After House Republican Leader Rep. John Boehner
suggested that he was considering shutting down the House
Republican Policy Committee and returning the committee's budget
for next year to the taxpayers as part of a broader budget
cutting campaign in the House, the staffs of House Whip Rep.
Eric Cantor and his deputy, Rep. Kevin
McCarthy, leaked the idea to the media in an attempt to
scuttle the plan, in part, say House leadership staffers, because
the plan might have overshadowed parts of a planned PR offensive
the House whip and others had in the works.
Boehner and Cantor and their respective staffs have been
competing to launch various policy strategies and campaigns for
the 2010 election cycle. Boehner's office is expected to put
forward a broad "Contract for America" like plan in late August,
and Cantor has a book about a GOP agenda coming out later this
summer, for which he has built an extensive, national book
tour.
Late last week, as several Capitol Hill reporters began
inquiring about Boehner's suggestion -- made during a private
leadership meeting -- a Boehner aide sent an e-mail to all
leadership staff complaining about the leak. The committee could
not be shut down without support from the full House Republican
conference, say the staffers, and the broader plan had not been
fully developed.
"The idea wasn't complicated," says a House leadership
source. "One of the reasons Republicans lost the majority was
that we became bloated and spent taxpayers' money like drunken
sailors during our time in [majority] leadership. We lost touch
with our base and our fiscal conservative roots. The American
people don't trust us quite yet to be responsible and make the
tough fiscal choices, so Rep. Boehner felt there were some steps
the leadership and conference could make leading into the fall
that would illustrate how we would lead if voters were to give us
another opportunity."
Boehner and House Policy Committee chairman, Rep.
Thaddeus McCotter, had discussed the notion of
shutting down the policy committee in late June, which would
largely have been symbolic until the next fiscal year came
around. But the broader plan would have involved identifying
additional spending cuts on the House Republican side and
challenging the Democrat leadership to find similar
savings.
"We're talking millions of dollars that is wasted up here
by Democrats on unnecessary staff, consultants, travel, projects
and studies, at a time when our constituents are struggling to
get by, cutting their own budgets and restraining their
spending," says another House GOP leadership aide. "We should try
to do the same."
McCotter argued that the policy committee was a good place
to start since it had completed its work for the year -- a
document that laid out a broad Republican ideological and
philosophical agenda for 2010, and which has been shared with
state and local Republican Party officials -- and that it largely
was a redundant committee since so much policy development took
place in other areas of the Republican conference.
But Cantor and McCarthy apparently saw things differently.
Perhaps most telling, during the leadership meeting where Boehner
floated the idea, Cantor suggested that if the funds wouldn't be
spent on a policy committee, then he could use the funds for
other projects. And this inclination to spend is what bothers a
number of House members about the man who would be poised to
serve as leader of House Republicans if they were to gain a
majority in 2010 and John Boehner were elevated to the Speaker's
chair.
"If we want the opportunity to really make a difference in
this place, and bury the Democrats and their ideas for a long
time, we can't afford to run this place like we did in 1996,"
says a veteran GOP House member. "Are there places where we need
to spend and hire staff? Yes. No one wants to hamstring a
committee from doing the work that has to be done. But we also
need to show the American people we can be accountable, that the
spending cuts and austerity start here. And with all due respect,
I don't know that Eric really gets that."
Cantor has shown a remarkable ability to recruit and
support Republican House candidates, and to raise money
nationally for their campaigns. His "Young Guns" program was a
highlight of the 2010 election cycle long before it appeared the
GOP might be looking at a potential "wave" election cycle. But
Cantor has also shown a weakness for poor messaging and a
fondness for the trappings of power.
Cantor sought a national platform by putting himself front
and center with the founding of the National Council for a New
America, an organization set up more than a year ago and intended
to provide the vision for Republicans in the 2010 and 2012
cycles. But Cantor chose to launch the group's first "listening
tour" event in Arlington, Virginia, less than five miles from
Washington, D.C., an odd choice for a group that was supposedly
not going to be tied to the Beltway crowd.
Prior to that, Cantor undercut his own party during the
votes over TARP, when instead of crediting conservative
principles for the initial defeats of TARP in the House, he
claimed the victories came as a reaction to Speaker Nancy
Pelosi's anti-Bush Administration/Republican tirade on
the House floor.
Cantor has
clashed at times with Boehner, as well as McCotter, who has
been criticized for not having the policy committee do enough in
the policy arena. Those criticisms have largely been generated by
allies of Cantor, who has over the past four years built out
policy working groups inside his office. Cantor's efforts in
policy weren't rogue operations. They were organized with the
approval of Boehner and the larger leadership team, but the
activities, and those of other House Republicans, limited the
areas of focus for the policy committee.
"Ironically, it's Cantor's insistence on running policy
that made the committee obsolete," says a House member who has
served on two separate policy working groups organized by Cantor.
"Maybe McCotter could've done more, but the policy committee
today is very different from what it was ten years ago, largely
because we have members who wanted a bigger hand in policy
development."
Cantor will be touring to promote his book on a new
Republican agenda, at the same time that Boehner and other
leaders will be putting the finishing touches on the House
Republican agenda for the fall campaign, a project that has been
run largely out of Boehner's office. "That's the kind of thing
we're talking about when we complain about Eric," says a House
leadership aide. "I'm sure the book will help. It just isn't what
we might have done had we all been working
together."
I am behind Eric and find that he is refreshing, has well defined
ideas backed by sound research and number crunching. He should be
leading the Republicans. Boehner’s Republican Leadership sends a
Conservative Consensus 2010 that was nothing of consequence
requesting money by the politics as usual (bashing Liberals).
There was absolutely nothing substantial in that very expensive
fund rising effort. In fact, my thought of the piece is that they
took the idea from the Democratic political play book. If Boehner
is a leader and worthy of leading the Republicans, he should step
aside and let this maverick run in front. Most leaders in the
corporate world do that when they have talent like him. Leaders
who do that know everyone will win!
Melvin| 7.6.10 @ 8:59AM
John Boehner political philosophy is not Conservatism, but rather
Progressivism. Look at Boehner's actions, are they the actions of
a Conservative? He talks a Conservative game, but his leadership
has done what? The Republican Progressives aka Republican Country
Club Blue Bloods message so far has only been, "We're not the
Democrats," and that has been the extent of their message.
November is just around the corner and Bohner and the boys (John
McCain) are still stuck on Progressive.
loulou| 7.6.10 @ 9:52AM
Let's be frank: Neither are true conservatives.
Doctor Right| 7.6.10 @ 10:02AM
I like John Boehner, but it's time for fresh thinking. A new
"Contract with Amercia", however well conceived, will appear
stale to a Conservative electorate that doesn't simply want to
win back Congress - WE WANT ACTION.
Specifically, we want a Congress with the brains and balls to
FIGHT Obama at EVERY opportunity...And too many of the G.O.P.'s
"Old Guard" are deal-makers, not fighters.
The best way to solve this problem is to un-elect as many
Old-Guard G.O.P. nit-wits as possible, and as SOON as possible,
too.
Obama's minions voted for "change" in '08. Well, they're about to
get a REAL lesson in what "change" is all about. It took a
bumbling incompetent like Jimmy carter for the country to wake-up
and realize that we needed a man like Ronald Reagan, and the Left
hated Reagan - and they still do.
What the Left doesn't realize is that the mood of the country in
2012 will make the mood of the country in 1980 look like...Well,
like a Tea Party!
My personal hope is that the man (or woman) who takes Obama's job
in 2012 is a fearless, die-hard Conservative that will make the
Left long for the days of Ronald Reagan.
But that's NOT going to happen if we continue to let the Old
Guard run the show.
Why TASOnline is clinging to the Old Guard, and criticizing
Cantor is anyone's guess. Maybe it's the same reason that
NATIONAL REVIEW recently endorsed John McCain..?
Michael L. Hauschild| 7.6.10 @ 6:40PM
I spent thousands of dollars and hundreds of grassroots hours
getting a young Republican elected back in 1994. We beat a three
term incumbent simply by blood, sweat and tears. Within one month
the “Contract with America” was abandoned. Newt Gingrich told us
it was impractical and we had to “move on” to the business at
hand. (Wink, wink, nudge, nudge) It was nothing more than an
election gimmick. Anything that comes out of Boehner’s office
will be the same. It makes no difference as to ideology, the
longer they stay in Washington, the more corrupt they become and
the more they scam the system for their own benefit and the
ultimate benefit is re-election; the ultimate tool to maintain
encumbancy is power. If you trust anyone that has been in the
beltway for more than two terms you are deaf, dumb, blind and
stupid.
Petronius| 7.6.10 @ 10:25AM
Oh my. The Republican caucus in the house is infested with
gadflies and the objective of their pestering is that sacred
seniority system. The RINO's can't double deal us any more. We
want All of Our Freedom back Now, not 20 years from now. And if
we return the Republicans to power in Congress, they will satisfy
our demands for Freedom or face recall and removal on their
watch.
Cantor is a careerist who's come to believe his own press
releases. Although a useful ally, he's hardly the person who
conservatives should want leading the party.
Boehner is a good solid guy who can use a little push in the
conservative direction but generally has the right instincts.
McCotter is firmly conservative with a strong theoretical bent.
These two are the better choice for Congressional leaders today.
Citizen Jerry| 7.6.10 @ 11:38AM
Until the Republican Party cleans house of the squishy RINOs and
stocks their leadership with true Reagan conservatives, they will
continue to wander in the wilderness while the Democrat
Socialists continue to take us down the road to perdition. Or
maybe today's Republicans will go the way of the Whigs. One can
only hope.
Allan| 7.6.10 @ 1:53PM
Drunken sailors spend their own money. One of the commentors in
the story demeans them by comparing them to congressmen.
Aaaah yes. I wondered when we would see the first open movement
toward snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Golf never has
been a good team sport so there's no reason to expect Republicans
to know how to be a team. I agree with Dr Right and Hauschild, we
will never get good conservative leadership if we wait for the
Republican Party to provide it.
jstwndring| 7.7.10 @ 10:58PM
Yup. I don't want the Republicans to merely take back Congress, I
want massive spending cuts, and massive repealing of
irresponsible legislation passed by the Dems over the last
several decades. Don't tell me it's not possible. I don't wanna
hear it. I want Republicans to start behaving as aggressively as
toward the goal of limited government as the Dems do toward the
rapid expansion of it. Slash and burn!
BA Cyclone| 7.8.10 @ 11:48AM
*5*
Excellent comment. We need conservative leadership that is
fearless in its conservative principles - enough so that it
pursues that goal with reckless abandon and is willing to SELL it
to the American people at large. Don't try to win the liberals
and sycophants in the beltway - SELL it to America and those and
the right and center-right will support you!
Center-lefties keep using a rightie message to sell their
Marxism, yet pursue Marxism with reckless abandon. It's time to
stop wondering if the issue is the right's message...it can only
be the fear on the right (leadership) of selling a message
everyone in the media and the lefty "intellectuals" keep telling
them has no base.
Donna| 7.6.10 @ 7:20AM
I am behind Eric and find that he is refreshing, has well defined ideas backed by sound research and number crunching. He should be leading the Republicans. Boehner’s Republican Leadership sends a Conservative Consensus 2010 that was nothing of consequence requesting money by the politics as usual (bashing Liberals). There was absolutely nothing substantial in that very expensive fund rising effort. In fact, my thought of the piece is that they took the idea from the Democratic political play book. If Boehner is a leader and worthy of leading the Republicans, he should step aside and let this maverick run in front. Most leaders in the corporate world do that when they have talent like him. Leaders who do that know everyone will win!
Melvin| 7.6.10 @ 8:59AM
John Boehner political philosophy is not Conservatism, but rather Progressivism. Look at Boehner's actions, are they the actions of a Conservative? He talks a Conservative game, but his leadership has done what? The Republican Progressives aka Republican Country Club Blue Bloods message so far has only been, "We're not the Democrats," and that has been the extent of their message. November is just around the corner and Bohner and the boys (John McCain) are still stuck on Progressive.
loulou| 7.6.10 @ 9:52AM
Let's be frank: Neither are true conservatives.
Doctor Right| 7.6.10 @ 10:02AM
I like John Boehner, but it's time for fresh thinking. A new "Contract with Amercia", however well conceived, will appear stale to a Conservative electorate that doesn't simply want to win back Congress - WE WANT ACTION.
Specifically, we want a Congress with the brains and balls to FIGHT Obama at EVERY opportunity...And too many of the G.O.P.'s "Old Guard" are deal-makers, not fighters.
The best way to solve this problem is to un-elect as many Old-Guard G.O.P. nit-wits as possible, and as SOON as possible, too.
Obama's minions voted for "change" in '08. Well, they're about to get a REAL lesson in what "change" is all about. It took a bumbling incompetent like Jimmy carter for the country to wake-up and realize that we needed a man like Ronald Reagan, and the Left hated Reagan - and they still do.
What the Left doesn't realize is that the mood of the country in 2012 will make the mood of the country in 1980 look like...Well, like a Tea Party!
My personal hope is that the man (or woman) who takes Obama's job in 2012 is a fearless, die-hard Conservative that will make the Left long for the days of Ronald Reagan.
But that's NOT going to happen if we continue to let the Old Guard run the show.
Why TASOnline is clinging to the Old Guard, and criticizing Cantor is anyone's guess. Maybe it's the same reason that NATIONAL REVIEW recently endorsed John McCain..?
Michael L. Hauschild| 7.6.10 @ 6:40PM
I spent thousands of dollars and hundreds of grassroots hours getting a young Republican elected back in 1994. We beat a three term incumbent simply by blood, sweat and tears. Within one month the “Contract with America” was abandoned. Newt Gingrich told us it was impractical and we had to “move on” to the business at hand. (Wink, wink, nudge, nudge) It was nothing more than an election gimmick. Anything that comes out of Boehner’s office will be the same. It makes no difference as to ideology, the longer they stay in Washington, the more corrupt they become and the more they scam the system for their own benefit and the ultimate benefit is re-election; the ultimate tool to maintain encumbancy is power. If you trust anyone that has been in the beltway for more than two terms you are deaf, dumb, blind and stupid.
Petronius| 7.6.10 @ 10:25AM
Oh my. The Republican caucus in the house is infested with gadflies and the objective of their pestering is that sacred seniority system. The RINO's can't double deal us any more. We want All of Our Freedom back Now, not 20 years from now. And if we return the Republicans to power in Congress, they will satisfy our demands for Freedom or face recall and removal on their watch.
Dai Alanye| 7.6.10 @ 11:36AM
Cantor is a careerist who's come to believe his own press releases. Although a useful ally, he's hardly the person who conservatives should want leading the party.
Boehner is a good solid guy who can use a little push in the conservative direction but generally has the right instincts. McCotter is firmly conservative with a strong theoretical bent. These two are the better choice for Congressional leaders today.
Citizen Jerry| 7.6.10 @ 11:38AM
Until the Republican Party cleans house of the squishy RINOs and stocks their leadership with true Reagan conservatives, they will continue to wander in the wilderness while the Democrat Socialists continue to take us down the road to perdition. Or maybe today's Republicans will go the way of the Whigs. One can only hope.
Allan| 7.6.10 @ 1:53PM
Drunken sailors spend their own money. One of the commentors in the story demeans them by comparing them to congressmen.
AMENBRO| 7.6.10 @ 5:01PM
Thanks for defending this retired Sailor.
Spot| 7.6.10 @ 10:04PM
Aaaah yes. I wondered when we would see the first open movement toward snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Golf never has been a good team sport so there's no reason to expect Republicans to know how to be a team. I agree with Dr Right and Hauschild, we will never get good conservative leadership if we wait for the Republican Party to provide it.
jstwndring| 7.7.10 @ 10:58PM
Yup. I don't want the Republicans to merely take back Congress, I want massive spending cuts, and massive repealing of irresponsible legislation passed by the Dems over the last several decades. Don't tell me it's not possible. I don't wanna hear it. I want Republicans to start behaving as aggressively as toward the goal of limited government as the Dems do toward the rapid expansion of it. Slash and burn!
BA Cyclone| 7.8.10 @ 11:48AM
*5*
Excellent comment. We need conservative leadership that is fearless in its conservative principles - enough so that it pursues that goal with reckless abandon and is willing to SELL it to the American people at large. Don't try to win the liberals and sycophants in the beltway - SELL it to America and those and the right and center-right will support you!
Center-lefties keep using a rightie message to sell their Marxism, yet pursue Marxism with reckless abandon. It's time to stop wondering if the issue is the right's message...it can only be the fear on the right (leadership) of selling a message everyone in the media and the lefty "intellectuals" keep telling them has no base.