When Pakistan's civilian leadership goes AWOL, it's a foregone
conclusion what happens next.
The floods in Pakistan and the devastation that followed
since mid-summer have exposed not only the economic inequities of
the country, but equally the impoverishment of its civilian
government. It didn't have to be that way.
When the floods first came at the end of July there was an
expectation in Pakistan that the nation's military forces --
primarily its army -- would have a central role in organizing the
massive relocation and supply effort necessary in such disasters.
Initially some military assistance was made available, but clearly
not enough. When asked about this, the military command quite
firmly indicated it had not received orders from the government to
go further.
The military stayed on the sidelines waiting for the
civilian leadership to act, or at least officially call in the army
for help. Nothing happened, so by direct intervention of the Chief
of the General Staff, General Ashfaq Kayani -- who inspected the
affected areas well before Prime Minister Yousef Raza Gilani
briefly toured the principal crisis sites -- the Pakistan Army
moved in to rescue 100,000 displaced people. The civilian
government was traumatized to the point of administrative
catatonia.
At this stage the military was entrapped on the one hand
by its moral commitment to aid its countrymen and on the other by
lack of official authorization by the constitutionally elected
civilian government. Neither the PM nor President Asif Ali Zardari
were willing to authorize air and ground assets to move in to
organize the humanitarian care required by the disastrous effects
of the rains and floods. It was obvious they were avoiding any
implication of even a partial implementation of martial law. As a
result nothing was done.
President Zardari flew away on a previously planned trip
to France and the U.K., leaving the entire mess in the hands of PM
Gilani. The military urged the Gilani civilian government to
provide it with the supplies to deliver to the now homeless tens of
thousands, but there were no supplies to deliver. Foreign NGO's
rushed in what aid they could and Gen. Kayani made sure they were
given as much physical help as the army and military air transport
could muster. Still Islamabad did little.
Meanwhile President Zardari was sojourning during the
brutal months of August first in his chateau in France and
subsequently in a five-star London hotel, insisting all the while
he was "monitoring" his country's tragic situation. PM Gilani took
to shuttling about the Pakistani countryside being photographed by
his press corps posse. In truth there wasn't much else he could do
absent a willingness to admit defeat of civilian governance and
turn the entire problem over to Gen. Kayani.
There had been no lack of public reaction to the
government's ineptitude and inaction, but only the most ludicrous
response was generated by Zardari swanning about Europe. He
explained the outcry regarding his trip abroad "gives me a
reassurance that I'm so wanted…by the people." At the same time he
charged "right wing forces" as "taking advantage of situations like
this."
While Zardari rushed to explain that he had been referring
to the Taliban rather than the Pakistan Army, analysts predicted
that the Pakistan Taliban would utilize the socio-political
breakdown caused by the floods to become the benefactor of the
refugees. Somehow the Taliban didn't get the message and proceeded
with bombings among Shia celebrants of Ramadan in Lahore and
Quetta. Apparently some elements of the Pakistan Taliban are more
interested in creating civil chaos than winning hearts and
minds.
If the military wanted to create an environment conducive
to a coup d'état it couldn't have a better political,
economic, and social stimulus than the devastation that now exists
in Pakistan. Estimates differ but there is a UN-published consensus
currently of 1,700 dead and 2-3 million homeless out of a total of
18.7 million people affected. Disease and hunger is pervasive in
the provinces of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab, Sindh and
Balochistan.
Gen. Kayani has had considerable pressure put on him to
step into the role of savior and once again have the military take
over the reins of government. It is clear that there are many of
his colleagues who see a return to military rule as the only path
to securing the future of Pakistan. In the meantime the army
doesn't want to be held responsible for the incompetence of the
civilian administration of Zardari and Gilani.
The suspicion exists that the military leadership and its
civilian allies are awaiting a groundswell of public reaction to
the economic and social turmoil created by the floods before they
move for military coup. It wouldn't be the first time this maneuver
has been used. Nonetheless, any junta must realize they
eventually would have to return to civilian democratic
rule.
Ali Asif Zardari may be more of a manipulative businessman
than a national leader, but he put his finger right on the problem
recently when he said in response to a question regarding the
possibility of another army coup, "I don't think anybody in their
right mind would want to take that responsibility; it's only
democracy that can carry that yoke."
Doesn't it depend on who is running that
democracy?
About the Author
George H. Wittman writes a weekly column on international affairs for The American Spectator online. He was the founding chairman of the National Institute for Public Policy.
It is the Pak army that rule the roost in Pakistan. There runs a
parallel govt. and that Pak Army. There is more than meets the eye
in this scenario. http://naturaldetoxcleanse.net.....y-cleanse/
Alan Brooks| 9.10.10 @ 5:57PM
Bin Laden is in Pakistan right now, living it up on camel meat,
baclava, and good wine.
Old Soldier| 9.10.10 @ 9:10AM
Maybe Mr. 10% needed to check in on his Swiss bank accounts.
GENE HAUBER| 9.10.10 @ 10:45AM
If Gen. Kayani is a friend of the USA , let him go for
it..................too bad we can't do that here with our
brainless president.
THINGS NEED TO BE DONE RIGHT.
ACynic| 9.10.10 @ 12:07PM
It is NOT the responsibility for the US taxpayer in any way to
support Pakistan. If they are headed for a coup d'etat, let them. I
could give a rat's ass. The Pakistanis hate the USA, and they
should not receive one penny of US taxpayer money. If we are
concerned about their nukes, India will handle them. India has far
more to fear from Pakistan than the USA. If we are concerned -
rightfully so - about terrorism emanating from Pakistan, then we
should prohibit all Pakastanis, as well as citizens of other
countries that support terrorism, from entering the USA.
In wartime, which is what we are in now - a war against radical
islam - you simply do not let into your country the citizens of the
enemy nations. It really is that simple.
canuckistani| 9.10.10 @ 2:20PM
I tend to agree with you.
Pakistan has shown that attempting to merge Islam with a "western"
governing system is a very bad mix. The judiciary, legislative and
executive branches of Pakistan were hold overs from the deals made
when the Brits flew the coop. It took a generation for India to
begin to get their act together (they still haven't, but progress
is noticed).
The systematic corruption is amost an automatic when dealing with
them - ask Wal-mart about their forays there since 9/11 and the
"peace dividend" campaign led by the Junior administration on
behalf of Musharraf.
The Lahore cabal needs to be busted up. These are the people that
run the military, the ISI, and the elite money class that has the
moghul-era grudge against anything Hindu.
Doctor Right| 9.10.10 @ 1:23PM
For Pete's sake...
Can we PLEASE drill for our own oil and gas, wherever we can
find it, and start disconnecting ourselves from this brutal,
corrupt, decrepit, dysfunctional, filthy, dangerous, murderous,
deceitful, barbaric part of the world????
Good grief! WHY must we constantly have to deal with these
nit-wits??
If we could achieve real energy independence, we could deny
these Craplakistans the cash they need to dig their wells and to
fund more Islamic terrorism!
Shiites wanna' kill Sunnis? WHO CARES??? Not our problem!
India and Pakistan wanna' duke it out??? WHO CARES??? Not our
problem!
Iran and Saudi Arabia don't get along??? WHO CARES??? Not our
problem!
China needs to squash Muslim unrest on their western borders???
GOOD!!! Let 'em!! Not our problem!!
The vast majority of the "3rd world" is a steaming puss-hole
that was far better off when the European colonial powers were in
charge. Better for them, and definitely better for us.
Well, they've got their independence, and they suck. WHY do we
have to constantly be dealing with them?? Aside from energy, who
cares?!?!?
...D'OH!!!!!!!
Jack Neidlinger| 9.13.10 @ 9:40AM
Amen Doc. Look at post colonial Africa. Nearly every country in
Africa is a basket case. Oh, for the good old days of empire.
Lori Ashlyafrib| 9.10.10 @ 8:20AM
It is the Pak army that rule the roost in Pakistan. There runs a parallel govt. and that Pak Army. There is more than meets the eye in this scenario.
http://naturaldetoxcleanse.net.....y-cleanse/
Alan Brooks| 9.10.10 @ 5:57PM
Bin Laden is in Pakistan right now, living it up on camel meat, baclava, and good wine.
Old Soldier| 9.10.10 @ 9:10AM
Maybe Mr. 10% needed to check in on his Swiss bank accounts.
GENE HAUBER| 9.10.10 @ 10:45AM
If Gen. Kayani is a friend of the USA , let him go for it..................too bad we can't do that here with our brainless president.
THINGS NEED TO BE DONE RIGHT.
ACynic| 9.10.10 @ 12:07PM
It is NOT the responsibility for the US taxpayer in any way to support Pakistan. If they are headed for a coup d'etat, let them. I could give a rat's ass. The Pakistanis hate the USA, and they should not receive one penny of US taxpayer money. If we are concerned about their nukes, India will handle them. India has far more to fear from Pakistan than the USA. If we are concerned - rightfully so - about terrorism emanating from Pakistan, then we should prohibit all Pakastanis, as well as citizens of other countries that support terrorism, from entering the USA.
In wartime, which is what we are in now - a war against radical islam - you simply do not let into your country the citizens of the enemy nations. It really is that simple.
canuckistani| 9.10.10 @ 2:20PM
I tend to agree with you.
Pakistan has shown that attempting to merge Islam with a "western" governing system is a very bad mix. The judiciary, legislative and executive branches of Pakistan were hold overs from the deals made when the Brits flew the coop. It took a generation for India to begin to get their act together (they still haven't, but progress is noticed).
The systematic corruption is amost an automatic when dealing with them - ask Wal-mart about their forays there since 9/11 and the "peace dividend" campaign led by the Junior administration on behalf of Musharraf.
The Lahore cabal needs to be busted up. These are the people that run the military, the ISI, and the elite money class that has the moghul-era grudge against anything Hindu.
Doctor Right| 9.10.10 @ 1:23PM
For Pete's sake...
Can we PLEASE drill for our own oil and gas, wherever we can find it, and start disconnecting ourselves from this brutal, corrupt, decrepit, dysfunctional, filthy, dangerous, murderous, deceitful, barbaric part of the world????
Good grief! WHY must we constantly have to deal with these nit-wits??
If we could achieve real energy independence, we could deny these Craplakistans the cash they need to dig their wells and to fund more Islamic terrorism!
Shiites wanna' kill Sunnis? WHO CARES??? Not our problem!
India and Pakistan wanna' duke it out??? WHO CARES??? Not our problem!
Iran and Saudi Arabia don't get along??? WHO CARES??? Not our problem!
China needs to squash Muslim unrest on their western borders??? GOOD!!! Let 'em!! Not our problem!!
The vast majority of the "3rd world" is a steaming puss-hole that was far better off when the European colonial powers were in charge. Better for them, and definitely better for us.
Well, they've got their independence, and they suck. WHY do we have to constantly be dealing with them?? Aside from energy, who cares?!?!?
...D'OH!!!!!!!
Jack Neidlinger| 9.13.10 @ 9:40AM
Amen Doc. Look at post colonial Africa. Nearly every country in Africa is a basket case. Oh, for the good old days of empire.
Joanna| 6.6.11 @ 5:49AM
I agree with most of these comments too.
UTI Treatment