By George H. Wittman on 11.6.09 @ 6:07AM
Where does all the pirates' ransom money go?
The insurance companies won't tell you; the shipping
companies won't tell you; and, of course, the Somali pirates
don't say a word. What is not talked about
is the amount of money being made by the Somali piracy
entrepreneurs -- and then what they do with it. One thing is
clear: Kenya is a major factor.
If the exact figures involved in the piracy activity are
not available, the count of hijacked vessels is more easily
obtained. The International Maritime Bureau has reported that
through the first nine months of this year 32 ships have been
taken by the Somalis. Quoting the same sources, the New York
Times last May reported that in the previous 18
months Somali pirates "have netted as much as $100 million by
hijacking dozens of ships…"
The insurance companies and private ship owners easily can
calculate what their vessel and cargo is worth. The kidnapped
crews are priced relative to the political pressure of their
families and governments on the victimized firms. Sources
insisting on anonymity in the relevant insurance concerns
suggested that depending on rank and nationality/ethnicity
individual ransoms run from $1,000 to $100,000 (European captain
level). The crew and cargo of November 2008's Saudi super tanker
hijacking were reportedly ransomed for $3 million last January.
That figure was considered a bargain by the ship's owners and its
insurers.
Less important than actual profit figures of Somali piracy
is what is done with the money. Anyone who has traveled to Kenya
recently can get a rather good idea. In the better sections of
Nairobi there are several high-rise office and residential
complexes. According to local journalists, many of the newer
buildings were financed for the most part by Somali investors.
The profits from piracy would appear to be well handled.
This is not to say the community of Somalis in Kenya
generally have not also benefited. The Eastleigh section of east
Nairobi, heavily populated by Somalis, is booming as a result of
a complicated web of private financial transfers that expedite
sale and purchase of smuggled goods avoiding taxes. The Barclay's
Bank branch in Eastleigh is open seven days a week to provide
full service. No other bank in Nairobi operates on this every day
schedule.
Kenya has long been known for its weak prosecution of
illegal money laundering. For that reason large amounts of cash
from Somali sources find their way into real estate investment
and commercial factoring. What was once a nice little business of
small scale commercial financing by non-African Kenyans of
Lebanese, Syrian, Greek, Indian and Pakistani background is now
an activity dominated by internationally connected
Somalis.
It is not surprising that local counter-terrorism officials
see the tightly related Somali community in Kenya as the primary
conduit for monies headed for Islamic jihadi
groups. Unfortunately the job of penetrating these networks
has been extremely difficult and electronic
surveillance is inhibited by an extensive courier system.
There is a seeming natural political outreach in a
situation where substantial sums of illegal funds proliferate --
and Kenya is no exception. Kenyan politics has long been marked
by political corruption. The Somali moneymen have found these
activities to be particularly useful to their working interests.
Multilateral trade operations combined with regional financial
connections make a perfect cover for weapons commerce.
In the same manner as the trade in illicit military
supplies, the covert transfer of monies for the maintenance of
jihadi groups in the Middle East and
elsewhere worldwide is facilitated through the Somali diaspora.
The informal network of Islamic money transfer, the
hawala, stretches globally and provides a
trustworthy yet clandestine system of financial manipulation.
Somali piracy is only one source of funding, though it has become
a major supplier in recent years.
The Kenyan authorities are well aware of the growth of the
independent economic system within the traditional Kenyan
environment, but there is little that can be done about it. To a
certain extent there are banking and commercial elements in this
East African country that are just as happy that the Somali
connection exists.
Kenya's economy, no longer the envy of the region, has
become reliant on the dynamics of its Somali immigrants and the
money that pours in from their nefarious activities along the
Horn of Africa. For Kenya the Somali phenomenon cannot be lived
with -- and yet at this stage Kenya does not seem to be able to
live without it!