-
Current Wisdom
May 11, 2013 | 0 comments
-
Current Wisdom
April 6, 2013 | 0 comments
-
Current Wisdom
March 16, 2013 | 0 comments
-
Current Wisdom
February 9, 2013 | 0 comments
-
Current Wisdom
December 1, 2012 | 0 comments
Current Wisdom
(Page 2 of 2)
Today’s conservatives prefer the company of anti-intellectuals
who know how to exploit nonintellectuals, as Sarah Palin does so
masterfully. The dumbing-down they have long lamented in our
schools they are now bringing to our politics, and they will drag
everyone and everything along with them. As David Frum, one of the
remaining lucid conservatives, has written to his wayward comrades,
‘When you argue stupid [sic], you campaign stupid [sic]. When you
campaign stupid [sic], you win stupid [sic]. And when you win
stupid [sic], you govern stupid [sic].
(May 27, 2010)
The Progressive
Professor Terry Tempest Williams, entrapped in a poetic thrall,
apparently after regurgitating a disgusting repast all over her
desk:
my desk, I have a scattering of damp leaves and needles newly
exposed from the snow: birch, beech, sugar maple, red oak, white
pine, and sumac. These are not from the branches of western trees,
but eastern ones, as I have spent the last three months in New
Hampshire teaching at Dartmouth College. The spring songs of tufted
titmice and chickadees touch me with their strength and velocity
emanating from such small feathered bodies.
(May 2010)
From the Archives
Timeless Tosh from Current Wisdoms Past
(July 1990)
Times-Union
(Rochester, New York)
A loyal member of The American Spectator audience suffers his very own Kristallnacht via the goose-steppers of the National Organization for Women:
NOW’s local chapter claims ultra-conservative Rush Limbaugh’s
radio talk show is “spewing out virulent sexist language and sexist
comments.” And they’ve called upon WHAM (AM-1180) to cancel the
show.
Limbaugh, widely known for his outspoken, often outrageous
comments, today called their efforts “an example of the new
fascism.”
“The new fascism is sensitivity,” said Limbaugh in an interview
from his New York City office. “I don’t express the proper
sensitivity they would like to hear on the radio…I think that
it’s another example of the left in this country, the people who
purport the right to do what they want with their own bodies, now
trying to deny me the right to do what I want to do with my voice
and vocabulary.”
(May 2, 1990)
San Jose Mercury-News
The advance of civilization as reported by Miss Laura Baione
Hayden in the Hartford Courant and reprinted in the
San Jose Mercury-News, God knows why:
When I was a child I never counted trash cans. The neighbors, however, did.
“How do you manage to have so little garbage?” my mother was asked more than once.
“We eat our garbage,” she would reply succinctly.
(April 17, 1990)
Letter to the Editor View all comments (3) | Leave a comment
More Articles by Assorted Jackasses
More Articles From Current Wisdom
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/07/03/current-wisdom
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
Current Issue
- The Mole in Don Draper
- Way Beyond the Lemonade Stand
- Overheated Frauds and Fools
The Spectacle Blog
Democrat Dan Maffei Blames Budget Cuts for Girl’s Rape, Mother’s Murder
Robert Stacy McCain | 4:12PM
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
ADVERTISEMENT
Alan Brooks| 8.11.10 @ 10:40AM
"lists the prof's hallucinatory problems 'bequeathed' by American conservatism"
However, as the Derb wrote, Bush's compassionate conservatism was in fact vapid.
Remember the old show 'Father Knows Best'?; the new one is 'Derb Knows Best'
FLOYD KRAUTNER| 9.13.10 @ 10:36AM
Hallucinations are very common among people who do not realize how their party compares with the other.
**********
How Democrats, Republicans compare
Yagil Hertzberg
San Francisco Chronicle
Sunday, September 12, 2010
For years I have been trying to persuade supporters of the other major American party to change their mind and vote with me, to no avail. That is, until last week, when three politically minded friends came over for an evening of snacks and politics, and, halfway through the evening, I unleashed my new one-two approach to political persuasion.
First, I asked my friends how they would go about choosing a new dishwasher. We agreed that the responsible and rewarding method would be to ignore any marketing hype and instead follow the Best Buy recommendations by Consumer Reports. Because nobody mentioned the virtues or shortcomings of, say, Whirlpool's executives as a valid criterion for choosing the appliance, I asked why they argue for hours about the perceived personalities of the candidates instead of comparing the track records of the major parties. My friends answered that it's simple enough to summarize the essential properties of dishwashers, while the elections are about a large number of issues that defy easy tabulation. Therefore, they concentrate on the candidates, hoping that by choosing the right person for the job, the elected official will make the right decisions when dealing with all those different issues.
I used to share this view myself, but then I checked the numbers. I was surprised to find out that the results of comparing the track records of the two major parties fall neatly (with one exception) into two categories - economy and family values. In my analysis, I compared all administrations going back to 1960 and all states based on how they voted in the presidential elections since 1980.
It was time for the second phase. I presented my friends with a list of numbers. To overcome bias, I used symbols (A, B, C and D) to represent the two major parties under the two categories. All state-related numbers (including those for the District of Columbia) are per person.
Economy
Jobs: Since 1960, each of the A Party administrations has delivered higher rates of jobs creation than any of the B Party administrations.
Deficit: Since 1960, the deficit each of the A Party administrations has passed to its successor was lower than the one it inherited, while each of the B Party administrations has increased the deficit. The average yearly deficit under the B Party administrations was 277 percent higher than the average deficit under the A Party.
Productivity: The gross state product of the 20 states that voted for the A Party candidate at least 5 times out of the last 8 elections (let's call them the A states) is 15 percent higher than the other states (the B states).
Household income: The median household income in the A states is 16 percent higher than in the B states.
Poverty: The percentage of persons below the poverty level in the A states is 21 percent lower than in the B states.
Health insurance: The percentage of people without health insurance in the A states is 25 percent lower than in the B states.
Advantage: Party A
Family values
Divorce: The divorce rate of the 20 states who voted for the C Party candidate at least 5 times out of the of last 8 elections (let's call them the C states) is 19 percent lower than the other states (the D states).
Birth to teenagers: The teenage birth rate in the C states is 38 percent lower than in the D states.
Birth to unmarried women: The unmarried women birth rate in the C states is 7 percent lower than in the D states.
Infant mortality: Children born in C states are 24 percent less likely to die before their first birthday than children in D states.
Murder: The murder rate in the C states is 17 percent lower than in the D states.
Rape: The forcible rape rate in the C states is 20 percent lower than in the D states.
Aggravated assault: The aggravated assault rate in the C states is 18 percent lower than in the D states.
Robbery: The robbery rate in the C states is 10 percent higher than in the D states (This is the one exception).
High school dropouts: The dropout rate in the C states is 16 percent lower than in the D states.
College: The college graduation rate in the C states is 16 percent higher than in the D states.
Advantage: Party C
I asked each of my friends to pick the category he or she considers more crucial, and then I showed them the key to the symbols.
That's when I was rewarded with my first success at achieving a crossover vote. To check whether your own preferences align with your vote, turn to Page E10.
The answers
This is the key to the identity of the two political parties analyzed by Yagil Herzberg in "The long view of the other party" on Page E3:
A - The Democratic Party
B - The Republican Party
C - The Democratic Party
D - The Republican Party
Yagil Hertzberg is an engineer who lives in Sunnyvale. Contact The Chronicle via our online form at sfgate.com/chronicle/submissions/#1.
This article appeared on page E - 3 of the 12 SEPTEMBER 2010 San Francisco Chronicle
*********
Considering the facts who do you like now?
sex toys | 7.4.11 @ 1:05AM
Considering the facts who do you like now?