The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Another Perspective

News Quiz #3

In a bogus world, what story isn’t bogus?

(Page 2 of 2)

Durex condoms cost the city 5.7 cents each, but the Trojans will cost six to nine cents each (depending, of course, on size).

Item 4

TAS NEWS SERVICE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. — Charges have been dropped against a 43-year-old gym teacher, Louis Andrews, who was accused of incest, a Class E felony in New York. Subsequently, Monica Andrews, his daughter, bore a child and claimed Andrews was the father. Because the alleged event occurred one week after Monica’s 18th birthday, Andrews was not also charged with having sex with a minor, police said.

During the course of the paternity suit brought by Monica to prove that Andrews was the father of her child, Andrews’s attorney’s wife, Joan Tyler, a gynecologist, while discussing the case with her husband, made an interesting discovery. Andrews’s blood type is A. The blood type of Andrews’s wife, Sharon, is B. The baby’s blood type is A, but the blood type of the baby’s 18-year-old mother is O.

Fans of detective fiction will quickly spot the problem: Monica could not possibly be the child of Louis Andrews, because a child must inherit his or her blood type (A, B, AB, or O) from the mother or the father. Thus, if a child’s blood type differs from the type of both the mother and the man alleged to be the father, the man could not possibly be the father of the child.

Sharon Andrews, upon being confronted with the impossibility of Andrews’s being Monica’s father, confessed to having had an affair that resulted in the birth of Monica.

Page:   12

About the Author

Daniel Oliver is a Senior Director of White House Writers Group in Washington, D.C. He served as Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission under President Ronald Reagan.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (41) |

Kitty| 7.19.10 @ 7:18AM

I say #1 is bogus.

Eric Cartman| 7.19.10 @ 9:18AM

A agree - they wouldn't cover their boobs before cops came.

MoneyMatters| 7.19.10 @ 7:45AM

Item #4 is bogus - there are too many facts and the story is not written in the same style of straight, matter-of-fact reporting as other 3 articles.

Monty.Crisco| 7.19.10 @ 12:38PM

I think you are right on the money.

Bill Lannon| 7.19.10 @ 7:51AM

I agree with MoneyMatters. #4 is the bogus, but plausible story.

FTM| 7.19.10 @ 8:07AM

Nah, nah, nah, #3 is the dud. I don't think that there is a company that manufacturers different sized condoms.

FTM| 7.19.10 @ 8:12AM

This one was a joke one time wasn't it? Something like some folks in America were complaining about the baby boom. Something like that. The Russians sent a couple of ship loads of latex condoms and said something of the like that they wanted to be good neighbors and help out, that sort of thing. The Americans sent back a couple ship loads of super-extra large condoms and said something the likes of, "thanks, but do you make any condoms the size that we use here?"

Something like that anyway.

Johan1| 7.19.10 @ 5:06PM

I believe the old joke went as follows:

For propaganda purposes, the Soviet Union ordered American made condoms which were 14 inches long and 3 inches in diameter. A smartazz country boy who was working the line saw who the boxes were being shipped to, stamped 'em all 'medium' and shipped 'em out.
-as told by Jay Hickman (rest his soul)

MoneyMatters| 7.20.10 @ 8:12AM

The condom story is real -- I have friends living in D.C. and they sent me the article from the Washington Post when it was first reported.

terrie| 7.20.10 @ 12:47PM

I remember the story, but with a slight difference. I thought the condoms they were distributing were too BIG for the juvenile deliquents, so they switched brands to bring in smaller sizes for the 12 yr olds that want to have sex,

FTM| 7.19.10 @ 8:13AM

There was another condom joke one time too, the difference between a tire and 365 condoms.

One was a Goodyear and the other is a Great Year.

FTM| 7.19.10 @ 8:14AM

Not that I'd know or anything.

Denver Todd| 7.19.10 @ 8:22AM

I say #2, because the state wouldn't ever require a divorce of a protected class.

Jameson Campaigne| 7.19.10 @ 8:29AM

#3. The rest read like daily dispatches from the NEW YORK TIMES, so they must be true.

R Fuller| 7.19.10 @ 8:29AM

#4 is false. Monica can have O with parents having A & B. If you are A, you have A/O. If you are B, you have B/O (:O). Mom & Dad gave Monica an "O."

Bill Barney| 7.19.10 @ 8:34AM

Number 3 is the false story

R Martin| 7.19.10 @ 9:05AM

You've made your point: when it comes to government behavior it's hard to distinguish believable from unbelievable.

That being said, I'm going with #2 because, even in the UK, I doubt there is a Recognition of Gender Act.

crodgers| 7.19.10 @ 9:17AM

#4 has to be bogus. The lawyer wouldn't be discussing private client information with his wife, doctor or not.

Maddox| 7.19.10 @ 9:19AM

I say they are all true because the world we now live in is absolutely crazy! None of theses stories are more absurd than what we read every day about actions taken by our dear leader and his crowd of crooks.

Bill| 7.19.10 @ 9:28AM

All of the stories are entirely plausible, except I agree with the person whose comment said the transgendered bikini-wearers wouldn't have put their tops back just because the cops showed up.

Bruce| 7.19.10 @ 10:01AM

Definitely #4. parental blood type A + parental bloodtype B can indeed make baby bloodtype O. So #4 is factually incorrect. But THAT'S the only way to tell which one's bogus!!!!!!!

Marv| 7.19.10 @ 10:12AM

#2

MikeN| 7.19.10 @ 11:15AM

The gentic facts on blood type in #4 are wrong.

Joe D| 7.19.10 @ 11:57AM

I say item #1 is incorrect. But to think that 3 of these are correct is really sick. Our world has truely fallen to hell.

Anne| 7.19.10 @ 2:28PM

Story #3 is true -- I remember reading it when it occurred -- some time ago.

Anne| 7.19.10 @ 2:39PM

Oops -- forgot to say -- I think #4 is the bogus one. Reads like a "one-minute mystery" regardless of whether the genetic facts are right or wrong.

Greg| 7.19.10 @ 3:55PM

#4 is the bogus one.

Mike | 7.19.10 @ 4:55PM

My, my, wouldn't it be a much better world if they were all bogus... #3 is my guess, one size fits all...

noneofyourbusiness| 7.19.10 @ 6:38PM

Number 3 is bogus. One size does not fit all. But when it comes to pricing of condoms, size doesn`t matter! :-)

Cheers!

Londie| 7.19.10 @ 10:55PM

I REALLY want number 4 to be bogus. It is too sick to be real (please please PLEASE let it be bogus!!)

David| 7.20.10 @ 11:50AM

Can someone tell what the deal is with the "pingback" posts? Are they as irritating to you as they are to me? Can't the Spectator stop those posts?

Ray| 7.20.10 @ 12:50PM

I was just wondering that myself. There's more "pingback's" than reader comments!

Ray| 7.20.10 @ 12:56PM

Item 2 is bogus. Two different mandatory retirement ages based on gender? Yea right, and I have some oceanfront property for sale in Arizona.

Ray| 7.20.10 @ 12:59PM

I've Chengdu my mind, it's the INTRO that's bogus!

Here's what tipped me off: "A bottle of bubbly and an autographed copy of the tie new book by American Spectator editor Bob Tyrrell goes to the first three readers who correctly identify the bogus paragraph."

Well, there's your bogus paragraph. A bottle of "bubbly," as if!

R Fuller| 7.21.10 @ 10:22PM

Where is my bubbly? I was #3.

Adult toys | 7.4.11 @ 3:33AM

l like the space.support.
thank you.

More Articles by Daniel Oliver

More Articles From Another Perspective

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/07/19/news-quiz-3

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT