Facing the glum prospect of no warming for the next 50 years.
(Page 2 of 2)
Prof. Easterbrook says that the warm mode of the PDO has now been replaced by a cool one and “this virtually assures us of three decades of global cooling.”
Ms. H-P: That makes me feel a little better, but why are so many sciences pushing global warming, or “climate change” as they now call it?
Us: Alas, science has become subject to fads and politics like most everything else. This UN effort, with gigantic conferences such as the one in Copenhagen, is driven by bureaucrats whose main objective is to redistribute the wealth of the industrialized nations to those that aren’t.
Ms. H-P: What about our Pontiff, Al Gore?
Us: He’s never met an outlandish claim he didn’t like, and he’s making a lot of money from promoting global warming.
Ms. H-P: Oh. I think I’ll go lay an egg.
Peter Hannaford is going to buy a new parka with thicker insulation for this winter.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?