The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Another Perspective

Amateur Hour

Coming to terms with one’s “nauseating puerilia.”

Few experiences are more humbling for an author, not to say humiliating, than coming across one’s early work. Fortunately, very little of mine exists prior to 1999. What output I had before then appeared in long defunct college literary magazines, or was archived on obsolete floppy discs that have long since been recycled, along with my notebooks, diaries, and all other evidence of a premature writer’s life.

Then came the Internet.

At first blush, the Net seemed like a boon and a blessing. Budding Shakespeares could — in the time it used to take to lick a stamp — deposit their brilliant submissions in the inboxes of anticipative magazine editors. None of this ten or twelve drafts nonsense. You typed out a rant or a bit of verse, hit send, and you could knock off for the day. Sometimes these slapdash pieces were even published. Online, that is. The more naïve among us took this as vindication of our prodigious talent. It wasn’t until decades passed, and our skills and judgment had somewhat matured, that we realized how badly we had misjudged our abilities, to say nothing of the critical faculties of the editors.

In the pre-Internet era, there were countless literary, political or news magazines, most of them of consistently high quality. If a young author published a piece in, say, Three Penny Review or Politics, it meant it was a pretty good effort. Maybe not Pulitzer-Prize worthy, but certainly nothing to be ashamed of.

At the other end of the spectrum were the so-called ‘zines, often slapped together by one or two unemployed English majors on the public library’s Xerox machine. Few of these publications lasted beyond a year. And, like an old bachelor, when they passed into oblivion, they left no trace of their existence.

Then came the Internet and its myriad third-rate webzines. Today, any dreamer with a Macintosh can start an online magazine, and often does. The only barrier to some enterprising Harold Ross wannabe is the suffering he will have to endure reading thousands of hopeless manuscripts. When I was starting out, I published a lot of dreck on these sites. And a lot of it is still out there, haunting me. (Or should I say taunting me?) Unless the website goes offline for some reason, these stories can remain live for generations, serving as a constant reminder of one’s humble, not to say, inept beginnings. I keep praying these sites will become defunct, but for some reason, despite their awfulness, they stubbornly hang on in cyberspace, while much better sites (remember Feed and Suck?) have gone the way of the broadsheet.

TO BE SURE, there are some authors whose early writings are master works of prose, who seem to spring fully formed like Greek demigods on the page. The French poet Arthur Rimbaud was so good out of the gate he stopped writing at 21, no doubt thinking, “Been there, done that,” in today’s un-Rimbauvian parlance. But we late-bloomers can do little but pray our cruder stuff ends up at the butt-end of any Google search.

It does no good to try to get the stuff removed. I’ve asked editors to take down some of my more crude early writing, and they inevitably refuse. If they published such dross in the first place, they probably think it is worth preserving. “I still like it,” they tend to say. “I think we’ll leave it up.”

I am reminded of an essay by the cantankerous Edmund Wilson titled “Thoughts on Being Bibliographed.” What did Wilson think of the honor? Not much. He would have preferred his trivial early work be left buried and forgotten, not drudged up and placed on display for all posterity. Wrote Wilson:

My scholarly instincts were tempted as well as my literary vanity, and I have ended by scraping up items of nauseating puerilia and insignificant reviews and paragraphs which the Library might never have found for itself and which might better perhaps have been left unidentified…

Late in life, H.L. Mencken had second thoughts about the art of poetry. He decided the form was no medium for grown men. Mencken was so embarrassed by his first book, a collection of poems called Ventures Into Verse, he attempted to buy up (and destroy) all of the copies of the book he could find.

He must have missed one. Today, Ventures Into Verse is available for all to see — on the Internet, of course. Actually, the poems aren’t too bad. Compared to mine, anyway.

About the Author

Christopher Orlet writes from St. Louis.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (17) |

Appleby| 2.17.11 @ 6:56AM

I was an enthusiastic contributor to zines (and actually produced two) in the 1980s, mainly concerned with Doctor Who; I had a lot of fans and at DW conventions my fans took me to breakfast and discussed my work as if it were literature.

I also wrote a number of novels; none were ever published (thank God) but a wise older person told me to keep them and read them in 30 years, and I did so -- and they tell me a lot more about myself than they would enlighten the world. I was very law and order back then, and one series of novels attempting to create Utopia proved to me even then that Utopia would always be defeated by human beings who did everything they could to defeat my grandiose plans for their best good. (It is impossible to write authentic human characters who obey you. The ones who do are flat-faced robots or fascists.) It was a wonderful lesson for me in later years, and also gave me rather more sympathy for young people and their stupid ideas because I knew how embarrassed they would be some day to think they had ever believed what they are espousing now.

I suppose the moral of the story is continue to write, but dont publish anything.

the permanent newbie| 2.17.11 @ 9:50PM

Ah yes! The voice of experience! Without any revealing detail, let me concur that there's no embarrassment like the embarrassment of a reformed fanfiction writer.

You are not alone. Oh boy, are you not alone...

Vern Crisler | 2.17.11 @ 8:45AM

Better yet, publish on your own blog. You can always change something on a blog, but cold print is hell.

Unger| 2.17.11 @ 9:15AM

Orlet's writing is improving. He didn't mention 'my girlfriend' once in this article. (Well he he did maybe obliquely with his reference to bachelors, but at least he dressed it up as a metaphor.)

Petronius| 2.17.11 @ 10:04AM

Yea. Look back to thine rhymes upon the stalls, of which and with all, methinks thou dost confess too much. For my part, doggerel was consigned to flames long ago.

Appleby| 2.17.11 @ 10:50AM

I like doggerel, especially Ogden Nash.

"That money talks/I can't deny.
I had some once.
It said "Goodbye."

Ken (Old Texican)| 2.17.11 @ 11:57AM

Heh, fortunately I can go back and read my early efforts with a grin and a smile....and a re-learning experience.
Boy! I was smart! heh!

Tim the Enchanter| 2.17.11 @ 12:17PM

Nikolai Gogol (author of Dead Souls) first publication was a poem that was so ridiculed by the critics that he bought up every copy that he could find and burned them. Wonder if that's where Mencken got the idea?

Franco| 2.17.11 @ 1:27PM

I took a peek at Mencken's book and two or three of the poems are really good, you can recognize the Kipling influence ("The Transport General Ferguson" is marvelous). The rest is, well, youthful.

The secret to writing is no secret: first, the trick is not writing, but sitting down to write; and that you have to generate several pages of crap in order to produce one paragraph of something decent. It's manual labor.

chuck jim fox| 2.17.11 @ 11:24PM

I found a paperback anthology of some of Edmund Wilson's American Jitters writings about things going on in the 20s and 30s, and his reportage is very interesting. He seems to have had a Heart, compared to Mencken, who seems to have never gotten past Everyone in the World is Stupid, which he was still hammering as late as his Library of Congress recording in '48.

Crackpot| 2.20.11 @ 3:54PM

It's just as bad for the artists. Fredrick Remington used to pay his hotel bills with paintings when he was young. In later years he spent much time trying to track down these early paintings with his signature on them and destroy them.

sex toys | 7.4.11 @ 1:14AM

The fact that Trump has come out against the Korea-U.S. trade deal and this week's pulling of a vote on a trade deal in the House by the leadership shows there a very fluid House GOP caucus against the kind of trade deals which benefit only corporate interests and infringe upon U.S. sovereignty

Reebok | 8.11.11 @ 3:28AM

is good

العاب بنات | 4.11.12 @ 5:05PM

thank you

very nic

More Articles by Christopher Orlet

More Articles From Another Perspective

http://spectator.org/archives/2011/02/17/amateur-hour

ADVERTISEMENT

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

It's.The.Law

Ross Kaminsky | 5.20.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

How Long Is This War?

Jed Babbin | 5.20.13

Flatten the IRS

Ray V. Hartwell | 5.20.13

ADVERTISEMENT