Half the pieces in this collection, writes Kimball, appear
between hard covers for the first time; many others are from books
now out of print. “A large portion of the pieces deal with matters
of urgent public concern. Not a few tackle basic questions of
political philosophy.” Given the mid-Victorian volume of Buckley’s
output, and the great variety of subjects, Athwart History
is a book of some bulk — although, Kimball assures us,
considerably trimmed down from the first working draft, which
competed “in girth with the Calcutta phone book.”
Bulky, but attractively produced and well structured. There are
178 pieces by Bill (the reviewer, being somewhat compulsive,
counted them twice), arranged under 13 headings such as “Politics
in Principle,” “Politics in Practice,” “The Raging Sixties.” Each
of the 178 pieces is titled, and each has its own brief descriptive
annotation: “Liberal Presumption — On the notion that a
‘central intelligence’ in Washington, D.C., can dispose of American
citizens’ money far better than they can”; “Black Thought,
Black Talk — On Senator Edward Kennedy’s description,
‘withered in distortion and malice,’ of Robert Bork’s
America”; “Duty, Honor, Country — Looking at Iraq
2007 through the lens of Vietnam 1973, with a reflection on the
people we abandoned back then”; “A Special Odium
— On the extraordinary ferocity displayed by critics of
Bush, and its possible effects on the democratic culture”;
“Inside Obama — On the candidate’s soaring rhetoric-but
underlying dishonesty-about what the government can do for
America’s children.” By themselves, these annotations are well
worth reading.
IN ALL, the selections and the finished product are a tribute to
the editors, both of whom were close friends and colleagues of
Buckley. Roger Kimball, co-editor and publisher of the New
Criterion, is author of several books, among them Tenured
Radicals: How Politics Has Corrupted Our Higher Education.
Bridges, who like this reviewer was hired personally by Bill
Buckley, came straight from the University of Southern California
to National Review, where she has worked since, including
10 years as managing editor, a job for which she was trained by
Priscilla Buckley.
In 2003 she moved to Bill Buckley’s personal staff as his
literary assistant, a position she held through the last years of
his life — one of those strong, trusted, highly intelligent women
such as Frances Bronson and Dorothy McCartney who helped keep his
life organized and his prose clean and flowing. In 2007, with this
reviewer, she co-authored Strictly Right: William F. Buckley
Jr. and the American Conservative Movement, a book that Bill’s
sister Priscilla pronounced “the best thing ever written about
Bill.” Bill Rusher agreed, as did Bill Buckley himself.
The next full biography of Bill, we’re told, will be by Sam
Tanenhaus, the liberal editor of the New York Times Book
Review. The deadline has been extraordinarily elastic, and
some believe the elastic may have snapped, as it did with Edmund
Morris’s incoherent biography of Ronald Reagan. Last year,
Tanenhaus, whose biography of Whittaker Chambers had given him
standing with conservatives, published a mini-book — a padded-out
version of an earlier New Republic article — entitled
The Death of Conservatism, yet another premature obituary
for what Bob Tyrrell, in After the Hangover, called
“America’s longest dying political movement.”
Hardly the logical candidate to write Bill Buckley’s life. But
if and when he does, and, as seems likely, his book bombs, let’s
hope the pieces are quickly picked up and reassembled by Linda
Bridges, who in the end is the writer best equipped to write the
full and definitive biography of Bill Buckley. There’s no doubt
he’d approve.
But whatever the final disposition of that assignment, the
editors have done a splendid job with this volume. In all,
Athwart History admirably achieves its purpose, allowing
us, to borrow a phrase from Mona Charen, to “rediscover whence
conservatism got its élan — and its spine.”
Thanks to Roger Kimball and Linda Bridges, in these pages Bill
Buckley rides up through the lists again, Ronald Reagan’s
clipboard-bearing knight errant, shaming the pedants and
pretenders, unhorsing the collectivists and statists, and smiting
the ungodly.
Dan Hirsch| 9.29.10 @ 9:45AM
I was a subscriber to NR from 1978 - 2003. As Mr. Buckley faded, so did their conservatism and their clarity of thought, their vocabulary, their grammar, their punctuation.
They really, really miss him. So do I. So do we all...
Nolite me conculcare!
Nate| 9.30.10 @ 5:42PM
You're not going to make any friends at Am. Spec. longing for the days when there were conservatives who possessed wit, clarity of thought, etc.
Hate to break it to you, Dan, but the new "conservative" way is to brag about one's ignorance and flaunt one's most zany and irrational suspicions as badges of honor.
Alan Brooks| 9.30.10 @ 12:15AM
Rich Lowry is there because he looks gay and can attract Log Cabin Republicans to NR.
BH| 9.30.10 @ 5:41PM
National Review used to be conservative until the non-cons ( pun intended)took over. Buckley himself led this betrayal to principles. It seems it became too important for him to be liked & mainstream rather than right.Check out Chronicles to see what NR once was.