There are almost as many Helen Thomas awards in journalism as there are Robert C. Byrd federal buildings in West Virginia. The Society of Professional Journalists, which gives out the Helen Thomas Award for Lifetime Achievement, describes Thomas as “a living icon of journalism for her dogged pursuit of the truth in a career that has spanned almost 60 years.” Thomas’s alma mater, Wayne State University in Detroit, honors Thomas’s “many years of exemplary service” with its Helen Thomas Spirit of Diversity Award. The Washington Post’s Sally Quinn, a past recipient (with husband Ben Bradlee) of the Helen Thomas Award from the American News Women’s Club, writes that “Helen Thomas set the standard for excellence in journalism.”
Thomas, who turned 90 in August, became United Press International’s White House correspondent in 1961, arriving at the executive mansion with John F. Kennedy, whose campaign she had covered. In 2000 she left UPI to become a columnist for Hearst Newspapers, but she kept her prized frontrow seat in the White House pressroom. She enjoyed her new role as an opinion writer. “I censored myself for 50 years when I was a reporter,” she said in a 2002 speech. “Now I wake up and ask myself, ‘Who do I hate today?’”
By answering that question, she brought her career to an abrupt if long-overdue end. On May 27 Thomas was at the White House’s Jewish Heritage Celebration when an amateur journalist, Rabbi David Nesenoff, approached her with a video camera and asked, “Any comments on Israel?”
“Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine,” she replied.
Nesenoff was taken aback: “So where should they go? What should they do?”
“They should go home.”
“Where is home?”
“So you’re saying the Jews should go back to Poland and Germany?”
“And America, and everywhere else.”
A week later, on Thursday, June 3, Nesenoff posted the video on YouTube and his own website, RabbiLive.com. The Drudge Report linked the next day, and the whole world knew. Thomas issued an apology, claiming that her comments “do not reflect my heartfelt belief” in “the need for mutual respect and tolerance.” Nobody believed her. Her virulent anti-Israel views were well known, though never before quite so crudely expressed in public. By Monday she was history. It didn’t help that on Friday, the Israel Defense Forces had released a tape of a man from a Turkish Islamist group that was running a Gaza-bound flotilla in defiance of Israel’s blockade. Ordered to dock at an Israeli port instead, the man radioed back with a chilling echo of Thomas: “Go back to Auschwitz.”
Journalism’s Beltway big shots mourned their profession’s loss. But why? In her later years, Thomas was known chiefly for asking truculent yet meandering questions, such as this one to President Bush in 2006:
Your decision to invade Iraq has caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis, wounds of Americans and Iraqis for a lifetime. Every reason given, publicly at least, had turned out not to be true. My question is: Why did you really want to go to war? From the moment you stepped into the White House, from your cabinet-former cabinet officers, intelligent people, and so forth. What was your real reason? You have said it wasn’t oil, quest for oil. It hasn’t been Israel, or anything else. What was it?
At least during the Bush administration, those who sympathized with Thomas’s views credited her with asking “tough” questions. But David Frum, a former Bush speechwriter and frequent critic of conservatives, got it right when he wrote, in the aftermath of her departure:
A tough question is a question that’s hard to answer. But any moderately skilled flack understood precisely how to deflect Helen Thomas’ histrionic denunciations….In fact, calling on Helen Thomas was a notorious method for a hard-pressed White House press secretary to evade tough questions from the rest of the press corps. A zany, out-of-left-field protest from Thomas would disrupt a flow of unwelcome queries, maybe spark a tension-breaking laugh, maybe change the subject altogether.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online