By George Neumayr on 11.12.09 @ 6:08AM
A hate criminal liberalism couldn't identify.
President Obama, speaking at Tuesday's memorial, described
the Fort Hood attack as "incomprehensible." But what's
incomprehensible about it? Nidal Malik Hasan telegraphed his
treachery. The drip-drip-drip of reports reveals that Hasan
self-identified himself as a threat to the military and
authorities still hesitated to investigate him.
A PC-addled military and Defense Department simply froze:
fellow soldiers didn't want to risk the appearance of
intolerance; investigators worried about incursions upon recent
First Amendment jurisprudence.
General George Casey's staggeringly inane comment after the
shooting captures the atmosphere that explains it: "Our
diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a
strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity
becomes a casualty, I think that's worse."
Diversity at this point is a synonym for mindlessness and
self-hating hypocrisy. Were Hasan a virulent and outspoken
Christian military chaplain, he would have been branded a hate
criminal and whisked away. But since he is a Muslim, since Obama
isn't at "war with Islam," and since Islam is so obviously a
religion of peace, he was given a wide swath.
Under the paralysis of a PC culture, all Muslims are
moderate Muslims and anyone who says otherwise is a bigot. If
Hasan didn't define Islam as a religion of peace but as a
religion of jihad, that was okay; he would come around in time to
the superior liberal understanding of Islam as
non-violent.
The irresponsible frivolousness of such attitudes is
mind-boggling. While Obama's Homeland Security was issuing
dilettantish warnings about disgruntled, Timothy McVeigh-style
soldiers coming back from war and pro-life activists at abortion
clinics, the Defense Department was ignoring a deadly threat in
plain sight.
While Obama was rescinding George Bush's protection of the
conscience rights of Christian doctors and nurses, the Defense
Department fretted over the freedoms of an open jihadist. While
Obama was attaching a "hate crimes" provision to his defense
spending bill, aimed not at radical Muslims but at the left's
usual list of conservative "bigots," a proponent of suicide
bombings was plotting the worst shooting on a U.S. military base
ever.
And after it all occurs, his administration doesn't even
pause in its political correctness. The priority now is to ensure
that Muslims don't suffer a "backlash" from Americans and that
"diversity" thrive in the military, according to Casey.
Liberalism as death wish has never been clearer. Completely
unwilling to engage the facts, Evan Thomas and company competed
for the most obtuse explanations of the shooting: maybe Hasan had
been victimized by anti-Muslim prejudice; then it was Hasan as
shared (through his patients) trauma victim of the Bush years;
finally Hasan as "just a nut case," Thomas's contribution to the
discussion.
For General Casey, a diminished commitment to diversity
loomed as the greater tragedy; for Evan Thomas, the greater
tragedy was that Hasan would "get the right wing going."
There it was: the real threat to America, the "right
wing."
The war against jihadists is not nearly as worrisome to the
left as the culture war at home. The only ideology the left seeks
to reform is conservatism; the only theology it considers
dangerous is Christian. Islam is peaceful; conservatism is
divisive.
But sometimes the doctrines of Christianity do come in
handy for liberal pols in need of bracing rhetoric. At Tuesday's
memorial, Obama departed momentarily from his Oprahized
Christianity and seemed to imply that Hasan was headed for hell:
"It may be hard to comprehend the twisted logic that led to this
tragedy. But this much we do know -- no faith justifies these
murderous and craven acts; no just and loving God looks upon them
with favor. For what he has done, we know that the killer
will be met with justice -- in this world, and the next."
topics:
Nidal Malik Hasan, Evan Thomas, Gen. George Casey