The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Sports Arena

Diversity Tennis

A special report on this year’s U.S. Open, killer instincts and lack thereof, eateries and politics on Washington’s east side, and more.

(Page 2 of 2)

What is interesting from a psycho-social point of view at the Kenilworth Park courts is that the regulars, who really should be called irregulars and most of whom are not dry, are always asking me to play doubles with them. At doubles I am always out to lunch, and not because I happen not to be dry either. They keep asking me because when we play singles they think, not inaccurately, I outplay them. So they want me on their doubles team. They tend to prefer doubles, which is more like the playground football games they grew up with, complete with trash talk and unending disputes over calls. But then the old pacifist instinct kicks in and I double fault in the tie breaker or something. The killer instinct is more needed in doubles than in singles, and its absence is more, so to speak, fatal.

ALTHOUGH MR. BA, whom I call Bailo because we are pals and business partners even though we cannot start a successful business, is an excellent pro and a man of international travels, he does not know who the prime minister of his country is, or even the president — it is Abdoulaye Wade, if you are interested — and he did not realize it was an event of some significance that there was a team called the Indo-Pak Express in the men’s doubles tourney at the U.S. Open. It was not derailed until the final, when it ran into the mighty Bryan Brothers, Bob and Mike, who are basically unbeatable.

Aisam ul Haq Qureshi and Rohan Bopanna played well and overcame barriers of caste and religion and tribe. This impressed the fans. Their respective ambassadors, Their Eminences Abdullah Harood and Hardeep Puri, visited Flushing Meadows and sat near each other. Their ambition is to bring peace to Kashmir and environs, which ain’t beanball considering how well diversity is regarded in that lovely and bloody region. The difficulty is that those neighborhoods are full of excited and excitable people who go haywire at the mention of a Jew or a Christian. Or a Muslim or a Hindu. They also kill girls for smiling at boys, especially when they are their sisters or daughters. They make our own book burning pastors look like Quakers, if you want to know the truth. However, the sportswriters love these fellows, Chariots of Fire and all that sort of thing, transcending such ignorant prejudices as the ridiculous notion that Pakistan is a violent treacherous hate-devoured place.

Aisam ul Haq Qureshi said after the match, “We are a peace-loving nation and we want peace as much as you.” All who heard were deeply moved, choked up. Moreover, the Bryan boys donated money to the victims of a Haiti-level climatic catastrophe in Qureshi’s homeland, thousands dead and a million homeless, but neither he nor Eminence Harood mentioned anything about donations, just peace and love.

There was a whisper of a hint that Ben’s Chili Bowl, a prestigious Washington culinary establishment, might take an interest in taking us over, but it stayed a whisper and then the nicest businessman on the street, Prabhjot Singh, a young Sikh about to become a father, was gunned down in broad daylight while protecting one of his customers from a couple of thugs. He ran a check-cashing store and was always a soft touch for an advance, helped the homeless, donated to the community.

The whole neighborhood turned out for Roger, as he was known on the street, and the police got the leads they needed to find the killers. Then some Indo-Paks took an interest in us, for reasons I could not fathom, but Mr. Ba said, in his native language, those Asian guys are good with money. Maybe that is why we did not see any. Anyway, in the meantime we serve Miss Harris’s excellent Jamaican curried chicken instead of the cheese steaks, because Mr. Malloy has been sulking and staying home and talking about re-upping in the Marines or writing a novel.

Toward the end of the U.S. championships, folks in some of these distant lands where we are engaged in savage wars of peace went bonkers and rioted due to some hayseed reverend saying he was going to burn a Koran (the Islamic Bible) on 9/11. In Kashmir the Indian army was ordered to maintain order by shooting to kill if necessary, which it did. I waited for the Indo-Pak Express to announce they were going to put their tournament money into a Kashmir Boys and Girls Tennis Camp, but if anything was said, I missed it, and there was nothing from the best-of-buddies ambassadors, either. The reaction of our own ambassador — your tax dollars at work — was to observe that desecrating holy books is a terrible idea, though he did not have anything to say about rioting and killing on the strength of a rumor (the pastor ended up not doing anything).

As a rule it is best to leave politics out of business and sports. In the 1930s the Nazis were always trying to broadcast the fact that Gottfried von Cramm was German. He sure was. He hated them, too, and they nearly murdered him. Don Budge’s intercession saved his life. When war came he served with distinction on the Russian front. He returned to tennis after the war and rebuilt the ravaged family businesses.

Last year Venus Williams raised some hell (as did Andy Roddick, who had a disappointing season this year) about the anti-Jewish policies in force at a tournament in one of the Gulf Emirates, wherein some sheiks are trying to buy their way into tennis respectability. Observe that in neighboring Abu Dhabi, they made a deal with the Louvre Museum, which the French government approved over the protests of many prominent critics and museum officials, including Françoise Cachin, who made the Orsay Museum the jewel it is and went on to serve with distinction as director of France’s museums. But who am I to editorialize. At any event, Miss Williams said it was wrong to prevent an Israeli athlete from competing, even on trumped up security issues. So this year the sheiks, who also are suspected by international security types of trafficking in small Indian boys and Filipina house slaves, said the Israeli, whose name is Shahar Peer, could compete, which she did, losing in the semifinals to Miss Williams, who went on to win . The two met again in the fourth round at Flushing Meadows and Miss Peer put up a good fight, including taking the elegant Miss Williams to a tie breaker in the first set.

RAFA NADAL, WHO IS FROM MAJORCA, had a much better year than his friend and rival from Basel, winning in Madrid, then in Paris, then in London. He was hot. The consensus among fans and sports writers was that there would be a showdown at Flushing Meadows and the question of the Pete Sampras Succession would be resolved once and for all. In fact, it was resolved for a few years, during which Federer was the undisputed Best in the World. His footwork, his ground strokes, his masterful serve, his volleys at the net (when needed: he is not a serve-and-volley player like Pete Sampras) made him unbeatable. He was graceful, fast like a leopard, always ahead of the return and in position to hit where he wanted.

Possibly he got distracted by parenthood and should take a cue from Miss Clijsters, who took a couple years off to stay with her daughter and by all evidence has returned to the tour invigorated and more powerful than ever. Mr. Federer could return in ‘12 or even ‘13 and play another ten years. Consider Pancho Gonzalez’s long career, or even Rod Laver’s. Consider Tilden’s. And they did not have the benefit of power-drinks and non-fat food, not to mention training regimes supervised by experts. Maybe their equipment was better. Today we play with funny shaped lightweight metal rackets, and it is quite possible they do not have the power and control afforded by the beautiful Bancrofts and Dunlop Maxplys and Slazengers of yore.

Anyway, as I say everybody was looking forward to the showdown and it did not happen. Late in the season, Mr. Federer brought the legendary Paul Annacone into his camp, reportedly to help rethink his game, but to no avail, or too late, or whatever. He kept getting ahead of Mr. Djokovic, and Mr. Djokovic kept coming back until Mr. Federer gave up or hit a wild backhand or thought of Basel, who knows. Meanwhile, Rafa Nadal was in excellent shape and no one could take a set from him or break his service. If Mr. Federer in his 2003-2008 heyday was a leopard, Mr. Nadal is a marsupial, springing from base line to net, bounding across the court into the stilts, a steeple-chase racer to Mr. Federer’s miler. Mr. Federer reminds tennis fans of Pete Sampras, further back of Rod Laver and his elegant compatriot Roy Emerson. Mr. Nadal is all Agassi, Connors, Gonzalez. In my book, gratuitous as it is to say this, Pancho Gonzalez is the greatest player of all time except for Don Budge, but it is completely gratuitous, so forget it. However, since I am in the hole anyway, I will add that Serena Williams, who was injured and could not compete in the U.S. Open, is better than Kim Clijsters, with all due respect, and is at the same level as Martina Navratilova, Margaret Court, and Billie Jean King, but these are different eras and cross-era comparisons are for the birds and the experts, so forget it. It was experts got us into Iraq and are keeping us in Afghanistan, too, but excuse me, no politics in a sports column.

Before I forget, Mr. Nadal crushed Mr. Djokovic in four sets and that was the Open that was. Mr. Djokovic is full of heart and guts and goes for some admirable rallies and has a power forehand that he sometimes hits while leaping into it, a new twist on the traditional advice to “step into the ball,” but he wilts. This does not prove Mr. Federer could a’ had him with a more concentrated… killer instinct, especially in that fifth set when he pulled ahead, but, well, they will talk about it. In the meantime, Mr. Nadal has achieved a career grand slam (as did Mr. Federer last year) and logically must be seen as the Numero Uno del Mundo. And although a Kansan named Joe Sock won the boys’ title, the first American in many years to do so, the fact is that U.S. tennis is going through a rough patch. So’s the country. We’re due for a change, that’s for sure. And this time it better be believable.

 

Page:   12

About the Author

Roger Kaplan, a Washington-based writer, covers the Middle East and Africa (and tennis) for The American Spectator.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (11) |

gearjammer| 9.16.10 @ 2:24PM

The female champ wins in 59 minutes. The male breaks his ass for 5 hours. And, they get equal pay. Tennis is liberal, at least pro tennis. They all seem like such " citizens of the world".

Norman B| 9.16.10 @ 5:51PM

I doubt you could generalize to any useful effect about tennis players as individuals, but it is true there is a certain tendency in pro sports -- not just tennis -- to embrace a kind of "citizens of the world" liberalism. It is not impossible this attitude is transmitted to the players, but taken one at a time you will usually find they are not more or less conservative or liberal than the rest of us. This said, I think the point here concerned the attitude of the Indians and the Pakistanis regarding the troubles, both political and natural, of their aptly named subcontinent. The Bryan's spontaneously made a decent, generous gesture that any decent person should admire. Venus Williams made a decent, generous and true statement, which anyone supporting liberty, left right or center, should applaud. As to pay, while the professional federations in sports naturally want to avoid controversy and prefer to go along with the reigning consensus (in this case equal pay for equal work even when, as many male tennis players have in fact pointed out, you could legitimately question whether the work is equal), it's unlikely anyone minds. Moreover, having women in the tour increases the overall popularity of the sport, so you can't necessarily quantify what their take should be.

gearjammer| 9.16.10 @ 7:18PM

It is a cave in to rot gut 60's feminism. The women would play for half the money. It's the equality obsession. We can't even admit women are not as strong and fast as men. Lies any lie is dangerous. Look at the silly movies and tv-you'd swear the toughest, baddest dudes out there are these silly anorexic females. Lies are bad.

Answers1| 9.17.10 @ 12:09AM

That's the last time I support this stupid politically correct sport.

Von Humboldt Fleisher| 11.22.10 @ 10:47PM

Kaplan is a genius, even if I don't always understand him. The rest of your magazine sucks donkey balls.

More Articles by Roger Kaplan

More Articles From Sports Arena

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/09/16/diversity-tennis

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable

Betsy McCaughey | 5.23.13

Obama's Imbroglios

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.23.13

Lerner's Plea

Ray V. Hartwell | 5.23.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

Laying Down My Pen

Quin Hillyer | 5.23.13

ADVERTISEMENT