The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Asking and Telling

Fascination over Palin and Hillary. Gays in the military. Christians and the State Department and more!

(Page 4 of 4)

It’s a boondogle!
— Dan Gebow

SUBSIDIZING WELFARE STATES
Re: Doug Bandow’s The Cold War Is History:

While it would be imprudent to totally abandon NATO it is time we begin looking for ways to cut back on U.S. defense expenditures in Europe. When President Bush wisely proposed scaling back on overseas bases, there was catcall from faux war hero John Kerry. Meanwhile, European politicians were worried about the loss of revenue, Democrats and conservatives — they were all wrong.  Europe must be forced to defend itself, because thanks to Barack Obama and Democrats the U.S. cannot continue funding foreign “military welfare programs” in Europe. With their reckless spending and bankrupt domestic agenda, Democrats are imperiling the U.S. military at a time when it must be focused on eliminating the threat of Islamic imperialism (a force Europe would rather coddle than fight).

While I’m not advocating closing all bases in Europe it would be wise to consider strategic downsizing and the first place to cut is the U.S. Army’s presence in Germany. British Tory Liam Fox is right, “For NATO to work properly as a security alliance in the post Cold War world, NATO members must have the willingness to take equal risks with regards to supplying troops and equipment.” He is also correct when he opines it is time for Britain to end its military presence in Germany.  The Soviet Union no longer exists, its massive horde of tanks rolling across Central Europe is no longer a threat, so there is no need for the U.S. to maintain expensive Army bases in Germany. The billions spent there on the Army would be better spent on the F-22 Raptor and increasing the size of the Navy. Both weapons systems are more essential to the defense of the U.S. and its power projection than “resorts” in lovely Bavaria. 

France and Germany want  to be players on the world stage and plan to dominate the E.U. — let them by shouldering the defense of their continent. There is also the issue that some of the host nations are hostile to the U.S., because of its dominance in the world.   To make them happy we should get the hell out of their countries as fast as possible. The socialists of Spain are far more interested in currying the favor of Islamic extremists than the U.S. military so maybe we should consider closing the Navy base at Rota. The U.S. military does not exist as a source of revenue for bankrupt leftist governments in Europe. Its purpose is to defend America and make life hell for this country’s enemies.

The time has come for the U.S. to end it financial subsidies to Europe’s military forces and their welfare states.
— Michael Tomlinson
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina

SUFFERING
Re: Jay D. Homnick’s A Thousand Points of Lightness:

With all due respect to Mr. Homnick, always very amusing to read, President Obama cannot “defeat the law of gravity” (not to mention gravity itself), and this will be his undoing. In the end, reality is what it is, and all the progressive nostrums in the world won’t change that. The only question is how much the rest of us will have to suffer, and for how long, until sanity returns. Happily, Americans don’t suffer suffering as some other peoples do, and it already appears that they have had enough. The next many months, and beyond that, two years or so, should be fun to watch; something about “reaping the whirlwind” comes to mind.
D. Reich

Auburn New York

THE MANDATE FROM HEAVEN
Re: Jeffrey Lord’s The Running of the Bulls: Is Harry Reid the Next Scott Lucas?:

I once ran across the theory that with those elected politicians who serve for long periods of time, after awhile the old generation that elected them dies out and a new generation comes in. These new voters “know of” the politician, but they don’t “know” him — he doesn’t campaign that much, they don’t hear him on radio (or, later, see him on TV), and they don’t get to know him in a way that will make them vote for him. Especially if someone they do know, and do want to vote for, comes along.   In any government, one’s Mandate from Heaven can run out abruptly, and any leader who loses sight of that might lose sight of other things.
— Robert Nowall
Cape Coral, Florida

Page: ‹ First   2 34

Letter to the Editor View all comments (22) |

Bob Vogler| 2.12.10 @ 12:33PM

Re Mr. Roy W. Hogue's letter:

Good point, except the nearest star (the tri-star Alpha Centauri system) is 4.3 light-years from our sun, not 30 light years. Either way, though, that's a lot of "are we there yet?"

Alan Brooks| 2.13.10 @ 7:15PM

Does anyone really think Palin will be ready for the presidency in less than three years?
Don't fall for your own chirpiness.

TJ from Texas| 2.12.10 @ 2:38PM

Glad to see Mimi back. Also (Chaplain) Michael Tomlinson. But if TAS only run's this section once a week, we miss out on other voices. I miss ol' Miss Gunn down home wisdom. Kessle, he gets me a head scratching and sometimes laughing.

Am I the only one of you all who miss the Readers Mail two three times a week?

G. Dominican| 2.13.10 @ 1:03AM

Mr. Welsh of Nehalem, Oregon, is sadly misinformed about what the vast majority of Oregon PERS members receive at retirement. See the data posted by the state below:
From PERS by the numbers, November 2009.

Alan Brooks| 2.13.10 @ 7:22PM

still, Welsh got one thing right:

"Of course when the system collapses, as it inevitably will, 110% of nothing won't be much, will it?
-- Jim Welsh"

Whether it is 50 percent or 110 percent of nothing, nothing from nothing equals nothing.

Pecos Pete| 2.13.10 @ 1:02PM

Hey TJ:

I agree with you ... Readers Mail needs to be posted more than once a week.

Pecos Pete| 2.14.10 @ 1:05PM

Pecos Pete,

Hand, that's gotta be a Texas handle. I'm in Bryan, near College Station. You?

Anyway, I enjoy the reader's section as much as the regular columns. I don't see why we don't have it twice or three times a week. Seems a bit lazy not to have it regular like.

I like Bev's stuff. Mimi's poems always worth a smile. Chaps is good too. Kessel (sorry, got the spelling wrong last time) is often wry and on point. Amos has his good days too.

Bottom line, gotta let the cattle run more than once a week or they get cramped up.

TJ from Texas| 2.14.10 @ 1:14PM

The above post is from me, TJ, but TAS done got its lasso tangled and put it as Pecos Pete's.

Alan Brooks| 2.13.10 @ 5:11PM

"It will not be Palin vs Obama in 2012..."

No, Palin wont be ready by then. She has a long row to go before being of Thatcher calibre.
Besides, as the left underestimates Palin, YOU people are underestimating Obama. He WILL be re-elected.

Richard Baker| 2.14.10 @ 11:44AM

Obama will be lucky if his own Party doesn't lead the way to Impeachment.

Alan Brooks| 2.14.10 @ 4:58PM

Impeachment? Clinton was impeached. Lot of good it did you guys here. You guys are inverse of Corleones: you underestimate your enemies vices and overestimate your own virtues.

You don't want to be a false prophet concerning Obama, as you were on Clinton 15 years ago?
Save your GOP Koolaid for friends and family.

PacRim Jim | 2.15.10 @ 4:04AM

The point of having the bases in Europe and Japan is logistical. The equipment needed in distant conflicts is prepositioned to shorten supply lines and to deter those who might doubt Americans ability (and will) to ship equipment thousands of miles. Moreover, the German and Japanese governments pay for much of the costs of the bases. The rationale is more complex than is discussed in the letters.

Puma x Alexander McQueen | 8.12.11 @ 11:11PM

is good

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/02/12/asking-and-telling

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

USPS: Radical Surgery Needed

Peter Hannaford | 5.17.13

ADVERTISEMENT