By W. James Antle, III on 10.29.09 @ 6:09AM
Could Doug Hoffman portend a less reflexively Republican
conservative future?
A vote for fill-in-the-blank conservative third-party candidate
-- be it Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin, or Pat Buchanan -- is a vote
for the Democrats. This argument has kept many a disgruntled
conservative on the Republican reservation, no matter how hard
they had to hold their nose in November.
For it wasn't John McCain, George W. Bush, or his father who
rallied the conservative faithful to pull the Republican lever as
much as Barack Obama, John Kerry, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, and
Michael Dukakis. In each case, some additional incentive was
provided in the form of running mates Sarah Palin, Dick Cheney,
and Dan Quayle (imagine trying to get out the conservative vote
with McCain-Lieberman or Bush-Ridge). But fear of the Democrats
has been employed successfully on behalf of Republicans as
liberal as Arnold Schwarzenegger, Lincoln Chafee, and Arlen
Specter -- only the first of whom remains in the GOP today -- who
were sometimes just millimeters to the right of their Democratic
opponents.
Whether or not Doug Hoffman wins next Tuesday's special election
in New York's 23rd congressional district, that argument may
sound a lot less persuasive to conservatives because of his
candidacy. Sarah Palin, the GOP's 2008 vice-presidential nominee,
has endorsed Hoffman over the liberal Republican candidate Dede
Scozzafava. So have Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, former House
Majority Leader Dick Armey, Republican ex-senators turned
presidential prospects Fred Thompson and Rick Santorum.
Sitting members of Congress have also crossed party lines to
support the Conservative Party nominee over the Republican: Sen.
Jim DeMint of South Carolina, Reps. Michelle Bachmann of
Minnesota, Tom Cole of Oklahoma, Todd Tihart of Kansas, and Dana
Rohrabacher of California. Cole, a former political consultant,
chaired the House Republicans' national campaign committee during
the 2008 election cycle.
In 2012, Republican presidential contenders who stuck with the
GOP nominee -- or stayed neutral like Mitt Romney or Mike
Huckabee -- may find their party loyalty as popular among primary
voters as Gerald Ford's support for the Panama Canal Treaty was
in his 1976 fight with Ronald Reagan. Former House Speaker Newt
Gingrich has already faced nearly as much criticism for his
persistence in backing Scozzafava as Hillary Clinton got from
Democratic primary voters for her refusal to repent of her Iraq
war vote.
Conservatives are deserting Scozzafava in droves, ignoring
warnings that their independence could swing the seat to the
Democrats. This is true not just national activist groups like
the Club for Growth and Eagle Forum, but also -- if the polls are
any indication -- grassroots voters in the 23rd district. "NY-23"
has emerged as a conservative rallying cry.
The situation is unusual. Scozzafava is not just pro-choice and
liberal on other social issues, but also economically liberal and
in favor of increasing union power through card check. New York
allows candidates to appear on multiple party ballot lines and
thus has a viable state Conservative Party. Unlike most
conservative third-party nominees, Hoffman is not a protest
candidate or sure loser. The closest analogy is when Jim Buckley
ran successfully for U.S. Senate in New York on the Conservative
Party ballot line against liberal Democrat Richard Ottinger and
liberal Republican Charles Goodell -- with the tacit support of
Republican President Richard Nixon.
Having bolted the Republican Party once, some disenchanted
conservatives might find it a hard habit to break. Faced with an
unprincipled GOP on the one hand and ineffectual
third parties of the right on the other, Hoffman might show a
third way: a conservative party that works in tandem with the
Republicans when they nominate conservatives but runs its own
candidates when the party of Reagan more closely resembles the
party of Rockefeller. This could make conservatives the swing
vote Republicans must pursue.
Doug Hoffman's way isn't the easy way, however. How conservative
must a Republican be to win this hypothetical third party's
support? The Empire State Conservatives have been criticized for
being too quick to give their ballot lines to Republicans. The
national Constitution Party could nominate few Republicans not
named Ron Paul. And what would such an arrangement do to
Republicans like Rudy Giuliani who really are the only GOPers who
could win in their home areas? (Though George Marlin's
Conservative Party candidacy didn't keep Giuliani from being
elected mayor in 1993, despite the former's insistence that the
only difference between Giuliani and David Dinkins was the way
they parted their hair.) Canada's experiment with two major
parties of the right -- the Progressive Conservatives and the
Reform Party turned Canadian Alliance -- ended in a merger.
New York is unique in allowing candidates to run on multiple
party ballot lines. Most other states make it difficult to
impossible for minor parties to compete, forcing them to spend
all their time and energy navigating byzantine ballot-access
requirements. By the time their nominees make the ballot, the
campaign is already broke.
Yet Hoffman's rebellion may reveal that the country's
conservative plurality is tuning out Republican leaders like Newt
Gingrich and instead heeding the Democratic icon John F. Kennedy.
Kennedy, after all, once said, "Sometimes party loyalty asks too
much."
topics:
Doug Hoffman, New York Conservative Party