The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Post-Victory Warfare

Obama’s retreat. Missile defenseless. Carterism. Plus more.

(Page 3 of 3)

Just as true-believer Obama won’t be controlled or change, neither will true-believer Carter.
The day after his initial condemnation and dismissal of those who object to Barack Obama’s and the tin-eared non-representative Congress’s politics and actions, Carter reprised his insult.

At Emory University, he said, “When a radical fringe element of demonstrators and others begin to attack the president of the United States as an animal or as a reincarnation of Adolf Hitler or when they wave signs in the air that said we should have buried Obama with Kennedy, those kinds of things are beyond the bounds.”

Further, “I think people who are guilty of that kind of personal attack against Obama have been influenced to a major degree by a belief that he should not be president because he happens to be African American. It’s a racist attitude, and my hope is and my expectation is that in the future both Democratic leaders and Republican leaders will take the initiative in condemning that kind of unprecedented attack on the president of the United States.”

Would that be like Carter, Obama, the Democrat leadership and others of their throng jumping to condemn the torrent of malicious, racist words spoken and images published in past years about George W. Bush, as well as Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, Miguel Estrada and other black and white conservatives and Republicans?
I didn’t think so, either.
— C. Kenna Amos Jr.


TREATING OUR FRIENDS BADLY
Re: Matthew Omolesky’s The Gray Zone: Poland and the Abandoned Missile Defense Shield Initiative:

This article and one regarding the Czechs and their fight for democracy both highlight a generic question about this U.S.   administration. Why do we treat our enemies so good and our friends so bad? Just one illustration of such is the insult of Obama and his lovely “better half” and the way they treated our ancestor and best friend, the Brits, when they refused to accept the bust of Churchill. Apparently because of Britain’s slave trading past. Are these half educated people unaware of the history of the English people in fighting for over a hundred years to eradicate the slave trade when it was still profitable? Contrast this with Obama’s and his wife’s affection for Muslim Africa and the Muslin Middle East where slavery still goes on and where women still have no rights separate from their often abusive husbands. It is inexplicable to say the least. Pray for the state of Israel. It is obviously going to need our prayers and support with this gang that believes in nothing but power and seems to have many grudges against most of our traditions and especially traditional Christianity. Lastly let us pray for this generation and those to come. Irving Kristol and Milton Friedman, two giant intellectual men of character have passed from the American scene and we are not apt to see their like again for a long time.
— Jack Wheatley
Royal Oak Michigan

Page:   1 23

Letter to the Editor View all comments (9) |

Big J| 9.24.09 @ 7:19AM

To Beverly:

While reading the first sentence of your letter to the editor, I knew exactly who was writing it. I thoroughly enjoy your writing, and sincerely hope TAS considers adding you to their list of regular writers.

Thank you so much for the glimmer of hope you spread here so eloquently.

Houston, Texas

Alan Brooks| 9.24.09 @ 10:48PM

Who started the war? the Russians invaded Afghanistan in '78 (the invasion officially began in '79), triggering Al Qaeda.
However, education is now so substandard we can't discuss such facts with the public anymore.

Michael L. Hauschild| 9.25.09 @ 5:35AM

Jack,
You do not know how refreshing it is to encounter an actual student of history.
May I add?
What is truly amazing is that many of the maritime nations during the slave trade era were more likely to be nothing more than transportation. The image of Ed Asner going on Safari in the jungle to capture O. J. Simpson (even though he was running backwards) while probably now on the “no child left behind” syllabus (emphasis on left), just is not how slave trade to the new world was instigated. The Muslim “empire” in this era provided the infrastructure of “supply” and except for those who have not actually chronicled the history, Islam remains blameless.
Want another eye-opener? Look up who “inherited” the slave population from the Caribbean at the demise of the plantation structure during this period. Hint: their first ambassador from the Colonies invented the stove.

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/24/post-victory-warfare

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable

Betsy McCaughey | 5.23.13

Obama's Imbroglios

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.23.13

Lerner's Plea

Ray V. Hartwell | 5.23.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

Laying Down My Pen

Quin Hillyer | 5.23.13

ADVERTISEMENT