There’s plenty out there preferable to the monstrosity Congress has proposed.
WASHINGTON — Well you might ask in the aftermath of the Democrats’ unseemly frenzy to create a healthcare reform that restrains expenses and extends healthcare to those who need or want it, is there an alternative? Through all the Democrats’ wheeling, dealing, and spilling of red ink, sensible healthcare innovations have been available. They are modern reforms that have been hammered out in conservative think tanks over the years. Wherever they have been tried they have shown promise. Yet during the Democrats’ Capitol Hill revels they have hardly been heard of. Allow me to suggest a modest healthcare alternative to what is commonly called the present Congress’s healthcare monstrosity.
The United States spends more than twice what the average industrialized nation spends on healthcare. Though, forget not, that American healthcare is the best in the world. Equally significant, the cost of healthcare is growing at just under 5% annually, a leading reason that some Americans are not insured and that Medicare and Medicaid are heading for financial ruin. A major reason for this rising cost is the Federal tax code’s exclusion of employer-provided health insurance. This is unfair to those who must purchase insurance with after-tax dollars. Moreover, it blinds consumers of employer-provided healthcare to the real costs of their healthcare and puts pressure upwards on healthcare’s costs.
The solution is to be found in bringing healthcare to the market place. End the tax-deductibility of employer-provided healthcare. Allow every citizen, except those enrolled in Medicare or in a military health plan, to receive a refundable tax credit to purchase Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). The key thing is that people should have a choice of plans. The tax credit should be available not only to those who purchase HSAs. Some people, for instance, have higher medical costs, so they may prefer a more comprehensive policy. But we could encourage more widespread use of HSAs by raising the cap on the amount of money that people could put in them. Also, owners of HSAs should be allowed to purchase health insurance in any state in the country. The money should be applicable to those employer-sponsored plans still available or to any healthcare plan an individual or family chooses, thus allowing product competition. Unused money in each account should be rolled over in succeeding years, and whatever money remains in each account should be part of an account holder’s estate upon death.
An additional twist to this might be to allow people with HSAs to pay for their healthcare expenses by drawing down from a healthcare debit card. This would be particularly desirable if healthcare were administered through a patient’s local hospital. Administering healthcare payments through hospitals is an innovation recently suggested by Hunt Lawrence, a New York investor and successful entrepreneur who has reviewed the American healthcare system and believes hospitals could compete successfully with insurers while offering a broader range of services. With his, admittedly ambitious reform, hospitals could simultaneously monitor a patient’s bills and health conditions. Furthermore the hospital could neatly maintain the patient’s health records, which would be portable for the patient in the event of moving from one locale to another. Of course, patients would be free to change hospitals, thus introducing competition among hospitals.
Also let us have tort reform. Reckless malpractice lawsuits account for at least half a trillion dollars in wasted healthcare expenses annually, through jackpot lawsuits and the unnecessary tests prescribed by doctors fearful of the reach of trial lawyers.
Finally for those who are impoverished and unable to pay for healthcare, let the government give them vouchers to pay for their medical expenses up to a certain amount annually.
Whatever the consequences of the Democrats’ 2009 healthcare monstrosity, conservatives should redouble their efforts to repeal its archaic collectivist requirements, if they ever become policy. Notwithstanding their promises to lower healthcare costs, the collectivists are going to increase those costs by a huge amount while reverting to government rationing and control of doctor-patient relations.
So here are some modest proposals that I have gathered up from thoughtful work that has been done in conservative think tanks and by conservative reformers. An omnium-gatherum of such domestic reforms can be found in Congressman Paul D. Ryan’s “A Road Map for America’s Future,” which is available on the Wisconsin Republican’s website. As conservatives mount their challenge to the Democratic reactionaries’ revived Great Society, replete with huge deficits and Stagflation II, I prescribe Ryan’s Road Map. Conservatives do have an alternative to economic ruin.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?