There are almost as many Helen Thomas awards in journalism as
there are Robert C. Byrd federal buildings in West Virginia. The
Society of Professional Journalists, which gives out the Helen
Thomas Award for Lifetime Achievement, describes Thomas as “a
living icon of journalism for her dogged pursuit of the truth in a
career that has spanned almost 60 years.” Thomas’s alma mater,
Wayne State University in Detroit, honors Thomas’s “many years of
exemplary service” with its Helen Thomas Spirit of Diversity Award.
The Washington Post’s Sally Quinn, a past recipient (with
husband Ben Bradlee) of the Helen Thomas Award from the American
News Women’s Club, writes that “Helen Thomas set the standard for
excellence in journalism.”
Thomas, who turned 90 in August, became United Press
International’s White House correspondent in 1961, arriving at the
executive mansion with John F. Kennedy, whose campaign she had
covered. In 2000 she left UPI to become a columnist for Hearst
Newspapers, but she kept her prized frontrow seat in the White
House pressroom. She enjoyed her new role as an opinion writer. “I
censored myself for 50 years when I was a reporter,” she said in a
2002 speech. “Now I wake up and ask myself, ‘Who do I hate
today?’”
By answering that question, she brought her career to an abrupt
if long-overdue end. On May 27 Thomas was at the White House’s
Jewish Heritage Celebration when an amateur journalist, Rabbi David
Nesenoff, approached her with a video camera and asked, “Any
comments on Israel?”
“Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine,” she replied.
Nesenoff was taken aback: “So where should they go? What should
they do?”
“They should go home.”
“Where is home?”
“Poland. Germany.”
“So you’re saying the Jews should go back to Poland and
Germany?”
“And America, and everywhere else.”
A week later, on Thursday, June 3, Nesenoff posted the video on
YouTube and his own website, RabbiLive.com. The Drudge Report
linked the next day, and the whole world knew. Thomas issued an
apology, claiming that her comments “do not reflect my heartfelt
belief” in “the need for mutual respect and tolerance.” Nobody
believed her. Her virulent anti-Israel views were well known,
though never before quite so crudely expressed in public. By Monday
she was history. It didn’t help that on Friday, the Israel Defense
Forces had released a tape of a man from a Turkish Islamist group
that was running a Gaza-bound flotilla in defiance of Israel’s
blockade. Ordered to dock at an Israeli port instead, the man
radioed back with a chilling echo of Thomas: “Go back to
Auschwitz.”
Journalism’s Beltway big shots mourned their profession’s loss.
But why? In her later years, Thomas was known chiefly for asking
truculent yet meandering questions, such as this one to President
Bush in 2006:
Your decision to invade Iraq has caused the deaths of thousands
of Americans and Iraqis, wounds of Americans and Iraqis for a
lifetime. Every reason given, publicly at least, had turned out not
to be true. My question is: Why did you really want to go to war?
From the moment you stepped into the White House, from your
cabinet-former cabinet officers, intelligent people, and so forth.
What was your real reason? You have said it wasn’t oil, quest for
oil. It hasn’t been Israel, or anything else. What was it?
At least during the Bush administration, those who sympathized
with Thomas’s views credited her with asking “tough” questions. But
David Frum, a former Bush speechwriter and frequent critic of
conservatives, got it right when he wrote, in the aftermath of her
departure:
A tough question is a question that’s hard to answer. But any
moderately skilled flack understood precisely how to deflect Helen
Thomas’ histrionic denunciations….In fact, calling on Helen
Thomas was a notorious method for a hard-pressed White House press
secretary to evade tough questions from the rest of the press
corps. A zany, out-of-left-field protest from Thomas would disrupt
a flow of unwelcome queries, maybe spark a tension-breaking laugh,
maybe change the subject altogether.
baslimthecripple| 9.17.10 @ 7:34AM
Helen Thomas' notariety came from being ugly, abrasive, and unfailingly liberal. She was the archtypal "assertive woman" which translated to being rude to Republican presidents on topics about which she knew precisely nothing. Good riddance.
Timothy L. Pennell| 9.17.10 @ 8:05AM
This is what you get, on the LEFT, when you hate Blacks and Jews. You get a prize.
Sieg Heil!
Jim Sweet| 9.17.10 @ 10:42AM
Helen Thomas -- wasting a perfectly good front row seat to 50 years of American history.
Dunce Biden| 9.17.10 @ 11:04AM
I have my Helen Thomas mask ready for Halloween. I'm sure to be the scariest goblin at any event. Nothing touches "Nasty Helen" for utter hideousness both in looks and words.
JohnnyCleveland | 9.17.10 @ 6:39PM
Helen Thomas is a broad caricature of the angry white liberal woman. Only Bea Arthur or Bella Abzug -- and perhaps now Rachel Maddow -- can compare with the antics of this snarling, snapping blowfish in red lipstick.
What a loser. If I saw this woman on the street, I'd tell her to go to hell where she belongs.
Jack Kinch(1uncle)| 9.17.10 @ 7:12PM
Legend ? Liberal slang for a mythical beast.
Ed| 9.17.10 @ 9:39PM
Helen who? LoL
Frank Ruth| 9.18.10 @ 12:29AM
Ms Thomas is just like the members of congress which she covered - both SHE and THEY needed/need term limits. Unlike Ms Thomas, the representatives do not know when to quit. Throw them all out by voting for TERM LIMITS!!!!!
student1776| 9.18.10 @ 1:15PM
You do not have to be competent at anything to be a liberal icon. Just being a petty, biased, ignorant but persistent statist and collectivist in the public eye is all the qualification you need.
RonCee| 9.18.10 @ 6:21PM
Har·py
/ˈhɑrpi/ [hahr-pee]
–noun, plural -pies.
1. Classical Mythology . a ravenous, filthy monster having a woman's head and a bird's body.
2. ( lowercase ) a scolding, nagging, bad-tempered woman; shrew.
3. ( lowercase ) a greedy, predatory person.
....so let's add 4. Helen Thomas.... in red lipstick
1GregM| 9.18.10 @ 9:11PM
Helen seems to be the first of many liberals that are going to be swept out of Washington this season. The only difference between her and the rest of the legislators and their staffers is that she could not be removed by the voice of the people. The end result is the same though, so there is no complaint as to her absence. The Dhimmicrats are soooo screwed. NOVEMBER, NOVEMBER, NOVEMBER.
verbatim| 9.19.10 @ 5:50PM
I bet, at some point, they'll quietly retire or rename some of the "diversity" awards.
Anatole Pushkin| 9.20.10 @ 6:15PM
They should rename the award
Helen Thomas Jounolist Award.
Joanna | 6.6.11 @ 5:35AM
I agree with most of these comments too.
UTI Treatment