Crimes Against Liberty: An Indictment of President Barack
Obama
By David Limbaugh
(Regnery, 503 Pages, $29.95)
Here’s attorney David Limbaugh’s opening salvo, fired in the
first sentence of this strongly written and thoroughly researched
bill of particulars: “This book is about a young presidency— young,
but already the most destructive in American history.”
“Since his first day in office,” Obama has worked to
“‘transform’ the country into a land consistent with his socialist,
secular, multicultural vision.” He views America, writes Limbaugh,
as a country that has failed “sufficiently to atone for its racial
sins,” subscribes to “an antiquated and discriminatory system of
values,” has an economic system “that fosters an ‘inequitable’
distribution of wealth,” consumes “a disproportionate share of the
world’s resources,” and exercises its power in the world
“imperialistically.”
In pursuit of his vision for a transformed country, Limbaugh
charges, Obama is wreaking havoc with “America’s culture, its
Constitution, and in every sector of the American economy (save the
public sector)”; and while “holding himself out as a post-partisan,
post-racial president, he has exacerbated racial tensions, inflamed
partisan divisiveness, engaged in acrimonious class warfare, and
demonized anyone to the political right of the late Ted
Kennedy.”
Limbaugh proceeds to lay out the particulars of his indictment,
attacking with strength and a gusto lacking in much current
conservative writing, documenting Obama’s offenses against the law,
including his administration’s concept of race-based justice, as
witness “his stunning protection of the New Black Panther Party”;
his attempts “to redistribute wealth among Americans in ways he
believes are fair”; pushing through “socialized medicine against
the will of the people”; and attempting a “redistribution of
America’s resources to other nations to further settle what he
perceives as our injustices toward the world.”
Moreover, Limbaugh writes, Obama “has apologized for and
condemned America at almost every turn,” and “his worldview leads
him to scorn American exceptionalism and American sovereignty in
favor of a globalist approach.” This worldview was reflected in
Obama’s “international apology tour,” which took him to London,
where he declared, “I would like to think that with my election and
the early decisions that we’ve made, that you’re starting to see
some restoration of America’s standing in the world.”
He told the French that America failed “to appreciate Europe’s
leading role in the world,” and that we’d been “arrogant,”
“dismissive,” and “derisive” (music, no doubt, to French ears). He
apologized to Latin America for our failure to pursue “sustained
engagement with our neighbors” (which his administration shows no
sign of doing), and repeated in Trinidad that we’d been
“disengaged” and “dictatorial.”
In May of this year, writes Limbaugh, the administration
actually apologized for Arizona’s immigration law to the Communist
Chinese, of all people. And in a Rose Garden press conference with
Mexico’s president Felipe Calderon, he stood by without comment as
Calderon, in a breach of common courtesy and diplomatic good
manners, attacked Arizona for passing that law.
And in his ill-advised speech in Cairo, says Limbaugh, Obama
gave legitimacy to Muslim grievances, inflated the number of
Muslims in America, exaggerated Muslim contributions to American
and world history, and implied that the war in Iraq was the result
of unjustified American aggression. Limbaugh quotes international
studies professor Fouad Ajami, who put it this way: “No one told
Mr. Obama that [in] the Islamic world, where American power is
engaged and so dangerously exposed, it is considered bad form, nay
a great moral lapse, to speak ill of one’s own tribe in the midst,
and in the lands, of others.”
Obama’s odd concern for Muslim sensibilities can take bizarre
turns, as when he directed the administrator of NASA to refocus the
space agency’s mission. As the administrator, quoted by Limbaugh,
told the Arabic TV network al Jazeera, “Perhaps foremost, [Obama]
wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage
much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good
about their historic contribution to science…and math and
engineering.”
“Making Muslims feel good,” Limbaugh comments, “—a very strange
charge for the head of America’s space agency.” (Although, if you
consider where flying carpets originated, it might make some
space-age sense.)
In contrast to this concern for the feelings of Muslims, his
dealings with the Israelis are much less delicate. Obama’s
unprecedented public attempts to force the Israeli government to
bend to his will prompted this response from former New York City
mayor Ed Koch: “I weep as I witness outrageous attacks on
Israel….I weep today because my president, Barack Obama, in a few
weeks has changed the relationship between the U.S. and Israel from
that of closest of allies to one in which there is an absence of
trust on both sides.”
Limbaugh puts it this way: “The Obama administration’s
heavy-handed treatment of Israel… bespeaks a pre-planned policy.
Obama’s approach to the Israeli-Palestinian issue has been
completely one-sided and strikingly unfair—as if he has inflexible,
preconceived notions about the conflict and is impervious to the
facts and history.”
“How can an objective witness to Obama’s behavior fail to
conclude that he has bought into Palestinian propaganda and its
skewed view of history?” Limbaugh asks.
THE GREAT STRENGTH of Limbaugh’s indictment lies in part in the
wealth of material he amasses in building his case. By so doing, he
not only provides opponents of the administration with a rich
source of campaign material, but also creates a series of topical
sections that in themselves could provide the basis for numerous
full-length books.
Booger | 11.10.10 @ 6:13AM
From the desk of former President Herbert Hoover:
To: Current U.S. President B. Hussein Obama
Dear President Obama,
I have observed your trials and tribulations over your first two years in office, and I must say it pains me to see you in such dire straits. I, too, suffered horribly while sacrificing on behalf of my country by serving as President. Perhaps my insights may be of use to you in your service as President. After all, if anybody knows about dealing with an economic downturn and unemployment, it would be me.
First of all, remember your first principles. I am pleased to see that you, like me, are an adherent of the efficiency movement. You realize, just as I did, that ordinary people are not capable of ordering the affairs of their day to day lives, and must be directed in how to do so by well-educated experts of superior intelligence. I am glad to see that you have applied this principle to the matter of health care. I believe that if you stay the course and refuse to allow Congress to repeal or de-fund your plan, you can do for health care what I was able to do for so many other aspects of American life. It is important to remember that patients and doctors need guidance from a firm and wise hand in Washington in order to assure that valuable resources are not squandered in inefficient practices. Please keep up the good work in this area.
I am likewise pleased to see your strong emphasis on volunteerism. I, too, was a strong proponent of having people serve as volunteers. After all, if they're not employed, they may as well have something worthwhile to do with their time. I believe that you should follow the advice of Congressman Charlie Rangle and institute mandatory national service. This should get a lot of those complaining young people off the streets and give them something to do besides complain about a lack of jobs. I believe it could boost your prospects exponentially.
Speaking of jobs, I understand that you are having a hard time getting enough manufacturing jobs in place. Well, I know just the thing. In 1930 I signed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act into law, with amazing results. I think you should try the same thing today. After all, if people can buy goods made overseas too cheaply, it will destroy your infrastructure. Thus, I recommend as many punitive tariffs as you can put into place as quickly as possible. As an added bonus, this will greatly increase your popularity with the unions.
Another policy of yours I find appealing is your plan to roll back the Bush tax cuts on high-end wage earners. Why, I used that same tactic myself in 1932, when I also raised the estate tax (what the rubes call a "death tax") and corporate income taxes as well. I must say, that went smashingly! The results were simply astounding. Of course, I know you'll get criticism for this. Why, I was so adamant in my position that even FDR accused me of taxing and spending too much! But, as you know, I believe history has shown I was right.
Additionally, I helped balance the budget by making massive cuts in defense spending, especially the navy. I assure you, you have many times more ships than you really need already. Take it from me, you can always cut defense spending without having to worry about any untoward consequences. People will vote you out if you cut their handouts, no one will vote you out if you mothball the fleet. And as you and I both know, there's no worse fate than being voted out of office.
I also implemented an earlier version of your stimulus bill, the Emergency Relief and Construction Act, which pumped massive amounts of federal spending into building programs. Then, just as now, the program was a complete success. Really, I get annoyed with the way people criticize the two of us. I suppose you can only expect so much out of lesser minds.
Really, now that I think about it, you are already following my program right down the line. I can't think of a single area where we have any significant disagreement. So I suppose I must simply give you a hearty congratulations on your superior intellect and urge you to stay the course. I know you will have your detractors, but let's face it, history will be the final judge. I know that's worked out fine for me, and I'm sure it will for you as well.
Your Admiring Friend,
Former President Herbert Hoover
http://beautifulletters-bls.blogspot.com/
Deborah D | 11.10.10 @ 8:55AM
A great comparison to Hoover. Next up -- perhaps a comparison to that "great" man who took an old fashioned Depression and made it Great...FDR.
Anita| 11.10.10 @ 12:52PM
Booger dear-
One can never really appreciate an article because of your automatic and continual response.
Yes, humorous, yes, informative, yes, intrusive.
In other words, give us a break now and then.
Thanks.
Alan Brooks| 11.11.10 @ 1:16AM
Bush's big piece of wadded paper has been published: best fiction all year.
Why, he is even more dishonest than his Dad!
He will go far in this world.
The Underwearinator| 11.11.10 @ 9:29PM
Your a rasist!
Alan Brooks| 11.18.10 @ 1:37PM
"Your a rasist!"
Yes, I like mulattos such as Obama more than whites & blacks. Does that make me a "fasist"?
Alan Brooks| 11.18.10 @ 1:35PM
Conservatism is technically dead, however it is a necessary fiction, such as religion (it is one thing to be pious, another to be a chump).
Good for Limbaugh-- all Limbaughs, they carry on the mythology.
JPG| 11.10.10 @ 7:30AM
You know, Booger, the first few times were cute. Not anymore. Anyone else tired of Booger's shtick?
jimH| 11.10.10 @ 8:43AM
One should keep in mind the show biz maxim: 'Leave your audience while they still want more.'
LarryK| 11.10.10 @ 8:55AM
"Stop the Insanity" Susan Powter
Deborah D | 11.10.10 @ 8:57AM
Keep 'em coming, Booger. Those who don't like them belong to the "I love Obama" club. You must be doing something right!
Dai Alanye | 11.10.10 @ 9:25AM
Booger's comparisons are right on but there's no denying that his humor is a bit heavy-handed.
Steve| 11.10.10 @ 3:59PM
When I don't feel like reading Booger's stuff, I find it relatively easy to scroll right past it. No biggy. I honestly don't know where he finds the time to write as much as he does.
Olympian| 11.10.10 @ 10:20AM
There is nothing worse than a sore winner. Now is the time for governing and we'd better heed Kenny Rogers' song The Gamblelr. You have to know when to hold when to fold etc.
Eric Damon| 11.10.10 @ 10:31AM
For all of you who don't like what Booger does, do what I do when I don't want to deal with it...skip over it! There are plenty of us who write other things in other, more conventional ways. So what's stopping you from simply seeking that out when you're not in the mood for what Booger's doing?
Personally, I like his stuff because it is generally on point in a humorous type of way. Plus, it can't be easy to read these articles, digest them, then come up with a letter that addresses the topic at hand.
To Booger, I say keep doing what you're doing; to the others I say if you don't like it, keep moving. No one is forcing you to read a word that he writes.
MacDaddy| 11.10.10 @ 12:18PM
I've never read any of Booger's stuff.....just too long, not enough time in the day. Booger...your stuff should be like my old pastor would say about his sermons....keep'em long enough to cover everthing, but short enough to keep 'em interesting....
Ken (Old Texican)| 11.10.10 @ 11:10AM
Folks,
Booger has found a delightful way of breaking through "commentary" and making an end-run to truth.
I have tried to do the same with "fiction". So far, so good.
Booger...if you will contact me at sales@texassaidno.com I will send you a review copy of my future-history.
Thank you for your contributions here.
Al Adab| 11.10.10 @ 12:45PM
Absolutely infuriating book. Reading it is an exercise in frustration. What can we as citizens do to rid ourselves of this administration?
Mojo Risin| 11.10.10 @ 12:58PM
Hussein Obonehead has learned the craft of antisemitism from his instructors: F. D. Davis, Rev. C. Louie Farrakhan, Rev. Sharpton, and the marble-mouthed one, Rev. Jackson. None of these associated schmucks raised a red flag to enough of the voters to sent Obonehead back to the south-side to pace the front porch of his favorite crack house of choice, to yell incoherently at passing cars and by what we've had to endure so-far, that's all he'd be good for!!!
Oldefarte| 11.10.10 @ 5:10PM
As one who just finished reading Libaugh's excellent book, I would highly recommend it to any/all bloggers here. It's a thorough description of who/what Obama was/is, and the political correctness that surrounds him from the MSM,etc. It's still astounds me that he was actually elected to the highest political office in this country, and sadly demonstrates the depth of the insanity and stupidity of this country's voters. Thankfully, they have been slapped upside their collective heads as to the reality of his personae, and the recent elections are the result of same!!!!!