Often controversial, egotistical, and mercurial, but always interesting and entertaining.
(Page 2 of 2)
Of course, I’m referring to the events of March 30, 1981. At 2:25 PM that afternoon, President Ronald Reagan was struck by a bullet as he exited the Washington Hilton after a speech. For decades, Haig’s subsequent reaction has been portrayed in the press as petulant and dictatorial. Bill Clark, however, as Haig’s deputy at State, was there to observe each and every Haig step. He retraced those steps for me a few years ago:
Clark was at the State Department when he got word that Reagan had been shot. He was with Secretary Haig, who said to him, “I’ll go over there,” meaning the White House, “and you man the ship here.” Haig steadily ordered: “Bill, stand by. We’ll have to get out a proper statement for the benefit of our allies and ‘non-friends,’ assuring them that all is well.”
Haig raced to the White House to the center of activity in the Situation Room. He and Clark remained in direct communication by secure phone.
The common wisdom is that Haig then over-asserted himself by trying to seize the reins of government. “I’m in charge!” he reportedly declared as he stomped into the Situation Room at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Clark here interjects: He says it is unfair to characterize Haig’s infamous words as reflective of a desire to take over the presidency, to leapfrog the Constitutional process requiring Vice President Bush to fill the gap. Importantly, the vice president was not present at that moment, meaning that someone needed to take command, and right away. Rather, says Clark, Haig was merely seeking order in the Situation Room and wanted to quickly issue statements making it clear to the world that all was operating smoothly atop the world’s greatest power. This was, after all, a tense Cold War period, and one never knew how the Soviets might react.
“That place was in great confusion and the vice president was in the air,” says Clark. “Al reminded people that as the primary cabinet member he was going to take charge of the meeting, not of the White House. So some of his detractors I think overplayed the meaning of what he said…. What he said was correct — that he heads the national security interest, that he’s the primary cabinet member. So, he did take charge in attempting to get a statement written and in trying to calm the others who were present.”
Moreover, Al Haig knew what to do because of his difficult experiences in the tumultuous Nixon administration. “He had been through a lot in the Nixon years,” adds Clark. There had been low periods for Nixon during which Haig effectively served as president. So, on March 30, 1981, Haig knew what to do better than anyone in that room. “He was not trying to take over the government,” says Clark. “That is inaccurate.”
Establishing order was Al Haig’s charge that day. He did the right thing.
Overall, Clark summed up Al Haig nicely: “Haig would drive us nuts,” said Clark. “He always felt he could do a better job than Ronald Reagan. But I loved the guy anyway.”
Alexander Haig was far from perfect, but aren’t we all? He left the world a more interesting place, and one not as black-and-white as his critics suggest.
Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City College. His books include The Judge: William P. Clark, Ronald Reagan’s Top Hand and The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online
jcm| 2.22.10 @ 7:38AM
Don't be so dismissive of his role as "Deep Throat." There is some evidence that he may have been one of the information pipelines to Woodward. Woodward lied about his former military role as a briefer to Haig in 1969, and Haig never volunteered the truth, either. No, not a smoking gun but not exactly a grassy knoll, either.
Hardcard| 2.22.10 @ 10:10AM
God bless you! Thank You General Haig R.I.P.
S.L. Toddard | 2.22.10 @ 10:38AM
“The notion that the United States can remake the world in its own image, on its own, as a reaction to violence from abroad dates from Woodrow Wilson’s time. It’s an old populist con detached from reality; calling it a neo-con doesn’t make it any better. Does anyone believe that the United States can turn Afghanistan and Iraq into thriving democracies; reconcile India and Pakistan; transform the Middle East and do it all with a 10-division army and a $500 billion deficit?”
~ General Alexander Haig
Red Phillips | 2.22.10 @ 1:39PM
I think Haig was more of an old school realist than a non-intervetionist, but he was right on about this.
S.L. Toddard| 2.22.10 @ 10:42AM
"Haig simply didn't seem to have the patience for the presidency, nor for the singular project of governing the globe"
Governing the globe, eh?
jomo2009| 2.22.10 @ 1:00PM
Despite the problems during his fifteen months as secretary of state, Al Haig was a true American patriot. RIP
Pingback| 2.22.10 @ 1:10PM
Glen Meakem Program » In Memoriam: Al Haig’s Charge links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Duscany| 2.22.10 @ 7:03PM
I never heard Haig speak when I didn't think he was in over his head.
Howard| 2.22.10 @ 7:31PM
One position that Haig had was President of United Technologies. This was I believe during the Carter years. There was some monkey business between United Technologies and Marcos of the Philippines. I think that Haig was not as pure as the driven snow in that caper.
Pingback| 2.23.10 @ 1:21AM
Rebellion News links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Yosemeti Sam| 2.23.10 @ 10:34AM
Re column - "Is our Children Learning?"
To American Spectator:
Appears I strike Liberal/Leftist nerves.
Do you or do you not validate email addresses
with posts?
You let an asshole - pardon the shorthand -
speak as if he were me.
Get your AS act together!
Do you have hacker firewalls - at all?
If not - moving on!
AS Webmaster - what's up with this compromise?
stmichrick| 2.23.10 @ 9:53PM
General Haig was a patriot and filled a valuable void, bridging the Nixon and Ford presidencies.
He also falls into the same mold as Wesley Clark and Colin Powell; military men who reached the pinnacle of that institution and think they know how to do it in the political arena. They don't.
They make fools of themselves playing the contrarian and having things both ways; they are totally unconvincing as civilian leaders. Somehow Eisenhower didn't come off that way, but he didn't get the media coverage these guys did. Thank God.
Pingback| 3.6.10 @ 4:33AM
Al Haig Blogs | Tech News links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 4.14.10 @ 10:37PM
What People Are Saying About Al Haig | Broadcasting News links to this page. Here’s an excerpt: