-
A Lebanese Charm Offensive
January 12, 2013 | 12 comments
-
Softness at the NSC
November 26, 2012 | 20 comments
-
Anti-Business as Usual
June 20, 2011 | 62 comments
-
National Public Internet
June 14, 2011 | 31 comments
-
This Property Is Condemned
June 13, 2011 | 25 comments
Washington Prowler
HHS’s Data Game
More on the numbers that were in play before passage of Obamacare.
Several points related to the push back by the Obama Administration and the Medicare’s Office of the Actuary and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to our recent post regarding the office’s report on the Obama health care reform legislation. Recall, the study determined that the law would actually increase the cost of health care and impose higher costs on consumers, when the administration had claimed that the law would do neither.
The Prowler reported via sources inside Health and Human Services that data from the study that indicated that costs would hit consumers in the pocketbook was made available to the senior officials in HHS, prior to final passage of the legislation in the House. The report never stated that it was submitted for approval. Such reports by “non-political” or “nonpartisan” entities inside Cabinet departments, such as the Bureau of Justice Statistics in the Department of Justice, routinely provide, to senior leadership offices in a department, studies and reports with data that often run counter to an Administration’s liking, and often before those reports are released to the media or the public.
It should be noted that in the Bush Administration, such reports were often leaked to reporters days before officials in the administration received them, allowing the “nonpartisan” agencies to shape their facts and studies with almost no push back from the departments in question.
Our sources stand by the facts that prior to final passage of the health care reform bill on Sunday, March 21, the Office of the Actuary had provided senior leaders inside HHS with data that indicated the then-bill would increase the cost of health care and impose higher costs on Americans. And that data was not provided to anyone publicly until after the legislation was passed.
That the report was issued after the bill’s passage is not in dispute. What is in dispute is who had data and when were those estimates initially available. According to our sources, researchers in the actuary’s office had several models prepared, at least one of them based on the Senate health care reform bill, which was passed several months before the House vote. Data from studying the Senate bill indicated that — big surprise — the bill would increase health care costs.
Recall that the House bill in most ways resembled the Senate bill, with the exception of a number of “technical fixes.” Obama signed the bill into law the Tuesday after House passage — before the Senate took those “fixes” up.
“The legislation was incredibly complex, there is no question about that,” says an HHS source we spoke to. “But people have been crunching numbers on these bills for quite some time after January 1.”
And it wasn’t as though the actuary’s office was reporting something that others were not reporting. The Congressional Budget Office going back to August of 2009 had estimates that indicated that the House health care proposal would increase the deficit by $239 billion over 10 years, and that some costs would be shifted to consumers. Rep. Paul Ryan detailed similar data in February during the so-called “health care summit” at Blair House. Data, which President Obama dismissed.
Why conservatives and Republicans are up in arms over the report of the Medicare Office of the Actuary data is because for years, such information was routinely leaked to the drive-by media to bash a Bush Administration plan or proposal, or to embarrass a Republican official. Now, the data that would seemingly aid in — at the very least — generating further debate over a major increase in the size of government was nowhere in sight.
All of which is a long way of saying, our sources stand by their information conveyed to The Prowler: that data on the outcomes of the Obama health care reform was available to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and HHS officials days before the final vote, and that that data was not released to the public or the press until almost a month after the final bill’s passage.
Letter to the Editor View all comments (36) | Leave a comment
More Articles by The Prowler
More Articles From Washington Prowler
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/04/28/hhss-data-game
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
ADVERTISEMENT
Ret. Marine| 4.28.10 @ 7:53AM
I think a case could be made and proven on the fact that this report alone was a clear violation between the trust of these people to bring out the truth to the American public. This is a clear violation to their oath of office.......Where in the hell are the prosecutors? So much for the equal protection laws.
owyheewine| 4.28.10 @ 9:57AM
The lawyer dominated Obama regime flauts the law just as the lawyer dominated Clinton administration did. Prosecution will never happen.
My question is, where is the supposed government watchdog press?
Hahahaha.
No wonder we have a regime that thinks it can didtate it's will no matter the public support.
Pingback| 4.28.10 @ 10:24AM
Too Scared to Go Public links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 4.28.10 @ 10:29AM
What the Administration Knew About the Costs of ObamaCare - Hit & Run : Reason Magazi links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 4.28.10 @ 10:45AM
HHS cover up HCR Cost; Didn't want Truth To Influence Vote - Page 4 - Political Foru links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Louis Jenkins| 4.28.10 @ 11:24AM
So the cat got out of the bag, but only after the vote had been made. An interesting feature of new government as we now know it. I guess we'll have to get used to it, for now.
Andrew Keirns| 4.28.10 @ 1:23PM
It's not so much that 'transparency' is a lie, it is that there does not appear to be any Conservative response to the lack of transparency. Rather than see an article which proves there is no transparency, we need to see some discussion on what to do about it.
For instance, how can we support Paul Ryan's lead taken at Blair House? What is the short version (the 'Tweet') that the average voter can comprehend?
Tim| 4.28.10 @ 1:29PM
As I see it, the problem is that too many Republicans want to replace Democrats, not repeal whatthey've done.
Jim O'Brien| 4.28.10 @ 2:40PM
National disaster called ObamaCare:
http://boustany.house.gov/inde.....itemid=473
Pingback| 4.28.10 @ 3:49PM
Cassidy Joins GOP Reps In Call For Health Bill Hearings | The Hayride links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 4.28.10 @ 4:45PM
Arguments Persist Over CMS Actuary Report – Blog Watch links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 4.28.10 @ 5:39PM
Democrats covered up actuary report? « Internet Scofflaw links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Radegunda| 4.28.10 @ 7:07PM
Waiting for the trolls to defend the Democrats who hid the data showing how their schemes will hurt the citizens.
Radegunda| 4.28.10 @ 7:10PM
Also waiting for the trolls to defend the "watchdogs" in the media who conspired with the Dems to keep this vital information hidden.
But Fox News is evil for letting any skeptical voices be heard.
Pingback| 4.29.10 @ 8:08AM
Withholding Material Information « Big Citizen links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 4.30.10 @ 8:31AM
Gateway Pundit links to this page.
Pingback| 5.6.10 @ 1:49AM
Arguments Persist Over CMS Actuary Report | Go HealthReform links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 5.7.10 @ 1:39AM
Arguments Persist Over CMS Actuary Report | Kaiser Permanente Health Insurance Plan F links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 5.7.10 @ 1:40AM
Arguments Persist Over CMS Actuary Report | Kaiser Permanente Health Insurance Plan F links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
fjksdj| 7.1.10 @ 2:14AM
beijing massage
shanghai girl