Few experiences are more humbling for an author, not to say
humiliating, than coming across one’s early work. Fortunately, very
little of mine exists prior to 1999. What output I had before then
appeared in long defunct college literary magazines, or was
archived on obsolete floppy discs that have long since been
recycled, along with my notebooks, diaries, and all other evidence
of a premature writer’s life.
Then came the Internet.
At first blush, the Net seemed like a boon and a blessing.
Budding Shakespeares could — in the time it used to take to lick a
stamp — deposit their brilliant submissions in the inboxes of
anticipative magazine editors. None of this ten or twelve drafts
nonsense. You typed out a rant or a bit of verse, hit send, and you
could knock off for the day. Sometimes these slapdash pieces were
even published. Online, that is. The more naïve among us took this
as vindication of our prodigious talent. It wasn’t until decades
passed, and our skills and judgment had somewhat matured, that we
realized how badly we had misjudged our abilities, to say nothing
of the critical faculties of the editors.
In the pre-Internet era, there were countless literary,
political or news magazines, most of them of consistently high
quality. If a young author published a piece in, say, Three
Penny Review or Politics, it meant it was a pretty
good effort. Maybe not Pulitzer-Prize worthy, but certainly nothing
to be ashamed of.
At the other end of the spectrum were the so-called
‘zines, often slapped together by one or two unemployed English
majors on the public library’s Xerox machine. Few of these
publications lasted beyond a year. And, like an old bachelor, when
they passed into oblivion, they left no trace of their
existence.
Then came the Internet and its myriad third-rate webzines.
Today, any dreamer with a Macintosh can start an online magazine,
and often does. The only barrier to some enterprising Harold Ross
wannabe is the suffering he will have to endure reading thousands
of hopeless manuscripts. When I was starting out, I published a lot
of dreck on these sites. And a lot of it is still out there,
haunting me. (Or should I say taunting me?) Unless the website goes
offline for some reason, these stories can remain live for
generations, serving as a constant reminder of one’s humble, not to
say, inept beginnings. I keep praying these sites will become
defunct, but for some reason, despite their awfulness, they
stubbornly hang on in cyberspace, while much better sites (remember
Feed and Suck?) have gone the way of the broadsheet.
TO BE SURE, there are some authors whose early writings
are master works of prose, who seem to spring fully formed like
Greek demigods on the page. The French poet Arthur Rimbaud was so
good out of the gate he stopped writing at 21, no doubt thinking,
“Been there, done that,” in today’s un-Rimbauvian parlance. But we
late-bloomers can do little but pray our cruder stuff ends up at
the butt-end of any Google search.
It does no good to try to get the stuff removed. I’ve
asked editors to take down some of my more crude early writing, and
they inevitably refuse. If they published such dross in the first
place, they probably think it is worth preserving. “I still like
it,” they tend to say. “I think we’ll leave it up.”
I am reminded of an essay by the cantankerous Edmund
Wilson titled “Thoughts on Being Bibliographed.” What did
Wilson think of the honor? Not much. He would have preferred his
trivial early work be left buried and forgotten, not drudged up and
placed on display for all posterity. Wrote
Wilson:
My scholarly instincts were tempted as well as my literary
vanity, and I have ended by scraping up items of nauseating
puerilia and insignificant reviews and paragraphs which the Library
might never have found for itself and which might better perhaps
have been left unidentified…
Late in life, H.L. Mencken had second thoughts about the art of
poetry. He decided the form was no medium for grown men. Mencken
was so embarrassed by his first book, a collection of poems called
Ventures Into Verse, he attempted to buy up (and destroy)
all of the copies of the book he could find.
He must have missed one. Today, Ventures Into
Verse is available for all to see — on the
Internet, of course. Actually, the poems aren’t too bad.
Compared to mine, anyway.
Appleby| 2.17.11 @ 6:56AM
I was an enthusiastic contributor to zines (and actually produced two) in the 1980s, mainly concerned with Doctor Who; I had a lot of fans and at DW conventions my fans took me to breakfast and discussed my work as if it were literature.
I also wrote a number of novels; none were ever published (thank God) but a wise older person told me to keep them and read them in 30 years, and I did so -- and they tell me a lot more about myself than they would enlighten the world. I was very law and order back then, and one series of novels attempting to create Utopia proved to me even then that Utopia would always be defeated by human beings who did everything they could to defeat my grandiose plans for their best good. (It is impossible to write authentic human characters who obey you. The ones who do are flat-faced robots or fascists.) It was a wonderful lesson for me in later years, and also gave me rather more sympathy for young people and their stupid ideas because I knew how embarrassed they would be some day to think they had ever believed what they are espousing now.
I suppose the moral of the story is continue to write, but dont publish anything.
the permanent newbie| 2.17.11 @ 9:50PM
Ah yes! The voice of experience! Without any revealing detail, let me concur that there's no embarrassment like the embarrassment of a reformed fanfiction writer.
You are not alone. Oh boy, are you not alone...
Vern Crisler | 2.17.11 @ 8:45AM
Better yet, publish on your own blog. You can always change something on a blog, but cold print is hell.
Unger| 2.17.11 @ 9:15AM
Orlet's writing is improving. He didn't mention 'my girlfriend' once in this article. (Well he he did maybe obliquely with his reference to bachelors, but at least he dressed it up as a metaphor.)
Petronius| 2.17.11 @ 10:04AM
Yea. Look back to thine rhymes upon the stalls, of which and with all, methinks thou dost confess too much. For my part, doggerel was consigned to flames long ago.
Appleby| 2.17.11 @ 10:50AM
I like doggerel, especially Ogden Nash.
"That money talks/I can't deny.
I had some once.
It said "Goodbye."
Ken (Old Texican)| 2.17.11 @ 11:57AM
Heh, fortunately I can go back and read my early efforts with a grin and a smile....and a re-learning experience.
Boy! I was smart! heh!
Tim the Enchanter| 2.17.11 @ 12:17PM
Nikolai Gogol (author of Dead Souls) first publication was a poem that was so ridiculed by the critics that he bought up every copy that he could find and burned them. Wonder if that's where Mencken got the idea?
Franco| 2.17.11 @ 1:27PM
I took a peek at Mencken's book and two or three of the poems are really good, you can recognize the Kipling influence ("The Transport General Ferguson" is marvelous). The rest is, well, youthful.
The secret to writing is no secret: first, the trick is not writing, but sitting down to write; and that you have to generate several pages of crap in order to produce one paragraph of something decent. It's manual labor.
chuck jim fox| 2.17.11 @ 11:24PM
I found a paperback anthology of some of Edmund Wilson's American Jitters writings about things going on in the 20s and 30s, and his reportage is very interesting. He seems to have had a Heart, compared to Mencken, who seems to have never gotten past Everyone in the World is Stupid, which he was still hammering as late as his Library of Congress recording in '48.
Crackpot| 2.20.11 @ 3:54PM
It's just as bad for the artists. Fredrick Remington used to pay his hotel bills with paintings when he was young. In later years he spent much time trying to track down these early paintings with his signature on them and destroy them.
sex toys | 7.4.11 @ 1:14AM
The fact that Trump has come out against the Korea-U.S. trade deal and this week's pulling of a vote on a trade deal in the House by the leadership shows there a very fluid House GOP caucus against the kind of trade deals which benefit only corporate interests and infringe upon U.S. sovereignty
Reebok | 8.11.11 @ 3:28AM
is good
العاب بنات | 4.11.12 @ 5:05PM
thank you
very nic