Liberty at risk, says talk show host, as he prepares
suit against Obama, Holder: "Deem
and pass" or "Demon Pass"?
Not so fast.
Democrats poised to use the so-called "deem and pass"
strategy to force through a health care bill will have to deal
with Mark Levin first.
Levin, known to his fans as one of the most popular talk
show hosts in the country, is also both a legal scholar and
longtime president of theLandmark Legal
Foundation, a nonprofit, public interest law firm A
former chief of staff to Reagan Attorney General Edwin Meese III,
Levin is the author of two New York Times bestselling
books on the Constitution and the judiciary, the last,
Liberty and Tyranny, at number one for a dozen
weeks.
The
lawsuit will name President Obama, Attorney General Eric
Holder and "other relevant cabinet members" as defendants. Those
cabinet members are Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
Levin's goal? To stop the government from "instituting this
unconstitutional contrivance."
Said Levin:
Landmark has already prepared a lawsuit that will be filed in
federal court the moment the House acts. Such a brazen
violation of the core functions of Congress simply cannot be
ignored. Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution is clear
respecting the manner in which a bill becomes law. Members are
required to vote on this bill, not claim they did when they
didn't. The Speaker of the House and her lieutenants are
temporary custodians of congressional authority. They are not
empowered to do permanent violence to our Constitution.
The "Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief" begins by
noting that "Landmark's employees receive healthcare through an
employer healthcare plan sponsored and contributed to by
Landmark."
In a move that would be hilarious if in fact it weren't so
serious, Levin lists the specific section of the U.S.
Constitution ("The Bicameralism and Presentment Clause of the
Constitution of the United States") and cites the fact that it
"mandates that 'Every Bill which shall have passed the
House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it becomes
a Law, be presented to the President of the United
States.…'"
The suit cites the source precisely as "U.S. Const. art. I,
§ 7, cl. 2." Which is to say, Levin is compelled to point out to
the President of the United States and the Attorney General of
the United States what every American school child learns in
those little pamphlets with catchy titles like "How a Bill
Becomes a Law." To wit: Both the House and the Senate must pass
the bill before it can be signed into law by the
president.
Levin goes go with this cite: "Article I, section 7, clause
2 further provides: 'But in all such cases the votes of both
Houses shall be determined by yeas and nays, and the names of the
persons voting for and against the bill shall be entered on the
journal of each House respectively.'"
The lawsuit goes on, saying:
In or about March 2010, the Rules Committee of the House
proposed a rule to the full House establishing the terms and
conditions pursuant to which certain legislation would be
considered by the House (the "Rule" or "Slaughter Rule"). The
Rule provided that, upon adoption by the House on a vote of the
yeas and nays of one bill (the "Reconciliation Bill"), an
entirely different bill, H.R. 3590 (the "Senate Bill") would be
"deemed approved" by the House.
If Nancy Pelosi twists enough arms to get this "passed" the
lawsuit, in decidedly legal language as dry as it is
un-Levin-like, says:
In or about March 2010, the House approved the Reconciliation
Bill. The House has never voted on the Senate Bill. The
President has stated his intention to sign into law the Senate
Bill upon presentment to him.
Mark is also known to his fans as "The Great One".
Good luck Mark with this endeavor - get out there and "school"
these folks on our beloved Constitution!
shelley lehigh| 3.19.10 @ 9:04PM
I am totally behing Mr. Levin and listen to him daily. Thank God
there is someone like him to speak for the regular people out
here. I can't stand this healthcare bill and pray if it passes
Mr. Levin can be the hero we need to STOP THIS from happening.
Gotta love Mark Levin. He's feisty and passionate -- two
qualities (along with his highly superior intellect) that I
admire in someone who reveres the Constitution.
Obama, in his interview with Bret Baier last evening, basically
pooh-poohed as focusing on "process" this unconstitutional
overreach by Nancy Pelosi and her buddy Louise Slaughter. Why
would we expect anything less from a so-called constitutional law
professor who has only contempt for the Constitution.
I hope it doesn't get that far, but I'm comforted knowing that
Mark Levin (the Great One) is waiting in the wings to battle with
"the One."
Anthony| 3.18.10 @ 9:43AM
Good points Deborah D. As with all tyrants, process is a tedious
little speed bump in the way of totalitarianism. As Stalin
quiped, one death is a tragedy, a million, a mere statistic; such
is the thinking of tyrants.
How positively Alice-in Wonderland like, that our president, an
alleged constitutional law lecturer at the great Univeristy of
Chicago Law School, deems a major Constitutional violation mere
process. You folks at Chicago Law should hold your heads in
shame, but then again, I suspect a good many of you hold a
similar contempt for the Constitution.
Not to worry, Mark Levin will show you intellectualoids some real
lawyering. Funny, only Democrats could fail to see the irony of
the death of their party by the use of the slaughter rule.
Levin will make the Little Big Horn look like a picnic compared
to what he will do to the Ds. At least at LBH, Custer's horse
survived. Can't hold out the same promise to you Ds. Hope you
"moderate" Ds have your resumes updated. Maybe you all will
finally get a chance to do some honest work, Home Depot is a
great place to work!! Hi !my name is Steny Hoyer, how can I be of
help to you today!!!
Cheryl| 3.19.10 @ 2:05PM
While Mark is at it, is there any possible way that those who
participate in this charade be impeached for treason against the
United States?
Norma McGinnis| 3.19.10 @ 4:23PM
Yes, PLEASE is this possible to impeach these people? There has
to be a way.
Norma... The constitution is very clear about the House
impeachment and Senate trial process.
There will be no impeachment of, say the President in this
congress, or the next congress.
People need to devote their energies to the doable and not the
wishable.
The left spent 8 years ranting on about impeaching Bush. It was
never going to happen.
MTB| 3.18.10 @ 3:42PM
He didn't "pooh-pooh" it process when he was a senator. He was
pretty outspoken against it when a Republican was President. I
hate democrats! VOTE THEM ALL OUT! All of them, good, bad or
indifferent. If a democrat is running in your state, vote him/her
out and put in a Republican. Send this arrogant SOB party a
message they will NEVER forget.
FawnridgeFarm| 3.18.10 @ 6:50AM
Thank you, Mr. Lord, for informing us regarding Mr. Levin's
intentions; and thank you, Mr. Levin, for this lauable legal
effort to defend the sanctity of the United States Constitution.
Should it prove to be unsuccessful, an informed, inflamed and
resolute American electorate awaits to ensure that individual
liberty will ultimately prevail.
Bellicus_Pium| 3.18.10 @ 6:52AM
The "Great One" stands for all Constructionists, both liberal,
conservative and moderate.
There is a REASON our republic has survived these many years and
Mark Levin is just one of many who cherish what our founders set
forth.
Bridget| 3.18.10 @ 6:53AM
I am glad to see this happening - just last night I was
discussing this with my husband - trying to figure out how the
President could sign something that wasn't jointly approved with
the exact same language by both houses of Congress. How can that
be? How can it actually be a law? I was lamenting that this
process they wish to use was not what was in the Constitution (I
even made reference to my high school government class and School
House Rock). Frankly, the argument that it was used before
doesn't hold water either - shouldn't be used at all. In this
case, it is being used on such a contentious issue that has
ramifications for every single citizen of the USA - I hope they
get butts kicked for this. I certainly will be paying even more
attention at the ballot box this Nov and in 2012 (I already do
lots of homework, but this situation makes me even more
suspicious and diligent)
ShoppinJunkie| 3.18.10 @ 5:06PM
Bridget - School House Rock ROCKS!!! I bought the set for my
daughter years ago. If ONLY we could get Congress & Prez to
watch it, they might actually learn something.
Ret. Marine| 3.18.10 @ 7:00AM
And cheering we should be. This is a defining moment of our
history. Maybe "We the People" should "deem" our Representative
"done and cooked well" if they pass this monster under a bill
proclaiming it " healthcare reform."
If these punks think for one muslim minute they will escape the
wrath of We the People, well in plain language they are sorely
mistaken. This is not going to go well or unnoticed by the very
population of free individuals commonly called Patriots.
I am not yet convinced that Mr. Levin can stop this mess. I've
read many opinions regarding the seperation of the three
"seperate branches" and I am as confused as to their powers of
interference between them. I am not a scholar by any means of any
subject, I am a simple man watching in awe at such a blantent
power grab by individuals who swore to protect the Constitution
against all enemies, it appears that these same individuals are
making themselves the enemy of We the People.
If nothing else, I await the first blows to this tryanny. Good
for Mr. Levin, I applaud him for his courage and straigh up
stance to the robbers of our liberties. I trust folks like Levin
over these so-called politicians of today. One has to respect a
man with principles over liars, or is this too "old school" for
them to understand.
This matter will end up before the Supreme Court. Pray it is
while a conservative majority remain on the bench.
Pat Gordon| 3.18.10 @ 9:46PM
AMEN to that!!!!!!
AJ West| 3.18.10 @ 9:52PM
Concur, fully. When Mr. Levin decides to move on this, this is
one former Navy pilot that is right there with the Marines to
preserve our freedom.
Semper Fi,
"An Old Cold Warrior"
darcy| 3.19.10 @ 12:23AM
And we'll be standing with you, shoulder to shoulder, wing to
wing.
Joe Hamilton| 3.18.10 @ 7:04AM
It's ironic. One of the few liberal magazines (most deemed it
unworthy of a review) who reviewed Mark Levin's latest book, made
a point of expressing their warped opinion, Mark was far from a
legal scholar. Now the demorats (liberals) will painfully find
out how wrong they were.
Brian Mc| 3.18.10 @ 7:38AM
Go for it, Mark! Next, might be we can talk him into attacking
the seventeenth amendment which is at the root of all this
evil...senators aren't concerned about their jobs any more (can
you boys and girls say, Ted Kennedy?) just so long as they have
enough sheep to pull the lever under the name they recognize the
most.
Griff| 3.18.10 @ 7:47AM
Thank God for people like Mark Levin.
(Are we still allowed to mention God on the internet?)
Jim B| 3.18.10 @ 7:56AM
It the President signs this bill in knowing violation of the
Consitiution, he has violated his oath of office and should
resign or be impeached.
fbom| 3.18.10 @ 8:46AM
oh - please don't make it that easy for the new Congress
AC| 3.18.10 @ 11:28AM
Or perhaps physically removed from his office by a 5 million man
march on Washington. Tar and feathers at least. I say God Bless
you, Mr. Levin. But I think the rest of us need to be figuring
out how to deal with this government other than talking about it.
They don't care what we think and if they can get away with what
they're trying, pretty soon our votes won't count either. It's a
power grab and it has to be stopped before it happens or we're
done.
Ret. Sailor| 3.18.10 @ 2:52PM
AC; I agree in principle with you and Ret. Marine but lately I've
been wondering, is this precisely what Obama has been working
for? An opportunity to declare a National State of Emergency and
Martial Law? I know it sounds rediculous and in my 20+ years in
the Navy I could never have contemplated a situation as we have
now but before we charge forth with our weapons loaded we best be
sure we can prevail.
AC| 3.18.10 @ 5:43PM
Ret. Sailor, you make a very good point. I'm worried about the
resolve of the American people as a whole. I know we have many
very good people here who believe as I do, but I think there's a
general lack of courage that makes the idea of taking a stand
perilous, but no less important. When Obama was running for
office he said that this country needs "fundamental" change and
he will succeed unless we stop him. You are absolutely right that
it's imortant to understand exactly what we will face in the
fight, but I'm really worried that if we just vent our
frustrations online, O will win and America will lose.
Phil Kearny| 3.18.10 @ 9:00PM
I agree with all of you. If Obama willingly signs this
unconstituional bill--knowing full-well as a Harvard-trained
lawer what he's doing--he should resign. He won't, so impeachment
will be the only recourse. Sad...
Christopher Holland| 3.18.10 @ 9:52PM
Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. I can't wait for the
day when Americans say that they have deemed to pay their taxes.
See how fast the wheels fall off the Obamamobile when that
happens. What is he going to do - arrest everybody in the
country? Not even Stalin could do that, although he gave it a
good shot.
Mad as Heck| 3.18.10 @ 9:51PM
You are thinking the same thing I am; and I'm becoming more
conviced of it every day. Why else is the 0 building up his
civilian "army?"
Mad as Heck| 3.18.10 @ 9:48PM
Don't forget the rail to run him out of town on!
glassfinger| 3.18.10 @ 6:27PM
As written before, teh legal process to stop the socialists has
begun. Some of us graybeards who once work the uniform are
participating, but all of us are watching to see how this shakes
out. If the legal process won't rid us of these criminals, other
means will. Lexington and Concord weren't accidental events, and
we're ready to do that again, if need be, and God willing.
Tony P| 3.19.10 @ 10:20AM
He won't resign - and who will impeach him?
Melvin| 3.18.10 @ 8:18AM
"Introduce a little anarchy. Upset the established order, and
everything becomes chaos. The taxpayers are agents of chaos. Oh,
and you know the thing about chaos? It's fair!"
The Joker, Dark Knight
Loadmaster| 3.18.10 @ 8:29AM
I would think that anyone who actively participates in this
"Slaughter Rules" who be subject to Sedition. That would be left
up the State AG's to make that determination. If the States are
going sue..then that just might be part of their legal findings.
Regardless Mark Levin is right on course. Let's hope this bill
gets shot down?
RetiredFed| 3.18.10 @ 8:36AM
Go for it, Mark! Perhaps the Dems will scare and not end up being
"slaughtered". Makes one slightly optimistic, but watch out. They
are ruthless.
Nick| 3.18.10 @ 8:51AM
Mark Levin and Hugh Hewitt are the two smartest Constitutional
experts on the radio.
Ohiojb| 3.18.10 @ 8:57AM
Thank you Mark. You are correct. "It is never the right time for
tyranny."
youfamissim| 3.18.10 @ 9:05AM
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to
deceive..."
The Dems hold on power will end the next election cycle. If this
bill passes, it will increase the losses for the Dems. I have
this gut feeling the largest political losses in recorded history
will soon come. But should this bill pass, the Liar In Chief
(LIC) will remain in office and his impudence will surely
increase when forced to confront the fruit of his follies.
Killing this healthcare bill will not an easy task. But the means
exists for Republicans to expose the left's hypocracy and place
Obama and his party on trial in the court of public opinion.
I want Republicans to craft legislation that requires ALL
government employees be enrolled in the new healthcare plan. The
president, the congress, all agency employees, and the unions as
they obtain - shall be subject to the healthcare remedy they find
so intoxicating - no exceptions; no if, and, or but. It's only
right they lead by example. I want to see the Dems in congress
railing against the very bill they shredded the Constitution to
achieve and then shoved down the citizenry's throat. I want the
very same congressional tactics used to present the bill to the
president. I want to watch the LIC squirm and refuse to sign the
bill that requires him, his family, and pals in government, and
all their families submit to the healthcare remedy they
proscribed for the nation.
PERFECT!
MTB| 3.18.10 @ 3:51PM
Excellent comments, youfamissim! Right on in every aspect. If
this nightmare of a bill passes, when the Republicans take
control of the Congress in November, the first thing they should
do is introduce a bill just as you stated. Then watch what
happens.
darcy| 3.19.10 @ 12:49AM
At the end of a lengthy and mildly contentious phone conversation
with one of my reps' staffers this afternoon, I forewarned her
that if this bill passes, Americans will NEVER trust democrats
with power again.
But to us here I say: Be ever vigilant -- a mere party label is
no guarantee of a pols' fidelity to the Constitution.
37 states, most notably VA and Idaho, are doing their part in
moving to counter demcare tyranny.
Sen. Coburn declares patronage a risky gamble for those lawmakers
who sign on to trading their HC vote for future federal jobs: he
will skewer them, and rightly so!
What are you, Sen. Kyl, going to do to stop this? This Arizonan
is waiting to hear your creative solutions to stopping this
egregious federal power grab, opposed by 55% of Americans -- many
of whom compare our current circumstances with those that wrought
the Declaration of Independence.
Giny| 6.30.10 @ 7:36PM
This is by far the best idea. If only it were possible. They have
all been there to long padding their pockets and protecting their
skins!!!!
Heatpacker| 3.18.10 @ 9:06AM
I wish to thank the Democrat Party for being completely open and
honest in demonstrating its contempt for the United States
Constitution. There can no longer be any doubt that a difference
does, in fact, exist between the two major political parties. The
Democrats have, in their blind arrogance, given the Republicans a
political gift beyond measure.
coal carrier| 3.18.10 @ 9:14AM
To me, the question is why does this plan have to be pushed
through so fast? Anyone from the left out there have an answer?
I’ll tell you why. Obama, Pilosi and the rest of empty heads in
Washington know that the general public does not want this
particular plan. Obama knows come November, it could be curtains
for his party. With this in mind they had better get it in place
as soon as possible. Once an entitlement always an entitlement.
MTB| 3.18.10 @ 4:23PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to remember that Obama or
someone even said that. That they had to hurry and get the HC
bill through before the Fall elections. And from what I'm hearing
on talk radio, they think if they pass it now, the American
people will forget all about the procedure, process, back-door
deals, lies and obfuscation and put them (the dems) right back in
office.
jd| 3.18.10 @ 9:39AM
GOD BLESS MARK LEVIN!
magua| 3.18.10 @ 9:46AM
Mark Levin once again demonstrates leadership and authentic
devotion to our founding principles. He has become the "tip of
the spear" leading this struggle to preserve our precious
Republic. We need to stand shoulder to shoulder with him as he
engages those who want to "fundamentally change America".
magua| 3.18.10 @ 9:47AM
Mark Levin once again demonstrates leadership and authentic
devotion to our founding principles. He has become the "tip of
the spear" leading this struggle to preserve our precious
Republic. We need to stand shoulder to shoulder with him as he
engages those who want to "fundamentally change America".
If this idiotic mess of an unconstitutional bill passes, there
will be mayhem in the many and varied ways that it will be
attacked, both on constitutional grounds (legally) and
legislatively, particularly after Jan.2011. I think there will be
restraining orders filed by both individuals and states that will
tie it up in court indefinitly. The federal government is not
granted the power to mandate that every citizen buy a particular
product or else face federal punishment. This can be overturned,
but let's continue to pray that it won't have to be.
…to bypass a formal recorded vote on the Senate health care bill, they may wish to rethink the plan. Talk Radio Host and constitutional lawyer Mark Levin is ready to take action. According to the American Spectator he and the Landmark Legal Foundation will sue to prevent enforcement of the law if it passes using this technique. The lawsuit will name President Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder and…
…are forced to buy health insurance. Similar legislation is pending in 37 other states…. Continue Readin g I knew we would be able to count on Mark Levin! From American Spectator: Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule By Jeffrey Lord on 3.18.10 @ 6:08AM Not so fast. Democrats poised to use the so-called “deem and pass” strategy to force through a health care bill will have to deal with…
Ken (Old Texican)| 3.18.10 @ 10:20AM
Is this "Deem" thing merely a head-fake while the powers keep
twisting arms and doing deals?
Let's not get too, focused, folks.
Keep faxing and calling reps.
Bob Miller| 3.18.10 @ 11:32AM
Ken, I think you're onto something. However, this is just stupid
and evil enough for them to try if other methods fail. So
defenders of liberty have to cover all bases.
MAJ Mike| 3.18.10 @ 10:28AM
When I took Political Science 1310 at a small regional south
Texas university (alma mater of LBJ), I learned that legislation
from the House and the Senate had to match exactly. To achieve
that, a Conference Committee comprised of both Congressmen and
Senators was required to produce a bill that would then be voted
on by the seperate House of Representatives and Senate.
In observing the current situation, what am I missing in the
process? THE ONE seems not to be interested in PROCESS, but
process is what keeps things fair. Process is what allows the
Opposition to gracefully accept defeat. When the process is
bypassed, then the Opposition has grounds for non-cooperation and
conintued opposition to the Majority.
Guess because I'm not a product of toxic Ivy League groupthink,
I'm not sufficiently educated to understand what is going on.
The LibCong are over-reaching and will reap a whirlwind.
Ryan| 3.18.10 @ 10:46AM
Precisely. The American legal process is NOT just about what gets
done, but it's the process in HOW something gets done.
The Dems breaking the process to get something done is tyranny,
pure and simple. I don't think that it's much of an
overstatement.
MAJ Mike| 3.18.10 @ 3:03PM
Thanks for the affirmation. I really did stay awake during that
class, took notes, did the reading, and made an "A". I was
begining to think that my Professor had it all wrong.
Could it be that this retired Army guy now teaching high school
U.S. History has a better grasp of constitutional law than THE
ONE?
Damn!
Robert C. Griffin| 3.18.10 @ 10:47AM
Dems seem to be pushing all-in with stupidity. If their attempt
to rail-road the constituion is successful, look out for Cap
& Tax and Immigration Reform(true name: amnesty)
@griffinrc
Melvin| 3.18.10 @ 10:50AM
If this, "Thing" passes, what are we are prepared to do?
Are we going to just keep running our mouthes, as does the
politicians, or are we going to respond with something of
substance?
If we as a Nation let this stand, then as Nancy Pelosi stated,
"All we need to go is kick the door down," will become the
standard fare for Amnesty, and the Climate Chane Bills that have
been silently chugging along on a parallel course.
Ken (Old Texican)| 3.18.10 @ 11:55AM
Melvin,
I pretty much think it depends on what happens in November. Until
then we keep our cards close to ye olde vest.
Joe| 3.18.10 @ 12:11PM
I hope he sues no matter what. The "Reconciliation" is an
unconstitutional process to pass this bill as well. This is
according to Robert Byrd a sponsor of the bill 30 years ago.
Finally, it is unconstitutional to force the American people to
pay/buy something, or pay taxes insurance, without there consent.
Conservative Attorney Scholar| 3.18.10 @ 12:13PM
I want the lawsuit to succeed. HOWEVER - The"enrolled bill"
doctrine from the Supreme Court decision in Marshall Field &
Co. v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649 (1892), will likely prevent the courts
from looking at a bill that has the signatures of the president
of the senate and the speaker of the house, even if there was
fraud in the signing. Pelosi and Reed are capable of the fraud,
and the courts may defer by giving deference to a co-equal branch
of government. It's enlightening to read the Marshall Field
decision - and depressing - to think that Pelosi/Reed/Obama will
get away with this. I would not rely on the courts to set things
right unless the court chooses to overturn the enrolled bill
doctrine (unlikely). It's important to stop congress now.
MTB| 3.18.10 @ 4:27PM
I think that's the whole point of the suit, to present to the
Court that the bill was not passed legally and lawfully, that
Pelosi should not have signed the bill, nor should Pres Obama. If
the Court agrees to hear the case, then the whole process is
opened up to legal scrutiny. The three powers are a checks and
balances to ensure that not one branch of government is more
powerful than the other. If the House "deems" this bill as
passed, the Supreme Court has an obligation to ensure the House
(and Senate) obeyed the law.
AuntieMadder| 3.20.10 @ 2:05AM
Well, geez. In case you're right and the courts won't look at
this bill, could Levin cite some alternative acts of treason
committed by Obamao & Co. as reasons to bring suit against
them? No, I suppose the law doesn't work that way and requires,
instead, a separate, expensive lawsuit for each crime they've
committed against America. Too bad there's no bulk rate for
filing numerous lawsuits as one.
…hosts. If you have read his book shown here you also know he is a bona fide constitutional scholar. Jeffrey Lord at the American Spectator reports that Levin is ready to take on President Obama and Nancy Pelosi on constitutional grounds if they try and use the “deem and pass” manuver which has been widely reported as an option to get health care reform through. What is almost comical is…
I hope every Congress man, every judge, every person who took and
oath or affirmed to uphold the U.S. Constitution and didn't, will
be shown to be a traitor to the United States and our U.S.
Constitution.
That includes George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and my own Republican
Congress men and all our State governors.
Because Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen, They all know it is
unlawful and all of them have helped it to happen including the
so called news media. Therefore nothing citizen obama does
sitting as an unlawful POTUS is legal.
…of the House and her lieutenants are temporary custodians of congressional authority. They are not empowered to do permanent violence to our Constitution. Read more: http://spectator.org/archives/2010/03/18/mark-levin-readies-lawsuit-on/ Related posts: Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule Landmark has already prepared a lawsuit that will be filed... H.R. 2454 American Clean Energy and Security…
…of the House and her lieutenants are temporary custodians of congressional authority. They are not empowered to do permanent violence to our Constitution. Read more: http://spectator.org/archives/2010/03/18/mark-levin-readies-lawsuit-on/ Related posts: Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule Landmark has already prepared a lawsuit that will be filed... H.R. 2454 American Clean Energy and Security…
…of the House and her lieutenants are temporary custodians of congressional authority. They are not empowered to do permanent violence to our Constitution. Read more: http://spectator.org/archives/2010/03/18/mark-levin-readies-lawsuit-on/ Related posts: Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule Landmark has already prepared a lawsuit that will be filed... Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule…
Maddox| 3.18.10 @ 1:06PM
I fully support and appreciate Mr. Levin's attempt to save our
country from the marxists who are trying an end run around the
Constitution to take control of our country's economy.
If this is not possible, as Conservative Attorney Scholar
suggested, could the American people petition to have the Obama
administration removed in a move similar to the Hondurans last
year?
Past and present Presidents and Congresses have stepped all over
our Constitution so many times it has ceased to be a guiding
document for these swine. Someone show me where in the Document
it is allowed for the President to make law by signing "Executive
Orders" by fiat? Orders that neither the Congress nor the People
can over-rule, and in many cases don't even have knowledge of.
…preparing to employ the Slaughter Rule to pass Obamacare — which should be further proof that this bill isn’t wanted — is allowing for another chance at challenging it. Jeffrey Lord at the American Spectator tells us how Mark Levin is already preparing a lawsuit against the Slaughter Rule. Jonathan Adler at the Volokh Conspiracy questions whether a bill passed via the Slaughter Rule would…
I stand with Mark Levin in this effort, and in all of his efforts
to preserve the US Constitution.
I do believe that if Obama signs the "deemed" passed bill into
law, then he has violated his presidential oath and has committed
an impeachable offense.
Still, I believe Pelosi will do the evil deeds necessary to
secure an up or down vote. It is shameful really, but given the
current unchecked status of the federal branches, I am seeing
things I never thought possible in this country.
If we go down, we go down fighting. Continue to contact your
representatives and senators.
Jon| 3.18.10 @ 1:46PM
I don't know about anyone else, but I wish Obama would lose his
unmitigated preoccupation with job creation and do something more
worthwhile, such as make his sweet sixteen picks. I mean, really,
how long do we have to wait?
MTB| 3.18.10 @ 4:29PM
I'd say about 3 years and 7 months.
r.j. callahan| 3.18.10 @ 2:15PM
As all the previous comments of support above, this household,
also, stands behind you, Mark. Good luck in over turning this
legislation.
DADZRITES| 3.18.10 @ 2:50PM
What the current statist administration is doing has been going
on in the family courts of this country for the past 25-30 years
(denial of rights, breaking up of families, draconian
enforcements, imprisonment for debt, ignoring of redress of
grievances, downplaying demonstrations at courthouses, etc.). But
now, it has escaped Pandora's Box and is affecting the entire
society under the current socialist-statist administration.
Apparently, the only thing statists will observe will be physical
confrontation using the Confrontation Clause. We may need to show
up at the White House with pitchforks and torches (or armed to
the teeth). When government ignores the legality and
constitutionality of its processes and procedures, the only thing
left that they will understand is a massive confrontation with
its people.
MAJ Mike| 3.18.10 @ 3:09PM
I prefer 7.62mm NATO rounds and .45ACP to pitchforks and torches.
"...whenever any form of government becomes distructive of these,
it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it."
The oath I took in 1976 to defend the Constitution against all
enemies, foreign and domestic, is still valid.
There's many more like me out here. The DemCong ignore us at
their peril.
darcy| 3.19.10 @ 1:14AM
" . . . it is the RIGHT of the people to alter or abolish it."
We join our forebears in exerting this RIGHT.
Right to federally directed health care insurance? Not so much.
Zip, nada, none. What part of NO can't they understand?
John II| 3.19.10 @ 1:59AM
Whoa. 7.62 mm NATO. I haven't heard that kind of talk in 40
years. We were trained with the M-14 back then, and I was still
serving when they switched to the M-16 in Germany, and I got
stuck with the job of training our unit in its use. Didn't like
it. The small caliber bullet driven by the heavy charge would
tumble in flight and shred whatever it hit. The M-16 was just a
dumb-ass man-killer with plastic stock (manufactured by Matel, as
I recall) stuck to what was otherwise just a friggin' Colt
machine-pistol. The M-14 was the last standard Army issue with
class; the 20-round clip gave it war-making authority, but it
would work just as well as a deer rifle. In Basic, I shoot expert
with it, no problem. It just did what you told it to do. It was a
gentleman's weapon.
…which Case it shall not be a Law. The House will not have voted on the bill. It’s that simple. But they are simply going to say it’s all good and send it to Obama anyway. Mark Levin and the Landmark Legal Foundation have plans to challenge this in court. They better get ready, because it’s on. Related posts: Dems Try to Steal Vote from House Republicans Mammoth Appropriations Bill Gives…
Hardcard| 3.18.10 @ 2:59PM
Thank You Mr. Levin and May God Bless You.
You are truly; A Man of the Law.
Oldefarte| 3.18.10 @ 3:16PM
His lawsuit is narrowly based upon the 'DEEM' concept; so if the
Democrats BREAK ENOUGH ARMS to pass a House vote, there is still
the possibility of a numerous collection of individual states
Attorneys General filing a federal lawsuit based upon the
constitutionality of the legislation's mandate that forces
everyone to purchase insurance. Additionally, I'm disgusted at
Republican congressmen for their lack of guts/courage in this
matter. Even though they're in the minority, they could still
initiate some in house type congressional attacks [ie say an
impeachment proceding against Obama,etc] that would wreck havoc
in congress and delay the Democrats actions on this legislation
until we conservative citizens/voters could hopefully take back
our government with the November elections. The Republicans are
simply being gutless as usual in not fighting these corrupt
Democrat tactics mono-e-mono style!!!!
MTB| 3.18.10 @ 3:45PM
You know, I was just thinking. All thes HC supporters who are
waiting on baited breath for their "free" health care. They're
going to be pretty upset when they find that yep, it's free, but
the quality sucks, or they have to wait weeks or months to get
treatment. They voted for an empty suit who is doing nothing more
than destroying this country.
DTCOFAZ| 3.18.10 @ 3:47PM
Mark Levin is the American' Hero! We need more courageous people
like Mark to protect our Great Nation from this tyranny
administration Obama/Holder/Pelosi/Reid.
The Republican party needs to confront with this administration
more aggressively on the behalf of the majority of American
people.
The people that stood by Obama and cheered him in OH when he said
" the employer would get 3000.00% rate decrease on health
insurance .. That's depressingly amazing!
CactusJack| 3.18.10 @ 3:59PM
CoalCarrier, you discerned intent about as well as anyone has -
why is there such a rush here if everyone just truly wants to get
it right? Answer is obvious, your analysis comes from a long ago
age of ladies and gentlemen to which we at least aspired. Now we
are seeing an age of thiefs and thuggery in DC, the Dems are
stiffarming with one arm and pickpocketing with the other hand,
fast as they can before the cops show up. Gotta fight back. Sen.
Coburn getting out the "switchblade" this afternoon big step
right direction.
Anthony| 3.18.10 @ 4:15PM
So, the first shot in the 2nd civil war has been fired; according
to NRO, Congress has just upheld the use of the Slaugher rule 222
to 202. May God have mercy on us and on what is about to happen
to America.
Clinton Lovell| 3.18.10 @ 5:10PM
Like the first civil war, they fired the first shot but we will
surely fire the last. The only question is how long will it be
until the actual bullets start flying and bombs start falling. I
see Greece and I see what we are doing now and it tells me that a
lot of suffering is coming and if we don't want it to be us then
it has to be them.
Michael Tomlinson| 3.18.10 @ 5:13PM
The father of American capitalism Alexander Hamilton once wrote,
"If it be asked, what is the most sacred duty and the greatest
source of our security in a Republic? The answer would be, an
inviolable respect for the Constitution and Laws - the first
growing out of the last.... A sacred respect for the
constitutional law is the vital principle, the sustaining energy
of a free government." His political nemesis Thomas Jefferson
stated without reservation, "When the people fear their
government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the
people, there is liberty." It is evident that the quasi despots
of the Democrat oligarchy do not respect the Constitution or
adequately fear the American people. . . Democrats seem intent
not only in destroying the greatest health care system in the
world, but virtually shredding the rule of law and the
Constitution in their quest for power. How can we resist this
headlong rush to soft despotism when the Constitution is flouted
and the people's will ignored by condescending, arrogant and
capricious Democrats?
Mark Levin and the Landmark Legal Foundation are taking one
track, the state of Virginia is preparing to sue, Bobby Jindal
and Rick Perry have talked of nullification, the Tea Party
movement can host rallies that shut down DC, local citizen in
districts with traitorous Congressmen can insure their visits
home are unpleasant and outraged Americans can go to the polls
and vote for Republicans in November who in 2011 will deem the
House's quasi vote for Obamacare null and void. In a few words we
must make the Democrats fear the American people and let them
know we're not going to take their betrayal of this country
anymore!
Mark Levin needs all the "God Bless You's" I have read here , for
he is one of the worse people I ever heard...arrogant and rude
and completely ready to bend the truth to his own desires. To
call him the GREAT ONE is ridiculous..he is great at acting like
jerk! If our country has sunk so low that so many of you think he
is a constitutional scholar...we are in bad shape. I say ..where
was he when Bush and Cheney were re-writing the Constitution and
as a result, so many people died and so much money went into
Blackwater, Haliburton, Brown and Root and any other of their
slimey co-horts in the Iraq massacre?? I am proud to have Barack
Obama as our president and pray that he accomplishes his goals
and help to clean up many of the messes he had thrown in his lap
by Republicans! He is a man of rare quality and knowledge and I
think he will go down in history as such!
Nick| 3.18.10 @ 6:26PM
GET OFF THIS BLOG, YOU BIG DOPE!!!
Nick| 3.18.10 @ 6:29PM
I've been waiting all day for just the right comment to post
that!
Tee-hee! (smiles like Calvin and Hobbes)
Michael Tomlinson| 3.18.10 @ 8:55PM
Mary have you ever read the Constitution? What of Obama giving
his big donors no bid contracts? You may not like Bush and
Cheney, but they did not flout the law. Barack Obama is a Hugo
Chavez wannabe, but true Americans will not be cowed by this tin
horn tyrant.
Nick| 3.18.10 @ 9:03PM
Mr. Tomlinson,
"You may not like Bush and Cheney, but they did not flout the
law."
Tsk, tsk, tsk.
Now, you know that line is going to cause at least a few bleeding
heart libs to stroke out, don't you?
Eric Holder might try to prosecute you for murder! Ha-ha!
NeilBJ| 3.18.10 @ 9:47PM
You have a point except that you seem to be advocating a double
standard.
In principle the Constitution is not a menu. Conservatives should
not ignore the parts they don't like, and liberals should not
ignore the parts they don't like.
I agree that Bush/Cheney violated the Constitution. Does this
mean its all right for Obama and his Congress to ignore the
Constitution, too?
The bottom line is we're in the mess we're in because the
Constitution has been ignored in so many ways by both parties.
B Brewer| 3.19.10 @ 1:35PM
He will go down in history as the man who tried , and by the
Grace of God ,FAILED to take control of our country and rewrite
our constitution.
wpnspr| 3.18.10 @ 5:59PM
Obama and his henchmen have now sown seeds of the worst kind,and
it,s going to come back to them. Meanwhile, I'm tired of all the
talk.Are we going to talk about this all the way to 2012?Let's do
this...let,s pray him out of office,even if you don't believe in
God.Every day,just do it,Let,s get this over with.
dcd| 3.18.10 @ 6:05PM
Just because the plain text of the constitution clearly states
that both house and senate must pass the bill doesn't imply that
that is what was intended anymore than the plain text of the
establishment clause means that a bill can't be passed
establishing state religion (see blackwell's article).
The constitution isn't a set of rules, just some guidelines to
follow if convenient.
…issue will sing his praises for it. Plus, how many Democrats in an election year want to go on record as having voted for an Obamacare payoff appointment? My guess is not enough to get around this. Mark Levin of the Landmark Legal Foundation has his suit against the Slaughter Rule passage ready to go. You can learn more about it there. If this happens, I’m donating to Levin, and I strongly…
MARK Levin Fan in Michigan| 3.18.10 @ 7:27PM
Get 'em, Mark. Set up a PayPal button for contributions to the
cause and go get 'em.
…folks who don’t understand the threat to our Republic. Most of us in spite of the bills substance care about procedure. If the question, is the Slaughter Rule, Deem and Pass Constitutional or not goes to court (and trust me, it will) I have no doubt that a Judge who deems (there’s that word again) the Constitution as the supreme law of the land will throw Obamacare out where it belongs, in the trash. More…
Oda Mores| 3.18.10 @ 8:05PM
Levin is a malcontent racist serving up a stew of irritable vowel
syndrome for you all to sick with irrational fear. Be afraid very
afraid!
Take a bag mark!
Nick| 3.18.10 @ 8:13PM
What, exactly, is "irritable [VOWEL] syndrome"?
GET OFF THIS BLOG, YOU BIG DOPE!!
Michael Tomlinson| 3.18.10 @ 8:57PM
You're obviously an anti-Semite from MoveOn.org Oda! Obama is
doomed and so is his nationalized health care -- in 2011
Republicans will deem it null and void.
AuntieMadder| 3.20.10 @ 1:46AM
How much does Move On pay you to troll sites like this one?
Whatever it is, it's too much. Idiot.
Oda Mores| 4.19.10 @ 8:03PM
Auntie poo
Irritable Bowel Syndrome causes dirrhea. Which Dr. Levin has of
the verbal variety. (Irritable Vowels...get it?) Your zealous
dogma caused you to miss the pun, and the truth in the humor.
Both Move-On and your beloved Levin acolytes lack these insights
as you are all soldiers of hatred. Just look at the language and
responses...
NeilBJ| 3.18.10 @ 8:12PM
I have one serious concern. Will Mark Levin be able to establish
standing to sue regarding use of the Slaughter rule?
The judicial doctrine of standing -- and I say judicial, because
it's not in the Constitution -- requires that the litigant show
that he will suffer a particularized harm, that is, one that
applies only to him and not to the population in general.
I profoundly disagree with the doctrine of standing, because
makes it virtually impossble for a citizen to bring suit to
enforce the Constitution.
David| 3.18.10 @ 9:24PM
Would this be considered a class action suit of the 300 million
American people?
I'm NOT an atty., but it appears Mark and Landmark Legal and
their attorneys are approaching it as a small business (Landmark
Legal), which provides health insurance to it's employees and as
such will be adversely affected.
AuntieMadder| 3.20.10 @ 1:49AM
That's a good question, NeilBJ. Standing, or the lack thereof, is
what's those who've filed suits to see Obamao's birth certificate
from prevailing.
Richard Baker| 3.18.10 @ 8:18PM
Oda Mores:
So you believe then that the Constitution means nothing and
defending it is an act of irrationality?
Oda Mores| 4.19.10 @ 8:08PM
No. I do believe Dr Levin is hiding behind the constitution in
the same manner Darth Cheney disparaged it with the (get this)
Patriot Act!
I do also believe this blog is only interested in agreement, not
challent to your narrow dogma. Arf!
…S and visit our store: Visit The STRATosphere Powered by eBay Turbo Lister The free listing tool. List your items fast and easy and manage your active items. Related Blogs The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule The American Spectator : The Future's Shadow FAA proposes new $300000 penalty against American Airlines over … Google Chrome 4 (Stable) Security Fixes Ke$ha…
…S and visit our store: Visit The STRATosphere Powered by eBay Turbo Lister The free listing tool. List your items fast and easy and manage your active items. Related Blogs The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule The American Spectator : The Future's Shadow FAA proposes new $300000 penalty against American Airlines over … Google Chrome 4 (Stable) Security Fixes Ke$ha…
David| 3.18.10 @ 9:22PM
I think Mark could use some donations, where to send them?
There is also a link to the preliminary draft of the brief on
that page.
Jeff| 3.18.10 @ 9:26PM
In the trash. That is where Mr. Levin's lawsuit is going to get
thrown. Either Mr. Levin is an idiot or he is posturing because
there is no way ANY federal judge is going to invalidate
Obamacare. The Supreme Court has already ruled deem and pass a
legitimate legislative tool.
More specifically, the House IS going to vote on the bill. Pelosi
isn't desperately rounding up 216 votes for fun. What they are
going to do is "deem" the Senate Bill passed and vote on the
amendments simultaneously. Like at the same time. The vote is not
technically for the Senate Bill but they will still be voting to
"deem" it passed. Get it? So while you may not like it, and it
may make you want to throw a tantrum and scream about how Obama
is the Anti Christ, it is not unconstitutional.
But dont let me stop you, get out your credit cards and donate.
Morons.
Nick| 3.19.10 @ 12:15AM
Jeff,
"The Supreme Court has already ruled deem and pass a legitimate
legislative tool."
Care to cite an actual case?
Jeff| 3.18.10 @ 9:38PM
Here is Norm Ornstein from the AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE.
"Any veteran observer of Congress is used to the rampant
hypocrisy over the use of parliamentary procedures that shifts
totally from one side to the other as a majority moves to
minority status, and vice versa. But I can’t recall a level of
feigned indignation nearly as great as what we are seeing now
from congressional Republicans and their acolytes at the Wall
Street Journal, and on blogs, talk radio, and cable news. It
reached a ridiculous level of misinformation and disinformation
over the use of reconciliation, and now threatens to top that
level over the projected use of a self-executing rule by House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi. In the last Congress that Republicans
controlled, from 2005 to 2006, Rules Committee Chairman David
Dreier used the self-executing rule more than 35 times, and was
no stranger to the concept of “deem and pass.” That strategy,
then decried by the House Democrats who are now using it, and now
being called unconstitutional by WSJ editorialists, was defended
by House Republicans in court (and upheld). Dreier used it for a
$40 billion deficit reduction package so that his fellow GOPers
could avoid an embarrassing vote on immigration. I don’t like
self-executing rules by either party—I prefer the “regular
order”—so I am not going to say this is a great idea by the
Democrats. But even so—is there no shame anymore?"
I think he makes a very valid point. Conservative media, this
magazine included, does a disservice to you, the reader. They
inflame rhetoric and whip up the base so that no compromise is
possible between the parties. The fact of the matter is, Obama's
bill is a reasonable centrist effort at reforming our highly
dysfunctional health care, which interestingly, is quite similar
to the 1993 Republican plan. Probably never heard that. You may
have legitimate policy disagreements but there is no way Obama's
plan can, honestly, be construed as a Socialist plot which is
going to destroy the country. Readers of this site should
consider moving out their media cocoon and consider alternative
viewpoints.
…The Speaker of the House and her lieutenants are temporary custodians of congressional authority. They are not empowered to do permanent violence to our Constitution. Read Full Story >> The American Spectator . Possibly related posts: (automatically generated) Landmark Legal Foundation releases draft of ‘Slaughter Rule’ complaint slaughter it: levin’s landmark legal challenge…
PCP Smoker| 3.18.10 @ 10:41PM
Well written piece. Brother Levin and LLF, the last line in the
sand before a citizens' revolt.
Jeff,
if you don't see the problem with ignoring the constitution, and
"deeming" a bill passed when it wasn't voted on by the House, on
this or any future issue, you are a fucking asshole drone and a
moron who needs to be shot. I'll be happy to do it when the
revolution begins.
…in on the act, radio host and constitutional scholar Mark Levin might well beat them to the punch. Levin, who runs a non-profit constitutional law outfit called the Landmark Legal Foundation, has prepared a lawsuit to challenge Obamacare on several constitutional grounds – most notably Article I, Section 7. As the American Spectator’s Jeffrey Lord writes, the text of the complaint is devastating:…
Yosemeti Sam| 3.19.10 @ 12:54AM
And if a scenario presents where the SCOTUS
ultimately determines CONSTITUTIONALLY of this BHO/HR democrat
led sinisterism - would it not then be especially sweet poetic
JUSTICE upon the SCOTUS slapping down the same ignoramus who
in-their-face MOCKED their 3rd Branch of Govt during his last
SOTU spiel?
Larry| 3.19.10 @ 1:00AM
Oh, please, Jeff. This is a "centrist" effort at reforming our
health care system? An effective government takeover of one-sixth
of our economy that is going to cost at least double the CBO's
preliminary estimate (they heavily qualified their assessment
today because they don't even know what the reconciliation
language is going to look like), based on the phony assumptions
the Democratic House leadership gave them? You define the
"center" way too far to the left, and you have no clue where the
center should truly be. A more "centrist" effort would entail
making more modest reforms, such as allowing insurance to be
purchased across state lines, to allow more consumer-driven
health care plans and actually increase the use of HSAs, and to
use coordinated state risk pools (with some help from the Federal
government) to deal with the problem of pre-existing conditions.
This is not even close, not even close, and it is NOT reasonable.
For Conservative Attorney Scholar: I have read the case you cite,
and it is indeed formidable. But it can be factually
distinguished in one important respect: we are not dealing with
an alleged "missing" section of legislation. The real issue in
Levin's case (aside from standing, which will be a formidable
enough issue, I don't know if his standing arguments will
prevail) is whether the House of Representatives may, under its
power to make its own rules of procedure, may "deem" a
controversial item of legislation passed in the Senate to be
passed by the House without a direct, official vote on the Senate
bill. That is what the Slaughter Rule implicates, because
reconciliation cannot take place under current Federal budget
laws except in connection with existing laws, and because each
House of Congress effectively passed their own measures without
properly reconciling them through conference committee. So if
standing issues can be resolved favorably, there may be a chance
to win on this issue. I don't think it is a great chance, but it
is a chance worth taking in my opinion.
John II| 3.19.10 @ 2:16AM
Good response. But I'd still like to know how much Jeff gets paid
by the DNC to drift in and out of websites with Obama-style
obfuscation. I'd like to get in on some of that action, being a
shameless parent with stiff tuition bills that I need to pay off
to keep my own kids out of the left's corrupt and dysfunctional
public school system.
…the Constitution and as a result, so many people died and so much money went into Blackwater, Haliburton, Brown and Root and any other of their slimey co-horts in the Iraq massacre? … Read more… Post a comment You must be logged in to post a comment. System Date & Time Friday, March 19, 2010 It is 5:07am UTC To wannabe mercenaries: This website has absolutely no connection to Blackwater/XE.…
darcy| 3.19.10 @ 1:21AM
Thank you, Larry, for your valuable input.
Miss Behavin| 3.19.10 @ 1:26AM
Don't worry about Obama ever declaring martial law. He will
mis-read his teleprompter and declare marital law and everyone
will think it has to do with gay weddings or polygamy or
marryrin' your mare..
2012 is just around the corner. Another interview with Brett
Baier ought to do it. Maybe a Roundatable discussion with Brett
Baier, Brit Hume, Charles Krauthammer and His Royal Haughtiness.
…in on the act, radio host and constitutional scholar Mark Levin might well beat them to the punch. Levin, who runs a non-profit constitutional law outfit called the Landmark Legal Foundation, has prepared a lawsuit to challenge Obamacare on several constitutional grounds - most notably Article I, Section 7. As the American Spectator’s Jeffrey Lord writes, the text of the complaint is devastating:…
Sowell Disciple| 3.19.10 @ 2:05AM
I'm now viewing Mark Levin as a present-day John Adams. We are a
fortunate nation to have such a voice, providing a chance of
redemption after collectively casting the most disastrous vote in
our history.
in Archives Contact About Tom's 2 Cents Links Search for: March 19th 2010 Massive State-Level Revolt Brewing Against Obamacare (Newsmax – David A. Patten) *Lead Story* Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule (American Spectator – Jeffrey Lord) *Must Read* The Biden Incident (National Review – Charles Krauthammer) If ObamaCare passes, what will happen by election day (Jewish…
…the Attorney General of the United States what every American school child learns in those little pamphlets with catchy titles like “How a Bill … Read more: The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule Posted in American | Tags: and-the, attorney, attorney-general, catchy-titles, levin, point-out, president, school-child, united, what-every Comments are closed. Search…
…the Attorney General of the United States what every American school child learns in those little pamphlets with catchy titles like “How a Bill … Read more: The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule Posted in American | Tags: attorney, attorney-general, catchy-titles, levin, pamphlets-with, president, school-child, united, united-states, what-every Comments are…
jh| 3.19.10 @ 9:27AM
Why not have all the governors call a constitutional convention,
only need 2/3 approve.
Aaron| 3.19.10 @ 12:03PM
Hell no! Can you imagine a constitutional convention whereby we
replace the Franklins, Madisons, et al. with Pelosi, Reid, and
the rest of the statist goons. In my opinion the risk to mischief
which would fundamentally alter our society is much too great to
countenance a constitutional convention.
Alan Jonas| 3.19.10 @ 12:40PM
It is with unbelievable relief that there is someone out there
who has the courage and ability to prepare for this treason that
is being perpetrated by the President, Congress and the Senate.
Not only should there be a lawsuit, but these people should be
IMMEDIATELY ARRESTED FOR TREASON and put in prison. This whole
evolution of Obama's campaign for office and now the last year
and few months of his being in office, just stuns and amazes me
at the absolute blindness and stupidity of the American people by
voting him into office. How America went DEAF, DUMB and BLIND to
all the truth that was brought to our attention about him, the
fact of the Socialist/Marxist/Muslim followings he pursued,
somehow got swept under the rug. What was most humiliating to me
was that my own people, after the annihilation of over 6 million
of them in death camps and gas chambers, blindly voted for him
and could not see the trappings of the very same raging evil from
Hitler by following of the monotony of this mans regurgitated
speeches that said nothing but lead everyone down a primrose path
of stupidity. So just as the many Dictators of Europe crushed the
countries around them, we have Obama, crushing America, something
many have tried but failed. This is an insidious, evil, hateful
man and THANK GOD FOR Mark Levin.
…PerezHilton.com 'American Idol' Judges Poll Results: Paula Abdul Comes Out On Top … “American Idol” Eliminates Lacey Brown, Gets a Visit From Ke$ha … The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule Is PPC Canabalising your Brand Traffic? | SEOptimise I will be Kerala's brand ambassador: Big B Ron Coleman's LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® | Blogging to brand | Tesco…
…PerezHilton.com 'American Idol' Judges Poll Results: Paula Abdul Comes Out On Top … “American Idol” Eliminates Lacey Brown, Gets a Visit From Ke$ha … The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule Is PPC Canabalising your Brand Traffic? | SEOptimise I will be Kerala's brand ambassador: Big B Ron Coleman's LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® | Blogging to brand | Tesco…
miss| 3.19.10 @ 1:43PM
God bless Mark Levin, go for it Mark!!!I agree with you Alan
jonas. throw all these crooked polictians in to prison!! If
Honduras can do it we can too!!! The feds can not mandate people
to buy insurance. Lord have mercy on our souls if this horrible
bill passes!!! I will go in to hiding!! It is the end of America
as we know!!!
…the Deathmobile 'American Idol' Judges Poll Results: Paula Abdul Comes Out On Top … “American Idol” Eliminates Lacey Brown, Gets a Visit From Ke$ha … The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule What's That Smell??? Oh It's Just The Body Decomposing Under The … The Body Shop Launches New Anti-Trafficking Campaign | End Human … Underwater Aruba…
…the Deathmobile 'American Idol' Judges Poll Results: Paula Abdul Comes Out On Top … “American Idol” Eliminates Lacey Brown, Gets a Visit From Ke$ha … The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule What's That Smell??? Oh It's Just The Body Decomposing Under The … The Body Shop Launches New Anti-Trafficking Campaign | End Human … Underwater Aruba…
WAKE UP| 3.19.10 @ 4:17PM
Impeach. Now.
jen| 3.19.10 @ 10:12PM
I'll join the chant:
Impeach. Now.
AuntieMadder| 3.20.10 @ 1:43AM
Impeach. Now.
Teamwork| 3.20.10 @ 2:50AM
He whos deligths in slaughter will not succeed in his ambition to
rule the world.
As the best DVD Creator software, FLV to DVD can easily can
quickly burn FLV files to DVD Disc, convert FLV to DVD Video,
decode FLV movie to ISO files. With just a few clicks, you can
convert FLV to DVD with superfast speed and high quality.
FLV to DVD
Mac-specially designed for Mac OS X users, including snow
leopard
…nbsp;Maine Hockey Journal Cele|bitchy » Blog Archive » DWTS’ Mark Ballas rips Kate Gosselin: ’standoffish,’ assumes she’s hard to train The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule Mark Levin Fan » Blog Archive » Michele Bachmann: Obama would control 48% of the private economy with deemed health care NHL dead-on in purging goon behavior…
Let's assume that the power-crazed, Lumpen Marxetariat cabal
currently controlling the Democrats, in congress and the White
House, succeed in their Demon Pass.
One minute after that vote, they are going to be buried in an
avalanche of law suits challenging them on many levels. The one
filed by Mark Levin and the Landmark Legal Foundation may make it
to the Supreme Court..
Which makes me wonder: will Obama's egregious attempt to
humiliate sitting justices, at his first State of the Union
address, come back to haunt him?
His arrogant and classless remarks began with factual
inaccuracies (as in: YOU LIE) about the 1st Amendment case. He
then petulantly blathered on in a manner that can only be read as
a DIRECT CHALLENGE to the constitutional role of the Supreme
Court from the other two co-equal branches. That is: the SC as
the final arbiters of what is, and what is NOT, legislatively
constitutional.
Well guess what Mr President, opponents of the Democrats'
instinctive totalitarian ideology are going to have their day in
court. The Supreme Court.
Underpinning these cases will be a challenge to the idea that the
Congress and the Executive can cook the legislative books to
enact legislation contrary to the articles enumerated in the
constitution; and also, as a byproduct, usurping the power of the
Supreme Court.
I think even Justice Ginsberg will not go along with opening the
door to unfettered legislative fiat that relies on being deemed
passed.
And I suspect that at least five Justices, (the ones whom you
insulted to their faces by lying about a decision they had just
made), will not forget your worrying instinct to bypass the
constitution at your will, Mr President. Well done.
Grandma| 3.20.10 @ 10:41AM
you go Mark, Thank you for your support of America, we can take
this country back and certainly will with your knowledge and
help. You and Hannity, Boortz, Cavuito, Rush and all the great
brilliant ones are our hope for the future.
E Pennington| 3.20.10 @ 10:58AM
Thank You Mark!!! It is so ironic that in only one year all that,
was so media driven about the greatness of this President is now
out of their control. The tea parties are gaining momentum and
the people's voices are starting to be louder then the elite
media. For this past year we have watched our Consitution be
stepped on over and over. Thank God for people like you that will
lead the charge to get it back in step ,for the good of All
Americans. Without our Constitution , America looses it's
greatness, and we will loose ONE COUNTRY UNDER GOD!
IMPEACH THESE DIRTBAGS!!!!| 3.20.10 @ 11:43AM
Thank you, Mark Levin, for speaking for a majority of Christian,
Conservative Americans who want our Constitution brought back
into compliance. We need to totally clean Washington with bleach
and start over. Those who voted for this "President" are
beginning to see what he's really like!!!!!
…» Blog Archive » DWTS' Mark Ballas rips Kate Gosselin … Freebie Friday & Game Sales: 'Earth Vs Moon', 'Transformers … The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readi es Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule Boston Bruins' Scoring Legend Phil Esposito » Instant Polaroid Sli ng Player Coming To Android | Android Phone Fans Recap: FlashForward,…
Michele San Pietro| 3.21.10 @ 11:03AM
Because of Obama, freedom in the United States and in the entire
free world is seriously at risk. Obama must be stopped before it
is too late!
Lillian Partos| 3.21.10 @ 12:48PM
We the American people can not stand by while Obama destroys our
county. Mr. Levin we are with you 100%. God bless you!
Lillian Partos| 3.21.10 @ 12:48PM
We the American people can not stand by while Obama destroys our
county. Mr. Levin we are with you 100%. God bless you!
Stephen S| 3.23.10 @ 12:44AM
I am an American "person" Lilly and I couldn't disagree with you
more.
Johnny M.| 3.22.10 @ 2:53AM
New World Order - 666 -
jinder| 3.22.10 @ 1:07PM
leving is going to do squat, he needs to get it out of his head,
HE IS A NOBODY...what government wants is what government
gets..unless the people rise and stop them..not some guy in his
bunker.
…when they didn’t. The Speaker of the House and her lieutenants are temporary custodians of congressional authority. They are not empowered to do permanent violence to our Constitution.” Jeffrey Lord at American Spectator has more. Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments » Leave a Reply Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website XHTML: You can use these tags:
Stephen S| 3.23.10 @ 12:41AM
Levin touts Goldline International incessantly on his radio show.
Take a look at this "ripoof report about these scammers.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/In.....-3ab95.htm
or how about this one
http://www.ripoffreport.com/in.....-642f5.htm
I don't see how anyone could call Levin "The Great One." His
sophmoric and downright nasty name calling and his screaming and
yelling totally devalue any arguments he tries to make. I
personally find him to be a despicable human being.
…Radical Agenda” — had more relevance to events than this one. 5. The Lawsuits: A hat tip to The Great One, Mark Levin. Within hours of his announcement that he had a lawsuit ready to go if the Pelosi constitutional wrecking crew proceeded with the so-called “Slaughter Rule” or “deem and pass” manipulation, his suit was being discussed at the White House…
…strategy been utilized by Speaker Pelosi to force Obamacare through without a House vote, Mark Levin — popular conservative talk-show host and constitutional law scholar — had already drafted a lawsuit to be immediately filed against President Obama, Att. Gen. Eric Holder, Sec. of Treas. Timothy Geithner, & Sec. of HHS Karen Sebelius for allowing such an “unconstitutional…
…and pass” strategy been utilized by Speaker Pelosi to force Obamacare through without a House vote, Mark Levin — popular conservative talk-show host and constitutional law scholar — had already drafted a lawsuit to be immediately filed against President Obama, Att. Gen. Eric Holder, Sec. of Treas. Timothy Geithner, & Sec. of HHS Karen Sebelius for allowing such an “unconstitutional contrivance” to be…
http://www.us-chaneloutlet.com| 4.3.10 @ 3:23AM
Starting tomorrow, chanel 2010 is
moving its SoHo store into a temporary 10,700 square foot duplex
store at 134 Spring Street. Its current shop across the street at
139 Spring will be closed for renovations until
mid-September.
Rents in the immediate area run around $300 a foot for the ground
floor.
Visit the official Chanel website :newest chanel
iPad to iTunes Transfer ia an all-in-one ipad transfer tool.
United four tools into one, this iPad to iTunes Transfer can be
considerred as the best assistant when dealing with iPad stuffs. As
an iPad uer, you can use iPad to iTunes Transfer as a iPad to
Computer Transfer, Computer to iPad Transfer, iPad Converter, DVD
to iPad Transfer, even it can be used as a hard drive to manage
iPad files in good order.
Noir| 3.18.10 @ 6:40AM
Mark is also known to his fans as "The Great One".
Good luck Mark with this endeavor - get out there and "school" these folks on our beloved Constitution!
shelley lehigh| 3.19.10 @ 9:04PM
I am totally behing Mr. Levin and listen to him daily. Thank God there is someone like him to speak for the regular people out here. I can't stand this healthcare bill and pray if it passes Mr. Levin can be the hero we need to STOP THIS from happening.
basur| 10.27.10 @ 6:00AM
There is a REASON our republic has survived these many years and Mark Levin is just one of many who cherish what our founders set forth.
Deborah D| 3.18.10 @ 6:44AM
Gotta love Mark Levin. He's feisty and passionate -- two qualities (along with his highly superior intellect) that I admire in someone who reveres the Constitution.
Obama, in his interview with Bret Baier last evening, basically pooh-poohed as focusing on "process" this unconstitutional overreach by Nancy Pelosi and her buddy Louise Slaughter. Why would we expect anything less from a so-called constitutional law professor who has only contempt for the Constitution.
I hope it doesn't get that far, but I'm comforted knowing that Mark Levin (the Great One) is waiting in the wings to battle with "the One."
Anthony| 3.18.10 @ 9:43AM
Good points Deborah D. As with all tyrants, process is a tedious little speed bump in the way of totalitarianism. As Stalin quiped, one death is a tragedy, a million, a mere statistic; such is the thinking of tyrants.
How positively Alice-in Wonderland like, that our president, an alleged constitutional law lecturer at the great Univeristy of Chicago Law School, deems a major Constitutional violation mere process. You folks at Chicago Law should hold your heads in shame, but then again, I suspect a good many of you hold a similar contempt for the Constitution.
Not to worry, Mark Levin will show you intellectualoids some real lawyering. Funny, only Democrats could fail to see the irony of the death of their party by the use of the slaughter rule.
Levin will make the Little Big Horn look like a picnic compared to what he will do to the Ds. At least at LBH, Custer's horse survived. Can't hold out the same promise to you Ds. Hope you "moderate" Ds have your resumes updated. Maybe you all will finally get a chance to do some honest work, Home Depot is a great place to work!! Hi !my name is Steny Hoyer, how can I be of help to you today!!!
Cheryl| 3.19.10 @ 2:05PM
While Mark is at it, is there any possible way that those who participate in this charade be impeached for treason against the United States?
Norma McGinnis| 3.19.10 @ 4:23PM
Yes, PLEASE is this possible to impeach these people? There has to be a way.
David Jack Smith| 3.20.10 @ 9:22AM
Norma... The constitution is very clear about the House impeachment and Senate trial process.
There will be no impeachment of, say the President in this congress, or the next congress.
People need to devote their energies to the doable and not the wishable.
The left spent 8 years ranting on about impeaching Bush. It was never going to happen.
MTB| 3.18.10 @ 3:42PM
He didn't "pooh-pooh" it process when he was a senator. He was pretty outspoken against it when a Republican was President. I hate democrats! VOTE THEM ALL OUT! All of them, good, bad or indifferent. If a democrat is running in your state, vote him/her out and put in a Republican. Send this arrogant SOB party a message they will NEVER forget.
FawnridgeFarm| 3.18.10 @ 6:50AM
Thank you, Mr. Lord, for informing us regarding Mr. Levin's intentions; and thank you, Mr. Levin, for this lauable legal effort to defend the sanctity of the United States Constitution. Should it prove to be unsuccessful, an informed, inflamed and resolute American electorate awaits to ensure that individual liberty will ultimately prevail.
Bellicus_Pium| 3.18.10 @ 6:52AM
The "Great One" stands for all Constructionists, both liberal, conservative and moderate.
There is a REASON our republic has survived these many years and Mark Levin is just one of many who cherish what our founders set forth.
Bridget| 3.18.10 @ 6:53AM
I am glad to see this happening - just last night I was discussing this with my husband - trying to figure out how the President could sign something that wasn't jointly approved with the exact same language by both houses of Congress. How can that be? How can it actually be a law? I was lamenting that this process they wish to use was not what was in the Constitution (I even made reference to my high school government class and School House Rock). Frankly, the argument that it was used before doesn't hold water either - shouldn't be used at all. In this case, it is being used on such a contentious issue that has ramifications for every single citizen of the USA - I hope they get butts kicked for this. I certainly will be paying even more attention at the ballot box this Nov and in 2012 (I already do lots of homework, but this situation makes me even more suspicious and diligent)
ShoppinJunkie| 3.18.10 @ 5:06PM
Bridget - School House Rock ROCKS!!! I bought the set for my daughter years ago. If ONLY we could get Congress & Prez to watch it, they might actually learn something.
Ret. Marine| 3.18.10 @ 7:00AM
And cheering we should be. This is a defining moment of our history. Maybe "We the People" should "deem" our Representative "done and cooked well" if they pass this monster under a bill proclaiming it " healthcare reform."
If these punks think for one muslim minute they will escape the wrath of We the People, well in plain language they are sorely mistaken. This is not going to go well or unnoticed by the very population of free individuals commonly called Patriots.
I am not yet convinced that Mr. Levin can stop this mess. I've read many opinions regarding the seperation of the three "seperate branches" and I am as confused as to their powers of interference between them. I am not a scholar by any means of any subject, I am a simple man watching in awe at such a blantent power grab by individuals who swore to protect the Constitution against all enemies, it appears that these same individuals are making themselves the enemy of We the People.
If nothing else, I await the first blows to this tryanny. Good for Mr. Levin, I applaud him for his courage and straigh up stance to the robbers of our liberties. I trust folks like Levin over these so-called politicians of today. One has to respect a man with principles over liars, or is this too "old school" for them to understand.
A Responsible American| 3.18.10 @ 9:09PM
This matter will end up before the Supreme Court. Pray it is while a conservative majority remain on the bench.
Pat Gordon| 3.18.10 @ 9:46PM
AMEN to that!!!!!!
AJ West| 3.18.10 @ 9:52PM
Concur, fully. When Mr. Levin decides to move on this, this is one former Navy pilot that is right there with the Marines to preserve our freedom.
Semper Fi,
"An Old Cold Warrior"
darcy| 3.19.10 @ 12:23AM
And we'll be standing with you, shoulder to shoulder, wing to wing.
Joe Hamilton| 3.18.10 @ 7:04AM
It's ironic. One of the few liberal magazines (most deemed it unworthy of a review) who reviewed Mark Levin's latest book, made a point of expressing their warped opinion, Mark was far from a legal scholar. Now the demorats (liberals) will painfully find out how wrong they were.
Brian Mc| 3.18.10 @ 7:38AM
Go for it, Mark! Next, might be we can talk him into attacking the seventeenth amendment which is at the root of all this evil...senators aren't concerned about their jobs any more (can you boys and girls say, Ted Kennedy?) just so long as they have enough sheep to pull the lever under the name they recognize the most.
Griff| 3.18.10 @ 7:47AM
Thank God for people like Mark Levin.
(Are we still allowed to mention God on the internet?)
Jim B| 3.18.10 @ 7:56AM
It the President signs this bill in knowing violation of the Consitiution, he has violated his oath of office and should resign or be impeached.
fbom| 3.18.10 @ 8:46AM
oh - please don't make it that easy for the new Congress
AC| 3.18.10 @ 11:28AM
Or perhaps physically removed from his office by a 5 million man march on Washington. Tar and feathers at least. I say God Bless you, Mr. Levin. But I think the rest of us need to be figuring out how to deal with this government other than talking about it. They don't care what we think and if they can get away with what they're trying, pretty soon our votes won't count either. It's a power grab and it has to be stopped before it happens or we're done.
Ret. Sailor| 3.18.10 @ 2:52PM
AC; I agree in principle with you and Ret. Marine but lately I've been wondering, is this precisely what Obama has been working for? An opportunity to declare a National State of Emergency and Martial Law? I know it sounds rediculous and in my 20+ years in the Navy I could never have contemplated a situation as we have now but before we charge forth with our weapons loaded we best be sure we can prevail.
AC| 3.18.10 @ 5:43PM
Ret. Sailor, you make a very good point. I'm worried about the resolve of the American people as a whole. I know we have many very good people here who believe as I do, but I think there's a general lack of courage that makes the idea of taking a stand perilous, but no less important. When Obama was running for office he said that this country needs "fundamental" change and he will succeed unless we stop him. You are absolutely right that it's imortant to understand exactly what we will face in the fight, but I'm really worried that if we just vent our frustrations online, O will win and America will lose.
Phil Kearny| 3.18.10 @ 9:00PM
I agree with all of you. If Obama willingly signs this unconstituional bill--knowing full-well as a Harvard-trained lawer what he's doing--he should resign. He won't, so impeachment will be the only recourse. Sad...
Christopher Holland| 3.18.10 @ 9:52PM
Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. I can't wait for the day when Americans say that they have deemed to pay their taxes. See how fast the wheels fall off the Obamamobile when that happens. What is he going to do - arrest everybody in the country? Not even Stalin could do that, although he gave it a good shot.
Mad as Heck| 3.18.10 @ 9:51PM
You are thinking the same thing I am; and I'm becoming more conviced of it every day. Why else is the 0 building up his civilian "army?"
Mad as Heck| 3.18.10 @ 9:48PM
Don't forget the rail to run him out of town on!
glassfinger| 3.18.10 @ 6:27PM
As written before, teh legal process to stop the socialists has begun. Some of us graybeards who once work the uniform are participating, but all of us are watching to see how this shakes out. If the legal process won't rid us of these criminals, other means will. Lexington and Concord weren't accidental events, and we're ready to do that again, if need be, and God willing.
Tony P| 3.19.10 @ 10:20AM
He won't resign - and who will impeach him?
Melvin| 3.18.10 @ 8:18AM
"Introduce a little anarchy. Upset the established order, and everything becomes chaos. The taxpayers are agents of chaos. Oh, and you know the thing about chaos? It's fair!"
The Joker, Dark Knight
Loadmaster| 3.18.10 @ 8:29AM
I would think that anyone who actively participates in this "Slaughter Rules" who be subject to Sedition. That would be left up the State AG's to make that determination. If the States are going sue..then that just might be part of their legal findings.
Regardless Mark Levin is right on course. Let's hope this bill gets shot down?
RetiredFed| 3.18.10 @ 8:36AM
Go for it, Mark! Perhaps the Dems will scare and not end up being "slaughtered". Makes one slightly optimistic, but watch out. They are ruthless.
Nick| 3.18.10 @ 8:51AM
Mark Levin and Hugh Hewitt are the two smartest Constitutional experts on the radio.
Ohiojb| 3.18.10 @ 8:57AM
Thank you Mark. You are correct. "It is never the right time for tyranny."
youfamissim| 3.18.10 @ 9:05AM
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive..."
The Dems hold on power will end the next election cycle. If this bill passes, it will increase the losses for the Dems. I have this gut feeling the largest political losses in recorded history will soon come. But should this bill pass, the Liar In Chief (LIC) will remain in office and his impudence will surely increase when forced to confront the fruit of his follies. Killing this healthcare bill will not an easy task. But the means exists for Republicans to expose the left's hypocracy and place Obama and his party on trial in the court of public opinion.
I want Republicans to craft legislation that requires ALL government employees be enrolled in the new healthcare plan. The president, the congress, all agency employees, and the unions as they obtain - shall be subject to the healthcare remedy they find so intoxicating - no exceptions; no if, and, or but. It's only right they lead by example. I want to see the Dems in congress railing against the very bill they shredded the Constitution to achieve and then shoved down the citizenry's throat. I want the very same congressional tactics used to present the bill to the president. I want to watch the LIC squirm and refuse to sign the bill that requires him, his family, and pals in government, and all their families submit to the healthcare remedy they proscribed for the nation.
PERFECT!
MTB| 3.18.10 @ 3:51PM
Excellent comments, youfamissim! Right on in every aspect. If this nightmare of a bill passes, when the Republicans take control of the Congress in November, the first thing they should do is introduce a bill just as you stated. Then watch what happens.
darcy| 3.19.10 @ 12:49AM
At the end of a lengthy and mildly contentious phone conversation with one of my reps' staffers this afternoon, I forewarned her that if this bill passes, Americans will NEVER trust democrats with power again.
But to us here I say: Be ever vigilant -- a mere party label is no guarantee of a pols' fidelity to the Constitution.
37 states, most notably VA and Idaho, are doing their part in moving to counter demcare tyranny.
Sen. Coburn declares patronage a risky gamble for those lawmakers who sign on to trading their HC vote for future federal jobs: he will skewer them, and rightly so!
What are you, Sen. Kyl, going to do to stop this? This Arizonan is waiting to hear your creative solutions to stopping this egregious federal power grab, opposed by 55% of Americans -- many of whom compare our current circumstances with those that wrought the Declaration of Independence.
Giny| 6.30.10 @ 7:36PM
This is by far the best idea. If only it were possible. They have all been there to long padding their pockets and protecting their skins!!!!
Heatpacker| 3.18.10 @ 9:06AM
I wish to thank the Democrat Party for being completely open and honest in demonstrating its contempt for the United States Constitution. There can no longer be any doubt that a difference does, in fact, exist between the two major political parties. The Democrats have, in their blind arrogance, given the Republicans a political gift beyond measure.
coal carrier| 3.18.10 @ 9:14AM
To me, the question is why does this plan have to be pushed through so fast? Anyone from the left out there have an answer? I’ll tell you why. Obama, Pilosi and the rest of empty heads in Washington know that the general public does not want this particular plan. Obama knows come November, it could be curtains for his party. With this in mind they had better get it in place as soon as possible. Once an entitlement always an entitlement.
MTB| 3.18.10 @ 4:23PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to remember that Obama or someone even said that. That they had to hurry and get the HC bill through before the Fall elections. And from what I'm hearing on talk radio, they think if they pass it now, the American people will forget all about the procedure, process, back-door deals, lies and obfuscation and put them (the dems) right back in office.
jd| 3.18.10 @ 9:39AM
GOD BLESS MARK LEVIN!
magua| 3.18.10 @ 9:46AM
Mark Levin once again demonstrates leadership and authentic devotion to our founding principles. He has become the "tip of the spear" leading this struggle to preserve our precious Republic. We need to stand shoulder to shoulder with him as he engages those who want to "fundamentally change America".
magua| 3.18.10 @ 9:47AM
Mark Levin once again demonstrates leadership and authentic devotion to our founding principles. He has become the "tip of the spear" leading this struggle to preserve our precious Republic. We need to stand shoulder to shoulder with him as he engages those who want to "fundamentally change America".
danR| 3.18.10 @ 9:58AM
If this idiotic mess of an unconstitutional bill passes, there will be mayhem in the many and varied ways that it will be attacked, both on constitutional grounds (legally) and legislatively, particularly after Jan.2011. I think there will be restraining orders filed by both individuals and states that will tie it up in court indefinitly. The federal government is not granted the power to mandate that every citizen buy a particular product or else face federal punishment. This can be overturned, but let's continue to pray that it won't have to be.
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 10:16AM
Mark Levin Joins the Battle @ Fight for Glenn Beck links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 10:17AM
Immunity Granted in Navy Seals Persecution – State Stimulus Crutch – Tea Party Health links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Ken (Old Texican)| 3.18.10 @ 10:20AM
Is this "Deem" thing merely a head-fake while the powers keep twisting arms and doing deals?
Let's not get too, focused, folks.
Keep faxing and calling reps.
Bob Miller| 3.18.10 @ 11:32AM
Ken, I think you're onto something. However, this is just stupid and evil enough for them to try if other methods fail. So defenders of liberty have to cover all bases.
MAJ Mike| 3.18.10 @ 10:28AM
When I took Political Science 1310 at a small regional south Texas university (alma mater of LBJ), I learned that legislation from the House and the Senate had to match exactly. To achieve that, a Conference Committee comprised of both Congressmen and Senators was required to produce a bill that would then be voted on by the seperate House of Representatives and Senate.
In observing the current situation, what am I missing in the process? THE ONE seems not to be interested in PROCESS, but process is what keeps things fair. Process is what allows the Opposition to gracefully accept defeat. When the process is bypassed, then the Opposition has grounds for non-cooperation and conintued opposition to the Majority.
Guess because I'm not a product of toxic Ivy League groupthink, I'm not sufficiently educated to understand what is going on.
The LibCong are over-reaching and will reap a whirlwind.
Ryan| 3.18.10 @ 10:46AM
Precisely. The American legal process is NOT just about what gets done, but it's the process in HOW something gets done.
The Dems breaking the process to get something done is tyranny, pure and simple. I don't think that it's much of an overstatement.
MAJ Mike| 3.18.10 @ 3:03PM
Thanks for the affirmation. I really did stay awake during that class, took notes, did the reading, and made an "A". I was begining to think that my Professor had it all wrong.
Could it be that this retired Army guy now teaching high school U.S. History has a better grasp of constitutional law than THE ONE?
Damn!
Robert C. Griffin| 3.18.10 @ 10:47AM
Dems seem to be pushing all-in with stupidity. If their attempt to rail-road the constituion is successful, look out for Cap & Tax and Immigration Reform(true name: amnesty)
@griffinrc
Melvin| 3.18.10 @ 10:50AM
If this, "Thing" passes, what are we are prepared to do?
Are we going to just keep running our mouthes, as does the politicians, or are we going to respond with something of substance?
If we as a Nation let this stand, then as Nancy Pelosi stated, "All we need to go is kick the door down," will become the standard fare for Amnesty, and the Climate Chane Bills that have been silently chugging along on a parallel course.
Ken (Old Texican)| 3.18.10 @ 11:55AM
Melvin,
I pretty much think it depends on what happens in November. Until then we keep our cards close to ye olde vest.
Joe| 3.18.10 @ 12:11PM
I hope he sues no matter what. The "Reconciliation" is an unconstitutional process to pass this bill as well. This is according to Robert Byrd a sponsor of the bill 30 years ago. Finally, it is unconstitutional to force the American people to pay/buy something, or pay taxes insurance, without there consent.
Conservative Attorney Scholar| 3.18.10 @ 12:13PM
I want the lawsuit to succeed. HOWEVER - The"enrolled bill" doctrine from the Supreme Court decision in Marshall Field & Co. v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649 (1892), will likely prevent the courts from looking at a bill that has the signatures of the president of the senate and the speaker of the house, even if there was fraud in the signing. Pelosi and Reed are capable of the fraud, and the courts may defer by giving deference to a co-equal branch of government. It's enlightening to read the Marshall Field decision - and depressing - to think that Pelosi/Reed/Obama will get away with this. I would not rely on the courts to set things right unless the court chooses to overturn the enrolled bill doctrine (unlikely). It's important to stop congress now.
MTB| 3.18.10 @ 4:27PM
I think that's the whole point of the suit, to present to the Court that the bill was not passed legally and lawfully, that Pelosi should not have signed the bill, nor should Pres Obama. If the Court agrees to hear the case, then the whole process is opened up to legal scrutiny. The three powers are a checks and balances to ensure that not one branch of government is more powerful than the other. If the House "deems" this bill as passed, the Supreme Court has an obligation to ensure the House (and Senate) obeyed the law.
AuntieMadder| 3.20.10 @ 2:05AM
Well, geez. In case you're right and the courts won't look at this bill, could Levin cite some alternative acts of treason committed by Obamao & Co. as reasons to bring suit against them? No, I suppose the law doesn't work that way and requires, instead, a separate, expensive lawsuit for each crime they've committed against America. Too bad there's no bulk rate for filing numerous lawsuits as one.
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 12:26PM
Mark Levin is ready to “lawyer up” « Grant County Republican Party links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
DixHistory| 3.18.10 @ 12:47PM
I hope every Congress man, every judge, every person who took and oath or affirmed to uphold the U.S. Constitution and didn't, will be shown to be a traitor to the United States and our U.S. Constitution.
That includes George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and my own Republican Congress men and all our State governors.
Because Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen, They all know it is unlawful and all of them have helped it to happen including the so called news media. Therefore nothing citizen obama does sitting as an unlawful POTUS is legal.
http://homepages.rootsweb.ance...../obama.htm
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 12:59PM
Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule | Republican Party of Door County links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 1:00PM
Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule | Republican Party of Door County links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 1:00PM
Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule | Republican Party of Door County links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Maddox| 3.18.10 @ 1:06PM
I fully support and appreciate Mr. Levin's attempt to save our country from the marxists who are trying an end run around the Constitution to take control of our country's economy.
If this is not possible, as Conservative Attorney Scholar suggested, could the American people petition to have the Obama administration removed in a move similar to the Hondurans last year?
Bruce| 3.18.10 @ 1:22PM
Past and present Presidents and Congresses have stepped all over our Constitution so many times it has ceased to be a guiding document for these swine. Someone show me where in the Document it is allowed for the President to make law by signing "Executive Orders" by fiat? Orders that neither the Congress nor the People can over-rule, and in many cases don't even have knowledge of.
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 1:25PM
The Legal Battle Against Obamacare « The Republican Heretic links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
The Republican Heretic| 3.18.10 @ 1:27PM
Trackback: http://republicanheretic.wordp.....obamacare/
Michael A. Gabel| 3.18.10 @ 1:42PM
I stand with Mark Levin in this effort, and in all of his efforts to preserve the US Constitution.
I do believe that if Obama signs the "deemed" passed bill into law, then he has violated his presidential oath and has committed an impeachable offense.
Still, I believe Pelosi will do the evil deeds necessary to secure an up or down vote. It is shameful really, but given the current unchecked status of the federal branches, I am seeing things I never thought possible in this country.
If we go down, we go down fighting. Continue to contact your representatives and senators.
Jon| 3.18.10 @ 1:46PM
I don't know about anyone else, but I wish Obama would lose his unmitigated preoccupation with job creation and do something more worthwhile, such as make his sweet sixteen picks. I mean, really, how long do we have to wait?
MTB| 3.18.10 @ 4:29PM
I'd say about 3 years and 7 months.
r.j. callahan| 3.18.10 @ 2:15PM
As all the previous comments of support above, this household, also, stands behind you, Mark. Good luck in over turning this legislation.
DADZRITES| 3.18.10 @ 2:50PM
What the current statist administration is doing has been going on in the family courts of this country for the past 25-30 years (denial of rights, breaking up of families, draconian enforcements, imprisonment for debt, ignoring of redress of grievances, downplaying demonstrations at courthouses, etc.). But now, it has escaped Pandora's Box and is affecting the entire society under the current socialist-statist administration.
Apparently, the only thing statists will observe will be physical confrontation using the Confrontation Clause. We may need to show up at the White House with pitchforks and torches (or armed to the teeth). When government ignores the legality and constitutionality of its processes and procedures, the only thing left that they will understand is a massive confrontation with its people.
MAJ Mike| 3.18.10 @ 3:09PM
I prefer 7.62mm NATO rounds and .45ACP to pitchforks and torches.
"...whenever any form of government becomes distructive of these, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it."
The oath I took in 1976 to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, is still valid.
There's many more like me out here. The DemCong ignore us at their peril.
darcy| 3.19.10 @ 1:14AM
" . . . it is the RIGHT of the people to alter or abolish it."
We join our forebears in exerting this RIGHT.
Right to federally directed health care insurance? Not so much. Zip, nada, none. What part of NO can't they understand?
John II| 3.19.10 @ 1:59AM
Whoa. 7.62 mm NATO. I haven't heard that kind of talk in 40 years. We were trained with the M-14 back then, and I was still serving when they switched to the M-16 in Germany, and I got stuck with the job of training our unit in its use. Didn't like it. The small caliber bullet driven by the heavy charge would tumble in flight and shred whatever it hit. The M-16 was just a dumb-ass man-killer with plastic stock (manufactured by Matel, as I recall) stuck to what was otherwise just a friggin' Colt machine-pistol. The M-14 was the last standard Army issue with class; the 20-round clip gave it war-making authority, but it would work just as well as a deer rifle. In Basic, I shoot expert with it, no problem. It just did what you told it to do. It was a gentleman's weapon.
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 2:54PM
All American Blogger » 222 Democrats Vote to Disregard Constitution links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Hardcard| 3.18.10 @ 2:59PM
Thank You Mr. Levin and May God Bless You.
You are truly; A Man of the Law.
Oldefarte| 3.18.10 @ 3:16PM
His lawsuit is narrowly based upon the 'DEEM' concept; so if the Democrats BREAK ENOUGH ARMS to pass a House vote, there is still the possibility of a numerous collection of individual states Attorneys General filing a federal lawsuit based upon the constitutionality of the legislation's mandate that forces everyone to purchase insurance. Additionally, I'm disgusted at Republican congressmen for their lack of guts/courage in this matter. Even though they're in the minority, they could still initiate some in house type congressional attacks [ie say an impeachment proceding against Obama,etc] that would wreck havoc in congress and delay the Democrats actions on this legislation until we conservative citizens/voters could hopefully take back our government with the November elections. The Republicans are simply being gutless as usual in not fighting these corrupt Democrat tactics mono-e-mono style!!!!
MTB| 3.18.10 @ 3:45PM
You know, I was just thinking. All thes HC supporters who are waiting on baited breath for their "free" health care. They're going to be pretty upset when they find that yep, it's free, but the quality sucks, or they have to wait weeks or months to get treatment. They voted for an empty suit who is doing nothing more than destroying this country.
DTCOFAZ| 3.18.10 @ 3:47PM
Mark Levin is the American' Hero! We need more courageous people like Mark to protect our Great Nation from this tyranny administration Obama/Holder/Pelosi/Reid.
The Republican party needs to confront with this administration more aggressively on the behalf of the majority of American people.
The people that stood by Obama and cheered him in OH when he said " the employer would get 3000.00% rate decrease on health insurance .. That's depressingly amazing!
CactusJack| 3.18.10 @ 3:59PM
CoalCarrier, you discerned intent about as well as anyone has - why is there such a rush here if everyone just truly wants to get it right? Answer is obvious, your analysis comes from a long ago age of ladies and gentlemen to which we at least aspired. Now we are seeing an age of thiefs and thuggery in DC, the Dems are stiffarming with one arm and pickpocketing with the other hand, fast as they can before the cops show up. Gotta fight back. Sen. Coburn getting out the "switchblade" this afternoon big step right direction.
Anthony| 3.18.10 @ 4:15PM
So, the first shot in the 2nd civil war has been fired; according to NRO, Congress has just upheld the use of the Slaugher rule 222 to 202. May God have mercy on us and on what is about to happen to America.
Clinton Lovell| 3.18.10 @ 5:10PM
Like the first civil war, they fired the first shot but we will surely fire the last. The only question is how long will it be until the actual bullets start flying and bombs start falling. I see Greece and I see what we are doing now and it tells me that a lot of suffering is coming and if we don't want it to be us then it has to be them.
Michael Tomlinson| 3.18.10 @ 5:13PM
The father of American capitalism Alexander Hamilton once wrote, "If it be asked, what is the most sacred duty and the greatest source of our security in a Republic? The answer would be, an inviolable respect for the Constitution and Laws - the first growing out of the last.... A sacred respect for the constitutional law is the vital principle, the sustaining energy of a free government." His political nemesis Thomas Jefferson stated without reservation, "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." It is evident that the quasi despots of the Democrat oligarchy do not respect the Constitution or adequately fear the American people. . . Democrats seem intent not only in destroying the greatest health care system in the world, but virtually shredding the rule of law and the Constitution in their quest for power. How can we resist this headlong rush to soft despotism when the Constitution is flouted and the people's will ignored by condescending, arrogant and capricious Democrats?
Mark Levin and the Landmark Legal Foundation are taking one track, the state of Virginia is preparing to sue, Bobby Jindal and Rick Perry have talked of nullification, the Tea Party movement can host rallies that shut down DC, local citizen in districts with traitorous Congressmen can insure their visits home are unpleasant and outraged Americans can go to the polls and vote for Republicans in November who in 2011 will deem the House's quasi vote for Obamacare null and void. In a few words we must make the Democrats fear the American people and let them know we're not going to take their betrayal of this country anymore!
Mary Carolyn Perry| 3.18.10 @ 5:56PM
Mark Levin needs all the "God Bless You's" I have read here , for he is one of the worse people I ever heard...arrogant and rude and completely ready to bend the truth to his own desires. To call him the GREAT ONE is ridiculous..he is great at acting like jerk! If our country has sunk so low that so many of you think he is a constitutional scholar...we are in bad shape. I say ..where was he when Bush and Cheney were re-writing the Constitution and as a result, so many people died and so much money went into Blackwater, Haliburton, Brown and Root and any other of their slimey co-horts in the Iraq massacre?? I am proud to have Barack Obama as our president and pray that he accomplishes his goals and help to clean up many of the messes he had thrown in his lap by Republicans! He is a man of rare quality and knowledge and I think he will go down in history as such!
Nick| 3.18.10 @ 6:26PM
GET OFF THIS BLOG, YOU BIG DOPE!!!
Nick| 3.18.10 @ 6:29PM
I've been waiting all day for just the right comment to post that!
Tee-hee! (smiles like Calvin and Hobbes)
Michael Tomlinson| 3.18.10 @ 8:55PM
Mary have you ever read the Constitution? What of Obama giving his big donors no bid contracts? You may not like Bush and Cheney, but they did not flout the law. Barack Obama is a Hugo Chavez wannabe, but true Americans will not be cowed by this tin horn tyrant.
Nick| 3.18.10 @ 9:03PM
Mr. Tomlinson,
"You may not like Bush and Cheney, but they did not flout the law."
Tsk, tsk, tsk.
Now, you know that line is going to cause at least a few bleeding heart libs to stroke out, don't you?
Eric Holder might try to prosecute you for murder! Ha-ha!
NeilBJ| 3.18.10 @ 9:47PM
You have a point except that you seem to be advocating a double standard.
In principle the Constitution is not a menu. Conservatives should not ignore the parts they don't like, and liberals should not ignore the parts they don't like.
I agree that Bush/Cheney violated the Constitution. Does this mean its all right for Obama and his Congress to ignore the Constitution, too?
The bottom line is we're in the mess we're in because the Constitution has been ignored in so many ways by both parties.
B Brewer| 3.19.10 @ 1:35PM
He will go down in history as the man who tried , and by the Grace of God ,FAILED to take control of our country and rewrite our constitution.
wpnspr| 3.18.10 @ 5:59PM
Obama and his henchmen have now sown seeds of the worst kind,and it,s going to come back to them. Meanwhile, I'm tired of all the talk.Are we going to talk about this all the way to 2012?Let's do this...let,s pray him out of office,even if you don't believe in God.Every day,just do it,Let,s get this over with.
dcd| 3.18.10 @ 6:05PM
Just because the plain text of the constitution clearly states that both house and senate must pass the bill doesn't imply that that is what was intended anymore than the plain text of the establishment clause means that a bill can't be passed establishing state religion (see blackwell's article).
The constitution isn't a set of rules, just some guidelines to follow if convenient.
maverick muse| 3.18.10 @ 6:24PM
Thank you, Mark Levin!
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 7:12PM
Obamacare Contingency Planning :: YankMcCain.com links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
MARK Levin Fan in Michigan| 3.18.10 @ 7:27PM
Get 'em, Mark. Set up a PayPal button for contributions to the cause and go get 'em.
2old2givea| 3.19.10 @ 2:33AM
There's a button on LL's hompage: http://www.landmarklegal.org/DesktopDefault.aspx
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 7:33PM
The Slaughter Rule: Deem And Pass Constitutional? » Right Pundits links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Oda Mores| 3.18.10 @ 8:05PM
Levin is a malcontent racist serving up a stew of irritable vowel syndrome for you all to sick with irrational fear. Be afraid very afraid!
Take a bag mark!
Nick| 3.18.10 @ 8:13PM
What, exactly, is "irritable [VOWEL] syndrome"?
GET OFF THIS BLOG, YOU BIG DOPE!!
Michael Tomlinson| 3.18.10 @ 8:57PM
You're obviously an anti-Semite from MoveOn.org Oda! Obama is doomed and so is his nationalized health care -- in 2011 Republicans will deem it null and void.
AuntieMadder| 3.20.10 @ 1:46AM
How much does Move On pay you to troll sites like this one? Whatever it is, it's too much. Idiot.
Oda Mores| 4.19.10 @ 8:03PM
Auntie poo
Irritable Bowel Syndrome causes dirrhea. Which Dr. Levin has of the verbal variety. (Irritable Vowels...get it?) Your zealous dogma caused you to miss the pun, and the truth in the humor. Both Move-On and your beloved Levin acolytes lack these insights as you are all soldiers of hatred. Just look at the language and responses...
NeilBJ| 3.18.10 @ 8:12PM
I have one serious concern. Will Mark Levin be able to establish standing to sue regarding use of the Slaughter rule?
The judicial doctrine of standing -- and I say judicial, because it's not in the Constitution -- requires that the litigant show that he will suffer a particularized harm, that is, one that applies only to him and not to the population in general.
I profoundly disagree with the doctrine of standing, because makes it virtually impossble for a citizen to bring suit to enforce the Constitution.
David| 3.18.10 @ 9:24PM
Would this be considered a class action suit of the 300 million American people?
2old2givea| 3.19.10 @ 2:12AM
In a word, yes. You can read & dload the preliminary draft of the brief at: http://www.landmarklegal.org/uploads/Landmark Complaint (00013086-2).pdf
I'm NOT an atty., but it appears Mark and Landmark Legal and their attorneys are approaching it as a small business (Landmark Legal), which provides health insurance to it's employees and as such will be adversely affected.
AuntieMadder| 3.20.10 @ 1:49AM
That's a good question, NeilBJ. Standing, or the lack thereof, is what's those who've filed suits to see Obamao's birth certificate from prevailing.
Richard Baker| 3.18.10 @ 8:18PM
Oda Mores:
So you believe then that the Constitution means nothing and defending it is an act of irrationality?
Oda Mores| 4.19.10 @ 8:08PM
No. I do believe Dr Levin is hiding behind the constitution in the same manner Darth Cheney disparaged it with the (get this) Patriot Act!
I do also believe this blog is only interested in agreement, not challent to your narrow dogma. Arf!
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 8:59PM
2010 Usa Fender Deluxe Stratocaster Strat Neck Plate | Electric Guitar Sales links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 8:59PM
2010 Usa Fender Deluxe Stratocaster Strat Neck Plate | Electric Guitar Sales links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
David| 3.18.10 @ 9:22PM
I think Mark could use some donations, where to send them?
2old2givea| 3.19.10 @ 2:18AM
Donations can always be made to Landmark Legal here (there's a button): http://www.landmarklegal.org/DesktopDefault.aspx
There is also a link to the preliminary draft of the brief on that page.
Jeff| 3.18.10 @ 9:26PM
In the trash. That is where Mr. Levin's lawsuit is going to get thrown. Either Mr. Levin is an idiot or he is posturing because there is no way ANY federal judge is going to invalidate Obamacare. The Supreme Court has already ruled deem and pass a legitimate legislative tool.
More specifically, the House IS going to vote on the bill. Pelosi isn't desperately rounding up 216 votes for fun. What they are going to do is "deem" the Senate Bill passed and vote on the amendments simultaneously. Like at the same time. The vote is not technically for the Senate Bill but they will still be voting to "deem" it passed. Get it? So while you may not like it, and it may make you want to throw a tantrum and scream about how Obama is the Anti Christ, it is not unconstitutional.
But dont let me stop you, get out your credit cards and donate. Morons.
Nick| 3.19.10 @ 12:15AM
Jeff,
"The Supreme Court has already ruled deem and pass a legitimate legislative tool."
Care to cite an actual case?
Jeff| 3.18.10 @ 9:38PM
Here is Norm Ornstein from the AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE. "Any veteran observer of Congress is used to the rampant hypocrisy over the use of parliamentary procedures that shifts totally from one side to the other as a majority moves to minority status, and vice versa. But I can’t recall a level of feigned indignation nearly as great as what we are seeing now from congressional Republicans and their acolytes at the Wall Street Journal, and on blogs, talk radio, and cable news. It reached a ridiculous level of misinformation and disinformation over the use of reconciliation, and now threatens to top that level over the projected use of a self-executing rule by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. In the last Congress that Republicans controlled, from 2005 to 2006, Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier used the self-executing rule more than 35 times, and was no stranger to the concept of “deem and pass.” That strategy, then decried by the House Democrats who are now using it, and now being called unconstitutional by WSJ editorialists, was defended by House Republicans in court (and upheld). Dreier used it for a $40 billion deficit reduction package so that his fellow GOPers could avoid an embarrassing vote on immigration. I don’t like self-executing rules by either party—I prefer the “regular order”—so I am not going to say this is a great idea by the Democrats. But even so—is there no shame anymore?"
I think he makes a very valid point. Conservative media, this magazine included, does a disservice to you, the reader. They inflame rhetoric and whip up the base so that no compromise is possible between the parties. The fact of the matter is, Obama's bill is a reasonable centrist effort at reforming our highly dysfunctional health care, which interestingly, is quite similar to the 1993 Republican plan. Probably never heard that. You may have legitimate policy disagreements but there is no way Obama's plan can, honestly, be construed as a Socialist plot which is going to destroy the country. Readers of this site should consider moving out their media cocoon and consider alternative viewpoints.
David Jack Smith| 3.20.10 @ 9:31AM
"Readers of this site should consider moving out their media cocoon and consider alternative viewpoints. "
You first Jeff.
Pingback| 3.18.10 @ 10:30PM
Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule « Citizen Right links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
PCP Smoker| 3.18.10 @ 10:41PM
Well written piece. Brother Levin and LLF, the last line in the sand before a citizens' revolt.
Jeff,
if you don't see the problem with ignoring the constitution, and "deeming" a bill passed when it wasn't voted on by the House, on this or any future issue, you are a fucking asshole drone and a moron who needs to be shot. I'll be happy to do it when the revolution begins.
Pingback| 3.19.10 @ 12:18AM
Potential Implications Of Obamacare’s Passage | The Hayride links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Yosemeti Sam| 3.19.10 @ 12:54AM
And if a scenario presents where the SCOTUS
ultimately determines CONSTITUTIONALLY of this BHO/HR democrat led sinisterism - would it not then be especially sweet poetic JUSTICE upon the SCOTUS slapping down the same ignoramus who in-their-face MOCKED their 3rd Branch of Govt during his last SOTU spiel?
Larry| 3.19.10 @ 1:00AM
Oh, please, Jeff. This is a "centrist" effort at reforming our health care system? An effective government takeover of one-sixth of our economy that is going to cost at least double the CBO's preliminary estimate (they heavily qualified their assessment today because they don't even know what the reconciliation language is going to look like), based on the phony assumptions the Democratic House leadership gave them? You define the "center" way too far to the left, and you have no clue where the center should truly be. A more "centrist" effort would entail making more modest reforms, such as allowing insurance to be purchased across state lines, to allow more consumer-driven health care plans and actually increase the use of HSAs, and to use coordinated state risk pools (with some help from the Federal government) to deal with the problem of pre-existing conditions. This is not even close, not even close, and it is NOT reasonable.
For Conservative Attorney Scholar: I have read the case you cite, and it is indeed formidable. But it can be factually distinguished in one important respect: we are not dealing with an alleged "missing" section of legislation. The real issue in Levin's case (aside from standing, which will be a formidable enough issue, I don't know if his standing arguments will prevail) is whether the House of Representatives may, under its power to make its own rules of procedure, may "deem" a controversial item of legislation passed in the Senate to be passed by the House without a direct, official vote on the Senate bill. That is what the Slaughter Rule implicates, because reconciliation cannot take place under current Federal budget laws except in connection with existing laws, and because each House of Congress effectively passed their own measures without properly reconciling them through conference committee. So if standing issues can be resolved favorably, there may be a chance to win on this issue. I don't think it is a great chance, but it is a chance worth taking in my opinion.
John II| 3.19.10 @ 2:16AM
Good response. But I'd still like to know how much Jeff gets paid by the DNC to drift in and out of websites with Obama-style obfuscation. I'd like to get in on some of that action, being a shameless parent with stiff tuition bills that I need to pay off to keep my own kids out of the left's corrupt and dysfunctional public school system.
Pingback| 3.19.10 @ 1:07AM
Blackwater Watch » Blog Archive » The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
darcy| 3.19.10 @ 1:21AM
Thank you, Larry, for your valuable input.
Miss Behavin| 3.19.10 @ 1:26AM
Don't worry about Obama ever declaring martial law. He will mis-read his teleprompter and declare marital law and everyone will think it has to do with gay weddings or polygamy or marryrin' your mare..
2012 is just around the corner. Another interview with Brett Baier ought to do it. Maybe a Roundatable discussion with Brett Baier, Brit Hume, Charles Krauthammer and His Royal Haughtiness.
watches| 3.19.10 @ 1:50AM
iamond watches we have tried to reach
href="http://www.beautywatches.com/category-38-b0.html">breitling watches their own place in the
Sue| 3.19.10 @ 1:59AM
Somehow I think he will not have standing.
We are being destroyed from within as promised.
Amazing we cannot seem to stop this Treason.
Pingback| 3.19.10 @ 2:00AM
Potential Implications Of Obamacare’s Passage | RedState links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Sowell Disciple| 3.19.10 @ 2:05AM
I'm now viewing Mark Levin as a present-day John Adams. We are a fortunate nation to have such a voice, providing a chance of redemption after collectively casting the most disastrous vote in our history.
Pingback| 3.19.10 @ 4:05AM
Credit Card Business Model Tested In Current Downturn links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.19.10 @ 5:09AM
Rebellion News links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
rayv| 3.19.10 @ 5:51AM
With each passing season,ray ban sunglasses sale styles change.ray ban 2010 sunglasses are like any other fashion accessory.So newer styles
can be seen at red-carpet and glamour queens on magazine covers andeventson the faces of Hollywood stars,at the same time,old
styles become the kind of ray ban wayfarer that "your grandmother used to wear,"Eventually those old styles stage comebacks as "retro"
ray ban sunglasses, and the fashion cycle comes full circle.
At the time,you can choose one kind of ray ban 2010 sunglasses if you guys want to look like Heath Ledger on the beach.
k962| 3.19.10 @ 6:13AM
Mark Levin a patriot! Let em have it Mark!
Pingback| 3.19.10 @ 6:30AM
The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.19.10 @ 6:30AM
The American Spectator : Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
jh| 3.19.10 @ 9:27AM
Why not have all the governors call a constitutional convention, only need 2/3 approve.
Aaron| 3.19.10 @ 12:03PM
Hell no! Can you imagine a constitutional convention whereby we replace the Franklins, Madisons, et al. with Pelosi, Reid, and the rest of the statist goons. In my opinion the risk to mischief which would fundamentally alter our society is much too great to countenance a constitutional convention.
Alan Jonas| 3.19.10 @ 12:40PM
It is with unbelievable relief that there is someone out there who has the courage and ability to prepare for this treason that is being perpetrated by the President, Congress and the Senate. Not only should there be a lawsuit, but these people should be IMMEDIATELY ARRESTED FOR TREASON and put in prison. This whole evolution of Obama's campaign for office and now the last year and few months of his being in office, just stuns and amazes me at the absolute blindness and stupidity of the American people by voting him into office. How America went DEAF, DUMB and BLIND to all the truth that was brought to our attention about him, the fact of the Socialist/Marxist/Muslim followings he pursued, somehow got swept under the rug. What was most humiliating to me was that my own people, after the annihilation of over 6 million of them in death camps and gas chambers, blindly voted for him and could not see the trappings of the very same raging evil from Hitler by following of the monotony of this mans regurgitated speeches that said nothing but lead everyone down a primrose path of stupidity. So just as the many Dictators of Europe crushed the countries around them, we have Obama, crushing America, something many have tried but failed. This is an insidious, evil, hateful man and THANK GOD FOR Mark Levin.
Pingback| 3.19.10 @ 12:59PM
Fender American Deluxe Tele New For 2010 Aged Cherry Sb | Electric Guitar Sales links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.19.10 @ 12:59PM
Fender American Deluxe Tele New For 2010 Aged Cherry Sb | Electric Guitar Sales links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
miss| 3.19.10 @ 1:43PM
God bless Mark Levin, go for it Mark!!!I agree with you Alan jonas. throw all these crooked polictians in to prison!! If Honduras can do it we can too!!! The feds can not mandate people to buy insurance. Lord have mercy on our souls if this horrible bill passes!!! I will go in to hiding!! It is the end of America as we know!!!
Pingback| 3.19.10 @ 2:01PM
Fender American Usa ‘57 Vintage Reissue Stratocaster | Electric Guitar Sales links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.19.10 @ 2:01PM
Fender American Usa ‘57 Vintage Reissue Stratocaster | Electric Guitar Sales links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
WAKE UP| 3.19.10 @ 4:17PM
Impeach. Now.
jen| 3.19.10 @ 10:12PM
I'll join the chant:
Impeach. Now.
AuntieMadder| 3.20.10 @ 1:43AM
Impeach. Now.
Teamwork| 3.20.10 @ 2:50AM
He whos deligths in slaughter will not succeed in his ambition to rule the world.
As the best DVD Creator software, FLV to DVD can easily can quickly burn FLV files to DVD Disc, convert FLV to DVD Video, decode FLV movie to ISO files. With just a few clicks, you can convert FLV to DVD with superfast speed and high quality.
FLV to DVD Mac-specially designed for Mac OS X users, including snow leopard
Pingback| 3.20.10 @ 3:39AM
NHL Scoring Machine: Phil Esposito « Thorbjorn Ljunglof.com links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
David Jack Smith| 3.20.10 @ 9:27AM
Let's assume that the power-crazed, Lumpen Marxetariat cabal currently controlling the Democrats, in congress and the White House, succeed in their Demon Pass.
One minute after that vote, they are going to be buried in an avalanche of law suits challenging them on many levels. The one filed by Mark Levin and the Landmark Legal Foundation may make it to the Supreme Court..
Which makes me wonder: will Obama's egregious attempt to humiliate sitting justices, at his first State of the Union address, come back to haunt him?
His arrogant and classless remarks began with factual inaccuracies (as in: YOU LIE) about the 1st Amendment case. He then petulantly blathered on in a manner that can only be read as a DIRECT CHALLENGE to the constitutional role of the Supreme Court from the other two co-equal branches. That is: the SC as the final arbiters of what is, and what is NOT, legislatively constitutional.
Well guess what Mr President, opponents of the Democrats' instinctive totalitarian ideology are going to have their day in court. The Supreme Court.
Underpinning these cases will be a challenge to the idea that the Congress and the Executive can cook the legislative books to enact legislation contrary to the articles enumerated in the constitution; and also, as a byproduct, usurping the power of the Supreme Court.
I think even Justice Ginsberg will not go along with opening the door to unfettered legislative fiat that relies on being deemed passed.
And I suspect that at least five Justices, (the ones whom you insulted to their faces by lying about a decision they had just made), will not forget your worrying instinct to bypass the constitution at your will, Mr President. Well done.
Grandma| 3.20.10 @ 10:41AM
you go Mark, Thank you for your support of America, we can take this country back and certainly will with your knowledge and help. You and Hannity, Boortz, Cavuito, Rush and all the great brilliant ones are our hope for the future.
E Pennington| 3.20.10 @ 10:58AM
Thank You Mark!!! It is so ironic that in only one year all that, was so media driven about the greatness of this President is now out of their control. The tea parties are gaining momentum and the people's voices are starting to be louder then the elite media. For this past year we have watched our Consitution be stepped on over and over. Thank God for people like you that will lead the charge to get it back in step ,for the good of All Americans. Without our Constitution , America looses it's greatness, and we will loose ONE COUNTRY UNDER GOD!
IMPEACH THESE DIRTBAGS!!!!| 3.20.10 @ 11:43AM
Thank you, Mark Levin, for speaking for a majority of Christian, Conservative Americans who want our Constitution brought back into compliance. We need to totally clean Washington with bleach and start over. Those who voted for this "President" are beginning to see what he's really like!!!!!
Pingback| 3.21.10 @ 3:18AM
Phil Esposito’s Rampage On The NHL Record Book links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Michele San Pietro| 3.21.10 @ 11:03AM
Because of Obama, freedom in the United States and in the entire free world is seriously at risk. Obama must be stopped before it is too late!
Lillian Partos| 3.21.10 @ 12:48PM
We the American people can not stand by while Obama destroys our county. Mr. Levin we are with you 100%. God bless you!
Lillian Partos| 3.21.10 @ 12:48PM
We the American people can not stand by while Obama destroys our county. Mr. Levin we are with you 100%. God bless you!
Stephen S| 3.23.10 @ 12:44AM
I am an American "person" Lilly and I couldn't disagree with you more.
Johnny M.| 3.22.10 @ 2:53AM
New World Order - 666 -
jinder| 3.22.10 @ 1:07PM
leving is going to do squat, he needs to get it out of his head, HE IS A NOBODY...what government wants is what government gets..unless the people rise and stop them..not some guy in his bunker.
Pingback| 3.22.10 @ 2:57PM
Lawyer Don Hecker Narration » Blog Archive » Mark Levin Has His Lawsuit Ready links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Stephen S| 3.23.10 @ 12:41AM
Levin touts Goldline International incessantly on his radio show. Take a look at this "ripoof report about these scammers. http://www.ripoffreport.com/In.....-3ab95.htm
or how about this one http://www.ripoffreport.com/in.....-642f5.htm I don't see how anyone could call Levin "The Great One." His sophmoric and downright nasty name calling and his screaming and yelling totally devalue any arguments he tries to make. I personally find him to be a despicable human being.
Pingback| 3.23.10 @ 12:19PM
Health Care Rebellion: Lessons From Martin Luther King | America Watches Obama links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.24.10 @ 12:39AM
This Ain’t No Waterloo « A View from the Right links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.24.10 @ 3:31AM
This Ain't No Waterloo | Liberty Scorned links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
http://www.us-chaneloutlet.com| 4.3.10 @ 3:23AM
Starting tomorrow, chanel 2010 is moving its SoHo store into a temporary 10,700 square foot duplex store at 134 Spring Street. Its current shop across the street at 139 Spring will be closed for renovations until mid-September.
Rents in the immediate area run around $300 a foot for the ground floor.
Visit the official Chanel website :newest chanel
vibram five fingers sprint| 4.25.10 @ 11:33AM
http://www.glauke.com/Wholesale-mens-kso_c782
LET ME TELL YOU | 5.29.10 @ 12:04AM
christian louboutin let me tell you
Brands watches| 6.28.10 @ 11:32AM
Brands watches
Breitling Bentley | 7.28.10 @ 11:06AM
Breitling Bentley Silver Dial With Date Edition - Men
iPad to iTunes Transfer| 11.21.10 @ 12:19AM
iPad to iTunes Transfer ia an all-in-one ipad transfer tool. United four tools into one, this iPad to iTunes Transfer can be considerred as the best assistant when dealing with iPad stuffs. As an iPad uer, you can use iPad to iTunes Transfer as a iPad to Computer Transfer, Computer to iPad Transfer, iPad Converter, DVD to iPad Transfer, even it can be used as a hard drive to manage iPad files in good order.
shoes pumps| 3.20.11 @ 8:49PM
shoes-pumps
handbags| 3.20.11 @ 8:50PM
handbags
سوريا| 6.25.11 @ 12:01AM
goooood
http://www.soryh.com
office 2010| 9.3.11 @ 5:41AM
http://julysoftware.com