The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Curious Reports

Bachmann, Steele, Ryan. The New York Times and Gay Priests, Stevens Republicans, and more.

(Page 3 of 3)

MISSING THE POINT
Re: Nicole Russell’s Bachmann Turns to Overdrive:

“Still, Bachman’s headline-grabbing stunts, time spent on talk radio and cable, and even labels from staff and peers would be worth it if she could put her money where her mouth gabbed. This is her second term as a U.S. Congresswoman. She has yet to sponsor and pass any effective legislation at all”

Clearly the author of this article, Nicole Russell, is missing the point. Failure to sponsor and pass new legislation is a victory, not a failure. We don’t need any more legislation. I’d be the first to vote for Ms. Bachman, and for any other congressional wannabee who runs on the idea that we need to stop passing new laws and instead spend our time sorting through and eliminating all the bad legislation currently on the books.
— Jim Werness
Edina, Minnesota

STRIKING TWICE?
Re: Brandon Crocker’s The End Game Is Near:

Didn’t FDR’s NRA and associated programs, also promulgated on the basis of the commerce clause, break up in the Schecter v. US case in 1935? Maybe lightning will strike twice…
— Robert P. Davis

THE CARNAL NATURE OF MAN
Re: George Neumayr’s The End of History and the Last Pope:

Every Catholic should read this article and pass it on to their brothers and sisters in the Church. Once these secular humanists use their media vehicles to hold the Church up to public ridicule and contempt in the eyes of all Catholics, taking down the other Christian denominations will be easy. Then, in such event, atheistic Marxism and the new left socialism can march across the world. Satin may win this round. The only consolation is that we know how the fourth and final act will play out. This may be the Church’s finest hour. A test to control the carnal nature of man in the Church, and to bring forth the Spirit of God that dwells in each of us.
— Paul J. Marino, Esq.
Belleair Beach, Florida

THANKS BEN
Re: Ben Stein’s We’ve Figured Him Out:

Thank you for having Ben Stein as a contributing editor to TAS. His recent editorial “We Figured Him Out” was beautiful, because it is full of compassion and reverence for America, and Americans. We all know that we are not perfect by a long shot, and yet Mr. Stein, in a loving and benevolent way, expresses kindness, and admiration for Americans and captures what our nation values.

I so regret that our president does not share this view. His track record domestically and internationally seems to offer the direct opposite of Mr. Stein’s view, and suggests he despises this great country. We need look no further than the recent outpouring for Haiti following the devastating earthquakes, to see how America responds to tragedy with an outpouring of compassion, even in times of great economic stress domestically.

Americans need to wake up, and realize how dangerous it is to have a leader in the White House who wants to bring America down, not build her up. Ben Stein captured the essence of Americans, and what motivates them. Thank you Ben Stein!
— Robert K. Leste

Page:   1 23

Letter to the Editor View all comments (14) |

David| 4.16.10 @ 5:08PM

Mr. Tomlinson, I think your characterization of the good job Bush did with Supreme Court justices is not consistent with reality.

The fact is Bush tried to shove Harriet Meirs down our throats ("because she is born-again and I know she will vote the right way"), and if he had gotten his way with her, he most certainly would have chosen Alberto Gonzales for his next pick. The only reason we got Roberts and Alito is because we demanded that Bush pick heavyweights.

Repub senators need to start paying attention to the lower federal courts and not just get excited over Sup Court nominees. The vast majority of cases never reach the high court. Further, when repubs go ahead and vote for the liberal judges' confirmations in the lower courts, the dems always point to that when the folks are then nominated for the Sup Court and say, well they voted for him/her before.

Alan Brooks| 4.17.10 @ 11:50PM

"This is the first article that I have read that explicitly says that the church recognizes the problem is due to homosexuality"

More to it: shrinks say most men are attracted to young girls and many to young boys. Then there are the bi-peds (which does not mean those who walk on two legs).
So screening gays from the Clergy doesn't restrict priests who go for girls, or who 'swing both ways'.

Alan Brooks| 4.17.10 @ 11:54PM

... ped-priests who can't have at boys might very well switch to girls.

Shrinks say that androgyny is a factor-- or The factor.

jfkdsjk| 6.30.10 @ 11:13PM

beijing massage shanghai girl

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/04/16/curious-reports

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

From the Obama Ministry of Truth

Ben Stein | 5.21.13

IRS Union Chief Stonewalls

Jeffrey Lord | 5.21.13

Wimps Versus Barbarians

Thomas Sowell | 5.21.13

Damage Control for Dummies

Matt Purple | 5.22.13

Anyone Still Believe Me?

Aaron Goldstein | 5.21.13

ADVERTISEMENT