By Robert Stacy McCain on 1.18.10 @ 6:08AM
Tuesday's Massachusetts election could signal a Revolution.
BOSTON, Mass. -- Valerie LaCasse stood in sub-freezing cold
Saturday evening in Middleboro awaiting the arrival of Senate
candidate Scott Brown. She was one of hundreds who turned out in
Everett Square for a chance to meet the Republican whose surging
campaign has sent political shockwaves through Massachusetts.
LaCasse is a lifelong Democrat who voted for both Barack
Obama and Ted Kennedy. It was Kennedy's death in August that
created the vacancy to be filled by Tuesday's special election,
but LaCasse won't be voting for Democrat Martha Coakley.
"I never warmed up to her," the Acushnet resident said of
Coakley. "When she took that break at Christmas, that really
irritated me -- that she wasn't out campaigning door-to-door like
[Brown] was."
LaCasse is certainly not the only Democrat swept up in the
phenomenal groundswell of support for the GOP state senator who
was barely known outside his district six weeks ago. One elected
Democratic official -- although required by the state party to
support Coakley publicly -- privately admitted over the weekend
that he will vote Tuesday for Brown, as will his wife.
Coakley was "mailing it in" on the senatorial campaign
trail, the official said, relating how in his own election, he
had gone door-to-door "seven days a week" soliciting votes. After
winning the Dec. 8 Democratic primary, however, Coakley seemed to
shift into neutral, expecting to coast easily to victory in the
general election. She even took a six-day vacation from
campaigning in December.
As polls increasingly point toward a victory for Brown,
criticisms of the blunder-prone Coakley campaign are being heard
from many quarters. Friday in Boston's North End, while Rudy
Giuliani was in town to campaign for Brown, longtime Boston
newspaper columnist Mike Barnicle stood on Hanover Street and
shook his head when asked about Coakley.
"I've never seen a worse campaign for a Democrat," said
Barnicle, a liberal who is a regular commentator on MSNBC. "It's
an election, not a coronation."
Coakley's aloof personality, disastrous gaffes and
strategic miscalculations may become a convenient explanation if,
as many Massachusetts political observers now expect, the
Democrat loses Tuesday. If her defeat can be explained in
strictly tactical terms -- a bad campaign by a clueless candidate
-- then liberals can argue that the election is neither a
negative referendum on the first year of the Obama administration
nor a harbinger of dismal Democratic prospects in the November
mid-terms.
Such a narrow interpretation of this Massachusetts election
-- "The Scott Heard 'Round the World," as Brown's supporters like
to say -- ignores the extent to which the Republican has
emphasized conservative stances on key issues, including health
care, economic policy and national security.
A lieutenant colonel in the National Guard, Brown has
relentlessly criticized the Obama administration's decision to
grant civilian trials to accused foreign terrorists like Khalid
Sheikh Mohammed and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. Giuliani
pounded that theme Friday while campaigning with Brown here,
slamming Coakley for her assertion during a debate last week that
terrorists were "gone" from Afghanistan.
"What the heck does she think we're doing
there?" the former New York mayor said.
Brown has also been a consistent critic of the economic
stimulus bill that President Obama pushed through Congress last
year. "The fact is the stimulus has not worked. Not
one new job has been created in Massachusetts, or anywhere in the
nation," Brown said in one of his earliest campaign statements.
"Our country can't afford any more stimulus spending that adds to
our deficit without adding to employment."
More than anything else, however, it is Brown's opposition
to the Democrats' pending health-care legislation that turned the
Massachusetts election into a crusade for conservatives
nationwide. The Republican has vowed to be the "41st vote"
against the bill, preventing Senate Democrats from maintaining
the filibuster-proof supermajority needed for final
approval.
While it has been speculated that Democrats may find some
procedural means of bypassing that obstacle, to do so would be to
ignore the clear message of this campaign. If opposition to the
administration's health-care policy can spur the election of a
Republican in one of the nation's most liberal states, Brown's
election would be an emphatic "no" in what is tantamount to a
referendum on Obama's first year in office.
The energy and enthusiasm of Brown's campaign here in
recent days is unprecedented for any Republican candidate in
Massachusetts, longtime residents say. Among the crowd who waited
in the cold Saturday evening in Middleboro for the arrival of
Brown's "Bold New Leadership" tour bus was Dick Glidden, a Navy
veteran of World War II.
"In all my years," said the 85-year-old local, "I've never
seen anything like this."
topics:
U.S. Senate Races 2010, Scott Brown, Martha Coakley