The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

On the Prowl

On the Prowl

Janet Jitters

According to former Obama transition team members, the selection of Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano to serve as Secretary of Homeland Security was one of the more contentious choices that the newly elected president had to make.

“At the time, I recall that illegal immigration was thought to be a potential big issue coming down the pike, and that Napolitano would be someone with the background to shift DHS’s mission away from terrorism to more domestic security issues,” says a former transition team member. “And she met certain diversity requirements the president-elect set forth.”

Napolitano’s seeming lack of foreign affairs and national security background, and her apparent inability to step up to internal administration political challenges, are now being blamed, in part, for the fallout from the failed Christmas Day attempted bombing of a Detroit-bound Northwest Airlines flight, which exposed weaknesses in both DHS’s Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and the Obama administration’s intelligence agencies.

“We’ve had unfilled positions at DHS for months, and Napolitano has not been a strong advocate to fill those slots,” says the former transition team member. “You get the sense she’s just happy to be here.”

At press time, there were growing calls for Napolitano to resign, and in the face of those calls, she announced she and other senior DHS officials were embarking on a global listening tour to set new, cooperative airport security measures.

GOP Brown Out

The campaign of Massachusetts Republican U.S. Senate candidate Scott Brown again put the spotlight on the role national Republican political organizations — specifically, the Republican National Committee, the National Republican Senatorial Committee, and the National Republican Congressional Committee — play in the electoral process.

Massachusetts Republican Party officials are claiming that Brown, who challenged the Democratic nominee, Attorney General Martha Coakley, in the January 19 special election to fill the late Ted Kennedy’s seat, received almost no support from the national party infrastructure.

Sources inside the RNC and NRSC say that because polling showed that Brown had next to no chance of winning, the party did not invest in the race. But conservatives and Republican Party operatives who don’t have ties to either the RNC or NRSC say that the lack of support had less to do with Brown’s polling, and more to do with the fact that Brown was not either organization’s first choice to challenge for the seat.

“If the NRSC doesn’t get the man or woman they want to run, they take their marbles and go home and sulk,” says one Republican political consultant. “And if they get their candidate, they do what they can to destroy any other Republican who dares to challenge them.”

As an example, most consultants point to the Florida Senate race, where the NRSC recruited Gov. Charlie Crist to run to fill the seat vacated by Sen. Mel Martinez. Crist is at best a moderate Republican, but one who has a strong fundraising network across the state.

“The Crist decision was all about easing fundraising pressure from the NRSC and RNC and getting a candidate who could run without a huge investment from the NRSC to get the campaign off the ground,” says the consultant. “It had nothing to do with whether Crist was the best Republican for the job.” At one point, as Crist’s primary challenger, Marco Rubio, gained in the polls, anti-Rubio videos started appearing online, backed by staff for the NRSC. Those ads were pulled after outcries from grassroots conservatives.

Sen. John Cornyn, who is chairing the NRSC for this election cycle, has taken heat for essentially endorsing Crist, and has since pulled the committee back from endorsing candidates as quickly as it has. This is largely due to the pressure placed on the NRSC by Sen. Jim DeMint, who has taken to endorsing and supporting conservative Republican candidates, sometimes pitting his candidate against the NRSC.

The RNC situation, say political consultants, is far more complicated. While national fundraising has been good, there continues to be a steady stream of disenchanted chatter about national chairman Michael Steele, who has inserted himself into a number of political and policy debates on Capitol Hill, and been a regular face and voice on cable TV and talk radio.

Page: 1 2  

Letter to the Editor View all comments (16) |

Brian Walsh | 2.27.10 @ 6:00PM

As the Communications Director for the NRSC, I take exception to a number of things written above because they are flat out inaccurate. First, I don't who you are claiming as "sources inside the NRSC" but I know for a fact that no one from the Spectator spoke with anyone at our organization. Frankly, it's disappointing that you did not because your statements about the MA Senate race would have been easily disproven. I would direct your attention for example to this January 21st story in Politico that reports on the NRSC's role in Massachusetts -
http://www.politico.com/news/s.....31639.html

In fact, both the NRSC and the RNC not only spent money in this race, but contributed important manpower and other resources. Of course, the lion's share of the credit rightfully goes to Scott Brown who was a great candidate and ran a great race, but to report to your readers that the NRSC was not involved is inaccurate.

In that same vein of inaccurate reporting, you write about anti-Rubio videos "backed by staff for the NRSC." I don't have any idea what videos you're referring to but can say publicly that NRSC staff have had no involvement with any such videos.

Again, had anyone at the Spectator contacted us prior to posting this, I would have been happy to address it. It's my hope that you will quickly correct this inaccurate item and call or email us in the future when writing about the NRSC. Thank you.

Regards,
Brian Walsh

Alan Brooks| 2.28.10 @ 1:26AM

Now we know why Reagan Democrats exist. You people have inflated images of yourselves as hotshots;
"the NRSC thought Brown would lose..."
Well, it IS Massachusetts, not SC. And Walsh says different.
Prima Donnas all.

It appears Obama's ego is less inflated than you people and your egos; you still wonder why he beat you in '08??
He is sure to be re-elected, as Clinton was. And Obama's personal morality is higher than Clinton's.

mbt| 3.15.10 @ 9:46PM

Our shop that mainly engaged in mbt Brands,where sale MBT shoes.MBT shoe is a perfect shoe,which be for physiological.Here you can enjoy discount mbt shoes without tax.you can buy cheap mbt shoes which have a positive effect on our body.

Puma x Alexander McQueen | 8.12.11 @ 11:03PM

is good

More Articles From On the Prowl

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/02/13/on-the-prowl

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

Obama's Unaffordable Act

Peter Ferrara | 6.19.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

ADVERTISEMENT