A few hundred conservative activists will be gathering at the
Mayflower hotel in Washington D.C. today and tomorrow to celebrate
one of the seminal events of the conservative movement, which
happened 50 years ago on these same two days of the calendar.
“A Tribute to
Sharon: Celebrating 50 Years of Advancing Liberty” will
commemorate the founding of Young
Americans for Freedom and the adoption of what for 50 years has
stood as the single best compendium of American conservative
movement beliefs — the Sharon Statement.
If you read the statement itself, you’ll immediately grasp
its eloquence and the importance of its timeless values. The
statement, and the conference, deserve a
column-cum-virtual-advertisement all their own, which will follow
this paragraph. But there’s a wonderful back story, too, so please
stay tuned for later paragraphs even if the conference itself
doesn’t interest you (although it ought to do so).
For some reason, I’m one of the 12 speakers, although out
of place in the midst of a list of conservative
movement supermen that includes political analyst extraordinaire
Michael Barone; former congressmen Barry Goldwater Jr., Robert
Bauman and Jim Kolbe; historian Lee Edwards; former Reagan
Administration officials and conservative stalwarts Don Devine and
Wayne Thorburn; direct mail guru and conservative movement leader
Richard Viguerie; and American Spectator publisher Al
Regnery. And the keynote address for the Friday banquet will be
federal appeals court judge and former U.S. Sen. James Buckley —
at whose family estate, Great Elm in Sharon, Conn., YAF and the
Statement were launched under the tutelage of brother William F.
Buckley. Sponsored by the Young Americas Foundation and the Fund
for American Studies, this weekend’s conference will look back at
Sharon and forward to the “future of freedom.”
It’s the look back that is of this column’s immediate
interest. There was a time when Young Americans for Freedom was the
cutting edge of the conservative movement, the training ground for
rising conservative leaders, and the most prominent and effective
voice in countering the student radicals of the 1960s. (Thorburn
has written
a book about it all, which finally gives due credit to the
organization. Do read it.) And it all started in Sharon on Sept.
10-11, 1960. My father, who passed away earlier this year,
was there. I found in his files all his original YAF
documents.
Imagine you are a conservative activist on a decidedly
liberal campus down south. You receive a letter dated August 16,
1960, from recent Georgetown graduate Douglas Caddy and the
“Interim Committee for a National Conservative Youth Organization”
(the committee included Suzanne Regnery of the conservative
publishing family, and Kolbe, later a congressman, and 10 other
worthies). “America stands at the crossroads today,” the letter
opened. “Will our nation continue to follow the path towards
socialism or will we turn towards Conservatism and freedom? The
final answer to this question lies with America’s youth…. An
intercollegiate society
for Conservative youth has been in operation for several years…
in bringing about a Conservative intellectual revival on the
campus. Many feel that now is the time to organize a complementary
nationwide youth movement which would be designed almost solely for
political action — implementing and coordinating the aspirations
of Conservative youth into a dynamic and effective political
force.”
Sounds like old hat, right? Not back then. Nothing like
this existed at the time. This was new. It was ground-breaking.
Which is why the letter, presciently, went on: “The Sharon
Conference can be of historic importance…. We hope you will agree
with us on its importance and urge you to make your plans today to
attend.”
Only 120 people were invited. According to the list I
have, only 86 attended. In addition to Dad, they included the
aforementioned Jim Kolbe and Lee Edwards; path-breaking
conservative journalist M. Stanton Evans; future Conservative
Caucus president Howard Phillips; Philadelphia Society founder Don
Lipsett; future Richmond Times-Dispatch editorial page
editor and Pulitzer Prize finalist Ross Mackenzie; future federal
appeals court judge Paul Niemeyer; National Review
publisher William Rusher as an observer (who joked that because he
was too old for YAF that made him an Old American for Freedom, or
OAF); future American Conservative Union leader Carol Dawson; and
future Human Events Editor Allan Ryskind — among others
who became major leaders in their fields.
In addition to adopting the Sharon Statement, those
assembled had to choose a name. My dad recalls identifying several
proposals as already being the names of “Communist front
organizations” (he had recently made a study of the topic), which
is why those names were nixed in favor of YAF. They adopted bylaws
for the national organization. They had cocktails and played
tennis. They had panel discussions. They watched films produced by
the House UnAmerican Activities Committee. They listened to remarks
by WFB. They elected officers. Dad’s notes from the break-out
sessions record the repeated idea to “infiltrate existing
organizations,” which doubtless didn’t have quite the
cloak-and-dagger connotations then that it has today — it seems to
have meant not only getting involved in conservative groups but
also bringing a conservative perspective to any group one joins —
but does in retrospect sound somewhat romantic. “Don’t use
labels,” he wrote. “Start off talking about
policies. Labels frighten; policies bring agreement.” And
“emphasize that conservatism is non-conformist” —
counterintuitive, but oh so true, and also a good sales point for
college students who typically like to think of themselves as
non-conformists even as they actually conform their thoughts,
actions, and clothing to the reigning liberal orthodoxy.
WFB devoted a full column to YAF in the first subsequent
issue of National Review: “A new organization was born
last week and just possibly it will influence the political future
of this country. … Ten years ago the struggle seemed so long, so
endless, even, that we did not even dream of victory. Even now the
world continues to go left, but all over the land dumbfounded
professors are remarking the extraordinary revival of hard
conservative sentiments in the student bodies…. It may be that, as
Russell Kirk keeps reminding us, the Struggle Availeth. No one
would doubt it who talked to the founding fathers of the Young
Americans for Freedom.”
By the spring of 1961, YAF’s national board of directors
included another future appeals court judge, Diarmuid O’Scannlein,
and boasted a national advisory board full of congressmen, leading
thinkers, and writers such as John Dos Passos, academic deans,
admirals and generals, and noted business leaders.
Back before the Internet and instant messaging, was there
ever any other such a successful launch of a political organization
for young people?
FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH, I lucked out when I got around to YAF
at Georgetown in 1982. A guy named Richard Mathias had re-founded
the group there that somehow had foundered since the time when
Georgetown grad Douglas Caddy was the national organization’s first
executive director. Mostly through Mathias’s work (and sometimes
with financial support from Ron Robinson’s Young America’s
Foundation), we sponsored a dazzling array of speakers that
included George Will (oddly enough pushing an agenda at the time
that was “more Lincolnesque” and “less Madisonian”), Morton
Blackwell, rising star Lee Atwater, several Reagan Cabinet
secretaries, U.S. Rep. Bob Livingston, Angelo Codevilla, Lyn
Nofziger, Stan Evans, and economics professor and columnist Walter
Williams. Three of our student board members became frequent
writers for conservative publications: In addition to me, there
were now-nationally syndicated columnist Deroy Murdock and Virginia
politics professor/AEI scholar Gerard Alexander, who has written
numerous pieces for the Claremont Review of Books and the
Weekly Standard. The Washington Post sent a
reporter to watch the anti-nuke ABC special The Day After
with us and write about our reactions; and later the Post
did a two-page profile of Murdock. (Hillyer and Murdock are
second and third from the right in the photo below, crowding a
patient George Will.)

Other YAF chapters across the country well into the 1980s,
at least, were still experiencing similar success. The national YAF
magazine New Guard was an amazingly fine publication.
Murdock wrote for it. So did now-famous author Dinesh D’Souza, and
Michelle Easton, who later founded the Clare Booth Luce Institute.
So did Doug Bandow, who frequently writes for these pages. And
Michael Boos, now vice president and general counsel for Citizens
United (of campaign speech rights fame).
And now, in 2010, YAF is enjoying a bit of a resurgence under executive director Jordan
Marks. It is a resurgence that should only strengthen with the
attention brought by this weekend’s conference. Which is all to the
good, because it is again the case, as it was at Sharon, that “in
this time of moral and political crisis, it is the responsibility
of the youth of America to affirm certain eternal truths. We, as
young conservatives, believe: That foremost among the transcendent
values is the individual’s use of his God-given free will, whence
derives his right to be free from the restrictions of arbitrary
force; that liberty is indivisible, and that political freedom
cannot long exist without economic freedom;… [and] that American
foreign policy must be judged by this criterion: does it serve the
just interests of the United States?”
And what of today’s youth? They, too, are re-embracing
freedom. Polls
show that young voters are now turning against Barack Obama.
Freedom does have a future. And Americans, young and old, will lead
it.