Asking and telling about Kagan. Getting MADDER. GLAAD about you. Mighty Quin. Ben Stein. Plus more.
(Page 2 of 3)
2) FEDERAL BUREAUCRACY, specifically the Transportation Department, lusts to impose their notions of “uniformity” and “good government” upon all States in our Union. MADD offers a ‘moral’ cover for the centralizing socialists to do what they lust to do anyway: control people.
3) STATE TREASURIES seek ‘revenue’ from whatever sources they can derive. Everyone involved with them today knows that the criminal courts in general, and OWI cases in particular, have become little more than alternative tax collection systems. On the OWI issue, most States eagerly sign on to reduction of BAC because the lower the level the higher the prospect that “anyone and everyone” can get tabbed for drunkenness if stopped in public. Friends of mine who are policemen confirm the “revenue-generating” directives the government imposes upon them. All MADD does is provide feel-good political “cover” for the legislators to do what they want to do anyway.
Again, AFTM. Cui bono? For sure, not most of the 200 million
drivers of America.
— Dave Hanson
Fayette, Iowa
THRILLED
Re: Quin Hillyer’s
Obama’s Hackneyed Hypocrisy:
This was absolutely great piece
with great word-smithing to really bring the truth to the
forefront. You-da-man!!
— Donald Edwards
HAPPY DAZE
Re: Jeffrey
Lord’s
GLAAD Strikes Out on Kagan:
Hi, I am writing on the following article.
I assume you acquired this information from the Politico article which quoted a “former spokesperson for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.”
Any other mention of GLAAD is inaccurate and should be corrected.
Also, it’s GLAAD not GLADD.
Thank you,
— Rich Ferraro
Director of Public Relations, GLAAD
Jeffrey Lord
replies:
Rich Ferraro is
correct. Politico identified Cathy Renna as a “former”
GLAAD spokesperson. Not current. I linked the article for
accuracy and did so while seeing the pitch coming right over the
plate. Alas, I took my eye off the ball and it was a broken bat
single, not a homer. Suffice to say, I am not GLAAD.
Apologies for not playing ball. Hopefully Mr. Ferraro and GLAAD will be glad about the First Amendment and hit a grand slam by opposing Elena Kagan.
ONE OF THOUSANDS
Re: Ben Stein’s Why
Do They Do It?:
My son 1LT HANS BEUTEL is fighting in the area of Kandahar so there you have one name among many thousands prepared to give their lives for us.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online
Pingback| 5.14.10 @ 6:28AM
Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : A Convenient Excuse [spectator.org] links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
IMKessel| 5.14.10 @ 7:57AM
Mr. Govett,
When criticizing teachers, you will make a better arguement if you choose the correct noun and not depend on spell check.
Appleby| 5.14.10 @ 11:39AM
Mr. Kessel, you have misspelled ARGUMENT, and should have used the word [i]do[/i] bfore the word[/i]not[/i].
IMKessel| 5.14.10 @ 2:11PM
Appleby,
I stand corrected. I thought I had corrected it myself, but as the good book states, remove the blank from your own eye before lifting the mote from your neighbors. Thank you for the reminder.
Jeff Perren | 5.14.10 @ 3:04PM
"Ms. Kagan will no doubt be confirmed, because the ambitious elites know that there are no consequences to shunning us.
--Mike Harris
MAJ, United States Army "
Good point, sir. Therefore, time to create some, and not just in politics but throughout the entire culture.
Progressives, like pedophiles, should not be tolerated in polite company.
David| 5.14.10 @ 3:34PM
David| 5.13.10 @ 3:13PM
Now is the time for repubs to start opposing liberal judge nominees: at the district court and appellate court levels. They make a huge mistake by waiting until libs are nominated to the Supreme Court.
First, the dems always claim that the repubs voted for them for the district or appellate court and now oppose them for the supreme court. If they are not supreme court material, then repubs had no business voting to confirm them to the lower courts.
Second, the vast majority of cases never make it to the supreme court, or to the appellate courts for that matter. Liberal judges wreak havoc at the district court and appellate court levels.
Federal judges at all levels serve for life, just like the justices on the supreme court.
It is time for repubs to start stopping them from ever becoming federal judges - like the dems did to Miguel Estrada and several other extremely well- qualified Bush nominees.
Pingback| 5.14.10 @ 5:15PM
The American Spectator : A Convenient Excuse capital university links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 5.14.10 @ 5:50PM
The American Spectator : A Convenient Excuse Contact links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 5.14.10 @ 11:58PM
A Convenient Excuse | Mr. DUI's Blog links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 5.15.10 @ 7:06AM
Houston teacher apologizes for recorded beating of student | Locks links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 5.15.10 @ 1:50PM
Teacher apologizes for recorded beating of student | Locks links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Alan Brooks| 5.16.10 @ 12:31AM
Ah so. To use it you must downroad it and www.ruin.net
Most honolable Amelican chump, the instructions to downroad it and instarr in are berow.
fdjsk| 7.1.10 @ 2:46AM
beijing massage