In an unusual step last week, the Federal Communications
Commission
released public guidance in an effort to encourage “forum
shopping” for lawsuits challenging the FCC’s order to
regulate the Internet.
Forum shopping is the practice litigators use to get their
cases heard in a court — in this case, a federal court — they
believe will more likely deliver a favorable ruling. But in this
case something else is at work. “The FCC knows its jurisdiction
over regulating the Internet is tenuous at best, and it is hoping
that its friends will file suits with a number of federal courts
across the country,” says a telecommunications attorney in private
practice in New York. “The FCC is gambling that it will get a more
sympathetic hearing that way.”
The FCC’s “Public Notice” provides a virtual road map for
groups that might want to file suit over the so-called “Net
Neutrality” order that the regulatory body approved in late
December. The FCC doesn’t even hide the fact that it is encouraging
groups to jump-start the “judicial lottery procedure,” which would
ensure that the FCC has a shot at a more friendly venue to hear its
defense for regulating the Internet.
For example, if three different entities or individuals
file three separate lawsuits in three different federal court
districts involving the same issue, in this case the FCC net
neutrality order, the cases are essentially placed together and a
lottery takes place to determine which federal district court will
hear the case.
“Look, this isn’t anything new; the Department of Justice
has at times forum shopped,” says the New York attorney. “You saw
it with some terrorism cases. But I can’t think of a time when a
federal agency sent out a kind of ‘wink, wink, nod nod’ press
release that encouraged others to file with different federal
courts so the agency can rig the system for a friendlier legal
venue. I wouldn’t go so far to say it’s unethical, but it’s highly
unusual. If I were in Congress, I’d be demanding an explanation,
and if I were a federal judge I’d sure be annoyed at the agency for
gamesmanship.”