The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Under the Table

No honor or morality. Too conservative for the NFL. Asking and telling. The mediocre man in the White House.

(Page 2 of 2)

JUST ANOTHER BIT OF ROAD-KILL
Re: Jeffrey Lord’s Who Is DeMaurice Smith?:

Anyone who has been following the approach of the renegotiation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement in the NFL and watching Mr. Smith’s gently escalating pusillanimity can see the hard seas approach for “America’s Game” one way or another. It is a safe bet that the conclusion of those CBA negotiations will seal Mr. Lord’s conclusion of the NFL as just another bit of road-kill in the seizure of American public institutions. I wonder if the lords of the NFL (Commissioner, owners, players) are conversant with the effects of the Major League Baseball strike.
— Reid Bogie
Waterbury, Connecticut

A RATHER ORDINARY MAN
Re: Andrew Wilson’s A Little Bit of Economics:

Mr. Wilson’s very revealing words about Obama confirm, I believe, my opinion of Obama. That is he is neither intellectually nor emotionally equipped for the position where he finds himself. He masks the insecurities inherent in his rather unusual history, by this surface self-importance and apparent extreme confidence in himself. I believe we can all identify with his situation since probably none of us have the ideal background we would write or create if we could.

We, however, soldier on as best we can but we do not have the future of Western Civilization on our shoulders as this quite unusual and at the same time rather ordinary man in mental capacity does. His situation is further complicated by having to deal with a wife who has issues of her own. These include a distaste for her affirmative action-provided Princeton education and apparently a great deal of animosity for Western Civilization, witness her influence over her husband’s decision to refuse Great Britain’s gift of the Churchill bust. Strange days indeed but every generation has probably thought the same. But at least Christians know this world is not all there is.
— Jack Wheatley
Royal Oak, Michigan

LOWLIFE
Re: John R. Guardiano’s Personal Fouls:

Rush is not now nor ever in the past ten years been racist. Why believe a lowlife like Sharpton??
— Connie Kenney

Page:   12

Letter to the Editor View all comments (19) |

TennesseeVolunteer| 10.19.09 @ 7:47AM

Sharpton came to memphis a couple of years ago when a youth was shot by a policeman in the middle of the night carrying a plastic gun and wouldn't drop it after repeated requests to do so.
Sharpton jumped to the front of a protest that was held. he left with his tail betwen his legs when they wouldn't pay him any money for his appearance. He is such a joke and it offends that Fox would even interview him. the other channels can't be accounted for.

DanH| 10.19.09 @ 1:17PM

Re: David Menard's comment on The Medal of Honor
If I hear or read one more time that someone "Won" The Medal of Honor My head is going to explode! It's not a freaking CONTEST.
Recepient, peeps.

LQQKY| 10.19.09 @ 5:48PM

Re:
LOWLIFE
Re: John R. Guardiano's Personal Fouls and the remarks of -- Connie Kenney...
Her final statement should more accurately read:
Why believe a [racist] lowlife like Sharpton??

Margie| 10.19.09 @ 6:15PM

C. Kenna Amos Jr.~
You forgot "...and had a baby-with-his-Adulterer-lover-lady."

Oops. Forgot. Wrong guy. That was Jesse Jackson.

DoS_Conservative| 10.19.09 @ 7:29PM

Mr. Menard;

Why are you so upset with it being called the Congressional Medal of Honor? The official of the award is called the Congressional Medal of Honor Society and on the site it states it is often called the Congressional Medal of Honor (CMOH) because it is awarded by the President on behalf of Congress.

You are correct that the award is called the Medal of Honor, but if the society doesn't have a problem with it being called CMOH, then why the outrage. I think the important thing is that Mr. Stein is recognizing the heroics of the man who was awarded the Medal of Honor, not to be blasted for calling it something that the society recognizes as an alternative name. Please don't create outrage over something so trivial.

DanH - I didn't see anywhere in the article, letters or comments where someone stated the man "Won" the Medal of Honor. Why bring the anger here distracting from Mr. Stein's message?

It was an excellent article that doesn't deserve these criticisms.

www.us-bapeoutlet.com | 4.3.10 @ 10:49PM

www.us-bapeoutlet.com

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/10/19/under-the-table

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

ADVERTISEMENT