-
Next: The Benghazi Select Committee
May 13, 2013 | 94 comments
-
Nobody Died in Watergate
May 9, 2013 | 148 comments
-
Benghazi Bullchips
May 6, 2013 | 184 comments
-
Obama’s Thin Red Line
April 29, 2013 | 207 comments
-
Why Has No One Taken Credit?
April 22, 2013 | 189 comments
Loose Canons
ABC News’ Credibility ‘Lost in Translation’
Brian Ross turns fabulist again.
(Page 2 of 2)
SSgt. Chase told a University of Nebraska seminar that she deployed to Afghanistan in 2005 and was injured in an IED attack in April 2006. She testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in April 2009 that she served in Afghanistan in 2006. But according to Funk’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court, the MEP contract was awarded in late 2007.
Mosk contends that ABC brought Chase in as an expert. When I repeatedly asked if Chase had ever observed any MEP translators in action, he demurred: “She wasn’t in Afghanistan when Mission Essential Personnel held the contract.” (Chase declined to be interviewed for this article.)
In government contracts, one or more “warranted” (i.e., licensed) contracting officers (“COs”) are responsible for awarding and administering each contract. Because the contracting officer is legally responsible to hold the contractor accountable for its performance of the contract, the CO receives both regular and ad-hoc reports on how well the contractor is performing from people in the field. If there were major problems — probably even minor ones — the Army CO responsible for MEP’s contract would know.
Ross does report — based on documents that MEP provided — that the Army contracting officers gave MEP outstanding ratings. But ABC didn’t obtain — and apparently is in ignorance of — the extensive documentation that the system requires to support those ratings. Mosk said that ABC had asked for more information but its requests resulted only in the Army statement that it was now investigating MEP.
Nowhere in the report was MEP given an opportunity to refute Funk’s charges. Mosk said that ABC had “begged and beseeched” MEP to come on camera, but MEP on the advice of their lawyers refused to do so.
After the interview, Mosk provided two e-mails to MEP which he believes supports that claim, but seem to refute it. They offer, on short notice, interviews on the Friday before and the Tuesday after the Labor Day. The story aired the following Thursday without an interview of MEP.
BUT WHAT WAS THE RUSH? Why wasn’t the Ross report delayed in order to include an MEP interview?
Those facts, and Ross’s nine-year track record of fabulism, make the MEP report highly questionable.
In October 2001, Ross made a series of reports that linked Saddam Hussein to the anthrax attack on congressional offices, saying a chemical called bentonite was found in the anthrax and comprised a “signature” of the Iraq chemical warfare program. After White House denials, ABC aired a series of elaborations, some of which “clarified” Ross’s story but didn’t correct the report.
In April 2006, Ross aired a report that then-House Speaker Dennis Hastert was implicated in a bribery scandal. Both the Justice Department and Hastert denied the bogus report.
Last December, Ross reported that two terrorist prisoners released from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, had planned the Christmas Day attempted airline bombing by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. But one of the two had surrendered to Saudi authorities the previous February.
Last February, Ross aired a report purporting to prove the accusation against Toyota that its cars were defective and dangerous, suddenly accelerating and endangering drivers. Ross was filmed in a Toyota that accelerated wildly and then emerging, shaken, from the car after the incident. Part of the report included a film of Ross driving a Toyota which included a view of the car’s tachometer purporting to show that the vehicle accelerated wildly. But in a March 18 letter to Toyota signed by ABC Senior Vice President John Zucker, the network admitted that the tachometer was filmed when the car was parked. It was, the Zucker letter admitted, an “editorial error.” But it was more than that: it was an editorial contrivance to prove the point that Toyotas were dangerous to drive.
Ross used a decorated combat veteran — who wasn’t there when MEP’s translators were on the job — to bolster his case against MEP. Were the inclusion of the British film and SSgt. Chase more “editorial errors”?
I asked Mosk about those problems. He said, “If you take the premise that this is a story that’s intended to be an indictment of MEP and the other elements are all built around that indictment of MEP, then you’ve misconstrued what the story is.” But it’s hard to construe it any other way.
Whoever succeeds David Westin at ABC will have to undo a lot of damage to the network’s credibility. Right now, with Westin on the way out and no successor named, Brian Ross is still “investigating.”
About the Author
Jed Babbin served as a Deputy Undersecretary of Defense under George H.W. Bush. He is the author of several bestselling books including Inside the Asylum and In the Words of Our Enemies. You can follow him on Twitter @jedbabbin.
Letter to the Editor View all comments (63) | Leave a comment
More Articles by Jed Babbin
More Articles From Loose Canons
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/09/22/abc-news-credibility-lost-in-t
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
ADVERTISEMENT
Tim*| 9.22.10 @ 6:46AM
We are in A Media War . Bankrupt The Mainstream Media .
Shamus| 9.22.10 @ 7:36AM
The US government is drowning in debt, yet it will not take basic steps monetize assets. The airwaves used by ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox are national assets that are provided gratis to these big corporations. This policy is a relic of the last century which needs to go the way of the poodle skirt. Not only are big corporations easily able to pay for this bandwidth, there is also no valid reason not to charge them for it.
Ken| 9.22.10 @ 10:01AM
Of course there is. The US government doesn't own the bandwidth.
Shamus| 9.22.10 @ 11:10AM
Then who does? ABC and CBS?
Tom Anderson| 9.22.10 @ 11:42AM
Broadcasting 101. The public owns the airwaves. The government regulates them on the behalf of the public.
Technically speaking, for broadcast airwaves, the rules were that broadcast stations have to offer certain amount of minutes of public information (including time on the hour) per hour. The rest of the time was available to the broadcaster to use. That was the original intent of broadcast airwaves, to provide information to the community.
Shamus| 9.22.10 @ 12:04PM
Sure, this might have made sense before cable, internet, and wireless. Everyone else pays for their broadband. Why should taxpayers donate billions of dollars to Sumner Redstone and Rupert Murdoch?
Al Adab| 9.22.10 @ 12:12PM
Guys,
Ask any radio station owner and he will tell you the cost of using the airwaves. What is the actual justification for government regulation of broadcasting? Why is their a government agency that oversees content and "public interest" whatever that is in broadcast operations. They mandatee public service time. Is not lost revenue a cost to business?
Al Adab| 9.22.10 @ 12:13PM
Oops: Why is there a government agency... wrong there, there. :)
Shamus| 9.22.10 @ 1:23PM
Until recently it was not possible to send more than one TV signal across a given segment of bandwidth, so the government stepped in to license users.
Given the advent of new technology this makes no sense. The internet provides bandwidth comparable to millions of broadcast channels. The broadcast spectrum should be auctioned off to the highest bidder, and the money collected used to pay down the public debt. Mandates for public interest should be scrapped and revenue should be collected instead. Business would pay the government what it thought broadcast spectrum was worth, and public debt could be reduced. The priority for the government should be to pay down its debt rather than tell business how to use broadcast spectrum.
joli| 9.22.10 @ 1:59PM
Maybe this would get rid of all those shopping channels and prevent providers from advertising 99 channels when only 8 of them are worth a darn.
Litvi| 9.22.10 @ 4:57PM
You keep talking about airwaves... but do you (or anyone you know) watch broadcast TV? The infrastructure used by the vast majority of the public (viewer and broadcaster alike) is through privately owned cables and satellites.
Forget the airwaves - look out for the FCC - unelected and unchecked by Congress - who are trying to regulate broadband networks using 1930's era Title II antitrust thinking. Yes, that would be the same broadband network that carries your internet, TV (and likely your home phone) signals simultaneously.
Forget the airwaves, but remember the 10 Cannots. Rather, the 11th... you can't open up communication for some people by reducing it for others.
Mel Torme| 9.23.10 @ 1:56PM
Shamus, do you understand that radio signals go through the air (and would through a vacuum too)? Seriously, do you not understand this? High-speed internet service costs money as there is cable, routers and more electronics involved in getting the signal from one place to another.
The frequency spectrum is a part of the physical world. Light waves have a range of frequencies, infrared another, down to some low frequencies that are good for certain things, like AM, FM radio, TV, aviation radio, etc. and up high to the GHz one used by mobile phones.
What in the heck should the government have to do with it, other than being there (in the form of civil courts) for disputes involving interfering broadcasts (same area at the same frequencies or too close - this gets into the real meaning of "bandwidth", not the BS use of the term in use now (which should just be "capacity"))?
What's the frequency, Shamus, I mean Kenneth?
RDN in Houston| 9.22.10 @ 4:04PM
"The airwaves used by ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox are national assets that are provided gratis to these big corporations."
The airwaves are no more national assets than are mineral deposits, water, or the air that we breath. The concept that we own national assets is a progressive concoction and is not found in the Constitution.
loulou| 9.22.10 @ 1:48PM
Bankrupt the MSM and soon we'll be bailing them out.
JR| 9.22.10 @ 10:21PM
MSM is already bankrupt. They are praying for a bailout...ergo, they kowtow to the progressives. They sincerely hope that their fortunes will be restored by O's novel interpretation of the "Fairness Doctrine."
No bailouts or government intervention, no broadcast (and most print) MSM.
Lullabys, Legends and Lies| 9.22.10 @ 7:27AM
If a tree falls in the woods, but nobody's around to hear it, does really make a noise? Well yes, I believe it does, but I'm not in the middle of the woods, so it really doesn't bother me if it does or doesn't. So Brian Ross is making a lot of noise over there at ABC news, but who really cares? If you didn't include the picture of Brian Ross at the top of this article, I couldn't have picked this guy out of a lineup if my life depended on it. ABC, CBS, and NBC (and their retarded twin MSLSD) don't have ratings anymore, and every month they sink even lower (is that possible if they don't have ratings to begin with?). It's so bad over there at CBS that Dan Rather's laughing at them now, and Dan lost half of the ratings Walter Cronkite had. They're all dying a slow death, like that stupid frog in the boiling water, too dumb to know it's boiling to death, too stupid to jump the hell out of the water before it's too late. Whoever takes over at ABC news, better realize that they had better change their ways, or the water will just continue to boil, as death takes over them slowly. Psst, here's a hint, Jump out!!
voice of reason| 9.23.10 @ 1:29AM
if a tree falls on brian ross
does his producer
use the clip
at once, at 6:00 or not at all
Bill Hussein O'Stalin| 9.22.10 @ 8:07AM
I think the news here is that anyone still considers ABC, CBS, NBC, CNBC or MSNBC as credible news sources.
UpChuck.Liberals| 9.22.10 @ 5:58PM
I believe you left out CNN also.
Roscoe| 9.24.10 @ 4:31PM
Well, everybody else leaves them out!
David W| 9.22.10 @ 9:50PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again. We need to pay attention to what the MSM is saying, no matter how lame, how wrong, how biased, etc. If they lie, which they will do, we must point it out. If they are biased, which they are, we must point it out. You never know who is watching and who may be swayed by what Chris "I get a woody whenever I see Barack Obama" Matthews may say. Remember what the law of unintended consequences or the butterfly effect or the result of all that liberal inbreeding could cause.
Louis Jenkins| 9.22.10 @ 8:54AM
I'll tell you how ABC can improve their ratings. Hire a conservative talk show host to do the news. Then the whole kit would turn around in a heart beat. Otherwise, choke on your poor ratings ABC, et al. I seldom watch the even news, other than to see what kind of lies, errors, spin, and omissions they are spewing.
Redstateboy| 9.22.10 @ 9:33AM
I exclusively watched CBS Evening News (because that's what my parents watched) and then when it ended I switched to the McNeil/Lehrer News Hour and I became a Flaming Liber-ul. Coincidence?
Thank God (and I'm not joking.. Thank God!) I grew up and - like the Apostle Paul.. "put away childish things and became a Man" and became a Conservative.
TR| 9.22.10 @ 10:23AM
"If you are 20 and not a liberal you have no heart. If you are 40 and not a conservative you have no brain"
Winston Churchill
wandak | 9.22.10 @ 11:30AM
So, grow up!
Appleby| 9.22.10 @ 2:52PM
I have never been a liberal.
noneofyourbusiness| 9.22.10 @ 6:06PM
And if you are 45 and believe that either liberals or conservatives can actually solve common sense practical problems with ideologically based prescriptions, then you haven't learned a thing.
Cheers!
Tim*| 9.22.10 @ 8:05PM
Uh Oh ! It's Know-it-All Canuck lecturin' We Great Unwashed Americans again.
Suck Ice !
Let's go after THEM!| 9.22.10 @ 10:00AM
Why can't someone here at Am Spec (Hello Mr. Tyrrell?) start a media campaign that starts questioning the media anchors in public----on TV ads, Newspapers and billboards?
Put Courics face on a billboard with "You Lie" underneath her smug mug and let her defend herself. OK, something softer like; " Liberal and Misleading: They want you un-informed".
High time we started knee-capping these people. They are out EVERY DAY lying about us---why don't we simply tell the truth about them. Call it our October surprise----we start going after them like they go after Conservatives.
If they (combine Morning and evening newscasts) lost just 2% of their audience due to calling them out, that would be over half a million people a day!!
Start it---we'll fund something like this to see their thin skin peel back!!
noneofyourbusiness| 9.22.10 @ 6:08PM
It's called PoliFacts, and Fox is far and away the worst offender.
Cheers!
Emma| 9.22.10 @ 10:02AM
Network news (and the "news story" programs) are never (and I do LITERALLY mean NEVER) on in our home. Haven't been for ten years.
The last thing these programs do is provide news. They are mostly a delivery system for marketing aimed at older people, of which I am one. (Of course, as obama's Medicare savings plans kick in, this demographic will become less and less significant as our death rates skyrocket.)
The journoLists just don't qualify for real jobs any more. That's why they keep doing this pathetic level of work (and get paid for it???? now there's the real mystery).
The owner and one employee from our local rural telephone company have been plowing a mile long ditch along our country road laying a new piece of phone cable this week. These are the people who make this country work.
TR| 9.22.10 @ 10:46AM
sorry, Emma. I posted a response to you but it showed up under Kylies's post below.
Kylie Estwick| 9.22.10 @ 10:21AM
It's absolutely hysterical for me to see a group of people who get their "news" from a news organization which deliberately fabricates stories (Fox News), attempt to call into question the integrity of any legitimate news organization.
So, when you all are sitting around blaming Obama for all your problems, does it bother you at all that you quote opinion pieces barely based in fact? Just wondering what that feels like to always be wrong. Must sting a little.
TR| 9.22.10 @ 10:27AM
Same here, Emma. I turned off the major network news over 12 years ago. The liberal agenda push became so blatant that I could not stomach the daily lies and the refusal to give a balanced report.
TR| 9.22.10 @ 10:34AM
That is your opinion, Kylie.
Fox is truly fair and balanced, and the others are liberal sounding blocks and merely an arm of the democrat socialist party.
Legitimate? Well, the word means legal, so that would be true. They are covered by the 1st Amendment just as Fox News is. Lacking ethics would be a better word. CNN/ABC/CBS/NBC/CNBC/MSNBC all are liberal agenda driven. I enjoy how you leftists always get your panties in a bunch over the balanced reporting of Fox. You never have evidence of bias, but then again, any reporting of liberal deceit and hypocrisy causes you all to blow a gasket. You had it so good for so many decades. One sided reporting, cramming your lies down our throats daily without retort. Well, those days ended with the bravery of Fox.
Opinion is opinion, not news. Learn the difference.
Just wondering what it feels like to always be wrong. Must sting a lot.
Tom| 9.22.10 @ 10:41AM
Kylie,
Have anything substantive to say about the article or are you just ranting? Because you failed to point out any shortcomings you may or may not see. I am curious, is this just you releasing bile or did you really have a point about the article?
John II| 9.22.10 @ 10:54AM
It would probably be more accurate for you to have end-stopped your comment after the first five words, Kylie. You do indeed sound chronically hysterical.
RCV| 9.22.10 @ 11:48AM
John - Some cranky guy is posting in your name today.
RCV| 9.22.10 @ 12:41PM
I'm Cranky Today.
I'm Constipated Again.
John II| 9.22.10 @ 12:55PM
No--it's me, Roberto. Summer's over and classes have started--always a challenge to my low crap tolerance. And I'm just warming up.
RCV| 9.22.10 @ 1:37PM
My torts professor in law school used to have a "bullshit" stamp that he used liberally early in the semester in getting over the early rush of nonsense on exams by unprepared students. It might help, at least with the written garbage.
RCV| 9.22.10 @ 2:01PM
Brrrrrrrrruuummmmp !
Ahhh ! The prune juice is startin' to work .
Anthony| 9.22.10 @ 11:32AM
Whoa, Hey guys, we got ourselves a gen u ine Koolaid drinker here with Kylie.
Tell me dear, were you the one who created the false TANG memo and gave it to Bill Burkett that ole "right down the middle news" Dan Rather and Mary Mapes choked on?
I believe dear that this story qualifies as fabricated news, along with the MSMs anthropogenic global warming, er climate disruption, hoax. Would you not agree?
As far as being wrong about Obozo, may I suggest dear that you remain up in the crows nest as Obozo's faithful lookout as the good ship Obozo heads for the icebergs, yes the same ones that haven't melted.
Oh, and to whittle away the time up in crows nest, take a copy of Newsweek with you.
Bon Voyage and watch out for Polar bears!!!
Nick in Virginia| 9.22.10 @ 11:55AM
Kylie,
Just because YOU say that Fox "deliberately fabricates stories" doesn't mean its true. You probably got that line from Jimmy Carter the other night (or maybe the junkie Janene Garofolo). Neither Carter, you, nor most of the people who criticize Fox ever give examples of "fabricated stories".
So I can only assume you are just repeating the Democratic Party talking points (possibly for a fee, for every post you make - after all, that would count as an 0bama "saved or created job"). Come up with some examples, ALLOW YOUR COMPETITION TO RESPOND (because what you call a "fabrication" is quite possibly a difference in interpretation or simply a mistake), go through the same process with YOUR favorite networks, and THEN see how Fox compares with the MSM that you apparently adore. I'll wager that you come out on the losing end of that comparison.
Actually, I'll take that statement back. I'll wager that you'll never go through with it.
Steve A| 9.22.10 @ 12:12PM
Hey Kylie, We really do not blame Obama for our problems, it's the Mensa quality voters like you who pulled the lever for him that we really blame. Obama is just being true to what he said he would do, as you cheerlead. Put the pom poms down & read a book about the great achievements of socialized economy. Good luck finding one.
LeftCoastRightBrain| 9.22.10 @ 1:53PM
Yea..ah...Kylie, do you have ONE (as in 1) example of a story that Fox News "deliberately fabricates"? One. I'm only asking for one.
My guess is that this is just a HuffPo, DummyUnderground, Moveon.org talking point and you've got NOTHING.
Nancy inNC| 9.22.10 @ 4:56PM
Could you be a little more specific?
And would you be so kind as to tell me what story Fox News has fabricated?
Didn't think so.
Karina| 9.22.10 @ 5:00PM
Well, Kylie, always glad to read the humorous comments from the Witch of Eastwick. Thanks for giving us the chance to laugh at you.You go grrrrlll!
Rob| 9.23.10 @ 2:52PM
Poor Kylie, it must suck to be you. Don't worry the mother ship will soon return to take you to your home plant. Have a safe trip.
coal carrier| 9.22.10 @ 10:35AM
When I hear the names Katie Couric, Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw, Andrea Mitchell, Keith Olbermann, Ed Schultz, Chris Matthews, Wolf Blitzer, Arianna Huffington
I wonder- What the hell are they going to make up today?
Kenneth E. MacAlister Jr.| 9.22.10 @ 10:36AM
ABC News had credibility? Who knew.
DEIN| 9.22.10 @ 10:55AM
Estwick-please identify the fabricated Fox news stories you are talking about;neither this article or any of the comments even mentions Obama; in fact these events allegedly took place during Bush years,except for the fabricated Toyota problems. Are you feeling a little sensitive today?Article is about Ross, not Obama.
ohiojb| 9.22.10 @ 12:35PM
ABC and all of their ilk are no longer the mainstream media. They are alternative media. We define who the mainstream media are, and no one is listening, watching, or buying.
This site, among so many others as well as talk radio, is the mainstream.
Patriots, let's keep the pressure on.
John II| 9.22.10 @ 12:59PM
Whoa. I've been called a lot of things in my day, but no one ever called me "mainstream." Does this mean I have to start wearing a tie?
And now back to Jeeves and Wooster, for sartorial advisement.
RCV| 9.22.10 @ 1:35PM
He's back!
RLH| 9.22.10 @ 1:21PM
Here's some FLASH news for Kylie.
Most of the posts on this site understand America is an exceptional nation. American people are essentially good, generous and our actions have accomplished more positive things in this sorry world than any other country in history.
However our country is in the grip of a post soverign government and media. Supported by people like Kylie who have rejected the premise that the United States is that great and good country. We must have a complete transformation according to Obama, the progressive media and the Kylieites. What they do not understand is a fundmental change has taken place and things will never be the same after
November 2010. The progressives Marxests are done and if the Republican elites do not get on board, within two or three elections cycles they will be gone as well.
John II| 9.22.10 @ 4:33PM
You have to LOVE that mugshot of Ross at the head of the post! If he ever gets canned at ABC, he can always take his pick of a cushy communication chair in the ivy league, with inflated salary to match the ego. He's a natural lefty academician. He's already got the contemptuous, self-regarding smirk down pat.
Thom| 9.22.10 @ 5:11PM
Brian Ross is the least of the Asinine Broadcast Company’s problems. Even being part of the Mickey Mouse Corporation can be overcome. On balance the A.B.C. is probably the best of the three network based Democrat profit seeking agenda based propaganda organizations. I turned off “network news” during the first Gulf War because of their obvious cheerleading for the enemy. The other two uglier sister Democrat outfits are almost the best friends this Nation’s enemies have on a regular basis outside of the Democrat leadership itself.
Never the less, the three Democrat “network” sisters, the Clinton News Network and most larger Urban News Papers dwarf the reach and coverage of what FNS and Talk Radio combined can approach. When you add in National Puke Radio and the government funded arm of the Democrat Party, PBS Heir Himmler has to be smiling from the grave at the level of control the Democrat Party has for essentially free. Network News is essentially free still for tens of millions of voters living in this country that don’t or can’t get “cable” or something comparable and the demographic that depends on “free” isn’t going to get the message just broadcast on “cable” and AM radio. One of these “network” Democrat organizations needs to “fall” and be reborn in the image of what the Founders intended. That will take a very long time at the current ratings drop.
Conservative can’t continue to give up most of the field of play in the market place of ideas by letting the “networks” have free reign over that market.
Paul Nelson| 9.22.10 @ 10:11PM
that would be rein, as in letting go of a horse's rein.
Joanna | 6.6.11 @ 6:13AM
The time is definitely right for change.
UTI Treatment