By Lisa Fabrizio on 9.23.09 @ 6:06AM
Color permeates wacko lefty politics.
Last week, former president Jimmy Carter, sounding much
like a man desperate to reclaim his relevance in a world that's
passed him by, told NBC News: "I think an
overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity
toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a
black man, that he's African-American."
Now, putting aside the fact that he, a very white man, was
on the receiving end of much intensely demonstrated animosity
during his days in office, since when, you ask, is Jimmy Carter
an expert on U.S. racial relations? But cut him some slack. After
all, he did unite the country in a way not seen in decades; after
only four years, almost all of America joined together in sending
him on his failed quest to become our greatest
ex-president.
But are Carter and those of his ilk correct? Are
conservatives bigoted louts or are they truly colorblind? In a
way liberals are right; about this conservative anyway. Colors
and the noxious movements they often represent do affect me in
many ways, most of them bad. And maybe I'm not alone in detesting
these oft beribboned symbols of latent hippydom which hurt my
brain as well as my eyes; think of the nausea induced by a
viewing of 1968's Yellow Submarine, for
instance, and you get the idea. Among those hues that
particularly rankle are:
Purple, pink or whatever this week's badge of homosexual
self-esteem might be. Is there anything worse than not only
having to witness attempts at the perverse gay and lesbian
assembly to subvert our culture to theirs, but then to have these
forays labeled as examples of 'gay pride'? As if the embrace of
rampant, unbridled and unnatural sex is good for our nation; so
good in fact, that it must be taught to our children as an
acceptable and even desirable 'alternative lifestyle'.
Yellow, as in journalism. Probably nothing has more
hastened the advent of our present mess as the corruption of the
great majority of our media into shills for the socialist agenda.
Historian Frank Luther Mott has
defined yellow journalism as consisting chiefly of these
characteristics:
• scare headlines in huge print, often of
minor news;
• lavish use of pictures, or
imaginary drawings;
• use of faked interviews,
misleading headlines, pseudo-science, and a parade of false
learning from so-called experts;
• dramatic sympathy with the "underdog" against the system.
Now, Mr. Mott wrote his assessment in 1941, but can you
imagine a more accurate summation of modern mainstream media
propaganda disguised as "news?" It is through these means that
most of the other offensive color schemers lay the roots for
their plans. Yes, yellow journalism is the last refuge of
scoundrels.
Green, as in the Earth-first, humans-last movement; one of
the most insidious examples of the use of yellow journalism of
our time. As outlined above, eager graduates of journalism school
learn not to report the news, but to make it, by propping up the
pseudo-science of like-minded liberals who prey on the fears of
gullible Americans.
First came over-population, which was replaced by global
cooling; next came the so-called depletion of the rain forests
that was followed by global warming, which has now morphed into
climate change. But, much like our ubiquitous president, the
greenies are beginning to overreach themselves and thus risk
exposing their true motives.
Especially when they overlap, as demonstrated by a
recent CNN broadcast which suggested that the best way to
save the planet is "putting on a condom." Charming, isn't it,
when a plan comes together? Yes, nearly all of these groups in
one way or another share the same goal: the defeat of western
civilization, especially capitalism.
Which that brings us to the hue that causes the most bile
to rise in conservative craws: red. We conservatives pride
ourselves on our steadfast determination to keep, or conserve,
that which we hold dear, namely our system of a constitutional
republic; one that has served our nation well for over 200 years.
Yet liberals are, in many ways, even more stubborn in the
opposite direction: they seek to embrace systems of governance
that have time and again proved to be murderous regimes and/or
outright failures; communism and socialism.
And the fact that we have in the White House a black man
who is a champion of nearly all of the above is irrelevant.
Conservatives have felt the same way about Jimmy Carter, Bill
Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry or anyone else that favors the red
without the white and blue.