The growth of government in America has not been gradual.
Rather, government spending has remained a consistent fraction of
our economy except for periodic dramatic bursts to new, and too
often permanent, levels. The Civil War, World War I, and World War
II all increased government spending and control over the American
economy to new — and permanent — highs.
Franklin Roosevelt refused to let a good crisis go to waste and
used the Hoover recession to enact the New Deal. His big-government
solutions were supposed to lead to economic recovery, but instead
lengthened the recession into a 10-year Great Depression — longer
if you measure up to when civilian employment recovered and even
longer if you measure up to when the stock market recovered: the
Dow Jones Industrial Average peaked at 381 on September 3, 1929,
and didn’t hit that mark again until November 24, 1954.
Lyndon Johnson used his supermajorities in Congress to pass
Medicaid and Medicare and to create the new cabinet post of Housing
and Urban Development.
Still, federal spending as a percentage of the economy averaged
20 percent of GDP from 1970 through 2007. The growth of social
welfare spending was masked by the decline of defense spending from
10 percent of GDP under Eisenhower to 4 percent today.
Obama, Reid, and Pelosi jumped spending from 20 percent of GDP
to 24.7 percent in 2009 through the massive TARP bailouts, the $878
billion “stimulus” package, and a doubling of domestic
discretionary spending that will add a trillion to the debt over
the next decade.
At this writing, it appears that Obama & Co. will have
failed to pass cap and trade legislation, which would have added
$800 billion in new taxes by 2020 — taxing existing real energy to
subsidize non-economic or nonexistent energy sources. This tax
increase on the American people was brought forward by Al Gore in
1993 and again by Gore in 2009, but with the damaging revelations
of “Climategate,” Gore, like Sisyphus, finds himself forced to
begin again.
Furthermore, the value-added tax — the silver bullet the left
hopes will turn America into Europe without the charming cathedrals
— and “Card Check,” which would have forced several million
Americans into labor unions, remain beyond the reach of
Tantalus.
However, there remains, within grasp, one more great leap
forward on the road to serfdom: a federal bailout of the $3
trillion in unfunded state and local pension plans.
OVER THE YEARS politicians have “hidden” their payoffs to
organized labor, which now commands union dues from 32 percent of
state and 43 percent of local government workers by promising them
rich pensions that would be paid out after said politicians were
retired or dead. Well, that day has arrived and governors, state
legislators, and mayors find themselves having promised $3 trillion
more than they had planned to steal from taxpayers.
Luckily for them, a trial run is already under way to
nationalize the unfunded liability of state and local government
workers’ pensions. That is House Democrat Earl Pomeroy’s “Preserve
Benefits and Jobs Act of 2009,” which would put federal taxpayers
on the hook for the $165 billion that Moody’s estimates is the
underfunding of multi-employer, union-controlled pensions.
Pomeroy’s legislation sets no limit on federal taxpayers’
liability, and has 51 co-sponsors in the House and a more modest
sister bill that might slip through the Senate.
The size of the federal government often confuses us into
thinking that most government workers work for the federal
government. In fact, much federal spending simply passes through
Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and some 80-plus welfare
spending programs to individuals.
There are “only” 2,854,000 federal civilian workers. That
includes 711,800 postal workers. There are an additional 1.2
million Americans in the military.
State governments employ 4,850,000 workers, 2,021,200 of whom
work in state colleges and universities.
Local governments pay 13,570,000 employees. Of those, 6,834,700
are in education.
Why would federal congressmen and senators add $3 trillion in
federal debt to pay off the overpromises of state and local
politicians?
Arms Merchant| 11.1.10 @ 4:07PM
In my neck of the woods, one of the candidates for election to the Water Board (no pun intended), Lillian Kawasaki, takes in a whopping $181,848 pension, ostensibly from a variety of previous L.A. city government jobs, including Asst Manager at the Dept of Water and Power, that she has held throughout the years. In other words, her entire career has been spent in city government, and here she is pulling down a pension equivalent to a nice private sector executive salary--not to mention her compensation as a current Board member.