africa is no longer the abysmal “Heart of Darkness” depicted
by Joseph Conrad. Rather, like the feebly
flickering florescent bulbs Mr. Naipaul complains about
in describing more than one urban African night scape, it
has become the “Heart of Dimness”: a shadowy region where
the thirst for modern knowledge (and consumer goods),
the struggle of decent individuals and
communities against the forces of ignorance, tribalism,
and—most of all—brutal corruption, will probably continue, as
it did in early Medieval Europe, for many generations. No one
can predict how it will end, but even viewed through Mr.
Naipaul’s jaundiced but occasionally whimsical
eyes, there are some signs of hope.
One of the most enjoyable passages in the book describes a
visit to the home of Flight Lieutenant Jerry Rawlings, the
peacefully (and voluntarily) retired former dictator (and then
popularly elected president) of Ghana, where he was
instrumental in restoring the rule of law and national
self-respect:
[Rawlings] was talking about the rights of the people when
Mrs. Rawlings came in and in a nice clear voice said, “Lunch.”
We looked at her, but Rawlings went on talking about the
difference between power and moral authority. Mrs.
Rawlings said with some firmness that we should move, and
we did…
A triumph of moral authority, indeed.
SO MR. NAIPAUL HAS NOT ENTIRELY lost the
sense of humor that was such an appealing part of
his early fiction. He still has a good novelist’s
sense for the telling detail and the ironic insight.
Sometimes, perhaps, unwittingly: Besides telling us a
lot about Africa, the narrative may tell us a little
more about Mr. Naipaul than he intended. For example,
on more than one field trip to local sorcerers who
will expect gratuities in return for their
performances, our author “forgets” to bring along his cash,
stiffing his hosts or volunteer guides for the bill. On the
plus side, in a region notorious for its cruelty to
animals, Mr. Naipaul always has a compassionate eye for
the starving mutt and forlorn kitten.
This may explain his affectionate take on the primitive
pigmies of the Gabon forest, whom most of their
Bantu fellow-citizens treat as barely human. “Even with
Claudine’s knowledge of pigmy ways, and her love for them,
it was hard to arrive at a human understanding of the
pigmies, to see them as individuals. Perhaps they
weren’t,” he writes of one educated Gabonese’s view of
these forest Nibelungen. Another educated Gabonese, still
holding to old animist beliefs, went even
further, blandly informing him that the pigmies “have
power, and we keep them just like you keep a pet. You can do
anything you like with your pet, but there is something in the
pet that you don’t have.”
A particularly degrading example of domesticated mojo? Yet,
as Zimbabwe-born British journalist Peter Godwin pointed out
in his much more compelling and heartfelt book, When a
Crocodile Eats the Sun, there is something more to Africa
than its dark—or even dim—side: “Just when you’re
about to dismiss it and walk away, it delivers
something so unexpected, so tender.” Claudine, the
educated Gabonese referred to above, gave Mr. Naipaul
one such example:
I knew a person who went really mad. They took him to a
pigmy master who treated him for three months, and he was
healed. The man wanted to reward the master with anything and
everything—car, house, a plot of land. He said he would do
anything for the master. But the master wanted nothing. All he
said to the man was, “Take my young daughter home with you.
Adopt her and educate her in modern ways.” The man did as
the master asked. He brought the girl to Libreville and
educated her and treated her like a close confidante. She is
now a civil servant and is still very close to her people. You
see, the master knew that the world had changed, and the
pigmies would need their own people to be a bridge to the
new world.
Mr. Naipaul may have his doubts, but at least some of the
pigmies seem to be sorting things out.
PJ| 2.17.11 @ 8:03AM
Why is it that when a writer is internationally recognized, he then becomes a sage for all? Naipaul knows how to write a good yarn & should stick with that craft. He should not dabble into a foreign subject & write as if he is an expert in it: a problem with so many fictional writers.
Unger| 2.17.11 @ 9:00AM
PJ, I think part of Naipaul's fame rests on his travel writing. If I remember right The Middle Passage came out in 1962, so fairly early in his career Naipaul was writing travel logs. (It is interesting now that I think of it how the quality of his fiction changed for the worse after the Middle Passge.)
Travel writing might be popular with authors because it is much easier to observe and comment than to create and narrate.
Petronius| 2.17.11 @ 9:39AM
'Tis a sensitive subject within the club rooms of St. James, but we can't have the natives getting uppity. It just is not done. As to the existence of God, he's Chairman of the Membership Committee.
Thomas Paulick| 2.17.11 @ 11:49AM
What a terrific article -- the antithesis of multiculturalism. Years ago, in The End of Racism, Dinesh D'Souza looked at Africa as 14th and 15th century explorers must have seen it when they first encountered it, and (in essence) asked "How could Europeans not have developed racist notions?" The deep explorations of the Victorian era could only have confirmed these views.
One of the few things that W.E. B. DuBois and Booker T. Washington agreed on was the slavery was literally a "school", without denying the barbarism and sin of those who provided this school. But look at the blacks who have achieved anything excellent, in all the world: the huge majority of them are Americans. This is why people as disparate as Muhammed Ali, Keith Richburg, and Thomas Sowell have expressed gratitude to God that it was their ancestors, and not someone else's, who were crammed into the slave ships 300 years ago.
God works in strange ways. One translation of the Bible (NIV 1984) expresses Matthew 18:7 in these words: "Woe to the world because of the things that cause people to sin! Such things must come, but woe to the man through whom they come!"
Doctor Right| 2.17.11 @ 1:57PM
When one looks for earthly means to spiritual problems, one is bound to fail.
Thus, Naipaul's comment that 'foreign religion' cures nothing, gives no final answers, and 'narrows the mind' is ignorant, to say the least.
Am Freemen| 2.17.11 @ 10:04PM
"'Free Trade', Globalism and SUGENICS
are ALWAYS intertwined. ALWAYS."
-Alan Watt
(on Youtube)
---Just as globalist free-traders cynically deployed
monotheism to advance their agendas of full spectrum dominance, so now they're using 'the
earth-centered belief systems' of prehistory
(i.e. witchcraft) to discredit and destroy monotheism. with special focus on genuine,
intractable, NON-collectivist, NON-ecumenical, scriptural Christianity.
The same ends are achieved by introducing
MASSIVE third world immigration in Europe
and the States. There the 'benevolent' game of
destruction takes the form of 'moral relativism'
and empty 'ecumenicalism' funded entirely by the
foundations. Been underway for over half a century under richly endowed full steam.
Of course franchise slumming and 'POP culture'
(i.e. homogonizing END culture) are the weapons
of choice for Islam.
---Naipal's obviously spent too much time napping in the quads, too many nights burbling
among the BOGUS intellects of this
all consumingly corrupt moment.
AN OLD OLD STORY ----WAKE UP!
Reebok | 8.11.11 @ 3:29AM
is good
العاب بنات | 4.11.12 @ 5:05PM
thank you
very good