IN 1961, SPEAKING OF “the virtue of avoiding hysteria in
governmental matters” and “the crisis rhetoric of the Kennedy
administration,” Eisenhower declared: “We should plan our
security, defend our rights, and live with the situation in
the world — no Napoleonic brooding, or impulse. Panicky
policies condemn people to live in apprehension,
not serenity, as is their birthright.”
Later in the decade, in 1968, against the backdrop of the
panicky politics of the Kennedy/Johnson administrations and
nationwide unrest, “the Gallup poll would once again name
Dwight Eisenhower the man most admired by the American people”
— a somewhat surprising choice for a man who “had spent
the 1960s in the relative obscurity of retirement.” But he did
give speeches and wrote articles focusing on “patriotism,
family, common sense,” delivering messages from what
Time magazine called, condescendingly,
“the remote past.”
“But somehow Eisenhower’s basic optimism
and his confidence in the future as America’s
leading ‘soldier of democracy’ was appreciated
that troubled December, and Americans
were beginning to look back on the peace
and prosperity of the 1950s with
nostalgia.”
We may never replicate those years, but
there’s no doubt they’ll continue to serve as a
model for the best that America could be. And
interestingly, as the distance increases and
today’s national leaders lose stature, Dwight
Eisenhower’s reputation continues to
grow.
In 1961, a New York Times Magazine article
by Arthur Schlesinger, Sr. ranked presidents in
order of greatness. “Eisenhower stood
twenty-eighth on the list out of thirty-three.”
That poll was hardly objective, conducted as it
was by the father of Arthur Schlesinger Jr., a
devoted courtier at Kennedy’s Camelot, who would
later take over his father’s presidential ranking
business.
Lately, however, the Schlesinger monopoly is being broken
by scholars like Alvin S. Felzenberg, who moves Eisenhower up
to fifth place, one ahead of FDR. And Robert W. Merry, working
on a book on presidential ratings, also believes the
Schlesinger ratings reflected partisan bias among the
respondents, and notes that in the 2005 Wall Street
Journal poll, Eisenhower was ranked eighth.
But whatever the ratings, writes his grandson, his
self-assessment stood: “He had understood his responsibility
in the White House to be, in addition to making correct
decisions and administering the government, one of defusing
the atmosphere of crisis that had pervaded national politics
since 1932. He felt strongly he had been successful.”
DURING THOSE LAST YEARS, Eisenhower brought his grandson
along like the brightest and most favored of his junior
officers, but was always careful not to show favoritism or the
affection he obviously felt. Twelve years old when
his grandfather left the White House, David
Eisenhower worked at assigned chores on the Gettysburg
farm, was rewarded for school grades — $5 for As, $3 for
Bs and a $1 fine for Cs (during his last year,
Dwight offered David $100 to cut his hair before his marriage
to Julie, but refused to pay when the cut didn’t meet GI
standards) — and spent much of his spare time in the company
of his grandfather.
Much of this book’s interest lies in his
description of those idiosyncrasies that show us
his grandfather as a man — and very much the
quintessential retired military man. When he gets
a driver’s license, his sharp corner turns produce “the squeal
of rubber against concrete [that] never ceased to surprise
him.… Every bump and lurch elicited a faint,
‘Damnation.’”
He is a dedicated bridge player, but others
are reluctant to join him because each game is waged like
a military campaign, with no blunders allowed. The same is
true of his approach to golf. He likes to read Westerns,
preferably with no romance, doesn’t suffer fools gladly,
dislikes casual conversation, and no matter the guests or
occasion, goes to bed promptly at 10.
A man of his times, Eisenhower was not given
to displays of affection. But he was also a
grandfather. When he learned from Mamie that
David and Julie Nixon were engaged (during a
visit, David had been too nervous to break the
news), he sent this letter to his
grandson:
For many years, I have been struck by the
virtual impossibility of men of the Nordic strain
to express, in a face-to-face meeting, their
affection, even when of the same family and when the ties
of sentiment are strong indeed.… I sometimes envy the Latins, who
do not seem to be prey to these particular inhibitions.…
Because of ties of love and respect for your mind and
character, I value every contact I have with you… if
at any time you think I might be helpful to you, during
whatever years may be left to me, it would be a great
privilege to me if you would let me know.…
Even if I could do nothing, it would not be for lack of
trying. This I mean very sincerely. I’m not only proud that
you are my grandson, but my friend as well — to whom I give
my deepest affection.
As for the engagement, he wrote: “Mamie told me of your
telephonic report of the joy you and Julie felt on her acceptance
of your great grandmother’s ring. I am more than delighted that the
two of you feel such a deep mutual affection. You are both the kind
of people who will, throughout your lives, enrich America.” And
with their three children, their quiet but productive lives — with
books like this — that’s exactly what they’ve done.
WRITERS TEND TO BE CYNICS, and the writers on the Nixon
staff during those last long Watergate-drenched days felt they
had plenty to be cynical about, with one notable exception —
the Nixon family, to whom Ben Stein was our unofficial
ambassador, and especially the president’s youngest daughter,
Julie, whose fierce loyalty to her father and concern for the
well-being of his staff exempted her from all criticism.
As Aram Bakshian recently wrote, “Julie was a good egg.”
And still is.
And as this memoir demonstrates, so is her
husband, David Eisenhower.
Kodos| 2.2.11 @ 8:19AM
We STILL like Ike.
Alan Brooks| 2.2.11 @ 6:02PM
Ike and Reagan were 16 out of all the other postwar years.
16 years out of almost 66 years since 1945-- 50 years you WASTED! a half-century wasted by a party that calls itself conservative and conserves NOTHING.
Ken (Old Texican)| 2.2.11 @ 8:37AM
I recall WEB Griffin's description of Ike in one of his novels...words to the effect: Never has a President exercised power so skillfully as to make him invisible.
Evidently, most people never felt his guiding hand, but it was an absolutely firm hand behind the scenes, and behind his smile.
skip| 2.2.11 @ 9:43AM
W.E.B. Griffin's 'Brotherhood Of War' and 'The Corps' series should be required reading before anyone opines on the U.S. military.
Ken (Old Texican)| 2.2.11 @ 1:11PM
Skip,
agreed! Not only that. His characters have become some of my best friends.
I can now open any of those books, to any page, and enjoy the 'visit' with my 'friends'.
Alan Brooks| 2.2.11 @ 6:10PM
I wont read it. If Robert E. Lee's son had written a book on the Civil War, "pass" would be the response as well. But read what you want; there are billions of books if you count web-books.
Read them all and tell us what you think--
we'll be sitting in front of the computers waiting.
And tell David's son to write a book about Nixon.
skip| 2.3.11 @ 11:59AM
Hey 'Brook no intelligent or honest thought',
If you were a character in one of W.E.B.'s books you would be Macklin.
Appleby| 2.2.11 @ 8:37AM
Ike was Daddys favourite General (he served in World War II in the Weather unit, at one time attached to Pattons 8th Army, but had no use for Patton) and he always had great respect for him as President too. All those who came after him did not fare so well in his opinion!
Howard| 2.2.11 @ 9:35AM
I remember how the cynical liberals made so much fun of the old "fuddy duddy", Ike. He was so 19th century. Well, let's see:
1. Balanced budgets
2. American strength
3. Strong families and communities
Sure, there were real problems as well; civil rights, crime, etc. But, Ike was a solid man who performed a solid job. RIP.
daddio| 2.2.11 @ 6:02PM
Our last great president (until Reagan).
Alan Brooks| 2.2.11 @ 6:16PM
"Sure, there were real problems as well; civil" rights [snip]"
if it were up to you, Obama wouldn't be president.
Make up your mind, Howard. If you want a black POTUS you could say "black conservative in 2012". But that isn't quite what you have in mind.
You don't have to agree, but you have to someday make up your mind-- do you like blacks or not?
Dai Alanye | 2.2.11 @ 9:48AM
One of, if not *the* biggest blot on Eisenhower's record is his mishandling of Patton during WW II, partly due, in my opinion, to the neophyte warrior's envy for the hardened and successful, but flamboyant, older soldier.
I could go on, but two words tell much of the story: Falaise Gap.
Alan Brooks| 2.2.11 @ 6:18PM
Monty was too cautious; his soldiers had to be saved many times by America's forces.
Dai Alanye | 2.3.11 @ 7:34PM
Monty was a great general... for the First World War.
Herb| 2.2.11 @ 11:18AM
What a remarkable contrast to today's top military brass who are more concerned with promoting sexual misfits and physically incapable females.
Amor de Cosmos| 2.2.11 @ 11:48AM
Contrast Ike's experience with the Community Organizer and part-time law lecturer. Who do you think has the better temperament, judgment and vision? Not even close.
Alan Brooks| 2.2.11 @ 6:22PM
Blacks were not allowed to be Supreme Commanders, much less presidents, in the '40s.
I thought perhaps most cons weren't racists, but might have been mistaken; maybe they are racists after all. How many black generals were there in the Big One?
Not a whole lot.
bookworm| 2.4.11 @ 12:42AM
How stupid can you get?
W| 2.2.11 @ 1:09PM
As soon as JFK replaced Ike, the Russians built the Berlin Wall and then installed nukes in Cuba. That conduct speaks more clearly than words on how the Russians regarded IKE and JFK
maxumumrandb| 2.2.11 @ 2:27PM
That he preferred to be called "General" as opposed to Mr. President" impresses me.
chris haynes| 2.2.11 @ 5:36PM
The biggest blot on Eisenhower's record, wasnt his "handling of Patton". It was his war crimes. He played significant roles in two American sponsored attrocities: Operation Keelhaul and the Morgenthau Plan.
bookworm| 2.4.11 @ 12:44AM
Well, Chris, next time there's a world war, we'll just put YOU in charge.
FREE tea| 2.2.11 @ 10:05PM
We MUST take into account the truly MASSIVE infiltrations of Soviet sympathizers, enablers, Globalist-eugenicists and banksters throughout our establishment begining with WW I---
STILL we have to admit Eisenhower
in the European theater viz a viz Soviet intentions
was a chump
(though here again he was probably just following Globalist agendas from the State Department)
---and, though again, he MASSIVELY misread
the long-term implications of REFUSING to
liberate North Korea from the RED Chinese
military takeover (again probably misdirected
and misinformed by the likes of Globalists
Dulles and Acheson, Harriman at al--who were
fresh off betraying China into the warm
'social eugenics agendas' of Mao Tse Tung
---and this after, in key family histories, having
betrayed Old China, TRUE China itself to the opium scourge thereby reaping VAST wealth,
power and, through Yale, Harvard and Princeton
which they OWNED ---influence)
--AND
though he failed to follow through and get to the bottom of the urgently REAL matter of Communist/Globalist infiltration of policy making, 'culture creation' and media
(CHECK OUT the declassified KGB documents
on the period if you already haven't. They
CONFIRM everything McCarthy was talking about ---AND MORE)
---HE was a genuine leader, a sane leader, a sober
leader on many other fronts and certainly
more solid than ANYTHING that's come our
way since.
He even had a moment or two of genuine awakeness.
-----------AGAIN, one really MUST go back
to Coolidge for a fully-functional American
citizen president.
Jerry Jones| 2.14.11 @ 12:06PM
Dwight Eisenhower was reared as a Jehovah's Witness. Ike's parents BOTH converted to the Jehovah's Witnesses when Ike was only 5 years old, and Ike's father became a JW Pastor. The Eisenhower home doubled as Abilene's Kingdom Hall throughout Ike's formative years, and for four years after Ike left home to attend West Point.
Mark Tooley's article attempts to perpetuate one of the biggest frauds perpetuated on the American public in the 20th century. Any 10 year-old with a computer now knows that President Eisenhower was not reared in the River Brethren religion.
To read the most brief and most comprehensive source of factual info on this topic simply google the phrase PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES REARED AS JEHOVAH'S WITNESS.
Bob K.| 2.14.11 @ 12:58PM
There are responses to this comment which Mr. Jones originally posted in Mark Tooley's article on this biography in today's (2/14/2011) American Spectator.
العاب بنات | 4.11.12 @ 4:11PM
I could go on, but two words tell much of the story
thanx