If I had to make a list of people we could not afford to lose,
the late Professor Denis Dutton, who died in New Zealand on
December 20, aged 66, would have been high on it.
Denis was best known for his Arts & Letters
Daily, the indispensable website and
guide to the best being published in the world (TAS is
there, of course), which he founded in 1998. It is said to have
been modeled on an 18th century broadsheet. If so, so much the
better for the 18th century! With ALD Denis proved the web
could be the vehicle for the popular dissemination and exchange of
intelligent ideas that its most idealistic founders may have once
hoped for. Steven Pinker called him a visionary: “among the first
to realize that a website could be a forum for cutting-edge
ideas.”
“It’s a grave mistake in publishing, whether you’re
talking about Internet or print publication, to try to play to a
limited repertoire of established reader interests,” Denis said in
a 2000
interview. “A few years ago, Bill Gates was
boasting that we’ll soon have sensors which will turn on the music
that we like or show on the walls the paintings we like when we
walk into a room. How boring! The hell with our preexisting likes;
let’s expand ourselves intellectually.”
Certainly not everything re-published or made
available at ALD was of the highest standard, but a
great deal of it was. Denis told me he tried to avoid giving
ALD a narrow image, but conservatives in particular have
reason to be grateful for the forum he created – it opened
magazines like TAS, Quadrant, City
Journal and the Weekly Standard to the
world, along with the sites of such as Michelle Malkin, Thomas
Sowell, Keith Windshuttle and Mark Steyn. The list goes
on…
I know of no one who has done more for the international
distribution of conservative ideas. For a professor of philosophy
his contribution to the world would have been eminently practical
even if her had done nothing else. And he did it from a provincial
university at the bottom of the world.
His achievements, however, ranged far beyond this. Denis
was raised in Los Angeles and was the brother of booksellers Doug
and Dave Dutton of the legendary Dutton’s Bookstores in Los
Angeles. He was educated at the University of
California-Santa Barbara.
He concluded his career as professor of philosophy at
Canterbury College at Christchurch in New Zealand, having joined
the faculty in 1984. He wrote widely on aesthetics and his last
major publication in his own field was the 2009 book, The Art
Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution. Michael S.
Roth, president of Wesleyan University, wrote of this: “The Art
Instinct is an important book that raises questions often
avoided in contemporary aesthetics and art criticism.… His
arguments against major figures in the philosophy and anthropology
of the arts are often devastating — and amusing.” His overarching
philosophical interest was an exploration of the nature of
beauty.
He believed that, because of our heritage, the same sort
of beauty appeals to all humans (We get our liking of trees with
branches close to the ground, he said, because they were handy for
our ancestors to scramble up to avoid predators, and, wherever we
come from, we like pictures of landscapes with paths or rivers in
them.)
I knew him as a Quixotic publisher. His experimental
online publishing company, Cybereditions, brought out two books of
mine, Return of the Heroes on “The Lord of The Rings” and
“Star Wars,” and Caverns of Magic on caves in myth
and storytelling. Neither, unfortunately, made either Cybereditions
or me a fortune (Amazon tells the tale), but their publication
showed his readiness to take a chance and his commitment to a
community of ideas. His support of Caverns of Magic in
particular showed his readiness to take risks in promoting
interests beyond the commercial. Few writers would ever find their
first feet without people like the Denis Duttons.
As the editor of the journal Philosophy and
Literature, he fought a lonely crusade for clear
writing among academics and intellectuals, perhaps the most
Quixotic of all his crusades. He saw that, given the Internet has
no gate-keepers, clear writing and good editors are needed more
than ever. He founded the celebrated bad writing contest in
Philosophy and Literature. In 1998, the
contest awarded first place to someone at the University of
California-Berkeley called Professor Judith
Butler, for this
gem of a sentence in the journal diacritics:
The move from a structuralist account in which capital is
understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous
ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to
repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of
temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from
a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as
theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the
contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception
of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of
the rearticulation of power.
As Denis put it, “To ask what this means is to miss the
point. This sentence beats readers into submission and instructs
them that they are in the presence of a great and deep mind. Actual
communication has nothing to do with it.” As part of his war on
nihilistic gobbledegook he also published Alan Sokal’s postscript
to his famous hoax on so-called Quantum Gravity.
He was one of the great civilized men. I almost put “one
of the last,” but I think such pessimism would have been foreign to
him.
I spent an afternoon with him in June, 2009, at Canterbury
University. The tiny office he occupied gave little indication that
here was a scholar, and an intellectual mover and shaker, of the
highest international significance. We spent several hours talking.
He was a witty, charming and gracious host. He must have been aware
by then of the cancer that was killing him but gave no sign of it.
We walked by a lovely little river very like the ideal he
illustrated of a beautiful landscape.
Vern Crisler| 12.30.10 @ 8:30AM
"We get our liking of trees with branches close to the ground, he said, because they were handy for our ancestors to scramble up to avoid predators, and, wherever we come from, we like pictures of landscapes with paths or rivers in them.)"
This nonsense hardly commends him to intelligent readers.
Quiote| 12.30.10 @ 4:10PM
If you're referring to yourself, Vern, consider whether the primeval pleasure of 'spoiling of a good walk by hitting andn chasing a small white ball' might also be because we evolved into homo intelligentythingy on savanahs which look a lot like a modern golf course. Or more pithily, it doesn't take much intelligence to speculate that the pleasures of walking a golf course could very originate from some 'ancester memory' from when we first became hunter and talkers in the similar looking treescapes and grasslands of savannah Africa?
Vern Crisler| 12.30.10 @ 8:48PM
You're right. It doesn't take much intelligence.
quiote| 12.30.10 @ 10:32PM
More speculative intelligence than some people enjoy, obviously.
Could we agree that lower-branch-less giants can also be regarded as beautiful and not necessary proofs of an irrational aesthetics theory - or New Zealand origins?
Dai Alanye | 12.30.10 @ 6:34PM
I imagine that should Mr Crisler ever come face to face with a grizzly he'd consider a nearby low-branching tree to be a thing of exceedingly great beauty.
Vern Crisler| 12.30.10 @ 8:49PM
Utility and aesthetics are not the same thing.
A. Murray Kahn| 12.30.10 @ 9:33AM
The word "instinct" in the title gives it away. "Instinct" is a placeholder for a word not yet invented because the understanding of such urges as the need to build a nest or paint a picture or suckle the young does not yet exist. The Darwinists (and Denis was one of them) have a very small model to explain the ineffable.
Dai Alanye | 12.30.10 @ 6:55PM
Male birds make nests due to their brains being wired to gain a mate by doing so, and the females of those species are again "wired" to choose a nest prior to mating. Other species---other techniques of courtship and procreation."Instinct" is simply a codeword for this process.
Similarly, birds drive their grown progeny from the nest due not to some cerebral process but to the cute little birdies having become teenagers---which, of course, the young birds are hardwired to do in order to prevent overloading a territory. Those species which fail to develop a similar strategy face an increased possibility of extinction.
Advanced human societies ignore this latter instinct, keeping our rebellious teens at home well into their twenties to make parents' lives miserable instead of being forced out to exercise their aggressive and abrasive "instincts" on strangers.
A. Murray Kahn| 12.31.10 @ 9:24AM
Wired? Hardwired? That's a placeholder for "instinct". It points toward a program. The problem doesn't go away by calling it something else. The teen years are gift so that a parent's heart is not broken when the fledgling leaves (is pushed from) the nest. Very witty response.
Dai Alanye | 12.31.10 @ 5:17PM
But Dutton claims they are related, and gives a reason. What's more, "Form follows function," is an aesthetic proverb of long duration. Think about it.
Dai Alanye | 12.31.10 @ 5:19PM
The above comment was meant for Crisler.
PJ| 12.30.10 @ 10:10AM
This video piece: http://www.mediabistro.com/gal.....ed_b20157, gives an idea on what Prof Dutton means by beauty.
I don't know if I agree w/his definition of beauty but I certainly appreciate his theory since it gives me reasons to think, re-evaluate, &/or reinforce my position. Isn't that what a civil exchange of ideas is all about?
I never heard of this man, Prof Dutton, before this article but I will miss him.
Richard Baker| 12.31.10 @ 10:11AM
My High School English teacher would have failed her for a run-on sentence like that. I've also read some of Hillary's writings and they're just as muddled. Somehow, clear writing is anathema to the "educated" class because that's too simple, I suppose. Give me a Churchillian sentence anytime, instead.
Richard Baker| 12.31.10 @ 10:12AM
I meant Judith Butler.
Doug Dryden| 1.1.11 @ 12:40PM
As to Judith Butler, writing such as hers always reminds me of Edgar Allen Poe interjecting French phrases - 'see how clever I am?' It is an 'intellectual' form of the emperor's clothes.
Henry| 1.2.11 @ 11:28AM
Judith Butler's wikipedia entry seems pretty damning.
The Sanity Inspector | 1.3.11 @ 11:52AM
RIP to Prof. Dutton. As Paul Harvey would say on occasions like this, someone will take his job, but no one will take his place.
Richard Baker| 1.3.11 @ 12:52PM
Henry:
This line in Wikipedia probably says it all.
"Butler has become famous in some circles for her "impenetrable, jargon-ridden prose." This is a virtue or is it the product of a muddled mind?