Whatever Moscow wants it slowly gets — as Ukraine’s upcoming elections will likely confirm.
Word has long made the rounds in Moscow that the Kremlin would consider expansion of NATO that includes Ukraine to be an outright military threat to the Russian Federation.
This threat of a threat plays well with the current effort by the Medvedev/Putin regime to nudge Ukraine back into Russia’s orbit. In more direct terms, such a maneuver effectively means Moscow gaining adequate controlling leverage over its economic and strategically important Former Soviet Union (FSU) neighbor.
One of the expectations of the “Orange Revolution” in 2004 was that Ukraine would quickly edge closer to the West. Joining the European Union and NATO was held out as a real possibility. But it didn’t happen. The working relationship of Viktor Yushchenko and Yulia Tymoshenko broke down as Tymoshenko chose the path of pragmatic relations (her term) with Russia after several friendly meetings with Putin that produced what she considered satisfactory results.
Yushchenko nurtured his well-justified antagonism toward a Moscow that he continued to view as having only exploitive aims. Meanwhile the Russophile Viktor Yanukovych has maintained his pro-Moscow stance at the same time as strengthening his political popularity mostly in Ukraine’s traditionally Russia-oriented east and south.
This return of Yanukovych is less a battle won by him than a failure of the Yushchenkoites to reform the corruption by politicians, bureaucrats, and businessmen against whom the original “Orange Revolution” was directed. The fact is that Ukraine is arguably more corrupt today than it was five years ago, with bribery of public officials the principal mechanism of government efficiency on all levels. In a now oft-quoted statement, the EU representative to the Ukraine said, “Corruption, red tape, administrative obstacles of every kind — these are only things that serve the interests of those who today control the [Ukrainian] economy…”
Using their knowledge of these vulnerabilities of the Ukrainian political economy, Russian business and government operators have eased themselves back into an influential position. Even the rich, beautiful, and smart Yulia Tymoshenko has effectively given up her fight against Russian influence in exchange for a policy based on accommodation for hoped-for eventual advantage. In the meantime, Russian entrepreneurs have bought out control of one of Ukraine’s major steel groups in an industry that is suffering greatly from the recession.
The movement to integrate Ukraine into NATO has all but died — much to the joy of Moscow. Neither of the two leading contenders for the presidency (Yanukovych and Tymoshenko) favors NATO integration. Only Yushchenko still holds on to his original aim of taking the country into the Western military alliance. All three have publicly supported the idea of Ukraine joining the European Union. The forthcoming election process beginning on January 17 will point the way for Ukraine’s immediate future.
From Moscow’s point of view, EU membership is a pipe dream, but one it can live with so long as it’s a theory that can’t come to fruition. Membership in NATO is another matter altogether. As quoted in the Financial Times, Sergei Karaganov, head of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, said extending NATO to include Ukraine would cause “a threat of large scale war in Europe.”
This type of rhetoric is a serious characterization of Moscow’s continued perception of its strategic need to maintain Ukraine (and Georgia) as a buffer between the Western alliance and Russia. To the Kremlin — in this case meaning Medvedev/Putin or any combination thereof — it is essential that Russia be alert to counter all efforts to extend NATO eastward. So far the Obama administration has carefully avoided challenging in any way this strongly held position.
Accepting Moscow’s proprietary military view of Ukraine’s strategic importance to Russia maintains and reinforces a precedent for the entire concept of Russian reestablishment of strategic military influence over FSU countries. Ukraine is the keystone in such a concept politically, economically and geographically. In most immediate term Ukraine is the principal route for the export of gas produced by or transiting Russia. As such this circumstance is a powerful factor in Western Europe’s energy supply and clearly a security concern in East-West relations.
Putin has envisioned a reborn sphere of influence contiguous to Russia. His ultimate objective — though perhaps not shared in the same sense by Medvedev — is eventually to build a strategic forward defense perimeter among the FSU nations as a military buffer and political economic partner. Ukraine is essential in that calculus.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Trackback| 1.15.10 @ 7:25AM
The American Spectator : Ukraine Sliding Backwards, on PunditKix, links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Tim| 1.15.10 @ 1:14PM
Is the Ukraine really worth a war guarantee? Wasn't Georgia enough of a fiasco? Can we stop playing chess with the Russians?
concernedforusa| 1.18.10 @ 12:03PM
What do you expect from the Ukraine? Obama has thrown under the bus Poland and Checz Republics on the anniversary of the Soviet's invasion into the Poland. Ukraine is afraid that Obama can also sell it out to Russians.
Jabberwok| 1.15.10 @ 1:34PM
Do not be naive about the Russians. People may scoff about the Domino Theory, but those of us who have studied the Russians, both professionally and personally, know that they still have a hidden messianic worldview. They no longer think that they should turn their attentions eastward, at least per their origins, but they do look to expand their influence any way then can. Witness the exchanges w/Chavez and the trade w/China. Let us not forget the toe-dragging re: Iran. This is a wounded country and no amount of Moscow window dressing will change that. Never underestimate Putin. Besides, w/a person as uniformed foreign policy-wise as Obama, we are not playing chess, not even checkers. More like Chutes and Ladders.
led mining light | 11.25.10 @ 1:45AM
In short, just as we still rely on nation-states for international security, we must still rely on national governments to protect individual rights. Your freedom still depends on where you live.
Alan Brooks| 1.15.10 @ 10:44PM
The Russians were correct (from their view) on proposed missile defense in Poland and Czechoslovakia.
Russia can't be sure hostile regimes to the West of her will not come to power someday. After what the Germans did to Russia, why shouldn't they be suspicious?
concernedforusa| 1.18.10 @ 12:15PM
Suspicious of whom? The war between Germans and Russians was the war between two totalitarian states. Nazi party were socialist party also. Stalin admired Hitler, but if Russia was stronger, Stalin would not hesitate to gobble up Germany. One can equate the former Soviet Union to the Germany (both countries were socialist and totalitarian) but one cannot equate Russia or Nazi Germany with the free West.
Yosemeti Sam| 1.16.10 @ 1:58AM
Ah - rapprochement.
Once a Ruskie - always a Ruskie; no matter
the inconvenient separations.
Oh, the intrigue.
As if, parenthetically, the KGB et al took a space ship to points unknown when the USSR was
dissolved; voiding their 'influencing' know-how.
Duh.
LOL.
Alan Brooks| 1.16.10 @ 9:14AM
Rapprochement? who said anything about rapprochement? Quite the opposite-- the Russians merely look out for their interests, which is why they were opposed to missile defense west of them.
Alan Brooks| 1.17.10 @ 1:52PM
...if they think they have to manipulate the Ukraine in their national interest, they will.
Yosemeti Sam| 1.17.10 @ 11:04PM
" ... This threat of a threat plays well with the current effort by the Medvedev/Putin regime to nudge Ukraine back into Russia's orbit ...."
"Nudge"?
The Ukraine was the breadbasket of the former
USSR.
Defense considerations - blah!
The Ruskies suddenly run short of nukes
of all sort as deterrent to - anybody?
Once upon a time - in the East.
Was an empire called the USSR - aka Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
Republics as in States.
States as in the former USSRs' former republic/state of Ukraine.
Handy definition - Oxford dict - of rapprochement:
" the resumption of harmonious relations, esp. between states ".
How may that be accomplished, this 'rapprochement'?
Well, perhaps by poisoning resistant Ukrainian leaders who don't want to be bear-hugged again. Hmmmmm.
Make no mistake - Russia seeks rapprochement with the Ukraine.
Through any pretense!
Lookie at the state of Georgia. The Russian rapprochement exhibited there.
Who says rapprochement has to involve candy and flowers?
Rapprochement to the Ruskies means a great big
bear-hug.
rkka| 1.18.10 @ 8:38AM
When Soviet Genocide against Ukraine ended in 1991, there were 52 million Ukrainians.
There are now 46 million, and deaths exceed births there by almost 250,000/year. Further, hundreds of thousands flee the catastrophic political and economic conditions there, every year.
Clearly, Ukrainian independence isn't working out. Population decline in Ukraine has reached almost 12% of Ukraine's 1992 population. I'm just wondering what is the population loss level required for people to rethink the whole "Ukrainian independence" thing. Will it take a population loss of 15%, or 20%, or 25%, or 30%, or 40%, or 50% before Mr. George H. Wittman is willing to consider that Ukraine just might be better off associated with Russia than associated with the West, since the West clearly has no solutions whatever to Ukraine's actual problems?
Calmark| 1.19.10 @ 4:24PM
Let's see if I'm reading this right: slavery (in Ukraine's case, to a brutal master) for marginal material comfort is preferable to struggling while free. By that logic, things are tough in the USA right now, so let's ask the House of Windsor to take us over!
rkka| 1.19.10 @ 8:20PM
Let me see if I'm reading this right: you don't much care how, or even whether, Ukrainians live, as long as they are separate from Russia. By that logic, you'll fight for Ukrainian independence, but only to the last Ukrainian.
jabberwok| 1.25.10 @ 12:39PM
No, that is not what he is saying. He is saying that Ukraine should stay the course. Ukraine is in its position because of two things: corruption and a divided mindset. Corruption is endemic to the whole post-Soviet system. The idea that greasing the wheel is the way forward did not go away w/the fall of the regime, in fact it worsened. The other problem, the two-sided Ukrainian national character, is a remnant of Soviet policy. That is, during the Soviet times, forcibly remove those who claim Ukrainian ethnicity and move Russians in. This leaves a country that is both East- and West-leaning, tearing the country in half. Don't kid yourself about Russia looking for rapprochement, they are looking to recreate their buffer zone, one former republic at a time. Say what you will about America's involvement, past and present, in the internal affairs of other countries, but it pales in comparison to the activities of "Nash Bol'shoj Sosed."
Chris| 2.12.10 @ 2:19PM
And the US doesn't have a buffer zone in the Americas? (in addition to the oceans)
When the Chinese took over mgmgt of the Panama Canal the Americans had hissing fit, and Russia is not supposed to be concerned with NATO (!!!!!!!!) on its borders???
Russia lost tens of millions of people to the German invader and you moron don't understand why they want a buffer zone???
The US almost started a nuclear war over Russian missiles in Cuba??
Get your heads checked!
Office 2007 Professional | 1.29.10 @ 1:57AM
Office 2007 Professional
Office 2007 Ultimate
Juliya| 2.26.10 @ 3:04PM
Well, I dont really know what to comment because all the clever stuff has been written by you. Perhaps I could add that Russians are realists for the most part, and so seeing military of their rivalry on the doorstep provokes anger and reaction, which I believe is justified. After all the USA have been invading and controlling so much more countries than Russia, and rarely for their benefit
www.us-bapeoutlet.com | 4.2.10 @ 5:20AM
www.us-bapeoutlet.com
karen | 4.2.10 @ 7:30AM
Not only are www.herveleger-outlet.comsuitable attire for most occasions they are also a very comfortable form of for men. The fabric they are usually made from is flexible and comfortable with plenty of ‘give’ in the cheapwww.us-chaneloutlet.com if you need to stretch, zcount jordan shoes they have a collar to protect your from the sun if you are likely to be spending time outdoors and they have buttons at the if the weather should turn a bit chilly.
L Tod Schlosser | 11.4.11 @ 12:21PM
First of all i would like to thank you for the great and informative entry. I have to admit that I have never heard about this information I have noticed many new facts for me. Thanks a lot for sharing this useful and attractive information and I will be waiting for other interesting posts from you in the nearest future. Keep it up.
L Tod Schlosser
mwinkey | 12.21.10 @ 7:23AM
Our Store mainly engaged in sales of Windows and Office product key. All products are fully authorized by Microsoft directly. Mwinkey'Store will provide the full range of products. Buy our products you will enjoy the cheap prices and professional service.you can find our store with follow keywords.
wow| 10.17.11 @ 11:54AM
Thanks for this informational blog, lot of people view in here
actos lawsuit
Converse | 8.11.11 @ 9:44PM
is good
yanyan | 10.10.11 @ 3:44PM
Awesome article, keeps up the work! Thanksmesothelioma attorneys
malibu real estate | 10.11.11 @ 1:47AM
This is a really good read for me. Must admit that you are one of the best bloggers I have ever read.
yanyan| 10.11.11 @ 1:00PM
did you ever find a key to write some other coms here?mas200
yanyan| 10.11.11 @ 2:29PM
This site is excellent and so is how the subject matter was explained. I also like some of the comments too.Waiting for next post. Thanks
zoloft lawsuit
balcuizar62| 10.12.11 @ 8:37PM
. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work!
Yaz lawyer
Rinah| 10.17.11 @ 5:50AM
You got a really useful blog I have been here reading for about an hour. I am a newbie and your success is very much an inspiration for me.
spot price of silver
ruth| 10.17.11 @ 9:40AM
thanks i really love this blog and also my friend love this keep it up..
silver spot price
fiance visa| 10.17.11 @ 8:50PM
This was a useful post and I think it is rather easy to see from the other comments as well that this post is well written and useful.
fiance visa
creamer| 10.19.11 @ 8:18PM
Thank you for your great article and I enjoyed reading it keep the good work.
actos lawsuit
love| 10.20.11 @ 5:34AM
I am trying to run my own weblog but I think its too normal and I want to focus more on smaller topics.
Actos Cancer
accident attorney dallas| 10.20.11 @ 1:50PM
It contains wonderful and helpful posts. I have read most of them and got a lot from them. To me, you are doing the great work. Carry on this. work at home In the end,
accident attorney dallas
yaz class action | 10.22.11 @ 1:57PM
i love this blog, american spectators very detailed made their blogs
devourment| 11.4.11 @ 12:58PM
larity on this significant content can be easily looked. Remarkable post and will look forward to your future update.
L Tod Schlosser
PIERCE| 11.8.11 @ 2:47AM
if it is small or big , from one person or group , your informations also must be thanked
filipina girls
chester| 11.11.11 @ 1:21AM
It’s a really great site you have here. Thank you for the effort to be so good for us (even though we don`t deserve it) and keep it up.
zoloft lawsuit
Perfect !!!| 11.14.11 @ 3:49AM
I think that Everything has been described in systematic manner so that reader could get maximum information and learn many things.
mesothelioma lawyer
oil lubricator | 5.24.12 @ 4:30AM
I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
lorina| 7.1.12 @ 10:21PM
Wonderful content This is such a Great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. Thanks
pradaxa lawsuit
lorina| 7.4.12 @ 1:41AM
I’m speechless as to how great this article is written. It’s simple to understand and right on par with the topic. This is some of the best content I’ve seen.
vaginal mesh lawsuit
hany| 7.12.12 @ 8:31PM
I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in composing this article. thanks for sharing the great information.
seo software reviews
hany| 7.17.12 @ 3:05AM
Thanks for taking the time to talk about this, I feel strongly about it and enjoy learning more on this subject. If probable, as you acquire knowledge, would you mind updating your blog with additional information and facts? It really is incredibly beneficial for me.
drug rehab texas
hany| 7.19.12 @ 9:13PM
The site had been superb, We found regarding plenty of excellent achievements. I love the way you pattern yuor web blog blogposts. Continue on the fantastic work and can even you have successes in fact.
orange county family law attorney
hany| 7.19.12 @ 10:01PM
Your style is so fresh in comparison with most other people. Thanks for posting whenever you have the opportunity to, I will be sure to save your website!
divorce lawyers orange county
hany| 7.22.12 @ 9:34PM
Hello,I love reading through your blog, I wanted to leave a little comment to support you and wish you a good continuation. Wishing you the best of luck for all your blogging efforts.
Lexapro Lawyer
hany| 7.25.12 @ 8:54PM
Thank you for the page. Hope to see more such wonderful pages in the near future. Keep up the good work and help people find more information.
estate plan
hany| 7.25.12 @ 10:00PM
I desired by way of thanking you just for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little it and i also maybe you've bookmarked to see new things you post.
estate planning basics