By Ken Blackwell on 11.24.09 @ 6:08AM
How soon before President Obama joins Jimmy Carter as a winner of
the Indira Gandhi Peace Prize?
The Norwegian Parliament can't build a "spite fence" between
themselves and the United States. But they have a more effective
way of showing their contempt for some of our elected leaders.
They give out Nobel Peace Prizes.
Leftist Scandinavian lawmakers are not like members of the
College of Cardinals. Roman Catholic prelates are sworn to
secrecy about who they voted for in the election of a Pope and
why they voted that way. The Norwegians were happy to say that
they gave Carter the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 as a way to poke
then-President George W. Bush in the eye.
Among the many honors that have gone to the ex-President
from Plains, Georgia, is this curious one: The Indira Gandhi
Peace Prize of 1997. Indira Gandhi led one of the most corrupt
governments in the history of India -- or of any country. Her
coercive population control methods singled out teenage boys for
vasectomies. These boys, many of them poor and illiterate, were
pressured by corrupt village chieftains into getting operations
that would forever render them incapable of fathering children.
Apparently, Jimmy Carter's vaunted concern for human rights did
not extend to refusing to accept such a prize from such a tainted
source.
Perhaps the most famous quote attributed to Jimmy Carter --
not the one from his Playboy interview --
was this one: Americans, he said in a 1977 commencement address
at the University of Notre Dame, should get over their
"inordinate fear of communism."
Yale University scholar Eugene Rostow -- the famous son of
a strongly Democratic family -- was appalled. U.S. foreign policy
was not based on what Carter called our inordinate fear, but on
"legitimate concern for…Soviet expansion and aggression."
The communist bosses then ruling the Kremlin took Carter at
his word: That speech was a starter's pistol shot for them as
they raced to exploit their clueless opponent's weaknesses.
Carter was shocked to find Soviets backing violent insurgencies
in Africa and Latin America.
More Africans lost their freedom during Jimmy Carter's four
years than at any other time in history. Latin Americans and
Asians fared no better. When the Soviets invaded Afghanistan late
in 1979, Carter deplored the USSR's move as the action of an
"atheistic government" against an Islamic people. Carter, who
campaigned as a born-again Christian, never showed similar
concern for the persecution of Christians.
Fast forward to 2009. President Obama recently gave an
interview to Ed Henry, CNN's senior White House correspondent.
The President reacted to the firestorm of criticism of his
administration for the decision to bring Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
and his fellow 9/11 conspirators into a federal court in
Manhattan. Mr. Obama scoffed at the inordinate fears of
today:
I think this notion that somehow we have to be fearful,
that these terrorists are -- possess some special powers that
prevent us from presenting evidence against them, locking then
-- them up and, you know, exacting swift justice, I think that
has been a fundamental mistake.
This is a week that saw the execution in Virginia of
John Allen Muhammed, the convicted Beltway Sniper. President
Obama also recently visited Fort Hood for a memorial service to
the 14 victims of a terrorist shooter.
We know already that the Fort Hood shooter was in contact
with a jihadist imam in Yemen. The Internet -- which did not
exist in Jimmy Carter's heyday -- now provides instant
communication through the World Wide Web between terrorists there
and terrorists here.
What if we had one hundred John Allen Muhammeds driving one
hundred cheap junker cars with one hundred teen shooters hiding
in the trunks of those vehicles? It does not take a great deal of
imagination to see how the country could be paralyzed by a small
number of terrorists. They could all be activated by Al Qaeda
operatives based in Pakistan, Afghanistan, or Texas.
Yassir Arafat -- for whose political heirs Jimmy Carter is
forever pleading -- learned how to do airline hijacking for
terror by watching CNN. That's the down side of living in a
global village.
It is not some inordinate fear of "special powers" that
should give us all pause today.
A wise administration would carefully gauge the threats to
our country and act accordingly. A serious administration would
never put known terrorists on trial in Manhattan, the media
capital of the world. David Beamer is father of the late Todd
Beamer, the hero of United Flight 93. David Beamer said it best:
"The decision [to put the terrorists on trial] is not
thoughtless, because a lot of thought went into it. But it is
mindless."
What we see today is the same mindless
naïveté in the Obama administration that we saw in the
invertebrate leadership of Jimmy Carter. We should pray daily for
the safety of the country we love.
topics:
Terrorism, Jimmy Carter, Indira Gandhi