A case of purposely mistaken political identity.
WASHINGTON — There has been yet another eruption of violence from what our Liberal friends a year or so ago were wont to call “the Angry Left.” However, if you read the Washington Post you might think this recent outburst of violence came from talk radio.
The angry leftist behind the violence is John Patrick Bedell, 36, who on the evening of March 4 walked up to an entrance of the Pentagon, pulled a gun on two Pentagon guards, Jeffrey Amos and Marvin Carraway, and was shot dead. Both guards were wounded.
In the aftermath of this attack it was reported that Bedell was a pot-smoking intellectualoid from California who left word on the Internet that according to his findings a “coup regime” took over Washington at the time of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, and has governed the country “up to the present day.” What is more, the “coup regime,” according to Bedell, was complicit in 9/11. This judgment might strike you as extreme, but apparently it is not, at least not on the left. You will recall that President Barack Obama’s recently resigned environmental, czar, Van Jones, had signed a petition to this effect before being invited into the Administration.
In the Post’s report on Bedell’s assault — headlined “Pentagon Shooter’s Erratic Journey” — a high school classmate recalled: “I remember him [Bedell] being a sweet-natured, funny peacenik.” Another acquaintance reported to the Post that Bedell was a heavy marijuana user, and elsewhere one of Bedell’s brothers reported that he was a perpetual student who so far as the brother knew never held a job while bouncing from campus to campus and developing his esoteric theories. All in all, this glassy-eyed ideologue was surely a man of the left, the infantile left to be sure, but the left.
Nonetheless in the Post’s companion piece analyzing Bedell’s assault and appearing on page one under the headline “The Disaffected Lashing Out at Symbols of Power,” Post reporters write of “Bedell’s rampage as a distorted manifestation of the anti-Washington view that has driven the rise of right-wing militias.” Yes, they said “right-wing militias.” Then just a few paragraphs away from the Post’s news report of Bedell being a pothead and a “sweet-natured, funny peacenik,” the Post analytical piece gibbers on about “militias and hate groups” that “are interlinked to a much greater degree by the Web and mainstream radio and TV talk shows that echo many of the same viewpoints.” So if Post readers think Rush Limbaugh had a hand in the recent assault on the Pentagon, they can be forgiven.
Now I actually listen to talk radio from time to time, and I cannot recall ever hearing one of the conservative talk hosts “echo[ing] many of the same viewpoints” of the wretched Bedell or any other member of the Angry Left. For that matter, I cannot imagine any member of the Angry Left finding himself in accord with conservative talk radio. How does one explain the Post’s analysis, which is contradicted so starkly by the Post’s news report? Does anyone edit the newspaper today?
My explanation is that some journalists are actually very pious people. They have a deep faith in their heroes, and the Angry Left remains revered in these journalists’ trusting minds. They see a California pothead, who shares Van Jones’s suspicion that the Bush Administration was complicit in 9/11, attempt to gun down Pentagon guards, and they want to change the subject. They change the topic to “right-wing militias.” Unsatisfied with that act of legerdemain, they bring in talk radio and TV talk shows. It has all happened before.
On November 22, 1963, an American Communist, Lee Harvey Oswald, who admired the Cuban Revolution, gunned down JFK in Dallas, Texas, and the same kind of pious journalists caught gibbering in the Post the other day fastened the nation’s attention not on left-wing violence but on right-wing critics of Kennedy living otherwise peaceful lives in Dallas. The violent potential of militant leftists was never pondered, though America was about to enter into a decade of protest that witnessed leftists burning down university buildings, bombing R.O.T.C. facilities, and otherwise committing acts of violence on behalf of peace and a better world.
Thus John Patrick Bedell, a life-long member of the Angry Left, gets himself killed while assaulting the Pentagon, and the pious journalists at the Washington Post lump the poor guy in with right-wing militias. It is shoddy journalism. Much worse, it is a shocking act of disrespect for the dead.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online