The wisdom of Newt and Steve Forbes. The Dems' BS degrees. Beck and the mainstream media. Here's the plan. Plus more.
BEWARE OF MITT
Re: R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.'s Listening
to Newt:
Happy to read your endorsement of Steve Forbes. I voted for him in the 1996 Pennsylvania primary, even though by that time he had folded his campaign. His name remained on the PA ballot -- my vote was my small conservative protest.
I think conservatives should beware of Mitt Romney. Romney signed
into law the disaster that is now the health insurance/care
system of Massachusetts, which, as I understand it, resembles
Obamacare. Wouldn't liberals love to throw that back in our faces
during a Romney candidacy?
-- Melinda Bowman
"Beyond Obama's oratorical skills.... a sinking feeling is arising."
To answer RET's parenthetical question, [can a sinking feeling
arise?]: Yes. Such are the oratorical skills of President
Obama.
-- Dan Martin
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Thank you for the nod to Steve Forbes and Dick Armey. If not presidential candidates, they certainly demonstrate the depth we have for cabinet posts, west wingers, and Senators.
I hope Dick will run to fill Kay Bailey Hutchinson's senate seat
that she is willing to toss aside in a run against Gov. Rick
Perry of Texas.
-- Barbara Ann Leary
COLLEGE-EDUCATED IDIOTS
Re: Alec Mouhibian's The BS
Degree:
Higher education in the feminized West thanks to the Ivy League and its European equivalents is about inculcating ignorance and destroying Western civilization. If vaginal Harvard graduate Barack "Insane" Obama and his radical cronies in academia, the media and politics get their way, Harvard law school will one day be dedicated to the study of Sharia law and the sciences of determining who is unworthy of life and the economics of how to shatter economic prosperity while increasing the power of the oligarchy over the sheep. All the while those who are recalcitrant will be harangued to death by Obama's death panels.
Mommas please don't let your children grow up to be
college-educated idiots: Democrats.
-- Michael Tomlinson
Jacksonville, North Carolina
STANDING AGAINST THE MIGHTY
Re: Robert Stacy McCain's
Secret Protocols of Beck's Legions:
I am not a fan of Glenn Beck or his style. I find his delivery grating, but his information well researched and his sources are better vetted than many of the Democratic Disciples of The New Messiah. If our dear departed President Reagan were here to speak in defense of Mr. Beck, he would probably start off with, "Well, there you go again..."
Once again the Left and the Mainstream Moronic Message Media Machine forget that along with First Amendment rights come First Amendment responsibilities. (But with people like Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski, Van Jones and George Soros gnawing at the Constitution, maybe they won't have to worry about the pesky First Amendment for too long.) The press has for too long neglected its responsibly for researching information, not just repeating what is stated; impartiality and ethics require getting past the spin no matter how much it hews to popular doctrine. Too many news departments have eschewed their responsibility of distinguishing between the difference of reporting and editorializing. Once upon a time, America trusted that the news that was reported was fair and balanced.
Once again the Left, with swift and powerful assistance from the news departments around the country, uses ad homonym attacks instead of arguing the issues. Attacking the man is easy; what man among men is without imperfections? Men are born and soon they die, but truth in eternal. The coward attacks the weak, but a warrior only stands against the mighty. (William F. Buckley, a voice in the wilderness, tilted at true giants, starting with his clarion call to sanity with the publication God and Man at Yale. He did not attack the hypocritical professors by name; he denounced their poisonously flawed philosophies and responded to their personal attacks with humor, grace and sagacity.) If Beck (or El Rushbo) is misstating or misrepresenting facts and truth, staking straw men or espousing fallacy filled philosophies, debunk his words, assail his facts or make counterarguments that rip apart his logic. To do so demands research, conceptualizing and cognition. In a word, it is work. Hard work. Attacking the man is easy. Gnats do it daily.
Once again, for the Left, the problem is not the messenger,
though being telegenic and personable has been major assets since
JFK out performed RMN on television but not radio, but one of
truth and passion. The problem is not Beck, but that President
Obama bet big on health care reform, and as he loses skirmish
after skirmish, the press is well aware that The One may lose all
momentum for transforming our great country into a backwater,
socialist third world nation. The American people know the truth
and are passionately beating back the encroachment of this
administration's overreaching, but if the liberal media can
distract the public with side shows, then maybe the Democrats can
snatch away democracy from the republic. Clearly, since the Left,
including The Titan of the Teleprompter, cannot argue their way
past Beck, they will seek to destroy him.
-- I.M. Kessel
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
Michael L. Hauschild| 9.25.09 @ 8:54AM
Bowman and Kessel, yea.
A half yea to Leary (Armey) who I am sure has no children named Tim.
IMKessel| 9.25.09 @ 5:03PM
Thank you.
BMSmythe| 9.25.09 @ 5:02PM
Glen Beck is a right wing racist hack. His attacks on OUR president are based on Obama's race.
victor| 9.25.09 @ 8:43PM
He, Glenn Beck, and we, attack and castigate that Man in the White House because of his IDEAS and nothing else.
PS which race would that man be as his mother was white and his father was a Kenyan Arab, eh?
marie| 9.26.09 @ 7:44PM
thats a crock, he speaks the truth of obama, and his chicago thugs. truth hurts,get over it.
Robert| 9.25.09 @ 6:28PM
Leave it to a Smythe to misspell Glenn Back's name. Once again, a demonstration that those mindless mandarins of the left - bereft of any semblance of intelligence, reason and cognition - can only attack the man...not his ideas.
IMKessel| 9.25.09 @ 8:27PM
Mr. Bogie,
A deep insight. I had not thought of the stimulus as a reward for ineptitude, but you are dead on with that analysis.
S.L. Toddard| 9.26.09 @ 9:54AM
I cannot *believe* the letters-to-the-editor AmSpec chooses to publish. They say far, far more about your publication than even its daily content.
IMKessel| 9.26.09 @ 4:40PM
Mr. Toddard,
I found your comment interesting. I infer an negative connotation, but I don’t want to assume facts not in evidence. Please elucidate.
Thank you.
Alan Brooks| 9.26.09 @ 8:28PM
here's an excerpt from Brookhiser on Newt:
"...Another reason is Gingrich's rise through the ranks since 1978, and the Republicans he had to supplant and outflank. Before Ronald Reagan and Jack Kemp, the congressional GOP was a party of inertia and self-defeat. I remember once hearing former Minority Leader Bob Michel
about his first political experience: passing out sunflower buttons for Alf Landon. No wonder he expects to get kicked in the head, I thought. In the long years of fretting as the minority of the minority, Gingrich had to sustain himself with the hope that he was the wave of the future - and there were the Tofflers, to tell him that it was so.
Curiosity and hope explain Newt Gingrich's strange weakness for trendology, but they do not excuse it. Statesmanship is hard. The more we tell politicians there is an easy way, the more we trap them. If the Speaker wants to fulfill the mission he has set himself, he and his followers will have to bring the second half of their reading list up to the level of the first.
Alan Brooks| 9.26.09 @ 9:03PM
Come to think of it, blaming the Soviet Union for Afghanistan wont go.
the SU is long gone. So Toddard is correct.
But Newt ought to be hammered for his 'futurist' tendencies; futurism is in fact mind candy, Marxism for computer geeks-- everybody can see that now that the 21st century is in full swing.
For a brilliant, well connected (so presumably well informed) doctoral holder such as Newt to be a futurist in 2009 is unconscionable.
Newt is either desperate or slightly disingenuous.
martin j smith| 9.27.09 @ 8:29AM
As nutty as Glen Beck comes across at times he is the one that brought Van Jones,Acorn,stories about the czars and many other totally ignored by you know who. What has to happen I think is that the truth has to be reported in double time . Like a war room. So super saturated that there will be a point that you know who cannot ignore it. So i say--keep it up double time. !!!!!!
Joanne| 9.27.09 @ 1:58PM
Alan, I think your last sentence has one too many words. If you eliminate 'slightly', the sentence would make more sense.
Newt is doubtless extremely intelligent, but his moral sense and disingenuous disqualify him IMO from running for president.
Margie| 9.27.09 @ 7:08PM
Fab! (to use an old term) letter, I.M. Kessel! I especially appreciate this: "The coward attacks the weak, but a warrior only stands against the mighty."
And this: "he denounced their poisonously flawed philosophies and responded to their personal attacks with humor, grace and sagacity.)"
Being a very imperfect and un-Ivy League educated, I will try and attain to this standard whist posting in this forum. Very good indeed.
~Margie
IMKessel| 9.27.09 @ 10:14PM
Margie,
Forgive me the informality of addressing you by your given name, but I do not know how else to address you.
I thank you for your kind words.
Like you, I learned far from the shade of the Ivy Leagues. I am public school educated and graduated college with assistance from the G.I. Bill. Public library are one of the few services that are cost effective to the public.
I will keep a keen eye for your postings.
Respectfully,
IMK essel