One reason taxpayers and the media are better informed is the
efforts of state think tanks like the Maine Heritage Policy Center
and the Illinois Policy Institute, which have used the Freedom of
Information Act to collect and post all state employee salaries and
pension payments online.
Ohio’s Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions has gone
one step further in highlighting the high cost of paying and
pensioning our civil servants. On its website
(www.BuckeyeInstitute.org), one can find the list of all employee
pay, and on the top right the actual annual pension any given
person would receive if he retired now, and on the top left a
calculator to calculate his pension if he retired at a normal age
and lived 18 years afterward. In the first 120 days after posting
the list, the website drew 755,562 visitors from all 50 states.
Buckeye Institute president Matt Mayer plans an iPod app that will
allow students at Ohio public universities to check out the pay and
pensions of their professors.
State and local workers earning $350 billion more than the real
economy would pay is a statistic. Your neighbor’s gold-plated
pension visible online is an outrage.
PUBLIC OPINION HAS SHIFTED in measurable ways. In Ohio, voters
were asked how the state should deal with its $8 billion
overspending problem, and 50 percent wanted to reduce the
compensation packages of government workers, 27 percent wanted to
cut government services, and 16 percent wished to increase taxes.
Fully 40 percent of liberals wanted to reduce government pay and
pensions. Sixty-seven percent of government workers thought their
compensation should be equal to the private sector, 14 percent said
“higher,” and a sainted 12 percent said “lower.”
Nationally, Rasmussen polls find that 77 percent of adults say
government workers have more job security than private sector
employees. Sixty-seven percent say private sector employees work
harder. Forty-six percent believe government workers make more
money than comparable workers in the private sector. Fifteen
percent say government workers make less and 17 percent say they
are paid the same amount.
But the best news for taxpayers hoping to avoid the pension
bailout comes from Utah. There, state senator Daniel R. Liljenquist
introduced and passed legislation that, beginning July 1, 2011,
ends the creation of any more unfunded liabilities. The state was
thrown into crisis in 2008 when it fell behind its pension
obligations by 30 percent. Utah was heading for bankruptcy and
would not be able to fund and pay its pension obligations.
Liljenquist’s legislation capped the taxpayers’ payment for new
state employees at 10 percent for most state and local employees
and 12 percent for police and firemen. All new employees will have
a defined contribution pension similar to a 401(k). If they want a
traditional defined benefit plan and the state’s contribution is
not enough to cover costs they are responsible for “topping off”
their pension contribution. There are no hidden costs to taxpayers.
No unfunded liabilities.
Retiring state and local employees have the state kicking in 22
percent of salary for their pensions. New employees will get 10 or
12 percent. As workers retire and are replaced, the savings will
increase to $500 million a year.
Republican governor Gary Herbert signed the legislation that
passed 55-35 in the House with four Republicans voting wrong (one a
highway patrolman, one the battered spouse of a teachers’ union
member). The Senate vote was 20-9 with no Democrats voting for
reform and one Republican (a current police officer) voting against
taxpayers.
Utah is the model for reforming state and local workers’
pensions in a politically feasible way. Present retirees and
employees were untouched. No new hires will create unfunded
liabilities, and their compensation packages will approach those of
the real economy.
When 10 states have enacted the Liljenquist/Herbert reform, it
will be near impossible for the federal government to put together
the votes to tax responsible states to bail out irresponsible state
and local governments. Until then, we are all in danger of one more
giant step forward to America becoming a hybrid of Greece, France,
and California.
Arms Merchant| 11.1.10 @ 4:07PM
In my neck of the woods, one of the candidates for election to the Water Board (no pun intended), Lillian Kawasaki, takes in a whopping $181,848 pension, ostensibly from a variety of previous L.A. city government jobs, including Asst Manager at the Dept of Water and Power, that she has held throughout the years. In other words, her entire career has been spent in city government, and here she is pulling down a pension equivalent to a nice private sector executive salary--not to mention her compensation as a current Board member.