The Financial Times
reported last week on a “sharp rise” in torture
cases in the West Bank, which is governed by the Fatah-affiliated
Palestinian Authority and thought to be a good deal more moderate
than Hamas-ruled Gaza, as well as a peace partner for
Israel.
The rise has, indeed, occurred since a Hamas terror attack
in the West Bank in August that killed four Israelis. The PA, which
saw the attack as implying a threat to its own rule, rounded up
over 700 suspects — “almost all,” FT says, “without
proper warrants and held…without the assent of civilian judges or
prosecutors.”
That, of course, was hardly the worst of it. Among others,
FT notes the horrific case of Ahmad Salhab, a 42-year-old
former mechanic who was first tortured by PA security officers in
2008, and then again in the latest wave, by a method called
Shabeh, “in which detainees are handcuffed and bound in
stress conditions for long periods.”
The first time, in 2008, Salhab emerged from the ordeal
with torn spinal discs. This time, in September and October, he
was
held in solitary confinement, deprived of the medication
he requires as a result of the earlier abuse and subjected again to
Shabeh. His condition deteriorated so badly that he could
neither walk nor stand upright…. [He] was released on October 16
but had to spend 10 days in Hebron hospital before he could return
home. Now he walks on crutches and has little hope of ever making a
full recovery.
FT also cites a
more detailed report on PA torture posted by
Human Rights Watch a month ago. It notes that “more than 100
allegations of torture [have been] registered so far this year,”
including one involving a man tortured for ten days; that “the PA
has been extremely lax in prosecuting security officials for
torture and ill-treatment of detainees”; and that eight detainees
have allegedly died in custody since 2007.
Troubling here is that the PA security forces making the
arrests, if not those actually carrying out the torture, are
largely U.S.-funded and trained. As Israeli commentator Caroline
Glick
noted in a recent column,
between 2007 and August 2010, U.S. assistance to the PA
security services totaled $400 million.… This assistance has paid
for the training and outfitting of 400 Presidential Guards and
2,700 soldiers in the National Security Forces. The U.S. plans to
train five additional 500-man NSF battalions.
The 2007 starting-date of the program, which until
recently was run by General Keith Dayton, was not arbitrary: that
was when Hamas staged a bloody coup in Gaza against Fatah, with
which it had been purportedly sharing rule. The U.S., fearing a
repeat performance in the West Bank, set out to build a more
capable PA force that would keep Hamas at bay.
But that wasn’t the only aim. The creation of a modern,
competent PA force is also supposed to enable the transition to
Palestinian statehood — a goal that has been pursued obsessively,
if unavailingly so far, by the Obama administration.
From a cold realpolitik perspective, one could
say that, if the PA force has succeeded so far in suppressing
Hamas, one shouldn’t quibble too much about the moral aspects.
Relatively moderate Arab countries like Egypt and Jordan also crack
down hard on their Islamists, and their methods are no prettier.
Comme ci, comme ça.
But the situation is indeed problematic, and partly for
moral reasons. If the point of Palestinian statehood is supposedly
to free the Palestinians from Israeli occupation, then creating
another Arab police state for them seems of dubious value at best.
At least, it is hard to see why the U.S. should invest so much
money and diplomacy — including harsh pressures on Israel —
toward that goal.
And pragmatically speaking, the fact that PA forces fight
Hamas hardly means they can be counted on to be moderate; such
internecine conflict is rampant in the Arab world. Indeed, the PA
continues to be an entity no less steeped
in anti-Israeli, anti-Semitic incitement than
Hamas-ruled Gaza.
So much so that Israeli security forces are quite worried
about the growing PA capacity, with General Avi Mizrachi, head of
Central Command, saying
in a speech last May that “the IDF must be prepared for an
escalation in fighting against Palestinian security personnel
trained in Jordan by U.S. General Dayton.”
He added:
Ken (Old Texican)| 11.29.10 @ 7:32AM
David,
Tighten up your cinch over there, and pull your hats down tight.
Our current President is too busy trying to dismantle America these days.
He will fail, but you allies are in for a wild ride it seems to me.
I'm sorry.
Post American| 11.29.10 @ 9:01AM
LOLZ Didn't Israel create Hamas in the First place to counter the PLO? Didn't the USA prop and support the secular Saddam in Iraq and the loons in Al Qaeda in Afghanistan? Blowback is a B!
loulou| 11.29.10 @ 11:03AM
What planet are you living on?
Israel did not create Hamas.
Are you a mentally deficient individual?
RCV| 11.29.10 @ 3:21PM
Pure nonsense. The origins of Hamas are well-documented and they have nothing to do with Israel.
As for the PLO, here is the stark reality: Israel must survive as a Jewish state, which is its purpose for being. Demographically, it cannot survive both as a Jewish and as a Democratic state, and at the same time retain the West Bank. (Sealing off Gaza and letting it fall into the sea, is an option on the other hand.) The best solution, in retrospect, would have been to return most of it (sans Jerusalem and certain other key parts) to Jordan after the '67 war, but that's no longer an option. The only remaining viable alternative is to deal with the Palestinian Authority as Israel is doing - from a position of strength and on its own timetable. But a non-Israeli entity on the West Bank is inevitable, and Israel knows that. The PA is the only present alternative available for Israel and for the US.
Alan Brooks| 11.29.10 @ 6:03PM
"But a non-Israeli entity on the West Bank is inevitable"
In other words, the wars go on for decades (you don't have to mince words at AS).
RCV| 11.29.10 @ 6:45PM
No question. If I knew how to end them, I'da won the Nobel.
BTW, did you see the wikileak about the Saudis pressing for military attacks on Iran? Surprise, surprise!
Alan Brooks| 11.29.10 @ 8:19PM
Right, Saudis don't want their oilfields WMD'd.
How many A-bombs (or even merely dirty bombs) do you think it would take to spread enough nuclear fallout in the oilfields to cripple production?
Not all that many.
Clint| 11.29.10 @ 8:34PM
This part is old new . It's about stability in the region regarding Sunnis and Shiites.
The question is who is getting advantage from the Wikileakage. Not The Saudis, Not Iran, Not The United States.
We shall see.
Alan Brooks| 11.29.10 @ 9:30PM
"Not The Saudis, Not Iran, Not The United States."
Yo meen, dem Jews in dat dere Israel are de onez who am takin' avdantige of de sit-jew-ashun? it's dat Mossad, eh?
Clint| 11.29.10 @ 10:15PM
Interesting, that you even went there.
Why not others ?
Joel| 11.29.10 @ 9:17AM
To Post American, Israel did not create Hamas--this is merely a myth. Details here
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrar.....ar.html#p4
Ken (Old Texican)| 11.29.10 @ 10:34AM
Joel,
No need for a link. PostAmerican's screen name says it all.
He is just another communist, (pardon the shorthand), either wearing Muslim robes or not.
jems | 11.29.10 @ 12:02PM
What is the bottom line?
again and again
Intelligent Design| 11.29.10 @ 1:32PM
Obama has pledged hundreds of millions of our tax dollars (and our Debt) to the "Palestinians". This is the same as giving aid and comfort to the enemy, both ours and Israel's. The new House of Representatives should defund this aid, as well as any aid going to North Korea. It should also impeach Obama.
Christopher Holland| 11.29.10 @ 6:25PM
You can not impeach Obama because he is a dickhead. Being stupid is not against the law, you can not legislate to make people be smart. Obama is part of the price everybody pays for living in a free, democractic country. I can't stand the bloody idiot either, but we have to wait until 2012 and then vote him out of office. That is the best system anybody has ever been able to come up with. Like Winston Churchill said, democracy is a terrible system, but the alternatives are much worse.
Anthony| 11.29.10 @ 8:53PM
What about a democracy where only male landowners who can read and write are allowed to vote? That worked for a while.
David Wrights | 11.29.10 @ 1:47PM
I think everyone knows that Obama will be impeached in the House soon. I see some heads shaking, but trust me on this. There will be a vote to impeach Obama in the House.
Steve A| 11.29.10 @ 2:18PM
David, For what? This would be an idiotic political move. I'm all about getting this guy out of office asap but come on man.
RCV| 11.29.10 @ 3:15PM
No, there will not, and if you think so you are just deluding yourself.
Dan| 11.29.10 @ 4:31PM
This is what happens when the only reason for a people's being is to destroy Israel. If Israel did not exist, Hezbollah, Hamas and the PA would have to invent another bogeyman to keep power.
Alan Brooks| 11.29.10 @ 6:05PM
Yes, this is probably the main point of all the countless points in the region.
Israel is the Other.
Alan Brooks| 11.29.10 @ 9:25PM
[so Toddard can grasp it] the "Other" being the #1 Enemy, an enemy to unite erstwhile enemies against.
Joel| 11.29.10 @ 5:12PM
Reply to RCV--the Palestinians in the West Bank already live under their own jurisdiction and are not part of Israel. They are not Israelis, not counted in its census, not relevant to its demography. They already have a level of autonomy just short of statehood, with all the problems that entails, some of them noted in Hornik's article. Promoting this entity to full sovereignty solves no problems for Israel and only creates worse problems of security. If Israel has demographic issues they concern Israel within the '67 borders and people who are citizens of people and part of it, not people who part of an autonomous Arab entity that is not Israel.
Christopher Holland| 11.29.10 @ 6:19PM
The only demographic issue for Israelis is that the Palestinians want to kill them all.
RCV| 11.29.10 @ 6:42PM
Of course, to everything you say. I was only speaking to the non-viability of the so-called "single-state solution", or of not dealing with the PA, which controls the entity of which you speak.
Christopher Holland| 11.29.10 @ 6:16PM
I am shocked - shocked - that there are terrorists in the PA. How did this happen?