The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Getting the Word Out

Silenced dissent. Boring sex and more.

SEPARATING FROM THE CONSTITUTION
Re: Mark Hyman’s The Plan to Silence Dissent:

Again I am shocked at how the government bureaucracy can devise outrageous and wildly expensive plans to deliver what no one wants at the expense of the people’s money and freedom. Our government seems to have completed their separation from the control of the Constitution and the will of the people.
— Ralph Riley

“Obviously, the most efficient way to control the nation’s broadband platforms is to control those who operate them.”

Drones “living” in the Soviet Slave Republics enjoyed a free press. The commissars attached great value to a free press, so much so that freedom of the press was written into their Constitution. Of course, the Party
controlled the newsprint and the presses.
— Dan Martin
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Not surprising. Broadcasters better be getting out the word as fast as they can.
— Roy Hogue
Newbury Park, California

THE GREATEST THREAT
Re: Andrew Cline’s Thankful for Obama:

Most of the commentary here discusses Obama in the context of the damaging domestic effects of his policies…how we are being governed….but I am afraid that the damage he is attempting to do to the way Americans live our lives pales when compared to the long term damage that he and his people are doing on the international front. We can survive and correct our internals but our enemies beyond that Obama seems not to acknowledge pose the greatest threat to us over time.
— Frank Parker

BOUGHT BY BANKSTERS
Re: William Tucker’s Living the Liberal Crack-up:

Thank you for a fine article. The only dissonance to a Republican victory is the thought of a political hack like John Boehner (and he is a hack by any definition of the word) as Speaker. That would make Nancy Pelosi look like Pericles.
— Morris Shinderman

While I agree with much of what William Tucker writes, his comment that “forcing people to buy health insurance is unconstitutional” is another example of what is increasingly becoming a fantasy on our side. I’m sorry, but that ship sailed decades ago. How is it any more unconstitutional to force people to buy health insurance than it is to force people to fund their own retirements via Social Security?

The only difference between this and any other tax is that it will be paid directly to (hopefully) private companies, rather than being directed through the federal government, and that it will actually provide a tangible benefit in return. This amounts to slim pickings for a constitutional challenge.
— Glen Hoffing
Shamong, New Jersey

Pretty nice slam of the dems. Democratic failure is not going to truly help the Republicans or the county until the Republicans face their failures and repent.

How about a few pieces about how the Republicans screwed up by being bought and paid for by the Banksters and others and a few ideas about how they can avoid it happening again.

From a former life-long republican,
— Douglas M. Dillon

We who love liberty might well feel most confident at this moment. Yesterday, however, I saw the University of Alabama v. Auburn game. Alabama arrived full of confidence and even began showboating in the first quarter. Bottom line: Through over-confidence, they nearly lost the game.
G.A.

Page: 1 2  

Letter to the Editor View all comments (15) |

John - TMF| 12.1.09 @ 8:37AM

Ah the ever observant Mrs. Gunn has made connection with the touchstone of how all of this social/sexual/Maxism insanity is pushed upon society.

The trick isn't to make it shocking. The trick is to make it look normal, desireable, comfortable.

My father (Navy Junior, West Point type, Vietnam combat veteran) warned me back in my early teenage years. "Evil isn't always ugly, cruel, vicious and cold. It can also be loving, seductive, almost kind and generous; until it entraps and destroys you."

He was not wrong. Our pop-culture has become corrosive and dangerous to our continued existence, which means that it is now critically evil.

Regards,

John - The Mighty Fahvaag

PacRim Jim | 12.1.09 @ 11:37AM

Under what constitution is the President responsible for government spending? The Constitution of the U.S. charges Congress with that responsibility. And which party controlled Congress during the last years of the Bush Administration? In case you've forgotten, it was the Democrat Party.

Alan Brooks| 12.1.09 @ 1:08PM

the Boring sex aerticle was first rate, and I also want to write of how James Bowman's pieces are always appreciated by me, as well.
Now that politics is celebritized gobbledygook, aesthetic discussions are more valuable.

Alan Brooks| 12.1.09 @ 3:16PM

"aerticle"?
Pardon; that must be the latest piece on Amelia.

uytuty| 1.4.10 @ 10:19PM

AVCHD Player,
AVCHD Player for Mac

fdgdfg| 1.4.10 @ 10:21PM

TS Player,
MTS Player

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/12/01/getting-the-word-out

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

Obama's Unaffordable Act

Peter Ferrara | 6.19.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

ADVERTISEMENT