8.20.10 @ 6:01AM
Peanuts for our president. Plus much more.
IT ONLY GETS WORSE
Re: R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.’s Worse Than Carter:
Thanks for articulating what has become painfully obvious
for some time now.
— Jeff Rennie
Mr. Tyrrell, it is not only time to declare one obvious truth — that Obama is worse than Carter — but a second one as well. Let’s drop the blather about Obama’s supposed intelligence. His inexplicable serial blunders re Troopergate, the Arizona border, the 9-11 mosque, et al. cannot continue to be dismissed simply as signs of tin ear disease. His inability to utter anything moving or uplifting when the teleprompter is off has become the stuff of comic legend. Spouting banal platitudes about hope, change, and freedom of religion without any awareness of context are the signs of an uncritical mind skilled at parroting what others have told it, not of any innate intelligence.
I grant that Obama is educated. I grant that he reads his
teleprompted words well and thus give a scripted, artificial
impression of eloquence. But I think it’s time to lay aside the
meme, probably psychologically inspired by the exquisite racial
sensitivity that now lies within us all, that the man is somehow
any more intelligent than any other failed politician. From foreign
policy, to domestic policy, to understanding the culture that
elected him, his cognitive skills have been painfully
— John Rogitz
San Diego, California
While I agree wholeheartedly that Obama has surpassed
Carter on the “worst” list, I don’t consider that to be a
stand-alone issue. This Congress is the worst Congress in recent
times. The two, together, constitute an as yet unmatched force for
the decline of the country. However, it should be borne in mind
that the reason for the election of these
incredibly destructive performers was the notably poor
performances of a Republican President and Republican
Congress. The American public, with the possible exception of those
Democrats who still support Obama, surely realize that they have
replaced poor performers with worse performers. The forthcoming
elections confront the voters with the problem of determining
who, if any, may be better. I think that it would be a mistake for
dissatisfied voters to leave the selection of the candidates to the
same political groups, the Republican and Democratic parties,
from whose ranks the poor and worse performers have come. The Tea
Parties offer voters a potential source for something better.
— Syd Chaden
Mr. Tyrrell’s “Worse Than Carter” article is fantastic, but I would like to add a few points. First, Mr. Obama is the type of liberal who believes the First Amendment requires the removal of the Ten Commandments from a state courthouse, but allows the building of a controversial mosque at Ground Zero. While his view is supported by the Supreme Court’s liberal interpretation of the First Amendment, most voters would not find the Ten Commandments in a courthouse offensive, but would find a mosque built at Ground Zero offensive.
Second, when conservatives are quick to criticize Mr. Obama’s credentials as a community organizer, liberals are quick to respond that Moses and Jesus were community organizers. Aside from the fact that Christians believe Moses was a spiritual leader and Jesus was the Son of God, rather than community organizers, the liberal comparison of Mr. Obama to either of them implies that in 2008, liberals voted for a religious leader, Mr. Obama, and thus violated the “separation of church and state” principle.
Third, nothing symbolizes the intersection of
religion and state more than Ground Zero. In fact, it was the
site of the most violent interaction between the
Judeo-Christian West and the Islamic Middle East in recent history.
The idea of Saudi Arabia and Iran funding a mosque at
Ground Zero is akin to the idea of the U.S. funding a
Catholic Church and Jewish Temple in Kabul and Baghdad. The
difference is that the U.S. would never consider such absurd
projects, not only because our Constitution prohibits it, but also
because the motives are clearly malicious. Unlike the president of
the United States, most Americans realize the motives behind
the Ground Zero mosque are malicious and oppose it.
— Mike Mitchell
I’d say the article misses two greater instances of
petulance and bad manners: his chronic blaming of his predecessor
for all the economic woes he “inherited,” when in fact the worst
were attributable to the Clinton/Barney Frank laws requiring
irresponsible loans to house purchasers, and his mindless “I want
to know whose ass to kick” comment in respect of BP which, although
likely negligent in its drilling, was working diligently to staunch
the flow from the spill and had already agreed to set up a $20
— Roger M. Milgrim
“President Obama represents the leadership of a sterile
elite”? How about intellectually bankrupt, spiritual bereft,
morally anchorless, totalitarian, arrogant and inbred
— C. Kenna Amos Jr.
Princeton, West Virginia
Hey Tyrell [sic],
Don’t forget “W”, Grant, Garfield, Buchanan, and Fillmore!
Obama is “THE OTHER,” right?
The cynical exploitation of FEAR and xenophobia by the right wing is truly APPALLING. That is indeed “The Other.”
— Moshe Mandelman
Re: Peter Ferrara’s The Obamacare Disaster:
Excellent summary but misses one item — the elites who enacted this legislation excluded themselves from coverage under the law. This fact needs to be commented upon frequently by conservative candidates during this fall’s campaigns and thereafter as an additional reason for repeal.
Please ask Peter to discuss that feature of the
legislation as well. an>
— Patrick R. Spooner
Windham, New Hampshire
GAYER, NOT ROSENBERG
Re: G. Tracy Mehan’s Paul Ryan’s Friends:
This article incorrectly cited my name. The post that
appeared on TaxVox, the blog of the Tax Policy Center, entitled “In
Defense of Congressman Paul Ryan,” was written by Ted Gayer of
Brookings and TPC.
— Joseph Rosenberg
Tax Policy Center
G. Tracy Mehan, III
My apologies to Messrs. Gayer and Rosenberg.
Re: Quin Hillyer’s A Badly Wounded Spirit of Golf:
The trouble is the PGA picked what is no doubt the ugliest
cow pasture in the world for a major. They ought to pick a course
where you can tell the sand traps from fairway, greens and even
rough. I wonder if it had been Tiger, Watson, would it still be a
— Amo Stephens
IT’S THE STUPID POLICIES
Re: Ron Ross’s This Recession Is Not Like the Others:
The most despicable thing about the current situation, as
Dr. Ross intimates, is that all of it could be corrected, and
probably fairly quickly, with the right policies, which will never
be put in place, because of Mr. Obama and Company’s “doctrinaire”
way of doing business. Even now, surely the president understands
this; Summers, Geithner, and Biden must understand it, too.
But they would all rather sink the nation, than admit that their
approach has been incorrect. Dr. Ross used the word “pathetic,” but
it is worse than that. It is a blatant betrayal of all their
respective offices and oaths stand for, and of the American people,
who put them in office, not to mention nearly all of Mr. Obama’s
campaign promises. This is not a matter of elected officials
bumbling around and doing a bad job; we have been betrayed, in
every conceivable way.
— D. Reich
Auburn, New York
SEPARATED BY BIRTH
Re: W. James Antle III’s The Constitutional Amendment Con:
This is an excellent article by James Antle III and speaks
eloquently to the problem confronting the electorate. The
Republicans always promise to pursue a conservative agenda, but
once in office they pursue and agenda that at best could be called
Marxism lite and at worst mimics the agenda of the democrat party
which I consider to be full blown Marxism. The problem confronting
the electorate and conservatives specifically is that there is no
real alternative to the Democratic Party. My most fervent hope is
that the Republicans will nominate someone like Newt Gingrich, John
McCain, Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin or some other progressive in
sheep’s clothing. If this happens it will be business as usual with
a lot of promises and conservative rhetoric accompanied by little
if any real action and change. Given the present political
environment I believe this will lead to the demise of the
Republican party and the rise of a real alternative to the Marxist
democratic party. Just remember when you start touting Newt
Gingrich as a viable presidential candidate that he supported
NAFTA, the WTO, CAFTA, is a member of the CFR and the Trilateral
— Paul Martell
We don’t need to change the 14th- simply require interpretation per the original intent.
Sen. Lyman Trumbull 1866 :”The provision is, that all persons born in the US and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens. That means subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof. What do we mean by complete jurisdiction thereof? NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANYBODY ELSE. That is what it means.”
Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, 1866: “[I]find no fault with the introductory clause [S61 Bill] which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of PARENTS NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN SOVEREIGNTY is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” (NOTE plural parents)
The fact is, the child of illegal immigrants is born a
citizen of their country and remains subject to that other country,
not the U.S.
— M. G. Ryon
PI IN THE
Re: Jed Babbin’s Kisses for My Blackberry:
Jed Babbin’s glib assertion that the Declaration of Independence and Thomas Paine’s Common Sense could have been more efficiently circulated as attachments to emails ignores the impatience that an electronically-communicative society develops with expressions longer than a couple sentences (or 140 characters). Sure those crucial documents make handy email attachments, but would anybody have read them? All the way to the end? I doubt it. Common Sense is longer than even the longest story in a modern newspaper, and as the New York Slimes knows well, the best way to bury an inconvenient fact is to put it below the fold on A-18, because few readers make it that far into the story.
Fast and easy communication comes at the cost of less, and
less intense, reading. Thus the begged question: were
Thomases Paine and Jefferson writing today, would we (1) read them,
and worse, (2) would we even know they existed?
— Ezra Hood
I had to laugh out loud of “LOL” when I read “Under FISA,
any innocent conversations that are intercepted have to be ignored
and any recording or documentation of them must be destroyed.”
That’s what the TSA said when full body scanners were introduced at
— Anthony (Tony) Reese
Peekskill, New York
“Pi … is an irrational number. It is not a ratio of a to b….”
If a is the circumference of a circle, and b is the diameter of the same circle, a/b=pi.
That is, pi is the ratio of a to b, or stated another way, pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter.
But try as one might, 2 integers cannot be found whose ratio is equal to pi, so Mr. Babbin is correct in calling it irrational.
For pi to be a ratio of 2 integers, Congress must
act. Nancy Pelosi, acting irrationally as usual, could ram through
a bill that mandates pi a rational number. pi=3
should be close enough for government work. President Barak Obama
would sign the bill. He has lectured on Constitutional Law, you
— Dan Martin
Re: Paul Chesser’s The Dejected Greens:
I walk around barefoot as much as possible; among other
things, it’s one of the perks of self-employment. Generally, I am
barefoot from late March to just past Thanksgiving. Reading the
final quote from Mr. McKibben, regarding the Earth melting, prompts
me to believe that I might know earlier than most if things were
getting a little warm and gooey underfoot. Relying on my 40+ years
barefootin’, please accept my advice that it is not.
— Reid Bogie
Re: Angelo M. Codevilla’s America’s Ruling Class — And the Perils of Revolution:
Great “article.” My daughter suggests one other class:
These people don’t mind being ruled over by the
Ruling Class as long as
they are “safe” and they are predominantly
the ones keeping the ruling
class in power.
— Boyd George
As you are probably well aware by now, Angelo Codevilla’s feature is probably the best thing you have ever published.
I say this as a reader of 40 years.
— Steve Lasecki
Sign up for our weekly newsletter:
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
By John Corry
By Mark Steyn
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
By Mark Steyn
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
By Brit Hume
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
The American Spectator Foundation is the 501(c)(3) organization responsible for publishing The American Spectator magazine and training aspiring journalists who espouse traditional American values. Your contributions are tax deductible to the extent permitted by law. Each donor receives a year-end summary of their giving for tax purposes.
Copyright 2013, The American Spectator. All rights reserved.