June 13, 2011 | 127 comments
April 6, 2011 | 21 comments
February 22, 2011 | 48 comments
February 14, 2011 | 78 comments
February 7, 2011 | 43 comments
All you can eat, according to the Obama socialist in residence, Dr. Ronald Werrbick, MD.
It is argued here and there that President Obama is not a socialist. But with the incredible recess appointment last week of Dr. Ronald Werrbick to head the newly created American Center for All-American Food Excellence (“American CAFÉ”), the charge of socialism is becoming difficult to refute. Dr. Werrbick will direct an agency that oversees all food production and distribution in the United States. Even though the food industry may account for a slightly smaller portion of U.S. GDP than health care, it is arguably far more important.
Half the population spends little or nothing on health care, while 5 percent spends almost half the total amount. Food, on the other hand — and obviously — is a requirement of all people, at all times.
Werrbick is clearly a socialist, and it is fair to assume that Obama thinks Werrbick’s views match his own. Why else appoint him? And why else take over two of the three automobile companies, and take effective control of the banking industry? If that isn’t socialism, what is?
Because the president’s recess appointment will deprive the American people of the chance to learn of Werrbick’s views through Senate confirmation hearings, it is worth taking a close look at what Werrbick has said about food policy. The following are excerpts from speeches and articles by Dr. Werrbick over the last few years.
“I cannot believe that the individual food consumer can enforce through choice the proper configurations of a system as massive and complex as food. That is for leaders to do.”
“You cap your food budget, and you make the political and economic choices you need to make to keep affordability within reach.”
“Please don’t put your faith in market forces. It’s a popular idea: that Adam Smith’s invisible hand would do a better job of designing food policy than leaders with plans can.”
“Indeed, the Holy Grail of good food for all in the United States may remain out of reach unless, through rational collective action overriding some individual self-interest, we can reduce per capita costs.”
“A progressive policy regime will control and rationalize financing — control supply.”
“The unaided human mind, and the acts of the individual, cannot assure excellence. Food production and distribution is a system, and its performance is a systemic property.”
“Food is a common good. We need to move toward a single payer, speaking and buying for the common good.”
“For-profit, entrepreneurial providers of fruits, vegetables, meat, and dairy products, for example, may find their business opportunities constrained.”
“I would place a commitment to excellence — standardization to the best known method — above production and distribution autonomy as a rule for food.”
“Food production and distribution has taken a century to learn how badly we need the best of Frederick Taylor [the father of scientific management]. If we can’t standardize appropriate parts of our processes to absolute reliability, we cannot approach perfection.”
Wow! Head for the hills.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online