By Christopher Orlet on 12.18.09 @ 6:07AM
Americans are becoming more promiscuous regarding faith.
I used to spend hours studying a faded, color-coded map at a
publishing house where I worked. The map, hung on the wall behind
my desk, showed the population density of the various
denominations and faiths across America. Save for the southern
half of Louisiana, the south was one thick crimson swatch of
Southern Baptists. The Northern Midwest was Lutheran green.
Utah's solid yellow represented the Church of Latter-Day Saints.
New Mexico, Louisiana, New Jersey, and Massachusetts were shaded
the deep blue of Roman Catholicism.
It used to be just that easy to generalize about Americans and
religion. That is no longer the case, as shown by several recent
polls on Americans and Religion.
Contemporary Americans, it appears, have no problem hopping from
one denomination to another, marrying a spouse of another faith,
or shopping around for a church or a preacher more to one's
liking. American churches -- for the past century and a half at
least -- have been pro-active in their recruitment strategies,
due to the countless denominations vying for a limited pool of
congregants. As American luck would have it, those countless
denominations turned out to be a good thing. It was Voltaire who
noted of 18th-century England: "If there were only one religion
in England, there would be danger of tyranny; if there were two,
they would cut each other's throats; but there are thirty, and
they live happily together in peace."
Americans remain one of most religious people on earth, but their
creed is no longer the Old Time Religion. The faith of our
fathers has been supplanted to an increasing extent by
"spirituality," a vague and amorphous term social scientists are
still trying to define. According to a recent
Pew poll, about 10 percent of believing
Americans no longer call themselves religious, but spiritual.
Double what it was in 1964. The results of an April 2009
Newsweek
poll, are even more
dramatic. Here 30 percent of believers confessed to being
"spiritual, but not religious." If you account for the roughly 11
percent of Americans who are nonbelievers, we are now at a point
where 41 percent of Americans hold views on religion that 200
years ago in Europe would have gotten them
roasted as heretics.
To many of these non-religious believers, "spiritual" may mean
believing in a prime mover, a god that encompasses everything, or
some kind of noble truths. It may entail membership in groups
like the American Ethical Union, Universal Unitarianism, or the
Universal Pantheist Society. What spiritual certainly does not
entail is a belief in the God of Abraham, or the belief in the
divinity of Jesus of Nazareth.
For those who continue to call themselves religious Christians, a
good portion of them experiment with other denominations and
faiths (three-in-ten Protestants attend services outside their
own denomination, and one-fifth of Catholics say they sometimes
attend non-Catholic services). Curiously, many of these same
religious Christians believe in pagan astrology (about a quarter
of Christians), or accept Eastern mysticism's concept of
reincarnation (22 percent). If you are willing to believe in
astrology and reincarnation, you are probably open to seeing
ghosts (one-in-five Americans have seen or experienced spooks),
while 16 percent of Americans fear the "evil eye."
ALL OF THIS avenue hopping and religion shopping has forced many
churches into yet another round of modernization and reinvention.
Like any modernization campaign, this often entails a drift to
the Left. In its more harmless manifestation, it is marked by
string bands, and colorful banners strung about the church, while
priests and ministers don even more Day-Glo vestments till they
begin to resemble not so much a minister as one of Ken Kesey's
Merry Pranksters. In its more pernicious manifestation, it is
evidenced by Happy Talk or Feel Goodism.
It is not surprising that Americans would jump from denomination
to denomination and faith to faith. Americans are used to having
choices, and why shouldn't religion be subject to the laws of
supply and demand? A city or town can only support so many
churches. Fire and brimstone may have worked fine when Calvinism
held a monopoly, but today's churches are likely to maintain that
God has mellowed, that he's gotten with the program. Even Billy
Graham has come around to this view, and now says don't worry,
hell isn't a scary, real place after all, it's just the absence
of God's presence. How hipper and happier can Happy Talk get?
Naturally, with this new, anything-goes belief system something
has been lost, those same things that are always lost when
tradition goes by the wayside: our sense of self, our confidence
in our mission, our connection to all that has gone before, of
standing on the shoulders of giants like Augustine and Luther and
Wesley. Today, Americans seem to be making it up as they go
along, improvising and personalizing religion -- a dash of New
Ageism here, a teaspoon of Eastern Spiritualism there, a sprinkle
of good old-fashioned Lutheranism for taste -- until everyone is
his own John Calvin or Mary Baker Eddy.
Religion is not like art -- something that should be
individualized and, in Ezra Pound's phrase, constantly "made
new." Stripped of tradition, it becomes just another ethical
system, no different from one devised by a secularist society.
That may or may not be a good thing, but it is not religion. It's
not even spirituality.
topics:
Religion, Spirituality