By Ryan L. Cole on 11.3.09 @ 6:07AM
Rocco Landesman, the new head of the National Endowment for the
Arts, likes to compare his president to the late dictator Julius
Caesar.
Rocco Landesman, the newly minted Chairman of the National
Endowment for the Arts (NEA), will soon hit the road to promote
"Art Works" -- a six-month fact finding mission that will take
the former Broadway producer across the country to remind
Americans of the profound importance of art and, presumably,
federally subsidizing said art.
The chairman's first stop on this tour of enlightenment, Peoria,
Illinois, is instructive though hardly incidental. In August,
Landesman, wandering off-script, as the ersatz populist Obama
administration occasionally does when ensconced in the friendly
confines of Americas' supposed centers of culture, admitted to
the New York Times "I don't know if there's a theater in
Peoria, but I would bet that it's not as good as Steppenwolf or
the Goodman..."
Well. So off Landesman will go to the Midwest to explain himself
to Americans inhabiting places without Tony Award-winning theatre
companies.
"There is a new president and a new NEA," proclaimed Landesman,
on October 21 in a preview of his upcoming voyage, at an arts
conference in Brooklyn. "This is the first president that
actually writes his own books since Teddy Roosevelt and arguably
the first to write them really well since Lincoln. If you accept
the premise, and I do, that the United States is the most
powerful country in the world, then Barack Obama is the most
powerful writer since Julius Caesar. That has to be good for
American artists."
Interesting premises. But ones that can be accepted only if you
ignore the fact that when he died in 1865 Abraham Lincoln had
never published a single book and disregard the penmanship of
other president-writers such as Ulysses S. Grant, Woodrow Wilson,
Calvin Coolidge, Richard Nixon and William Clinton.
Discounting the embarrassing historical ignorance of the head of
a federal agency and the unfortunate comparison of the president
to the dictator perpetuo, what about this new NEA?
If new is defined as unlike George W. Bush, Landesman and company
are off to a swinging start. The Obama team's move into the NEA's
offices in the Old Post Office Building earlier this year follows
a period of relative tranquility in the agency's stormy
existence. After decades as a flashpoint in the culture wars, the
Bush-era NEA placated liberals by incrementally increasing the
agency's funding and pleased conservatives by promoting programs
that steered clear of controversy, effectively detoxifying this
once notorious federal entity. From 2001 to 2008, the words
"censorship" and "de-fund" were seldom heard in regards to the
NEA.
What Bush accomplished in eight years, Obama has undone in little
more than eight months. In fact, in little less than a year, the
new administration has (inadvertently, one hopes) done everything
in its power to re-polarize the endowment and reopen the debate
over federal funding for the arts.
The opening salvo was an $80 million chunk of the supposed
salvation of the U.S. economy -- the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act -- for the NEA, $50,000 of which found its way
to San Francisco's Frameline film house -- sponsors of
"Thundercrack," "the world's only underground kinky art porno
horror film, complete with four men, three women and a gorilla."
Another $25,000 went to CounterPULSE, weekly hosts of "Perverts
Put Out" -- a "long-running pansexual performance series."
Stimulating indeed.
When such uses of the public's money generated concern,
Landesman, shortly after being sworn in as NEA chief, fumed to
the New York Times, "The arts are a little bit of a
target. The subtext is that it is elitist, left wing, maybe even
a little gay." Why would anyone think such things?
Well, there was that now infamous White House planned NEA-hosted
conference call in August during which Yosi Sergant, NEA
Communications Director, exhorted the participants (16 of whom
had received a total of nearly $2 million from the NEA in the
four months prior the call) to use their craft to further the
Obama administration's agenda. "I would encourage you to pick
something, whether it's health care, education, the
environment...," said Sergant. Unsurprisingly, after the call
several of the participants signed a public letter supporting
Obama's health care reform agenda.
After conservative bloggers pointed out the dubious legality of
an independent federal agency leaning on grantees to accomplish
political goals and create policy propaganda, Sergant was
"reassigned" and eventually resigned from the NEA in September.
These controversies have hardly provoked a rethink or slowdown at
the new NEA. In fact, Landesman promises to press on. His goals
include an increase in the agency's $155 million budget which, in
the middle of a recession, he describes as "pathetic" and a
return to individual grants to artists -- the now banished
funding formula that paved the way for taxpayer-financed
exhibitions of the lurid work of Robert Mapplethorpe and Andres
Serrano.
He also plans to "lay the groundwork for the most arts-supportive
administration since Roosevelt." And if in rejecting the "keep
your head down, and build your credibility good grant by good
grant" policy of the Bush administration, the NEA reignites the
culture wars, so be it.
In the president's parlance, it is an audacious agenda.
But will it play in Peoria?
topics:
Culture War, National Endowment for the Arts, Rocco Landesman