The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

A Holiday Potpourri

Kit Carson and Native Americans. Ben Stein and Ron Paul. Liberals and Santa. Obama and National Security. Napolitano and Rendell. Plus much more. 

(Page 3 of 5)

Thank you,
— Donna Madden

ONLY IN DREAMS
Re: W. James Antle III’s Dreaming of Repeal:

I can only say, in response to Mr. Antle’s holiday fantasy, that, as one born shortly after the war, I have never seen the Federal government do anything but grow. In terms of its overall size, percentage consumption of GDP, our national debt, the number of laws on the books, its level of intrusiveness into the lives of all Americans in matters great and small, and on and on ad nauseam, what was a tadpole in 1783 is now a Leviathan that could snack on whales. Even Mr. Reagan didn’t really roll things back; as I recall, anyway, he just slowed things down; and he was the best of us, the likes of whom we won’t see again for a century or two.

 All of which is to say that, while we can write amusing holiday pieces and such, and congratulate ourselves on our erudition and cleverness, unless someone, somewhere, comes up with an actual, workable strategy, which can be implemented — make that, actually gets implemented — and, in fact, successfully rolls back the size of the Federal government (it doesn’t matter how long it takes; a slow ratcheting process in the reverse direction would be perfectly fine; that’s the very successful method Liberals used throughout the twentieth century), then what is point of everything else? In the end, we will lose.
— D. Reich

The Republicans lost their grip on power because they were no longer fit to hold it.

The Republican Party, post-Reagan, has completely surrendered its ideals of limited government, balanced budgets and pro-American foreign policy. It has, to its lasting shame, gone Bush: A go-along-to-get-along, me-too, wishy, squishy, wet bag of good intentions and, beside the Iraq war, not much else. You can look through the GOP today and hardly find anybody who will FIGHT— who will not begin by ceding the debate to the other side, who is not afraid to call things by their right names and cut through the cant and whining and lies. Hell, they won’t even call foul against the low blows. Give them their due, the Democrats would be roaring with synthetic rage if one of theirs had been borked and slimed the way Sarah Palin was. The Republicans just looked on. Hardly even a tsk-tsk was heard.

Repeal the health care mess? What a laugh! What is left of the GOP is playing “mother may I” while the Dems

play for keeps. Republicans will be lucky if the Obama EPA doesn’t order the Party dissolved on some carbon pretext or other — if so, they won’t even have the guts to sue. Somebody might say something mean.
— Martin Owens
Sacramento, California

Antle is right the GOP must state clearly that it plans to repeal bad laws once the American voters have punished the profligate and terrorist-appeasing Democrats. Republican Congressional majorities and a future Republican President have to begin thinking outside the box to rebuild America after years of Democrat misrule in Congress (2007-2010/2012) and the Obama White House. Everything from Obamacare to the arrogant and out-of-control EPA need to feel the wrath of the American people through their elected Republican officials. What Reagan talked about, but never did must become reality and the Federal bureaucracy must be cut down to a workable size that is efficient and effective. A Federal government that works for the American people and not for itself or the Democrat party only.
— Michael Tomlinson

From the “the more things change, the more they stay the same” department, Mr. Antle, G.K. Chesterton said it best a long time ago: “The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives an Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected.”

As for repeal? Dream on!
— Mike Showalter
Austin, Texas

WITH RELATIVITY LIKE THIS
Re: RiShawn Biddle’s Bargaining for Reform?:

Let’s not forget, as you are discussing unions and education reform, the AFT’s most famous member, whom I doubt Randi Weingarten even knows was a member unless I reminded her of it, was Albert Einstein. He was a founding member of the AFT Princeton chapter, as he believed in professionals needing to organize to protect intellectual integrity. Although, he is viewed as a lightweight intellect in your assessment, since he was a socialist and didn’t embrace your Ayn Rand solipsism.

Turning schools into mini-corporations where the principals are dictators is every dictator’s dream. A democratic society that abolishes public schools and teachers’ rights to due process (called tenure), which every worker should have, is doomed to tyranny. How ironic it’s the path this “conservative” journal is advocating.
John Elfrank-Dana
UFT Chapter Leader
Murry Bergtraum High School
New York, New York

CONFRONTING SKEPTICS
Re: Christopher Orlet’s The Gift Delusion:

Page:   1 23 4 5  

Letter to the Editor View all comments (16) |

Pingback| 12.31.09 @ 6:31AM

Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : A Holiday Potpourri [spectator.org] links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Button to your Blog or Web Site. WordPress  Web Sites 2 Shortened Links Linking to the spectator.org page http://bit.ly/4roU1h info http://bit.ly/6KA4U9 info   2 tweets tweet The American Spectator : A Holiday Potpourri spectator.org/archives/2009/12/31/what-makes-you-so-sure – view page – cached My thanks to Mr. Croke for his article on Kit Carson. One correction, Kit's father was more…

Le Cracquere| 12.31.09 @ 10:42AM

J. Elfrank-Dana's letter merely supports what everyone already knew: Einstein's opinions were utterly valueless at sub-cosmological scales. Additionally, I'll leave it to other readers to judge whether abolishing tenure and union featherbedding amounts to "tyranny." I shall only observe that the depredations of Elfrank-Dana and every other union member merit nothing less than tyrannical treatment, and quite a bit more into the bargain.

IMKessel| 12.31.09 @ 11:50AM

Mr. Dooley,

If you return to my original post, you will find we are in agreement on marriage. Religious institutes sanctify marriages; the state regulates contracts, My point was, and is, that if the people who want to have civil contracts truly want just a legal agreement, the state is the place to go. For those who want the sanctity of marriage, the church, mosque or temple is the place for them.

To all,

I wish you a happy new year. To make this happen, lets do all we can to return sanity to our government and the government to the people.

Richard L.A. Schaefer| 12.31.09 @ 4:41PM

One can argue that (individuals and groups) have the right to name themselves as they wish and to require others to use that name, keeping in mind that there is a distinction between a generic name and an official name that the group prefers. Regarding the generic name, there are no Native Americans. Generically, one could call them "Asian-Americans" or "Japanese-Americans," based on the DNA studies to discern where people immigrated from--specifically, those who are sometimes called "Indians" and sometimes "Native Americans." Note the complications regarding blacks. James Jones is just one of many who repudiate being called an African American, with or without hyphen. Some prefer to be called blacks, with or without a capitalized first letter and note that the immediate ancestors of many blacks did not come here from Africa. Others are insulted by the word "Negro." With this disagreement, people can be forgiven for taking the approach of trying to determine a generic term; that is, not using the term that particular blacks or even "Native American Indians" might insist that everyone use for all who are in their category.

Seek| 12.31.09 @ 4:49PM

Glen McCarthy:

Egypt has received the same amount of money as Israel since the Camp David Accords of 1978. But I suppose their hands aren't "grubby" enough to merit any mention. After all, they're not Jews.

IMKessel| 12.31.09 @ 6:21PM

Seek,

Amen.

Your information is correct. While questioning the wisdom of sending American money abroad is prudent, the questions asked often show the (askewed) mind set of the questioner.

Ira

Electricity meter | 4.20.11 @ 4:33AM

Wow this is a great resource. I'm enjoying it. Good article.

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/12/31/what-makes-you-so-sure

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

From the Obama Ministry of Truth

Ben Stein | 5.21.13

IRS Union Chief Stonewalls

Jeffrey Lord | 5.21.13

Wimps Versus Barbarians

Thomas Sowell | 5.21.13

Damage Control for Dummies

Matt Purple | 5.22.13

Anyone Still Believe Me?

Aaron Goldstein | 5.21.13

ADVERTISEMENT