The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Presswatch
Print Email
Text Size

Presswatch

There are almost as many Helen Thomas awards in journalism as there are Robert C. Byrd federal buildings in West Virginia. The Society of Professional Journalists, which gives out the Helen Thomas Award for Lifetime Achievement, describes Thomas as “a living icon of journalism for her dogged pursuit of the truth in a career that has spanned almost 60 years.” Thomas’s alma mater, Wayne State University in Detroit, honors Thomas’s “many years of exemplary service” with its Helen Thomas Spirit of Diversity Award. The Washington Post’s Sally Quinn, a past recipient (with husband Ben Bradlee) of the Helen Thomas Award from the American News Women’s Club, writes that “Helen Thomas set the standard for excellence in journalism.”

Thomas, who turned 90 in August, became United Press International’s White House correspondent in 1961, arriving at the executive mansion with John F. Kennedy, whose campaign she had covered. In 2000 she left UPI to become a columnist for Hearst Newspapers, but she kept her prized frontrow seat in the White House pressroom. She enjoyed her new role as an opinion writer. “I censored myself for 50 years when I was a reporter,” she said in a 2002 speech. “Now I wake up and ask myself, ‘Who do I hate today?’”

By answering that question, she brought her career to an abrupt if long-overdue end. On May 27 Thomas was at the White House’s Jewish Heritage Celebration when an amateur journalist, Rabbi David Nesenoff, approached her with a video camera and asked, “Any comments on Israel?”

“Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine,” she replied.

Nesenoff was taken aback: “So where should they go? What should they do?”

“They should go home.”

“Where is home?”

“Poland. Germany.”

“So you’re saying the Jews should go back to Poland and Germany?”

“And America, and everywhere else.”

A week later, on Thursday, June 3, Nesenoff posted the video on YouTube and his own website, RabbiLive.com. The Drudge Report linked the next day, and the whole world knew. Thomas issued an apology, claiming that her comments “do not reflect my heartfelt belief” in “the need for mutual respect and tolerance.” Nobody believed her. Her virulent anti-Israel views were well known, though never before quite so crudely expressed in public. By Monday she was history. It didn’t help that on Friday, the Israel Defense Forces had released a tape of a man from a Turkish Islamist group that was running a Gaza-bound flotilla in defiance of Israel’s blockade. Ordered to dock at an Israeli port instead, the man radioed back with a chilling echo of Thomas: “Go back to Auschwitz.”

Journalism’s Beltway big shots mourned their profession’s loss. But why? In her later years, Thomas was known chiefly for asking truculent yet meandering questions, such as this one to President Bush in 2006:

Your decision to invade Iraq has caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis, wounds of Americans and Iraqis for a lifetime. Every reason given, publicly at least, had turned out not to be true. My question is: Why did you really want to go to war? From the moment you stepped into the White House, from your cabinet-former cabinet officers, intelligent people, and so forth. What was your real reason? You have said it wasn’t oil, quest for oil. It hasn’t been Israel, or anything else. What was it?

At least during the Bush administration, those who sympathized with Thomas’s views credited her with asking “tough” questions. But David Frum, a former Bush speechwriter and frequent critic of conservatives, got it right when he wrote, in the aftermath of her departure:

A tough question is a question that’s hard to answer. But any moderately skilled flack understood precisely how to deflect Helen Thomas’ histrionic denunciations….In fact, calling on Helen Thomas was a notorious method for a hard-pressed White House press secretary to evade tough questions from the rest of the press corps. A zany, out-of-left-field protest from Thomas would disrupt a flow of unwelcome queries, maybe spark a tension-breaking laugh, maybe change the subject altogether.

Page: 1 2  

About the Author

James Taranto, a member of the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board, writes the Best of the Web Today column for OpinionJournal.com.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (15) |

baslimthecripple| 9.17.10 @ 7:34AM

Helen Thomas' notariety came from being ugly, abrasive, and unfailingly liberal. She was the archtypal "assertive woman" which translated to being rude to Republican presidents on topics about which she knew precisely nothing. Good riddance.

Timothy L. Pennell| 9.17.10 @ 8:05AM

This is what you get, on the LEFT, when you hate Blacks and Jews. You get a prize.
Sieg Heil!

Jim Sweet| 9.17.10 @ 10:42AM

Helen Thomas -- wasting a perfectly good front row seat to 50 years of American history.

Dunce Biden| 9.17.10 @ 11:04AM

I have my Helen Thomas mask ready for Halloween. I'm sure to be the scariest goblin at any event. Nothing touches "Nasty Helen" for utter hideousness both in looks and words.

JohnnyCleveland | 9.17.10 @ 6:39PM

Helen Thomas is a broad caricature of the angry white liberal woman. Only Bea Arthur or Bella Abzug -- and perhaps now Rachel Maddow -- can compare with the antics of this snarling, snapping blowfish in red lipstick.

What a loser. If I saw this woman on the street, I'd tell her to go to hell where she belongs.

Jack Kinch(1uncle)| 9.17.10 @ 7:12PM

Legend ? Liberal slang for a mythical beast.

Ed| 9.17.10 @ 9:39PM

Helen who? LoL

Frank Ruth| 9.18.10 @ 12:29AM

Ms Thomas is just like the members of congress which she covered - both SHE and THEY needed/need term limits. Unlike Ms Thomas, the representatives do not know when to quit. Throw them all out by voting for TERM LIMITS!!!!!

student1776| 9.18.10 @ 1:15PM

You do not have to be competent at anything to be a liberal icon. Just being a petty, biased, ignorant but persistent statist and collectivist in the public eye is all the qualification you need.

RonCee| 9.18.10 @ 6:21PM

Har·py
/ˈhɑrpi/ [hahr-pee]
–noun, plural -pies.
1. Classical Mythology . a ravenous, filthy monster having a woman's head and a bird's body.
2. ( lowercase ) a scolding, nagging, bad-tempered woman; shrew.
3. ( lowercase ) a greedy, predatory person.

....so let's add 4. Helen Thomas.... in red lipstick

1GregM| 9.18.10 @ 9:11PM

Helen seems to be the first of many liberals that are going to be swept out of Washington this season. The only difference between her and the rest of the legislators and their staffers is that she could not be removed by the voice of the people. The end result is the same though, so there is no complaint as to her absence. The Dhimmicrats are soooo screwed. NOVEMBER, NOVEMBER, NOVEMBER.

verbatim| 9.19.10 @ 5:50PM

I bet, at some point, they'll quietly retire or rename some of the "diversity" awards.

Anatole Pushkin| 9.20.10 @ 6:15PM

They should rename the award
Helen Thomas Jounolist Award.

Joanna | 6.6.11 @ 5:35AM

I agree with most of these comments too.
UTI Treatment

More Articles by James Taranto

More Articles From Presswatch

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/09/04/the-legend-of-helen-thomas

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable

Betsy McCaughey | 5.23.13

Obama's Imbroglios

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.23.13

Lerner's Plea

Ray V. Hartwell | 5.23.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

Laying Down My Pen

Quin Hillyer | 5.23.13

ADVERTISEMENT