Another result of the American concept of "government" is that
"anti-government" is an ideological designation -- albeit usually a
tendentious description of one's opponents. Thus when Bush was
president, commentators on the left often attributed administrative
failures to his supposed "anti-government" philosophy. Now that an
administration is in power that favors increasing state power over
domestic affairs, the left's criticism of the right is even more
heated. On NBC's The Chris Matthews Show in April,
Time magazine's Joe Klein told the host:
I did a little bit of research just before this show -- it's on
this little napkin here. I looked up the definition of sedition,
which is conduct or language inciting rebellion against the
authority of the state. And a lot of these statements, especially
the ones coming from people like Glenn Beck and to a certain extent
Sarah Palin, rub right up close to being seditious.
This is the sort of thing that liberals imagined conservatives
were saying about them when Bush was president. Accepting the
Democratic presidential nomination in 2004, John Kerry
declared:
We have an important message for those who question the
patriotism of Americans who offer a better direction for our
country....We are here to affirm that when Americans stand up and
speak their minds and say America can do better, that is not a
challenge to patriotism; it is the heart and soul of
patriotism.
Kerry's party is now in power, and its leaders and supporters
actually are questioning their critics' patriotism. In an August
2009 USA Today op-ed, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and
Majority Leader Steny Hoyer called ObamaCare opponents
"un-American" (though Hoyer, eight months later, said he regretted
using the term). It is clear in hindsight, if it was not already in
2004, that complaints like Kerry's were a matter more of
partisanship than of principle.
Somehow, even the most hysterical critics of Bush's anti-terror
policies were almost never tagged as anti-government. And the truth
is that ideological libertarians -- those who are consistently
anti-government -- make up a tiny fringe. Generally speaking, the
right favors more limits on government power in areas of economics
and personal hygiene, and the left in matters of war and law
enforcement.
Fortunately, a consistently "pro-government" view is even rarer.
Hardly anyone wants a socialist police state -- even if many of us,
right and left, are prone to worry that our opponents are moving
dangerously in that direction.
I find it hard to diss both Bushes as people, they were not
nearly as smarmy as Jimmuh, they didn't possess that crap-eating
smile Carter had on his Howdy Doody kisser.
There are two 'things', and only two, that I dislke about the
Bushes: the 'Bush Uber Alles' air about them, and the nonstarter
of 'compassionate conservatism'. The Kennedys were more loyal to
their family than to America; so why ought such a clannishness be
more attractive in the Bushes? The Bush I dislike is Barbara the
Elder: her saying in public after Jeb won in Florida that "all
America must be led by a Bush", was sickening, even though
facetious. Heavy handed, not firm.
It could be the only thing you don't quite get is how relieved
the public-- not just politicos-- are that the last decade is
finished. We shouldn't reject a whole decade, however the
misfiring was on Dubya's watch, so the guilt by association is
understandable.
It is not UNPRECEDENTED.
Alan Brooks| 7.18.10 @ 6:10PM
I find it hard to diss both Bushes as people, they were not nearly as smarmy as Jimmuh, they didn't possess that crap-eating smile Carter had on his Howdy Doody kisser.
There are two 'things', and only two, that I dislke about the Bushes: the 'Bush Uber Alles' air about them, and the nonstarter of 'compassionate conservatism'. The Kennedys were more loyal to their family than to America; so why ought such a clannishness be more attractive in the Bushes? The Bush I dislike is Barbara the Elder: her saying in public after Jeb won in Florida that "all America must be led by a Bush", was sickening, even though facetious. Heavy handed, not firm.
It could be the only thing you don't quite get is how relieved the public-- not just politicos-- are that the last decade is finished. We shouldn't reject a whole decade, however the misfiring was on Dubya's watch, so the guilt by association is understandable.
It is not UNPRECEDENTED.