The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Washington Prowler
Print Email
Text Size

Washington Prowler

His Own Whip

Rep. Eric Cantor doesn't always seem to get it.

After House Republican Leader Rep. John Boehner suggested that he was considering shutting down the House Republican Policy Committee and returning the committee's budget for next year to the taxpayers as part of a broader budget cutting campaign in the House, the staffs of House Whip Rep. Eric Cantor and his deputy, Rep. Kevin McCarthy, leaked the idea to the media in an attempt to scuttle the plan, in part, say House leadership staffers, because the plan might have overshadowed parts of a planned PR offensive the House whip and others had in the works.

Boehner and Cantor and their respective staffs have been competing to launch various policy strategies and campaigns for the 2010 election cycle. Boehner's office is expected to put forward a broad "Contract for America" like plan in late August, and Cantor has a book about a GOP agenda coming out later this summer, for which he has built an extensive, national book tour.

Late last week, as several Capitol Hill reporters began inquiring about Boehner's suggestion -- made during a private leadership meeting -- a Boehner aide sent an e-mail to all leadership staff complaining about the leak. The committee could not be shut down without support from the full House Republican conference, say the staffers, and the broader plan had not been fully developed.

"The idea wasn't complicated," says a House leadership source. "One of the reasons Republicans lost the majority was that we became bloated and spent taxpayers' money like drunken sailors during our time in [majority] leadership. We lost touch with our base and our fiscal conservative roots. The American people don't trust us quite yet to be responsible and make the tough fiscal choices, so Rep. Boehner felt there were some steps the leadership and conference could make leading into the fall that would illustrate how we would lead if voters were to give us another opportunity."

Boehner and House Policy Committee chairman, Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, had discussed the notion of shutting down the policy committee in late June, which would largely have been symbolic until the next fiscal year came around. But the broader plan would have involved identifying additional spending cuts on the House Republican side and challenging the Democrat leadership to find similar savings.

"We're talking millions of dollars that is wasted up here by Democrats on unnecessary staff, consultants, travel, projects and studies, at a time when our constituents are struggling to get by, cutting their own budgets and restraining their spending," says another House GOP leadership aide. "We should try to do the same."

McCotter argued that the policy committee was a good place to start since it had completed its work for the year -- a document that laid out a broad Republican ideological and philosophical agenda for 2010, and which has been shared with state and local Republican Party officials -- and that it largely was a redundant committee since so much policy development took place in other areas of the Republican conference.

But Cantor and McCarthy apparently saw things differently. Perhaps most telling, during the leadership meeting where Boehner floated the idea, Cantor suggested that if the funds wouldn't be spent on a policy committee, then he could use the funds for other projects. And this inclination to spend is what bothers a number of House members about the man who would be poised to serve as leader of House Republicans if they were to gain a majority in 2010 and John Boehner were elevated to the Speaker's chair.

"If we want the opportunity to really make a difference in this place, and bury the Democrats and their ideas for a long time, we can't afford to run this place like we did in 1996," says a veteran GOP House member. "Are there places where we need to spend and hire staff? Yes. No one wants to hamstring a committee from doing the work that has to be done. But we also need to show the American people we can be accountable, that the spending cuts and austerity start here. And with all due respect, I don't know that Eric really gets that."

Cantor has shown a remarkable ability to recruit and support Republican House candidates, and to raise money nationally for their campaigns. His "Young Guns" program was a highlight of the 2010 election cycle long before it appeared the GOP might be looking at a potential "wave" election cycle. But Cantor has also shown a weakness for poor messaging and a fondness for the trappings of power.

Cantor sought a national platform by putting himself front and center with the founding of the National Council for a New America, an organization set up more than a year ago and intended to provide the vision for Republicans in the 2010 and 2012 cycles. But Cantor chose to launch the group's first "listening tour" event in Arlington, Virginia, less than five miles from Washington, D.C., an odd choice for a group that was supposedly not going to be tied to the Beltway crowd.

Prior to that, Cantor undercut his own party during the votes over TARP, when instead of crediting conservative principles for the initial defeats of TARP in the House, he claimed the victories came as a reaction to Speaker Nancy Pelosi's anti-Bush Administration/Republican tirade on the House floor.

Cantor has clashed at times with Boehner, as well as McCotter, who has been criticized for not having the policy committee do enough in the policy arena. Those criticisms have largely been generated by allies of Cantor, who has over the past four years built out policy working groups inside his office. Cantor's efforts in policy weren't rogue operations. They were organized with the approval of Boehner and the larger leadership team, but the activities, and those of other House Republicans, limited the areas of focus for the policy committee.

"Ironically, it's Cantor's insistence on running policy that made the committee obsolete," says a House member who has served on two separate policy working groups organized by Cantor. "Maybe McCotter could've done more, but the policy committee today is very different from what it was ten years ago, largely because we have members who wanted a bigger hand in policy development."

Cantor will be touring to promote his book on a new Republican agenda, at the same time that Boehner and other leaders will be putting the finishing touches on the House Republican agenda for the fall campaign, a project that has been run largely out of Boehner's office. "That's the kind of thing we're talking about when we complain about Eric," says a House leadership aide. "I'm sure the book will help. It just isn't what we might have done had we all been working together." 

Letter to the Editor View all comments (13) | Leave a comment

Donna| 7.6.10 @ 7:20AM

I am behind Eric and find that he is refreshing, has well defined ideas backed by sound research and number crunching. He should be leading the Republicans. Boehner’s Republican Leadership sends a Conservative Consensus 2010 that was nothing of consequence requesting money by the politics as usual (bashing Liberals). There was absolutely nothing substantial in that very expensive fund rising effort. In fact, my thought of the piece is that they took the idea from the Democratic political play book. If Boehner is a leader and worthy of leading the Republicans, he should step aside and let this maverick run in front. Most leaders in the corporate world do that when they have talent like him. Leaders who do that know everyone will win!

Melvin| 7.6.10 @ 8:59AM

John Boehner political philosophy is not Conservatism, but rather Progressivism. Look at Boehner's actions, are they the actions of a Conservative? He talks a Conservative game, but his leadership has done what? The Republican Progressives aka Republican Country Club Blue Bloods message so far has only been, "We're not the Democrats," and that has been the extent of their message. November is just around the corner and Bohner and the boys (John McCain) are still stuck on Progressive.

loulou| 7.6.10 @ 9:52AM

Let's be frank: Neither are true conservatives.

Doctor Right| 7.6.10 @ 10:02AM

I like John Boehner, but it's time for fresh thinking. A new "Contract with Amercia", however well conceived, will appear stale to a Conservative electorate that doesn't simply want to win back Congress - WE WANT ACTION.

Specifically, we want a Congress with the brains and balls to FIGHT Obama at EVERY opportunity...And too many of the G.O.P.'s "Old Guard" are deal-makers, not fighters.

The best way to solve this problem is to un-elect as many Old-Guard G.O.P. nit-wits as possible, and as SOON as possible, too.

Obama's minions voted for "change" in '08. Well, they're about to get a REAL lesson in what "change" is all about. It took a bumbling incompetent like Jimmy carter for the country to wake-up and realize that we needed a man like Ronald Reagan, and the Left hated Reagan - and they still do.

What the Left doesn't realize is that the mood of the country in 2012 will make the mood of the country in 1980 look like...Well, like a Tea Party!

My personal hope is that the man (or woman) who takes Obama's job in 2012 is a fearless, die-hard Conservative that will make the Left long for the days of Ronald Reagan.

But that's NOT going to happen if we continue to let the Old Guard run the show.

Why TASOnline is clinging to the Old Guard, and criticizing Cantor is anyone's guess. Maybe it's the same reason that NATIONAL REVIEW recently endorsed John McCain..?

Michael L. Hauschild| 7.6.10 @ 6:40PM

I spent thousands of dollars and hundreds of grassroots hours getting a young Republican elected back in 1994. We beat a three term incumbent simply by blood, sweat and tears. Within one month the “Contract with America” was abandoned. Newt Gingrich told us it was impractical and we had to “move on” to the business at hand. (Wink, wink, nudge, nudge) It was nothing more than an election gimmick. Anything that comes out of Boehner’s office will be the same. It makes no difference as to ideology, the longer they stay in Washington, the more corrupt they become and the more they scam the system for their own benefit and the ultimate benefit is re-election; the ultimate tool to maintain encumbancy is power. If you trust anyone that has been in the beltway for more than two terms you are deaf, dumb, blind and stupid.

Petronius| 7.6.10 @ 10:25AM

Oh my. The Republican caucus in the house is infested with gadflies and the objective of their pestering is that sacred seniority system. The RINO's can't double deal us any more. We want All of Our Freedom back Now, not 20 years from now. And if we return the Republicans to power in Congress, they will satisfy our demands for Freedom or face recall and removal on their watch.

Dai Alanye| 7.6.10 @ 11:36AM

Cantor is a careerist who's come to believe his own press releases. Although a useful ally, he's hardly the person who conservatives should want leading the party.

Boehner is a good solid guy who can use a little push in the conservative direction but generally has the right instincts. McCotter is firmly conservative with a strong theoretical bent. These two are the better choice for Congressional leaders today.

Citizen Jerry| 7.6.10 @ 11:38AM

Until the Republican Party cleans house of the squishy RINOs and stocks their leadership with true Reagan conservatives, they will continue to wander in the wilderness while the Democrat Socialists continue to take us down the road to perdition. Or maybe today's Republicans will go the way of the Whigs. One can only hope.

Allan| 7.6.10 @ 1:53PM

Drunken sailors spend their own money. One of the commentors in the story demeans them by comparing them to congressmen.

AMENBRO| 7.6.10 @ 5:01PM

Thanks for defending this retired Sailor.

Spot| 7.6.10 @ 10:04PM

Aaaah yes. I wondered when we would see the first open movement toward snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Golf never has been a good team sport so there's no reason to expect Republicans to know how to be a team. I agree with Dr Right and Hauschild, we will never get good conservative leadership if we wait for the Republican Party to provide it.

jstwndring| 7.7.10 @ 10:58PM

Yup. I don't want the Republicans to merely take back Congress, I want massive spending cuts, and massive repealing of irresponsible legislation passed by the Dems over the last several decades. Don't tell me it's not possible. I don't wanna hear it. I want Republicans to start behaving as aggressively as toward the goal of limited government as the Dems do toward the rapid expansion of it. Slash and burn!

BA Cyclone| 7.8.10 @ 11:48AM

*5*

Excellent comment. We need conservative leadership that is fearless in its conservative principles - enough so that it pursues that goal with reckless abandon and is willing to SELL it to the American people at large. Don't try to win the liberals and sycophants in the beltway - SELL it to America and those and the right and center-right will support you!

Center-lefties keep using a rightie message to sell their Marxism, yet pursue Marxism with reckless abandon. It's time to stop wondering if the issue is the right's message...it can only be the fear on the right (leadership) of selling a message everyone in the media and the lefty "intellectuals" keep telling them has no base.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Articles by The Prowler

More Articles From Washington Prowler

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/07/06/his-own-whip

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Greg Sowards Battles Queen RINO

Jeffrey Lord | 5.24.12

We Have To Do Something

Ben Stein | 5.24.12

The Problem With High-Mileage Cars

Eric Peters | 5.24.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT